Sulkowski MS, et al. Presented at the 44 th Annual Meeting of the European Association for the Study of the Liver (EASL), April 23, 2009, Copenhagen, Denmark.04/25/09.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Bruix J, et al. Presented at the 44 th Annual Meeting of the European Association for the Study of the Liver (EASL), April 24, 2009, Copenhagen, Denmark.04/28/09.
Advertisements

What’s new in HCV genotype 2? Alessandra Mangia S.Giovanni Rotondo,ITALY PARIS HEPATITIS CONFERENCE January 2012.
WHAT FUTURE FOR RIBAVIRIN? Mitchell L Shiffman, MD Chief, Hepatology Section Medical Director, Liver Transplant Program Virginia Commonwealth University.
Hepatitis web study Hepatitis web study Sofosbuvir + Peginterferon + Ribavirin in Genotype 2 or 3 LONESTAR-2 Phase 2 Treatment Experienced Lawitz E, et.
Hepatitis web study Hepatitis web study Hepatitis web study Hepatitis web study Ombitasvir-Paritaprevir-Ritonavir and Dasabuvir +/- RBV in GT1 PEARL-III.
Hepatitis web study Hepatitis web study 3D (Paritaprevir-Ritonavir-Ombitasvir + Dasabuvir) +/- RBV in GT1 PEARL-III and PEARL-IV Phase 3 Treatment Naïve.
Hepatitis web study Hepatitis web study Peginterferon alfa-2b + Weight-based Ribavirin in HCV GT 2,3 Phase 4 Treatment Naïve, Chronic HCV Zeuzem S, et.
Hepatitis web study Hepatitis web study Simeprevir + PEG + RBV in Treatment-Naïve Genotype 1 QUEST-2 Trial Phase 3 Treatment Naïve Manns M, et al. Lancet.
Hepatitis web study Hepatitis web study Simeprevir + PEG + RBV in Treatment-Naïve Genotype 1 QUEST-1 Trial Phase 3 Treatment Naïve Jacobson IM, et al.
Hepatitis web study Hepatitis web study Peginterferon alfa-2b + RBV vs. Peginterferon alfa-2a + RBV IDEAL STUDY Phase 3, Treatment Naïve Treatment Naïve,
Hepatitis web study Hepatitis web study Sofosbuvir + Ribavirin to Prevent Post-Transplant HCV Recurrence Phase 2 Curry MP, et al. Gastroenterology. 2015;148:100-7.
Hepatitis web study Hepatitis web study Sofosbuvir + Ribavirin in HCV Recurrence Following Liver Transplantation Phase 2 Charlton M, et al. Gastroenterology.
Stefan ZEUZEM.
How to optimize the treatment of HCV-4 patients? Nabil Antaki MD, FRCPC Aleppo, Syria Paris, January 30, 2012.
Predictors of response with boceprevir and telaprevir combined with pegylated interferon and ribavirin Paul Y Kwo, MD Professor of Medicine Medical Director,
Triple Therapy Today: Phase III Results in G1 Relapsers and Nonresponders Bruce R. Bacon, M.D. James F. King MD Endowed Chair in Gastroenterology Professor.
ATOMIC  Design  Objective –SVR 24 by ITT-analysis, detection of a 30% or 25% difference between two treatment groups, 2-sided significance level of 5%,
ELECTRON  Design SOF + RBV Randomisation* 1 : 1 : 1 : 1 Open-label ELECTRON Study: SOF-based therapy for genotypes 1, 2 and 3 W8W4W12 ≥ 19 years Chronic.
OBV/PTV/r + DSV + RBV Placebo Randomisation** 3 : 1 Double blind years Chronic HCV genotype 1 HCV RNA ≥ 10,000 IU/ml Failure to pre-treatment with.
OBV/PTV/r + DSV + RBV OBV/PTV/r + DSV Randomisation* 1 : 1 Open label years Chronic HCV infection Genotype 1b Prior failure to PEG-IFN + RBV HCV.
No prior therapy with PI
