Hongyu Fu, Trigger group 01-6-26 The Monte Carlo for Trigger Design of BES3 Scintillating Fibre BEMC Outline: Introduction to BES3 Scin-fibre BEMC Trigger.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
NDVCS measurement with BoNuS RTPC M. Osipenko December 2, 2009, CLAS12 Central Detector Collaboration meeting.
Advertisements

CBM Calorimeter System CBM collaboration meeting, October 2008 I.Korolko(ITEP, Moscow)
Introduction This project used cosmic rays to test a prototype Minimum Bias Trigger Scintillator (MBTS) that will be used in the ATLAS experiment at CERN.
The performance of Strip-Fiber EM Calorimeter response uniformity, spatial resolution The 7th ACFA Workshop on Physics and Detector at Future Linear Collider.
Study of Photon Sensors using the Laser System 05/7/12 Niigata University, Japan Sayaka Iba, Editha P. Jacosalem, Hiroaki Ono, Noriko.
Calorimeter1 Understanding the Performance of CMS Calorimeter Seema Sharma,TIFR (On behalf of CMS HCAL)
30 March Global Mice Particle Identification Steve Kahn 30 March 2004 Mice Collaboration Meeting.
1 Measurement of f D + via D +   + Sheldon Stone, Syracuse University  D o D o, D o  K -  + K-K- K+K+ ++  K-K- K+K+ “I charm you, by my once-commended.
The Origins of X-Rays. The X-Ray Spectrum The X-Ray Spectrum (Changes in Voltage) The characteristic lines are a result of electrons ejecting orbital.
1 KEK Beam Test Analysis Hideyuki Sakamoto 15 th MICE Collaboration Meeting 10 st June,2006.
Energy Reconstruction Algorithms for the ANTARES Neutrino Telescope J.D. Zornoza 1, A. Romeyer 2, R. Bruijn 3 on Behalf of the ANTARES Collaboration 1.
1 Hadronic In-Situ Calibration of the ATLAS Detector N. Davidson The University of Melbourne.
1 Andrea Bangert, ATLAS SCT Meeting, Monte Carlo Studies Of Top Quark Pair Production Andrea Bangert, Max Planck Institute of Physics, CSC T6.
1 N. Davidson, E. Barberio E/p single hadron energy scale check with minimum bias event Hadronic Calibration Workshop 26 th -27 th April 2007.
Scintillator (semi)DHCAL? Vishnu Zutshi for. Introduction Can a scintillator (semi)digital calorimeter work? Cell sizes are necessarily 6-12 cm 2 Can.
FMS review, Sep FPD/FMS: calibrations and offline reconstruction Measurements of inclusive  0 production Reconstruction algorithm - clustering.
The Transverse detector is made of an array of 256 scintillating fibers coupled to Avalanche PhotoDiodes (APD). The small size of the fibers (5X5mm) results.
The PEPPo e - & e + polarization measurements E. Fanchini On behalf of the PEPPo collaboration POSIPOL 2012 Zeuthen 4-6 September E. Fanchini -Posipol.
W  eν The W->eν analysis is a phi uniformity calibration, and only yields relative calibration constants. This means that all of the α’s in a given eta.
14/02/2007 Paolo Walter Cattaneo 1 1.Trigger analysis 2.Muon rate 3.Q distribution 4.Baseline 5.Pulse shape 6.Z measurement 7.Att measurement OUTLINE.
Time of Flight Counter BESIII International Review Sep. 16, 2002 Heng Yuekun
Feb 10, 2005 S. Kahn -- Pid Detectors in G4MicePage 1 Pid Detector Implementation in G4Mice Steve Kahn Brookhaven National Lab 10 Feb 2005.
Status of the NO ν A Near Detector Prototype Timothy Kutnink Iowa State University For the NOvA Collaboration.
EAS Reconstruction with Cerenkov Photons Shower Simulation Reconstruction Algorithm Toy MC Study Two Detector Configuration Summary M.Z. Wang and C.C.
Exclusive π 0 electroproduction in the resonance region. Nikolay Markov, Maurizio Ungaro, Kyungseon Joo University of Connecticut Hadron spectroscopy meeting.
Start Counter Collaboration Meeting September 2004 W. Boeglin FIU.
T. Sugitate / Hiroshima / PHX031 / Nov.01 The Photon Spectrometer for RHIC and beyond PbWO 4 Crystal Density 8.29 g/cm 3 Radiation length 0.89 cm Moliere.
Design and development of micro-strip stacked module prototypes for tracking at S-LHC Motivations Tracking detectors at future hadron colliders will operate.
NESTOR SIMULATION TOOLS AND METHODS Antonis Leisos Hellenic Open University Vlvnt Workhop.
1 Energy loss correction for a crystal calorimeter He Miao Institute of High Energy Physics Beijing, P.R.China.
Mitglied der Helmholtz-Gemeinschaft Calibration of the COSY-TOF STT & pp Elastic Analysis Sedigheh Jowzaee IKP Group Talk 11 July 2013.
16-Nov-2002Konstantin Beloous1 Digital Hadron Calorimeter Energy Resolution.
