January 20, 2011. 1. Liberalism 2. Social Contract Theory 3. Utilitarianism and Intuitionism 4. Justice as Fairness – general conception 5. Principles.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Justice & Economic Distribution (2)
Advertisements

Rawlsian Contract Approach Attempts to reconcile utilitarianism and intuitionism. Attempts to reconcile utilitarianism and intuitionism. Theory of distributive.
John Rawls A Theory of Justice.
Roderick T. Long Auburn Dept. of Philosophy
Justice as Fairness by John Rawls.
Lecture 6 John Rawls. Justifying government Question: How can the power of government be justified?
"... reason accepts no authority above itself and is necessarily subversive." - Allan Bloom, The Closing of the American Mind (1987), p. 258.
Liberalism, Rawls’ Theory of Justice and Nozick’s Libertarian theory of Justice January 20, 2011.
PHIL 104 (STOLZE) Notes on Heather Widdows, Global Ethics: An Introduction, chapter 4.
Chapter Three: Justice and Economic Distribution
Justice as Fairness by John Rawls.
COMP 381. Agenda  TA: Caitlyn Losee  Books and movies nominations  Team presentation signup Beginning of class End of class  Rawls and Moors.
Egalitarians View Egalitarians hold that there are no relevant differences among people that can justify unequal treatment. According to the egalitarian,
RAWLS 1 JUSTICE IS FAIRNESS. John Rawls Teachers: H. L. A. Hart Isaiah Berlin Students: Thomas Nagel Martha Nussbaum Onara O’Neill.
John Rawls, Who? GETTING TO THE ASSIGNED ARTICLE: A THEORY OF JUSTICE (1971) HOW WERE PEOPLE THINKG ABOUT ETHICS AND JUSTICE? – Utilitarian.
THE PRINCIPLE OF UTILITY: Bentham
Ethical Principle of Justice principle of justice –involves giving to all persons their "rights" or "desserts" –the distribution of various resources in.
Thomas Hobbes ( ) l Fear of others in the state of nature (apart from society) prompts people to form governments through a social contract l State.
Contemporary Liberalism: John Rawls: Justice as Fairness l All citizens should share in a society’s wealth and be given equal economic opportunities l.
January 20, Liberalism 2. Social Contract Theory 3. Locke, Liberalims Social Contract and Natural Law 4. Locke on Property 5. Utilitarianism.
Deontological tradition Contractualism of John Rawls Discourse ethics.
A Theory of Justice. “What is justice?” The Code of Hammurabi (Babylon, 18 th c. BCE) Judaism, Christianity, Islam: scales (balance, regulation, harmony),
Rawls John Rawls ( ): A Theory of Justice (Harvard UP, 1971) -and other books, notably Political Liberalism (1990) -and Justice as Fairness Restated.
January 20, Liberalism 2. Social Contract Theory 3. Utilitarianism and Intuitionism 4. Justice as Fairness – general conception 5. Principles.
Chapter One: Moral Reasons
Business Law with UCC Applications,13e
Ethics of Administration Chapter 1. Imposing your values? Values are more than personal preferences Values are more than personal preferences Human beings.
BAM321 Business Ethics and Social Responsibility Session 7 Business and Management.
CRITICAL QUESTION How should the bounty of a society be distributed?
Ethics Theory and Business Practice
“To be able under all circumstances to practise five things constitutes perfect virtue; these five things are gravity, generosity of soul, sincerity, earnestness.
Ethical Theories Presentation LP 5 Melissa Sweet, Tara Guelig, Katherine Norton April 9 th,2009.
Human Rights - incorporates not only liberties associated with being a member of a free political society but also entitlement to a fair distribution.
Business Ethics Lecture Rights and Duties 1.
Rawls II: Another version of the social contract PHIL 2345.
Rawls on justice Michael Lacewing co.uk.
Contractualism and justice (1) Introduction to Rawls’s theory.
LIBERTY, EQUALITY AND JUSTICE GONDA YUMITRO. LIBERTY Liberty is the ultimate moral ideal. Individuals have rights to life, liberty, and property that.
Distributive Justice John Rawls. Which is better? MusicCheese 65.
CHAPTER ONE ETHICS MUSOLINO SUNY CRIMINAL & BUSINESS LAW.
Justice as Fairness John Rawls PHL 110: ETHICS North Central College.
Justice and Economic Distribution
Egalitarian Liberalism: Justice in the Modern State
Three Modern Approaches. Introduction Rawls, Nozick, and MacIntyre Rawls, Nozick, and MacIntyre Have significant new approaches Have significant new approaches.
Justice as Fairness by John Rawls. Rawls looks at justice. Kant’s ethics and Utilitarianism are about right and wrong actions. For example: Is it ethical.
John Rawls Theory of Justice. John Rawls John Rawls (February 21, 1921 – November 24, 2002) was an American philosopher and a figure in moral and political.
Rationality in Decision Making In Law Nisigandha Bhuyan, IIMC.
The System of Social Justice Principles in the Contemporary Law Tradition of the West dr. Jolanta Bieliauskaitė Brno, 2015.
DEONTOLOGICAL ETHICS (CH. 2.0) © Wanda Teays. All rights reserved.
Deontological Approaches Consequences of decisions are not always the most important elements as suggested by the consequentialist approach. The way you.
Kantian Ethics Good actions have intrinsic value; actions are good if and only if they follow from a moral law that can be universalized.
WEEK 2 Justice as Fairness. A Theory of Justice (1971) Political Liberalism (1993)
Rawls’ Justice Srijit Mishra IGIDR, HDP, Lectures 5, 6 and 7 13, 18 and 20 January 2012.
Social Ethics continued Immanuel Kant John Rawls.
Philosophy 219 Rawls, A Theory of Justice and Political Liberalism.
Justice. What is justice? It seems we develop a sense of fairness from an early age and most people would agree with Plato that the only life worth living.
PHIL 104 (STOLZE) Notes on Heather Widdows, Global Ethics: An Introduction, chapter 4.
Deontological tradition
Democracy in the United States
History of Philosophy.
Rawl’s Veil of Ignorance
John Rawls’ theory of justice
Rawls, A Theory of Justice and Political Liberalism
Justice distribution “Rats and roaches live by competition under the laws of supply and demand; it is the privilege of human beings to live under.
Rawls’ Theory of Justice
Theories of justice.
Chapter 1 Section 3 Mr. Gordon.
Chapter 1 Section 3 Mr. Plude.
Rawls, A Theory of Justice and Political Liberalism
Professional Ethics (GEN301/PHI200) UNIT 3: JUSTICE AND ECONOMIC DISTRIBUTION Handout #3 CLO#3 Evaluate the relation between justice, ethics and economic.
Presentation transcript:

