Chlorinated Paraffins

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Toxic Substances Control Act of 1976 Christopher Dang Mr. Bodas P.4.
Advertisements

Toxic Substances Control Act of 1976(TSCA) *passed by the United States Congress in 1976 *The TSCA is found in United States law at *addresses the production,
Toxic Substances Control Act TSCA Current Events Heighten Awareness for Semiconductor Industry SESHA Hill Country Chapter December 5, 2002.
Challenges and opportunities for effective implementation of TSCA Joel A. Tickner, ScD School of Health and Environment, UMASS Lowell US EPA National Pollution.
1 High Production Volume (HPV) Challenge Program Diane Sheridan Chief, Existing Chemicals Branch, Chemical Control Division, Office of Pollution Prevention.
Definition of Solid Waste Final Rule Public Meeting Charlotte Mooney Office of Resource Conservation and Recovery U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.
1 Globally Harmonized System of Classification and Labelling of Chemicals (GHS): U.S. Update.
1 High Production Volume (HPV) Challenge Program – Future Directions Jim Willis Director, Chemical Control Division, Office of Pollution Prevention and.
Oregon State Department of EnergyConference Daniel Duncan, EPA Region 10 PCB Program Manager November 5, 2003.
P2 Framework Models Overview Jan P2 Framework Models Overview Bill Waugh U.S. EPA
Controlling Toxic Chemicals: Production, Use, and Disposal Chapter 19 © 2004 Thomson Learning/South-Western.
Chemical Screening Programs Ted Smith Dale Phenicie.
1 Persistent, Bioaccumulative and Toxic Pollutants Persistent, Bioaccumulative and Toxic Pollutants Programme (PBT) launched by the EPA in 1998: - Reduce.
Chemicals Policy – A View from the United States Joel Tickner, ScD, Ken Geiser, PhD Lowell Center for Sustainable Production University of Massachusetts.
The Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) Interagency Testing Committee (ITC)
Will the U.S. Ever Pass TSCA Reform? Ken Zarker, Washington State Department of Ecology Northwest.
UNEP POPs Negotiations Background Mandate Status Report Relevance to Great Lakes.
GUYANA GREEN CUSTOMS INITIATIVE BY DAVID HERMONSTINE.
Results of Canadian DSL Categorization Activities – What’s Next CPPI April 28, 2006 Calgary AB Health Santé Canada.
Regulatory Controls PBT Strategy Team Great Lakes Regional Collaboration February 22, 2005.
1 Nanoscale Materials Stewardship Program Update July 30, 2008 Jim Alwood Chemical Control Division Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics.
ENVIRONMENTAL RISK ASSESSMENT.  History of the Act ◦ The primary purpose of TSCA is to regulate chemical substances and mixtures  It does so by regulating.
International Initiatives and the U.S. HPV Challenge Program Ken Geiser, PhD Lowell Center for Sustainable Production University of Massachusetts Lowell.
U.S. High Production Volume (HPV) Challenge Program Diane Sheridan U.S. Environmental Protection Agency October 25, 2005 Region 2 Emerging Chemicals Workshop.
U.S. High Production Volume (HPV) Challenge Program Diane Sheridan U.S. EPA, Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics December 12, 2006.
1 Workshop on the Directive 96/61/EC concerning (IPPC) Integrated pollution prevention and control INFRA Public participation & access to environmental.
The Toxic Substances Control Act of 1976 (TSCA) Yunmi Lee (period 6 )
Phasing Out PFOS and PBDEs: Voluntary and Regulatory Steps Kenneth Moss Chemical Control Division Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics, EPA HQ October.
Overview of Civil Judicial Enforcement. Civil Judicial Enforcement  Who may file civil judicial environmental enforcement actions in U.S.? Federal Government.
Chemical & Environment Considerations in Product Safety: Current research, legislation, and the public and industry response Chemical Safety Regulations.
Chapter 46 Environmental Law Copyright © 2015 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent.
Toxic Substance Control Act of 1976 (TSCA) By Don Bingham.
Reassessment of PCB Use Authorizations AASA Legislative Advocacy Conference July 8, 2014 PCB-Containing Fluorescent Light Ballasts.
Malaysia Update on “draft” proposal for the Environmentally Hazardous Substance (“EHS”) Notification and Registration Scheme.
McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2011 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Chapter 18 Environmental Law.
September 22, 2011 Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics1.
Introduction to a Safe Workplace
Overview & Implications for Affinia Registration, Evaluation, and Authorisation of Chemicals.
U g i l e c Re-assessment under provisions of UN-ECE POPs protocol 1 st meeting of TFPOP, The Hague March 2004.
ROPES & GRAY LLP Chemical Policy Reform: State/Federal Approaches Mark Greenwood.
By Michelle Hoang Period 2 APES April 30, 2012 The Toxic Substances Control Act of 1976.
WHO European Centre for Environment and Health Joint WHO/ECEH - Convention Task Force on Health Aspects of Air Pollution (TFH) Health Risks of Persistent.
1 Nanoscale Materials Stewardship Program Environmental Summit May 20, 2008 Jim Alwood Chemical Control Division Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics.
Industry Perspective on TSCA Modernization ABA Conference June 11, 2010.
New Framework for EPA’s Chemical Management Program Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics Wendy Cleland-Hamnett, Director.
TSCA Name: Toxic Substances Control Act Draft Year: 1976 Amendment Years: 1986, 1988, 1990, 1992 Affects only U.S. businesses and firms (national) Chris.
California Sediment Quality Advisory Committee Meeting SWRCB Program to Develop Sediment Quality Objectives for Enclosed Bays and Estuaries of California.
Chapter 19 Environmental Law Copyright © 2015 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent.
Event – Points ! Environmental Laws US.
Introduction to REACH Flavie Guérin U.S. Mission to the EU 15 November 2011.
DRAFTED: OCTOBER 11, 1976 AMENDMENT YEARS:1976 NATIONAL The Toxic Substances Control Act of 1976 (TSCA) Kaitlin T.
Using Insurance to Fund Brownfield Development Technical Issues Geoff Glanders, President August Mack Environmental, Inc.
Nora Savage, PhD US EPA, Office of Research & Development National Center for Environmental Research Environmental Engineering Research Division EPA STAR.
Position of the Japanese Government and Possible impact of the REACH on Japanese trade relations with the EU.
Cefic template to convert REACH dossier
Food Additives Project
Communication: Safety Summary
The US Toxic Substance Control Act (TSCA)
Will the U.S. Ever Pass TSCA Reform?
UNECE LRTAP-38th Session of the September 2006
The Toxic Substances Control Act of 1976 (TSCA)
Environmental Management Information System (EMIS2)
Toxic Substances control act.
Toxic Substances Control Act of 1976
The Toxic Substances Control Act of 1976 (TSCA)
How Can Standards for Graphene Nanomaterials Support TSCA Compliance?
Standard Operating Procedures and Termination Procedures
International Initiatives and the U.S. HPV Challenge Program
EPA Resources for Exporters
The Global environment and Trade
Presentation transcript:

Chlorinated Paraffins Maria J. Doa Environmental Protection agency

What Is Being Reviewed? Premanufacture notices (PMNs) submitted under Section 5 of the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) Several PMNs submitted for certain medium-chain (C14-C17) chlorinated paraffins (MCCP) long-chain (C18-C20) chlorinated paraffins (LCCP) very long-chain (>C20) chlorinated paraffins (vLCCP)

Why Are They Being Reviewed? Settlements resolving violations of the TSCA premanufacture notice obligations Illegal production and import of various chlorinated paraffins

Consent Decrees Consent decree between the Department of Justice (DOJ) and EPA and Dover Chemical Consent decree between DOJ and EPA and INEOS Chlor Americas, Inc These companies were required to submit premanufacture notices under TSCA section 5 for all chlorinated paraffins domestically produced or imported As part of the consent decree, the companies agreed that the chemical substances would be review as new chemical substances under TSCA section 5 Allowed to continue to produce these chemicals during the review period

Short-Chain Chlorinated Paraffins As part of the settlement, the companies were required to cease domestic manufacture and import of short-chain chlorinated paraffins Persistent, bioaccumulative and toxic (PBT) Proposed for addition to Stockholm Convention on Persistent Organic Pollutants UNECE Convention on Long Range Transboundary Air Pollution (LRTAP)

Short-Chain Chlorinated Paraffins EPA initially raised concerns about chlorinated paraffins in its December 2009 Action Plan on Short-Chained Chlorinated Paraffins (www.epa.gov/oppt/existingchemicals/pubs/actionplans/sccps.html) The Action Plan also identified MCCPs and LCCPs EPA is concerned about the potential persistent, bioaccumulative, toxic properties of these chemicals Particularly in light of the dispersive nature of many of the uses

TSCA Section 5 Review As with all PMN submissions, EPA has and is continuing to follow the processes, procedures and statutory provisions of TSCA section 5 for the chlorinated paraffin PMNs, TSCA section 5 policy on chemical substances that are potential PBT chemicals Assessment of human health and environmental toxicity Exposure assessment consistent with other PMN reviews Section 5(e) determination on whether the chemicals “may present an unreasonable risk”

TSCA Section 5 Review PBT Concerns for MCCPs and LCCPs Persistent to very persistent Bioaccumulative to very bioaccumulative Toxic to aquatic organisms at low levels Risk to aquatic organisms even without considering persistence and bioaccumulation

TSCA Section 5 Section 5 PBT policy Identifies action that EPA could take based on degree of persistence and bioaccumulation Policy is based on the concern that EPA has for chemicals that are persistent and bioaccumulative The chemical is persistent and bioaccumulative There can be commercialization with testing required to be completed once certain production levels are reached The chemical is very persistent and very bioaccumulative Ban commercialization of the chemical until certain testing is completed

Critical Uses TSCA section 5 finding The chemical presents or may present an unreasonable risk When a chemical may present a risk, is it “unreasonable”? Consideration of use and what it is a substitute for In this case a consideration of critical uses

Critical Use Distinguishing critical uses from those uses for which a company needs a period of time to transition to another material or to reformulate a product The information that we need to consider such a request is: What specifically is the use and an explanation of its importance What is the specific chlorinated paraffin(s) that is critical to that use Note that chlorinated paraffins or MCCPs is not sufficiently specific. Why will the available substitutes not work. Please describe why the substitutes will not work

Critical Use EPA research Requests to industry over the last nine months Department of Defense DoD has asked suppliers Information from industry Information on how widespread the use is Very little information provided on critical uses

May 31, 2016 EPA will be completing its assessment shortly The assessments and the regulatory decisions are specific to the individual PMNs submitted Does the May 31, 2016 date still hold? Have heard from many that they need time to transition Mid-2017 Would apply to the domestic production and import

Questions?

Thank You! Contact Informaton Maria J. Doa Doa.maria@epa.gov