January 21, 2007Suvadeep Bose / IndiaCMS - Santiniketan 1 Response of CMS Hadron Calorimeter to Electron Beams Suvadeep Bose EHEP, TIFR, Mumbai Outline:
Shashlyk FE-DAQ requirements Pavel Semenov IHEP, Protvino on behalf of the IHEP PANDA group PANDA FE-DAQ workshop, Bodenmais April 2009.
Detector Monte-Carlo ● Goal: Develop software tools to: – Model detector performance – Study background issues – Calculate event rates – Determine feasibility.
1 Performance of a Magnetised Scintillating Detector for a Neutrino Factory Scoping Study Meeting Rutherford Appleton Lab Tuesday 25 th April 2006 M. Ellis.
G4 Validation meeting (5/11/2003) S.VIRET LPSC Grenoble Photon testbeam Data/G4 comparison  Motivation  Testbeam setup & simulation  Analysis & results.
Charged Particle Multiplicity and Transverse Energy in √s nn = 130 GeV Au+Au Collisions Klaus Reygers University of Münster, Germany for the PHENIX Collaboration.
PID simulations Rikard Sandström University of Geneva MICE collaboration meeting RAL.
The experimental setup of Test Beam HE EE ES BEAM  A slice of the CMS calorimter was tested during summer of 2007 at the H2 test beam area at CERN with.
A. SarratTPC jamboree, Aachen, 14/03/07 1 Full Monte Carlo of a TPC equipped with Micromegas Antony Sarrat CEA Saclay, Dapnia Motivation Simulation content.
FSC Status and Plans Pavel Semenov IHEP, Protvino on behalf of the IHEP PANDA group PANDA Russia workshop, ITEP 27 April 2010.
Magnetized hadronic calorimeter and muon veto for the K +   +  experiment L. DiLella, May 25, 2004 Purpose:  Provide pion – muon separation (muon veto)
00 Cooler CSB Direct or Extra Photons in d+d  0 Andrew Bacher for the CSB Cooler Collaboration ECT Trento, June 2005.
Search for High-Mass Resonances in e + e - Jia Liu Madelyne Greene, Lana Muniz, Jane Nachtman Goal for the summer Searching for new particle Z’ --- a massive.
Calice Meeting Argonne Muon identification with the hadron calorimeter Nicola D’Ascenzo.
1 Performance of a Magnetised Scintillating Detector for a Neutrino Factory Scoping Study Meeting U.C. Irvine Monday 21 st August 2006 M. Ellis & A. Bross.
1 Limitations in the use of RICH counters to detect tau-neutrino appearance Tord Ekelöf /Uppsala University Roger Forty /CERN Christian Hansen This talk.
1 Giuseppe G. Daquino 26 th January 2005 SoFTware Development for Experiments Group Physics Department, CERN Background radiation studies using Geant4.
A. SarratILC TPC meeting, DESY, 15/02/06 Simulation Of a TPC For T2K Near Detector Using Geant 4 Antony Sarrat CEA Saclay, Dapnia.
Testbeam analysis Lesya Shchutska. 2 beam telescope ECAL trigger  Prototype: short bars (3×7.35×114 mm 3 ), W absorber, 21 layer, 18 X 0  Readout: Signal.
Hall C Summer Workshop August 6, 2009 W. Luo Lanzhou University, China Analysis of GEp-III&2γ Inelastic Data --on behalf of the Jefferson Lab Hall C GEp-III.
Neutron Identification with ECAL  Sergey Kiselev, ITEP Moscow, for the ECAL group  Motivation  Input info  Signal parameters  Preshower – 1 GeV/c.
A New Upper Limit for the Tau-Neutrino Magnetic Moment Reinhard Schwienhorst      ee ee
Paolo Massarotti Kaon meeting March 2007  ±  X    X  Time measurement use neutral vertex only in order to obtain a completely independent.
09/06/06Predrag Krstonosic - CALOR061 Particle flow performance and detector optimization.
A Brand new neutrino detector 「 SciBar 」 (2) Y. Takubo (Osaka) - Readout Electronics - Introduction Readout electronics Cosmic ray trigger modules Conclusion.
Photon Transport Monte Carlo September 27, 2004 Matthew Jones/Riei IshizikiPurdue University Overview Physical processes PMT and electronics response Some.
Preliminary Design of Trigger System for BES III Zhen’an LIU Inst of High Energy Physics,Beijing Oct
BESIII offline software group Status of BESIII Event Reconstruction System.
Xiong Zuo IHEP, CAS, for the LHAASO Collaboration
FSC status and plans Pavel Semenov IHEP, Protvino
MoNA detector physics How to detect neutrons. Thomas Baumann NSCL.
CALICE scintillator HCAL
Detector Configuration for Simulation (i)
Plans for checking hadronic energy
Backgrounds using v7 Mask in 9 Si Layers at a Muon Higgs Factory
Xiong Zuo IHEP, CAS, for the LHAASO Collaboration
BESIII TOF Digitization
Gain measurements of Chromium GEM foils
Presentation transcript:

Hongyu Fu, Trigger group The Monte Carlo for Trigger Design of BES3 Scintillating Fibre BEMC Outline: Introduction to BES3 Scin-fibre BEMC Trigger Monte Carlo Procedures Results and Discussion

Introdution to BES3 Detector and BEMC Geometry of BEMC – 24 equi-lateral detector modules,aligned along phi, BEMC cross section is regular polygon of 24 sides. – Inner radius is 123.5cm – 160 fibre and 160 Pb layers, thickness=19.2cm

Positioning of Other Detectors and Material Layers When doing Monte Carlo with geant,the following detectors and materials are considered: – VC – MDC4 – BTOF – ETOF – ECAL – magnetic iron

Geometry of BEMC and BES3

Monte Carlo Data Production – Use geant to produce detector simulation data, 8kgauss uniform magnetic field along z – 1cm long fibre section is defined as a hit spot(detector cell) – A hit info includes its deposited energy, time and position information – Position info includes in which module, which fibre layer, which fibre and which fibre section the hit lies Monte Carlo and Data Analysis Procedures

The Further Processing of Monte Carlo Data The geant output data merely give energy deposit, time of flight and position info of each hit, not the output signal at detector ends. It is necessary to sample randomly according to different distribution and constants, then group hit info into front- end electronics readout signals and trigger channel signals. – Randomize energy information 1. Sample hit energy to photons, 30photon/MeV to two ends, according to poisson distribution 2. Photons exponentially attenuate to detector ends, =3.0m 3. Group photons into FEE cells, and sample binomially to p.e, PMT quantum efficiency=20% 4. Change p.e to equivalent energy, to convenience analysis and comparison

1. With energy as weight,calculate FEEcell energy deposit centre z and its RMS, randomize z according to gaussian distribution 2. Calculate FEEcell time of flight (tof) similarly, adding light transmission time(calculated with z) in detector, is FEE time readout 1. Phi-direction, 12columns/module 2. R-direction, 8rows/module 3. 12*8=96 FEEcells in one module – Randomization of time and z position – FEEcell division

FEEcells in one detector module

The Selection of Trigger Cell Size – Make energy of one cluster deposit in one trigger cell as much as possible – Small trigger cell to reduce influence of multi-hit Results and Discussion Selection rules: Two indices are used to decide trigger cell size: – Phi width of energy deposit in fibre of a particle. Use 0.3GeV/c electron, because it has max phi-width of energy deposit. – The ratio of the energy of the trigger cell that has max energy deposit to total energy deposit

