1 1 Beacon Power Corporation Energy Storage – Regulation Issues Prepared for: Emerging Technologies Working Group January 5, 2011.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
IMPACT TO FREQUENCY CONTROL DURING STARTUP AND SHUT DOWN OF UNITS
Advertisements

1 Utility Wind Integration Group Workshop ACE Diversity Interchange (ADI) Project Sharing Area Control Errors July 2007 Sponsoring Utilities: British Columbia.
Ancillary Services and SCED Jeff Gilbertson Market Analyst Congestion Management Working Group 9/4/2013.
11 Presentation for ERCOT ETWG FERC Notice of Proposed Rulemaking: Frequency Regulation Compensation in the Organized Wholesale Power Markets (RM )
Infrastructure Planning: Non-Transmission Alternatives 2010 NASUCA Mid-Year Meeting San Francisco, June 15, 2010 Drew Murphy NRG Executive Vice President.
Energy Storage Definitions/Definitions ETWG 18 Feb 2013.
NARUC-FERC Demand Response Collaborative Meeting NARUC Fall Meeting Anaheim, CA T. Graham Edwards President & CEO November 11, 2007.
Unlocking value from existing utility assets NARUC Meeting – February 2012
Jim Mcintosh Director, Executive Operations Advisor California ISO Independent Energy Producers 2011 Annual Meeting - October 5, 2011 Stanford Sierra Conference.
G 200 L 200 ISO NEW ENGLAND T H E P E O P L E B E H I N D N E W E N G L A N D ’ S P O W E R. COLD SNAP Overview of Proposed Options for Winter 2004/2005.
Electricity Markets Overview Lo-Cal seminar, 09/21/2010.
ERCOT Public 1 AS Demand Curves for Real-Time Co-optimization of Energy & Ancillary Services.
National Renewable Energy Laboratory Innovation for Our Energy Future * NREL July 5, 2011 Tradeoffs and Synergies between CSP and PV at High Grid Penetration.
Long Term Study Task Force Update to ETWG ERCOT Long-Term Study: Scenarios, New Software, and Emerging Technology Assumptions January 27, 2012.
ERCOT Tool to manage unexpected incremental load November 16, 2006.
OPSI Annual Meeting Bob Hayes Vice President Natural Gas Trading October 13, 2014.
STORAGE OVERVIEW 2010 Steve Isser, JD, PhD Vice President & General Counsel Good Company Associates.
1 Nodal Stabilization Market Call December 28, 2010.
Sai Moorty ERCOT Integration Options into ERCOT systems.
Applications and Benefits of Energy Storage Maui, Hawaii June 16, 2010 Garth P. Corey, Consultant Sandia National Laboratories Sandia is a multiprogram.
Lead from the front Texas Nodal Version EDS 3 R6.3 8 Focused Input Test (FIT) II Web Ex Texas Nodal Load Frequency Control.
Demand Side Working Group Load Resource Performance Subgroup April 9, 2010 Mary Anne Brelinsky EDF Trading North America.
Storage Integration – Look Ahead SCED Issues for ETWG CAES Perspectives Brandon Whittle ETWG Storage Workshop.
1 April 22, Q 2003 Earnings. 2 Safe Harbor Statement This presentation contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of the federal securities.
Demand Response Workshop September 15, Definitions are important Demand response –“Changes in electricity usage by end-use customers from their.
Lead from the front Texas Nodal 1 Texas Nodal Load Frequency Control (LFC) EDS 3 Release 6 - Handbook EDS 3 Release 6 MP Planning.
Section 5.9 – added export language Each ERS Generator site must have an interconnection agreement with its TDSP prior to submitting an ERS offer and must.
1Texas Nodal Market Trials Update. 2Texas Nodal Full System Market and Reliability Test 24-Hour Test Observations Duration of Test for Week of 8/ Hour.
Klondike Wind Power Project, Oregon Donald Furman Senior Vice President - Business Policy and Development December 3, 2009 Energy Bar Association Mid-Year.
1 Compliance Update May Control Performance Highlights  NERC CPS1 Performance Performance further declined in March  March performance comparison.
NPRR 097 DSR and Small Capacity / Low Operating Level Issues for Compliance Monitoring.
Barriers to Energy Storage providing Ancillary Services in ERCOT