CURRY  Design Open-label CURRY Study: SOF + RBV for HCV with liver cancer before transplantation ≥ 18 years Chronic HCV infection Any genotype HCV RNA.
SMV + PEG-IFN + RBV Open-label W12 W24* or W48* N = years Chronic HCV infection Genotype 4 Treatment-naïve or experienced with relapse or partial.
Randomisation* 2 : 1 Double blind *Randomisation was stratified on genotype (1a or 1b or other) and IL28B genotype (CC, CT or TT) N = 133 N = 260 W24W48.
FUSION  Design  Objectives –SVR ≥ 20% compared with historical control of 25%, 97% power –Difference of SVR > 20% between the 2 groups, 82% power SOF.
FISSION  Design  Objective –Non inferiority of SOF + RBV : SVR 12 (2-sided significance level of 5%, lower margin of the 95% CI for the difference =
AI Study  Design SOF 1W then DCV + SOF 23W DVC + SOF Randomisation* 1 : 1 : 1 Open-label AI Study: DCV + SOF + RBV for genotypes 1, 2 and.
Reesink H, et al. Presented at the 44 th Annual Meeting of the European Association for the Study of the Liver (EASL), April 23, 2009, Copenhagen, Denmark.04/28/09.
OBV/PTV/r + DSV + RBV OBV/PTV/r + DSV + placebo Randomisation* Partial blind years Chronic HCV infection Genotype 1 Treatment-naïve HCV RNA > 10,000.
Reddy KR. Lancet Infect Dis. 2015;15:27-35 ATTAIN SMV + TVR placebo + PEG-IFN + RBV TVR + SMV placebo + PEG-IFN + RBV Randomisation* 1 : 1 Double-blind.
ION-1  Design LDV/SOF LDV/SOF + RBV Randomisation* 1 : 1 : 1 : 1 Open-label ION-1 Study: LDV/SOF + RBV for genotype 1 W24W12 ≥ 18 years Chronic HCV infection.
W24 ≥ 18 years Chronic HCV infection Genotype 1 Treatment naïve Early fibrosis to compensated cirrhosis No HBV or HIV co-infection N = 10 SOF + weight-based.
 Treatment regimens –Co-formulated ombitasvir (OBV)/paritaprevir (PTV)/rironavir (r) : 25/150/100 mg QD = 2 tablets –Dasabuvir (DSV) : 250 mg bid  Objective.
SOLAR-2 LDV/SOF + RBV Randomisation of the 7 groups 1 : 1 Open-label SOLAR-2 Study: LDV/SOF + RBV in decompensated and post-liver transplant with genotype.
SOLAR-1 LDV/SOF + RBV Randomisation* of the 7 groups 1 : 1 Open-label SOLAR-1 Study: LDV/SOF + RBV in advanced liver disease  Design W12W24 ≥ 18 years.
Hepatitis web study Hepatitis web study Sofosbuvir + RBV in Treatment-Naïve Genotypes 2,3 FISSION Trial* Phase 3 *Note: Published in NEJM in tandem with.
TURQUOISE-I OBV/PTV/r + DSV + RBV Randomisation* 1 : 1 Open-label years HCV genotype 1 HCV RNA ≥ 10,000 IU/ml Naïve or pre-treated with PEG-IFN +
SOF/VEL 400/100 mg qd N = 75 W24 SOF/VEL > 18 years Chronic HCV infection Genotype 1 to 6 Naïve or treatment-experienced No prior treatment with NS5A or.
 Treatment regimens –Co-formulated ombitasvir (OBV)/paritaprevir (PTV)/rironavir (r) : 25/150/100 mg QD = 2 tablets –Dasabuvir (DSV) : 250 mg BID –RBV.
No randomization N = 59 W12W24 Arm B : compensated cirrhosis N = 31 N = 29 Arm C : compensated cirrhosis Arm A : No cirrhosis AGATE-II Study: OBV/PTV/r.
SMV + DCV + SOF Open label Chronic HCV infection Genotype 1 or 4 Treatment-naïve or pre-treated with PEG-IFN ± RBV Portal hypertension or liver decompensation.