0.3GeV/c electron,hit at a module centre, phi-direction energy distribution, 1 event 0.3GeV/c electron,hit at a module centre, phi-direction energy distribution, 1000 event

Different trigger cell size, the ratio of the energy of the trigger cell that has max energy deposit to total energy deposit, 0.3GeV/c electron

Conclusion: Two trigger cells ( namely 6columns/triggercell ) in one module is a proper selection

24 modules,one module is divided into two trigger cells. Two groups of overlapping trigger cells(u and v) are defined to ensure one cluster energy deposit in one triger cell as much as possible

1.5GeV/c electron, ratio of u and v trigger cell max energy deposit to total energy deposit 1.5GeV/c electron, ratio of only u trigger cell max energy deposit to total energy deposit

The Selection of Trigger Threshold Scheme 1.Major factor considered is to compensate light transmission attenuation 2.Two schemes,log AMP scheme and double threshold schme are to be selected The thresholds of each trigger channel are divided into BBT(Bhabha threshold) and LET(low energy threshold).Then a high and a low threshold are set in the LET(or BBT).The high and low thresholds in the following text refer to the two thresholds in the LET. – Double threshold cheme

LET threshold logic LET effective threshold curve, two-grade and-or logic give a high and a low curve

1. High and low threshold satisfy E h /E l =exp(L/2 ),L=fibre length, =attenuation length, which makes effective threshold curve have min fluctuation 2. Two curves superpose at z=  L/4, fluctuate exponentially, the fluctuation range is exp(L/4 )=exp(3.85/(4*3.0))=1.38.

– Log AMP scheme Principle: log(Ea)+log(Eb)=log(E*exp(-z/ ))+log(E*exp(-(L- z)/ ))=2*log(E)-(L/ )*log(e), independent on z

Transfer function: I o =I y *log10(|V in /V x |), V x =1mV Dynamic: 44db Error: (V in = 1mV to 100mV) 0.3db (V in = 0.75mV to 200mV) 1db Two-end errors added according to gaussian distribution, **sqrt(2.) 1db =1.12 **sqrt(2.) = db =1.035 **sqrt(2.) =1.050 Some statistics of AD641 log AMP

– Comparison of two schemes 1.1GeV/c gamma,  =90 0, random ,inject at different z, effective threshold=0.085GeV and 0.10GeV/c, ratio of passing threshold events under different threshold scheme, 1000 event per spot

1. When using log AMP, the fluctuation of passing threshold ratio by z is much smaller than double threshold scheme. But if the log AMP error is considered, Both of the errors of the two schemes are labeled as decibel,which means higher threshold has larger error, and is of the same error level. The error of the double threshold scheme can be eliminated by offline calibration, because it is systematic error; but error of log AMP scheme cannot. 2. In comparison, log AMP scheme has no superiority to double threshold scheme. So double threshold scheme is selected. Conclusion:

The Selection of Threshold Logic Time Window Because of scattering(not distinct for photon, electron and muon, but distinct for hadrons ), rounding of low transverse momentum charged particles and multihit, many peaks can appear in the same trigger channel at different time and z position. The Peaks that have large lag time are caused by the rounding of low transverse momentum charged particles or scattering, thus need to be excluded. This can be done by setting a time window.

Lund_charm event, the effect of scattering and low transverse momentum rounding can be seen

Estimation of the longest time from the occurrence of one event to the signal’s coming out at detector ends:  Use heaviest stable particle, namely proton  Have minimum transverse momentum p t that allow partile to arrive BEMC  hit one end of the detector According to these rules,the time can be calculated as : tofl=14.264ns ns=36.65ns The Monte Carlo shows a peak at time 32ns to 33ns in the following picture. – Calculation of time window and its Monte Carlo value

0.6GeV/c gamma, z=0,  =139 0, far- end FEE readout signal time spectrum, 1000 events.

The time window of one trigger channel

Main Conclusions – Trigger channels: 2 trigger channel per module, two groups of trigger channels(u and v) – Double threshold scheme – 35ns time window for trigger logic