January 20, 2011

1. Liberalism 2. Social Contract Theory 3. Utilitarianism and Intuitionism 4. Justice as Fairness – general conception 5. Principles of Justice, Rules of Priority 6. Argument 1: Intuitive Equality of Opportunity 7. Argument 2: Social Contract 8. Application of the Principles of justice

 Liberalism is a political view based around liberty or freedom.  Coercive force can only legitimately be used in the service of freedom.  Liberalism is also concerned with equality: freedom is something all are equally entitled to.  There is an intersection between the values of freedom and equality in liberal philosophy

 How can political authority be seen as compatible with the fundamental value of freedom and equality?  Any legitimate political authority must derive from the free consent of the governed, such consent is best understood as being derived from the idea of a contract or mutual agreement between free and equal contractors, whereby the governed freely surrender certain freedoms so as to gain the benefits of mutual cooperation.

 Utilitarianism: justice is best served by taking that course of action which creates the greatest overall utility or the greatest sum of utility.  Intuitionism: for properly constituted human beings their intuitions tell them where the moral good lies.

 “all social primary goods – liberty and opportunity, income and wealth, and the bases of self-respect – are to be distributed equally unless an unequal distribution of any or all of these goods is to the advantage of the least favoured”. 1. Has the structure of an imperative 2. Links justice to fair distribution of social goods 3. Systematic conception of priorities.

Principle 1: Each person is to have an equal right to the most extensive total system of equal basic liberties compatible with a similar system of liberty for all. Principle 2: Social and economic inequalities are to be arranged so that they are both – a)to the greatest benefit of the least advantaged, and b)attached to offices and positions open to all under conditions of fair equality of opportunity. Priority rule 1 (The Priority of Liberty): The principles of justice are to be ranked in lexical order (that is, the first principle takes priority over the second principle) and therefore liberty can only be restricted for the sake of liberty. Priority rule 2 (The Priority of Justice Over Efficiency and Welfare): The second principle of justice is lexically prior to the principle of efficiency and to that of maximizing the sum of advantages; and fair opportunity is prior to the difference principle.

 The standard Equal Opportunity suggests that one’s social circumstances are morally arbitrary and so one ought not be advantaged by them.  Thus we need fair competition that ameliorates social advantage.  But, natural capacities and talents are just as morally arbitrary and so we must consider the advantage that they bring in competition.  The standard equal opportunity view does not apply to natural talents and abilities, thus it fails to consider all morally arbitrary factors.

 “The idea here is simply to make vivid to ourselves the restrictions it seems reasonable to impose on arguments for principles of justice, and therefore on these principles themselves. Thus it seems reasonable and generally accepted that no one should be advantaged or disadvantaged by natural fortune or social circumstance in the choice of principles. It also seems widely agreed that it should be impossible to tailor principles to the circumstances of one’s own case”.

 Contractors begin in the ‘original position’ and behind the veil of ignorance  Contractors are rational and self-interested agents who, while ignorant of specifics know that we will have a life plan and that this will require both liberties and social primary goods  Based on the maximin principle the contractors agree to pronciples of justice that will maximise what they would get if they found themselves in the minumum (worst) situation  In making this decision behind the veil of ignorance contractors much choose by considering the perspective of every other contractor, because when the veil is lifted they could end up in any position.

a) The Enunciation of the principle of justice from the original position b) Partial lifting of the veil: principles of justice are applied to generating a constitutional system, the basic structures of government and the rights that citizens can expect. c) Principles of justice and constitutional principles used to generate specific legislation d) Legislation applied by judges and administrative institutions