Hepatitis web study Hepatitis web study Sofosbuvir + Peginterferon + Ribavirin in Genotype 2 or 3 LONESTAR-2 Phase 2 Treatment Experienced Lawitz E, et.
> 18 years Chronic HCV infection Genotype 1 Failure (relapse) to 4, 6 or 8 weeks of GZR/EBR + SOF in C-SWIFT Part A Compensated cirrhosis assessed by liver.
OBV/PTV/r + DSV Open label Chronic HCV infection Genotype 1 Treatment-naïve HCV RNA > 1,000 IU/ml Chronic kidney disease with eGFR < 30 ml/min/1.73m 2.
Asselah T. AASLD 2015, Abs OSIRIS  Design SMV + PEG-IFN + RBV Open label Chronic HCV infection Genotype 4 Treatment-naïve Mild to moderate fibrosis.
 Objective –SVR 12 (HCV RNA < 25 IU/ml), with 95% CI, next observation carried backward DCV + SOF + RBV Randomised* 1:1 Open-label ALLY-3+ study: DCV.
SOF + RBV Randomisation* 1 : 1 : 1 Open-label BOSON Study: SOF + RBV + PEG-IFN for genotypes 2 and 3 ≥ 18 years Chronic HCV infection Genotype 2, treatment-
Hepatitis web study Hepatitis web study Sofosbuvir + Ribavirin to Prevent Post-Transplant HCV Recurrence Phase 2 Curry MP, et al. Gastroenterology. 2014;September.
 Objective –SVR 12 (HCV RNA < 25 IU/ml), by ITT OBV/PTV/r + DSV + SOF +RBV Open-label W24 ≥ 18 years Chronic HCV Genotype 1 Prior failure on DAA-regimen.
Dore G. J Hepatol 2016; 64:19-28 MALACHITE TVR + PEG-IFN + RBV Randomisation Open-label years HCV genotype 1 HCV RNA > 10,000 IU/ml Naïve (MALACHITE-I)
 Design Randomisation* 2 : 1 Double blind *Randomisation was stratified on genotype (1a vs 1b) and ILB28 genotype (CC or non-CC) N = 134 N = 257 W24W48.
Hepatitis web study Hepatitis web study Daclatasvir + Asunaprevir + Peg/RBV in Genotype 1 and 4 HALLMARK-QUAD Study Phase 3 Treatment-Experienced Jensen.
Hadziyannis SJ et al. EASL Peginterferon alfa-2a (40KD) (PEGASYS ® ) in combination with ribavirin (RBV): efficacy and safety results from a phase.
 Objective –SVR 12 (HCV RNA < 25 IU/ml), by ITT OBV/PTV/r + SOF + RBV OBV/PTV/r + SOF Not randomised Open-label QUARTZ-II Study: OBV/PTV/r + SOF for HCV.
Maria Buti,1 Yoav Lurie,2 Natalia G. Zakharova,3 Natalia P. Blokhina,4 Andrzej Horban,5 Gerlinde Teuber,6 Christoph Sarrazin,6 Ligita Balciuniene,7 Saya.
Journal Conference Hepatology 2009;50: Background.
LDV/SOF Randomisation * 1:1 Open-label ≥ 20 years, Japanese Chronic HCV infection Genotype 1 HCV RNA ≥ IU/ml Treatment-naive, or pre-treated Compensated.
Glecaprevir-Pibrentasvir in GT 1-6 with Renal Disease EXPEDITION-4
Design Single arm Open label W12 ≥ 18 years, HCV genotype 1 to 6
Phase 3 Treatment-Naïve and Treatment-Experienced
Phase 3 Treatment-Naïve and Treatment-Experienced
Volume 139, Issue 5, Pages e1 (November 2010)
HCV SPRINT-1 Final Results SVR 24 Boceprevir
Phase 3 Treatment-Naïve and Treatment-Experienced
Phase 2b Treatment Naïve and Treatment Experienced
ARV-trial.com TURQUOISE-I Study: ombitasvir/paritaprevir/ritonavir + dasabuvir + ribavirin for HCV in HIV co-infected patients Randomisation 1 : 1 Open-label.
Volume 145, Issue 5, Pages e5 (November 2013)
Phase 3 Treatment-Naïve and Treatment-Experienced
Phase 2 Treatment Experienced (with Sofosbuvir and Ribavirin)
Telaprevir in Treatment Experienced GT-1 PROVE3
Presentation transcript:

Sulkowski MS, et al. Presented at the 44 th Annual Meeting of the European Association for the Study of the Liver (EASL), April 23, 2009, Copenhagen, Denmark.04/25/09 11 Hemoglobin Decline Associated with SVR Among HCV G1-Infected Persons: Analysis from the IDEAL Study Sulkowski MS, Shiffman ML, Afdhal N, Reddy R, McCone J, Lee WM, Herrine SK, Harrison S, Deng W, Brass CA, Koury K, Noviello S, Albrecht JK, McHutchison JG on behalf of the IDEAL Study Team EASL 2009 Copenhagen, Denmark April 25, 2009

Sulkowski MS, et al. Presented at the 44 th Annual Meeting of the European Association for the Study of the Liver (EASL), April 23, 2009, Copenhagen, Denmark.04/25/09 22 Background and Study Design   Treatment-Related Anemia (30% of patients)   Hemolysis (RBV) and bone marrow suppression (PegIFN)   RBV dose reductions and treatment discontinuations   Erythropoietin (EPO) supplementation   Maintains RBV dose levels and improves patient quality of life   Study objectives   To test the hypothesis that treatment related hemoglobin decline are associated with virologic response during treatment with peginterferon and ribavirin therapy   To assess the relationship of anemia, epoetin alfa use and virologic response during treatment with peginterferon and ribavirin

Sulkowski MS, et al. Presented at the 44 th Annual Meeting of the European Association for the Study of the Liver (EASL), April 23, 2009, Copenhagen, Denmark.04/25/09 33 Study Schema and Treatment Regimens N = 1019 PEG-IFN alfa-2b 1.5 μg/kg/wk + RBV mg/d ×48 weeks N = 1035 PEG-IFN alfa-2a 180 μg/wk + RBV mg/d ×48 weeks N = 1035 PEG-IFN alfa-2a 180 μg/wk + RBV mg/d ×48 weeks N = 1016 PEG-IFN alfa-2b 1.0 μg/kg/wk + RBV mg/d N = 1016 PEG-IFN alfa-2b 1.0 μg/kg/wk + RBV mg/d ×48 weeks N = 1016 PEG-IFN alfa-2b 1.0 μg/kg/wk + RBV mg/d N = 1016 PEG-IFN alfa-2b 1.0 μg/kg/wk + RBV mg/d ×48 weeks ScreeningScreening Follow-up 24 weeks  Stratified by baseline viral load (> or ≤ 600,000 IU/mL) and race (African American)  Standard response stop criteria applied at weeks 12 (no EVR) and 24 (HCV RNA-positive) HCV RNA a LLQ <27 IU/mL (COBAS TaqMan; Roche) a LLQ <27 IU/mL (COBAS TaqMan; Roche)

Sulkowski MS, et al. Presented at the 44 th Annual Meeting of the European Association for the Study of the Liver (EASL), April 23, 2009, Copenhagen, Denmark.04/25/09 44 Anemia and EPO Use   Anemia   Protocol defined as Hb level <10 g/dL   RBV dose reductions   PEG-IFN alfa-2b + RBV arms   Full dose mg  decrease by 200 mg (first dose reduction) then by 200 mg (second dose reduction)   Full dose 1400 mg  decrease by 400 mg (first dose reduction) then by 200 mg (second dose reduction)   PEG-IFN alfa-2a + RBV arm   Full dose mg  decrease to 600 mg (product insert)   EPO use criteria   Permitted in patients with Hb level <10 g/dL with simultaneous RBV dose reduction   At the discretion of investigator and patient   Not provided by study

Sulkowski MS, et al. Presented at the 44 th Annual Meeting of the European Association for the Study of the Liver (EASL), April 23, 2009, Copenhagen, Denmark.04/25/09 55 Subject Characteristics: Hgb Decline Hb Decline ≤3 g/dL n=771 Hb Decline >3 g/dL n=2252 P values Male47%64%<.001 Race Caucasian63%75%<.001 African American/Black27%15%<.001 Age, y, mean (SD)45.6 (8.6)48.2 (7.7)<.001 Weight, kg, mean (SD)82.0 (16.9)83.9 (16.1).007 Baseline HCV RNA >600,000 IU/mL79%83%.023 Steatosis Absence40%35%.011 Presence56%60%.038 METAVIR fibrosis score F0/1/288%83%.002 F3/48%12%.004 Baseline Hb conc, g/dL, mean (SD)14.3 (1.2)15.2 (1.2)<.001 Baseline Cr, μmol/L, mean (SD)70.6 (14.2)75.4 (14.0)<.001 Baseline estimated Cr clearance, a mL/min, mean (SD)123.3 (34.0)118.0 (30.8)<.001 Initial RBV dose (mg/kg/d), mean (SD)13.4 (1.6)13.4 (1.5).640 Hb <10 g/dL during treatment5%37%<.001 EPO Use3%20%<.001 a Using Cockcroft-Gault equation. Cr = creatinine.