WGR Ramp Rate in Nodal: “As High as Possible” Mike Grimes for QMWG Meeting 10 August 2009.
NPRR425 - Creation of a WGR Group for GREDP and Base Point Deviation Evaluation and Mixing Turbine Types Within a WGR Art Deller, P.E. RARF Workshop 8/29/13.
Quick Start Resource – Payment for Start-Up at less than LSL Current NPRR language: ( 8) If a QSGR comes On-Line as a result of a Base Point less than.
Lead from the front Texas Nodal 1 EDS 3 R6.2 Testing Overview Texas Nodal Load Frequency Control (LFC) EDS 3 Release 6 LFC WebEx.
PRS Response to Steel Companies’ Appeal of NPRR’s 351 and 378 Tom Payton on behalf of PRS August 4, 2011 Disclaimer: This response attempts to capture.
Demand Response: What It Is and Why It’s Important 2007 APPA National Conference San Antonio, Texas June 26, :00 a.m. to Noon Glenn M. Wilson Director.
IWWG Annual Conference Wind Management at MISO July 22, 2011.
7 August, 2006 TPTF MMS Issues Review Brandon Whittle Lead, Real-Time Market Operations.
PJM©2013www.pjm.com Demand Side Working Group Loads in SCED Angelo Marcino Real-Time Market Operations – PJM April 14, 2014.
October 29, Organizational role of Short-Term Planning and Hydro Duty Scheduling Relationship to other groups in BPA Planning and analysis job.
ISO Proposed Flexible Capacity Requirements Stephen Keehn Senior Advisor California ISO CPUC Workshop January 26, 2012.
Appeal of PRS Action NPRR 351, Calculate and Post Projected Non-Binding LMPs for the Next 15 Minutes Floyd Trefny Texas Steel Companies.
Hawaii Energy Storage Seminar: Utility Regulation Service
ERCOT Pilot Project for Fast Responding Regulation Service (FRRS) August 8, 2012 PDCWG August 9, 2012 ETWG/QMWG.
Floyd Trefny, P.E. Director of Wholesale Market Design Nodal Market Tools to Manage Wind Generation January 29, 2009 Presentation to the Renewables Technology.
PDCWG 8/25/2015 GTBD Bias Analysis ERCOT Market Analysis and Design PDCWG August 25, 2015.
1. Non-Dispatchable Resources and EIS Market Carrie Simpson May 30,
Texas Nodal © Electric Reliability Council of Texas, Inc. All rights reserved. 1 Load Frequency Control (LFC) Business Requirements Energy.
Review of Integration of the Requirements of MOD Standard with ERCOT Protocols and Operating Guides S. Looney, Luminant Energy Company For Presentation.
“Managing the Integration of Energy Storage Technologies” Kenneth Ragsdale ERCOT.
Document number Anticipated Impacts for FRRS Pilot Program ERCOT TAC Meeting September 7, 2012.
PDCWG Report to ROS January 13, 2011 Sydney Niemeyer.
Analysis for the Determination of X, Y, and Z for Compliance Monitoring NATF.
Real Time Balancing (RTB) & Resource Plan Statuses Change to the QSE practice of showing offline units as online and available ERCOT Presentation to ROS.
ERCOT Pilot Project for Fast Responding Regulation Service (FRRS) June 13, 2012 WMS and June 14, 2012 ROS.
Lead from the front Texas Nodal 1 Texas Nodal Energy & Market Management System EMS/MMS Projects Requirement Documents November.
California Senate Energy, Utilities and Communications Committee Oversight Hearing May 10, 2016 Southern California Edison Colin Cushnie Vice President,
Non-Spin Deployment Resmi Surendran. RUC Awarded Ancillary Service Bring Resources On-Line if awarding REG or RRS When awarding Non-Spin – First award.
NSRS in Nodal Proposal for Deployment & Recall Procedures ERCOT ROS 10/12-13/2006 By: S.Niemeyer R.Jones R.Wheeler B.Green J.Dumas P.Breitzman.
Davion Hill, DNV GL Elizabeth Endler, Shell
Asia-Pacific Energy Regulatory Forum
Current FRRS Language & Explanation of Posted Data
ERCOT Pilot Project for Fast Responding Regulation Service (FRRS)
Pilot Project Concept 30-Minute Emergency Response Service (ERS)
Overview of New Control Room Desk
4th Quarter 2016 Earnings Call
30 Minute Reserves EPFSTF January 4,
Transforming the Electric Grid with Storage
Presentation transcript:

1 1 Beacon Power Corporation Energy Storage – Regulation Issues Prepared for: Emerging Technologies Working Group January 5, 2011

2 Safe Harbor Statement This presentation contains forward-looking statements, including the Company's beliefs about its business prospects and future results of operations. These statements involve risks and uncertainties. Among the important additional factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those forward-looking statements are risks associated with the overall economic environment, the successful execution of the Company's plan of operation, changes in the Company's anticipated earnings, continuation of current contracts, changes in energy and other applicable regulations, and other factors detailed in the company's filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission, including its most recent Forms 10-K and 10-Q. In addition, the factors underlying Company forecasts are dynamic and subject to change and therefore those forecasts speak only as of the date they are given. The Company does not undertake to update them; however, it may choose from time to time to update them and if it should do so, it will disseminate the updates to the investing public. 2

3 Fast Regulation: Speed Matters… New Storage resources have a speed and precision of response which is unattainable by traditional generator ramp limitations Fast response capability demonstrated in ISO-NE, NY, CA, PJM, Midwest Slow ramping GeneratorAdvanced Energy Storagevs.

4 ERCOT’s Regulation Deployment Signal vs. ACE 10/27/10 LFC Test data: Actual system imbalance: ACE Up: +400 MW Down: -580 MW Average in one direction: 2 min Max in one direction: 24 min Regulation deployed to correct ACE Up: MW Down: -700 MW Average in one direction: 20 min Max in one direction: 94 min If ERCOT could respond instantaneously to ACE significantly less Regulation is needed Effective integration of Storage can lower procurement and result in savings for ratepayers

5 Studies confirm benefits of fast response storage for Regulation PNNL Study: Fast response technologies can help reduce the amount of regulation procurement required - Up to 40% in CAISO *Source: Makarov, Y.V., et al. “Assessing the value of Regulation Resources Based on Their Time Response Characteristics.” Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, PNNL – 17632, June 2008.

6 Integration of Storage Resources 1)Raise Ramp Limitation, and/or; 2)Fast Signal to Storage, and/or; 3)Allow Storage resources to manage their energy level using the 5-minute energy market Covered in this presentation: Covered in AES presentation:

7 Fast Regulation Signal for Storage CAISO developed ACE “Smoothing” Dispatch –Storage is used as “ACE Eraser” –Dampened Signal to slower units Recommend ERCOT do a similar dispatch –Send Storage a LFC signal based off the instantaneous ACE –Subtract Storage deployment from the current signal sent to Generators –Will provide further dampening

8 Dispatching Storage resources to utilize their fast response capability has several advantages Advantages for ERCOT Less Regulation Procurement More effective and tighter control Fewer emissions associated with Regulation Advantages for Storage Takes advantage of the ramp capabilities Energy neutral signal maintains resource “state-of-charge” Advantages for Traditional Generation Allows generation to cycle less frequently Reduced heat rate and fuel consumption Reduced wear and tear Dispatching Storage resources to utilize their fast response has advantages for ERCOT, Traditional Generators, and Storage resources

9 Using 5-minute Energy Market to Manage Stored Energy Level (SOC) Power EnergyPowerEnergy PJM AGC Data w/o 5-minute Correction PJM AGC Data w/ 5-minute Correction EPRI studied utilizing Limited Energy Storage to provide Regulation Allowing a Storage Resource to dynamically schedule energy in the 5-minute Energy market, if necessary, enables continuous Regulation Schedule energy into / out of the resource to maintain its preferred energy level, i.e. “state-of-charge” (SOC) Similar method implemented in other ISOs September 11, 2009 ERPI Webcast, Prototype Method for Analyzing Regulation by Limited Energy Storage Results: Regulation can have a significant energy bias (cumulative energy trend in one direction) Implementing a 5-minute adjustment to move the energy trend out of the Regulation signal and into the 5-minute energy market reduces the required duration of storage

10 Benefits of Dynamically Scheduling Storage: “Smart Following” Storage provides ERCOT with the ability to both respond to unpredicted energy imbalances and economically schedule this energy in the Energy market Allows imbalances to be reflected in price of energy (right market signals) Cannot be done today with Generators Example: When Reg Down is scheduled on a Generator it reduces its energy production but has no impact on marginal unit in Energy market; unlike Storage which stores this energy and then later discharges it in the Energy market resulting in the marginal unit being turned down or displaced Adjusted Load ForecastLoad ForecastLoad Regulation Down Forecasted Load Adjusted Load Forecast Power Regulation Energy 0 Forecasted Load Adjusted Load Forecast Power Regulation Up Regulation Energy Minutes Minutes Dynamically Scheduling Storage provides System and Resource benefits

11 Allow Storage to be a Dynamically Scheduled Resource Recommend ERCOT allow a QSE to Dynamically Schedule Storage Enable the QSE to update the Output Schedule for a Storage resource before each SCED Output Schedules for Dynamically Scheduled Resources (1)A QSE representing a DSR may update the Output Schedule for a dispatch interval at any time before the SCED process for that interval. Consistent with protocol rules for resources that need special scheduling considerations, like QFs and Intermittent Renewable Resources Protocol Changes : Protocol Section 2: Definitions and Acronyms Dynamically Scheduled Resource (DSR) A Resource that has been designated by the QSE, and approved by ERCOT, as a DSR status-type and that follows a DSR Load or is an Storage Resource with a ONDSRREG status. Protocol Section : Output Schedule Criteria (3) For a QSE representing one or more Dynamically Scheduled Resources, the sum of all Output Schedules (excluding Ancillary Services Energy deployments, energy deployed through Dispatch Instructions, and Energy Trades, and Energy used for Storage Resources with a Status of ONDSRREG) for the QSE must be within 15% or 15 MW (whichever is greater) of the aggregate telemetered DSR Load;

12 Contact Information Judith Judson Vice President, Asset Management and Market Development (978) Isaac Read Energy Systems and Market Analyst (978)