Sulkowski MS, et al. Presented at the 44 th Annual Meeting of the European Association for the Study of the Liver (EASL), April 23, 2009, Copenhagen, Denmark.04/25/09 66 SVR and Maximum Hb Decline

Sulkowski MS, et al. Presented at the 44 th Annual Meeting of the European Association for the Study of the Liver (EASL), April 23, 2009, Copenhagen, Denmark.04/25/09 7 EOT a and SVR b Responses by Decline in Hb 7 a EOT rates for >3 g/dL = 61.6% (1386/2250) and ≤3 g/dL = 41.8% (323/773); P < b SVR rates for >3 g/dL = 43.7% (984/2250) and ≤3 g/dL = 29.9% (231/773); P < Hemoglobin Decline Patients, %

Sulkowski MS, et al. Presented at the 44 th Annual Meeting of the European Association for the Study of the Liver (EASL), April 23, 2009, Copenhagen, Denmark.04/25/09 88 Subject Characteristics: Anemia/EPO No Anemia (A) n = 2158 Anemia/ No EPO (B) n = 416 Anemia/ EPO (C) n = 449 P A vs B P A vs C P B vs C Male67%38%44%< Race Caucasian72%68%72% African American/Black17%21%20% Age, y, mean (SD)46.8 (7.9)48.7 (8.2)50.2 (7.6)< Weight, kg, mean (SD)84.7 (16.1)79.8 (16.9)80.5 (15.9)< Baseline HCV RNA >600,000 IU/mL83%77%84% Steatosis Absence36%38% Presence60%58%55% METAVIR fibrosis score F0/1/285% 80% F3/410%12%13% Baseline Hb conc, g/dL, mean (SD)15.2 (1.2)14.3 (1.1)14.3 (1.2)< Baseline Cr, μmol/L, mean (SD)74.5 (14.1)72.7 (13.5)74.1 (15.1) Baseline estimated Cr clearance, a mL/min, mean (SD) (31.6)110.2 (30.8)108.9 (28.9)< a Using Cockcroft-Gault equation. Cr = creatinine.

Sulkowski MS, et al. Presented at the 44 th Annual Meeting of the European Association for the Study of the Liver (EASL), April 23, 2009, Copenhagen, Denmark.04/25/09 9 Median and Mean RBV Exposure (mg/kg/d) Higher in PEG-IFN alfa-2a Arm Than in alfa-2b Arms PEG-IFN alfa-2a + RBV a P <.001 for PEG-IFN alfa-2b RBV vs PEG-IFN alfa-2a + RBV and for PEG-IFN alfa-2b RBV vs PEG-IFN alfa-2a + RBV; P =.012 for PEG-IFN alfa-2b RBV vs PEG-IFN alfa-2b RBV. b P <.001 for PEG-IFN alfa-2b RBV vs PEG-IFN alfa-2a + RBV; P =.002 for PEG-IFN alfa-2b RBV vs PEG-IFN alfa-2a + RBV; P =.270 PEG-IFN alfa-2b RBV vs PEG-IFN alfa-2b RBV. c P <.001 for PEG-IFN alfa-2b RBV vs PEG-IFN alfa-2a + RBV; P =.001 for PEG-IFN alfa-2b RBV vs PEG-IFN alfa-2a + RBV; P =.616 for PEG-IFN alfa-2b RBV vs PEG-IFN alfa-2b RBV. Treatment No Anemia a Anemia/No EPO b Anemia/EPO c PEG-IFN alfa-2b RBV PEG-IFN alfa-2b RBV Mean (SD) 12.6 (1.3)11.5 (1.7)11.7 (2.0) Mean (SD) 12.8 (1.2)11.8 (1.7)11.8 (1.4) Mean (SD) 13.4 (2.0)12.6 (2.7)12.5 (2.3) Median RBV Exposure, mg/kg/d

Sulkowski MS, et al. Presented at the 44 th Annual Meeting of the European Association for the Study of the Liver (EASL), April 23, 2009, Copenhagen, Denmark.04/25/09 10 Early Anemia Treated with EPO Resulted in Higher SVR Rate* Onset of Anemia Anemia/No EPO % (n/N) Anemia/EPO % (n/N) P-value ≤4 weeks of treatment23.5% (19/81)43.0% (58/135).004 >4-8 weeks of treatment29.0% (18/62)47.6% (49/103).019 >8-12 weeks of treatment51.6% (32/62)47.4% (27/57).644 >12 weeks of treatment61.6% (130/211)57.8% (89/154).462 *P<0.001 for early anemia (≤8 weeks of treatment).

Sulkowski MS, et al. Presented at the 44 th Annual Meeting of the European Association for the Study of the Liver (EASL), April 23, 2009, Copenhagen, Denmark.04/25/09 11 Lower Discontinuation Rates in Early Anemia Treated with EPO Onset of Anemia Anemia/No EPO % (n/N) Anemia/EPO % (n/N) P-value ≤4 weeks of treatment6% (5/81)<1% (1/135).019 >4-8 weeks of treatment29% (18/62)2% (2/103)<.001 >8-12 weeks of treatment6% (4/62)14% (8/57).170 >12 weeks of treatment22% (46/211)27% (42/154).227

Sulkowski MS, et al. Presented at the 44 th Annual Meeting of the European Association for the Study of the Liver (EASL), April 23, 2009, Copenhagen, Denmark.04/25/09 12 Odds Ratios for SVR (EPO vs No EPO) 12 Onset of AnemiaModelOdds Ratio (95% CI)P-Value Early (<=8 weeks)Unadjusted a 2.34 (1.49, 3.68)<0.001 Model 1 b 3.52 (2.05, 6.03)<0.001 Model 2 c 3.13 (1.86, 5.28)<0.001 Late (> 8 weeks)Unadjusted a 0.84 (0.58, 1.20)0.336 Model 1 b 0.95 (0.62, 1.45)0.806 Model 2 c 0.92 (0.61, 1.39)0.699 All Anemic SubjectsUnadjusted a 1.08 (0.82, 1.41)0.591 Model 1 b 1.35 (0.99, 1.84)0.059 Model 2 c 1.29 (0.96, 1.75)0.097 a No control for potentially confounding factors. b Odds ratio adjusted for all potentially confounding factors (age, gender, race, BMI, baseline viral load, fibrosis, steatosis, fasting glucose, ALT, hemoglobin, platelet count, ribavirin (mg/kg/day) assigned, genotype (1a, 1b), and body weight). c Odds ratio adjusted for factors related to outcome (stepwise variable selection procedure based on all anemic subjects: race, baseline viral load, fibrosis, steatosis, fasting glucose, and body weight).

Sulkowski MS, et al. Presented at the 44 th Annual Meeting of the European Association for the Study of the Liver (EASL), April 23, 2009, Copenhagen, Denmark.04/25/09 13 Safety No AnemiaAnemia a / No EPOAnemia a /EPO Serious adverse events9%12%14% Relevant adverse events, % Fatigue64%67%74% Anaemia b 9%87%97% Dyspnea/exertional dyspnea19%29%33% Cardiac events Hypertension4% Increased blood pressure1%<1%1% Myocardial infarction<1% Coronary artery disease<1% 0 Congestive heart failure0<1% Angina pectoris<1%00 Thromboembolic events Pulmonary embolism<1%0 Deep venous thrombosis<1%01% Cerebrovascular accident00<1% Cerebral hemorrhage<1%00 Cancer1%<1%1% a Anemia based on Hb conc <10 g/dL. b Anemia based on adverse event as reported by the investigator.

Sulkowski MS, et al. Presented at the 44 th Annual Meeting of the European Association for the Study of the Liver (EASL), April 23, 2009, Copenhagen, Denmark.04/25/09 14 Conclusions   Higher magnitude of Hb decline is associated with higher likelihood of SVR   EPO use was associated with higher SVR rates if anemia occurred in the first 8 weeks of treatment   No benefit of EPO use in patients who became anemic after 8 weeks of treatment   Magnitude of Hb decline may be a pharmacokinetic marker for efficacy of treatment and EPO may prevent treatment discontinuation in patients with early anemia