CARE/ASAS Validation Framework Ros Eveleigh Activity 2 Project Manager NATS.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
A I R T R A F F I C O R G A N I Z A T I O N Future Communications Study Technology Assessment Team: Suggested Phase III Activities Presented at ICAO ACP.
Advertisements

1 Measurements & Validation R G Stamp Head of Department of ATM Research National Air Traffic Services Ltd, UK.
1 Validation & Measurement Methods for the PHARE Demonstrations R A Whitaker Validation Project Leader.
CARE ASAS Validation Framework. Partners CARE ASAS Board - Francis Casaux EURCONTROL - Mick van Gool, Ulrich Borkenhagen Consortium Partners Aena, Isdefe,
CARE/ASAS Activity 2 Follow-up: Validation Framework Dissemination Forum Isdefe Ingeniería de Sistemas CARE/ASAS ACTIVITY 2 FOLLOW-UP: VALIDATION.
The EMERALD RTD Plan and the ASAS Validation Framework R P (Bill) Booth 10 October 2002.
One Sky for Europe EUROCONTROL © 2002 European Organisation for the Safety of Air Navigation (EUROCONTROL) Page 1 FAA/Eurocontrol Technical Interchange.
WP 3: Human Performance Metrics 10 Oct 2002 Brian Hilburn.
PETAL A major step Towards Cooperative Air Traffic Services Patrice BEHIER Manager of the Air/ground Co operative ATS Programme Directorate Infrastructure,
ENAV S.p.A. ASAS TN I Workshop, April 20031/13 Airborne Spacing and Safety Alberto Pasquini - Deep Blue (ENAV)
A2 Unit 4A Geography fieldwork investigation Candidates taking Unit 4A have, in section A, the opportunity to extend an area of the subject content into.
© 2009 The MITRE Corporation. All rights Reserved. Evolutionary Strategies for the Development of a SOA-Enabled USMC Enterprise Mohamed Hussein, Ph.D.
Episode 3 1 Episode 3 EX-COM D Final Report and Recommendations Operational and Processes Feasibility Pablo Sánchez-Escalonilla CNS/ATM Simulation.
National Academic Reference Standards
Investigations MATHEMATICS Years 1 to 10. Investigations  exemplify a teaching approach that supports thinking, reasoning and working mathematically.
Direction générale de l’Aviation civile direction de la Technique et de l’Innovation sous-direction Etudes et Recherche appliquée direction des services.
Episode 3 / CAATS II joint dissemination event Combining Techniques: Expert Groups, Fast-Time Simulation and Prototyping Episode 3 - CAATS II Final Dissemination.
Case Studies in Assistive Technology
Thinking, reasoning and working mathematically
Software Verification and Validation (V&V) By Roger U. Fujii Presented by Donovan Faustino.
Developing Effective Questioning In Teaching Games For Understanding (TGfU) Pearson & Webb, 2008.
‘One Sky for Europe’ EUROCONTROL © 2002 European Organisation for the Safety of Air Navigation (EUROCONTROL) Page 1 VALIDATION DATA REPOSITORY Overview.
Towards Appropriate Selection of Analysis Tools and Methods.
ASSTAR User Forum #1 Rome 4th April 2006 ASAS-TN2 Second Workshop ASSTAR Safety Approach and Preliminary Issues Dr Giuseppe GRANIERO, SICTA
INTERNATIONAL LABOUR ORGANIZATION Conditions of Work and Employment Programme (TRAVAIL) 2012 Module 13: Assessing Maternity Protection in practice Maternity.
A COMPETENCY APPROACH TO HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT
CRISTAL ATSAW Project Sep 2007 ASAS TN Christelle Pianetti, DSNA Simona Canu-Chiesa, Airbus.
CRISTAL ITP European Organisation for the Safety of Air Navigation CRISTAL ITP ASAS-TN, Paris Johan Martensson CASCADE CRISTAL ITPJohan Martensson ASAS-TN.
CARE/ASAS Validation Framework Guidelines & Case Studies Mark Watson NATS.
ASAS TN2 WP3: Assessing ASAS Applications Maturity Eric Hoffman EUROCONTROL.
ASAS FRA OB/T ATM Projects Lufthansa point of view.
The NATS Review of ATM Occurrence Reporting Prepared for ICAO European Region Aviation Safety Seminar/Workshop (Baku, Azerbaijan, 5 -7 April 2006) by Jane.
ASAS WORKSHOP Roma April 2003 Airlines’ perspective Nicolas Zvéguintzoff Assistant Director- Technical / Financial Liaison – Europe.
Projects EMERALD and EMERTA EMERALD WP5 The Specific case of ASAS/ADS-B.
Formulating a Simulation Project Proposal Chapter3.
MFF is a EC co-funded programme Rome, 3-5 Aprili 2006 ASAS-TN2 Rome, 3-5 April 2006 Maurizio Zacchei, ENAV (MFF PM) Mediterranean Free Flight Programme.
PRO-EAST Workshop, Rome, May 9-11, Curriculum and Programme Objectives: Mapping of Learning Outcomes Oleg V. Boev, Accreditation Centre, Russian.
Technology Components
Types of writing assignments Source:
Requirements Engineering Lesson 2. Terminologies:  Software Acquisition is where requirement engineering significantly meets business strategy.  Software.
Page 1 CARE/ASAS Activity 3: ASM workshop Brétigny, 19 December 2001 Time-Based Sequencing OSED CARE-ASAS Activity 3: ASM Time-Based Sequencing OSED.
CARE/ASAS Activity 2 Follow-up: Validation Framework Dissemination Forum Isdefe Ingeniería de Sistemas CARE/ASAS ACTIVITY 2 FOLLOW-UP: VALIDATION.
Episode 3 E3-WP0-MWPM PPT-V th ExCom Slides 1 Episode 3 - Ex-Com Final Report Tools & Validation Dr. Ralph Leemüller R&D Division - DFS.
 European Urban Roadmaps to 2030  Dr Guy Hitchcock  Knowledge Leader  ETC, 28 th September 2015.
The project includes around 36 centres across Europe. Reference Centres Twin Centre 1s (Twin Centre 2s) About to add 24.
1 Fame Readiness Self- Assessment Tool Roger Vaughan Centre for Social and Business Informatics University of Newcastle upon Tyne.
SSAP The European Strategic Safety Action Plan (SSAP) The History & Rationale.
Process Asad Ur Rehman Chief Technology Officer Feditec Enterprise.
Partnership Conference  Welcome  The university-based training, including that for special educational needs and sport, which enables trainees.
Games in Practice Prepared by RLEF, July Why Games? It’s recommended that a players development in each training session should consist of learning.
ESA Harwell Robotics & Autonomy Facility Study Workshop Autonomous Software Verification Presented By: Rick Blake.
ASAS Crossing and Passing Applications in Radar Airspace (operational concept and operational procedure) Jean-Marc Loscos, Bernard Hasquenoph, Claude Chamayou.
International Civil Aviation Organization Global Runway Safety Symposium ICAO’s Harmonization Initiatives John Illson Air Navigation Bureau 25 May 2011.
19-21 April 2004ASAS TN – 3 rd workshop AIRLINES/IATA OVERVIEW Needs and Considerations Anthony van der Veldt/IATA Assistant Director Safety Operations.
A consolidated starting point from DFS / AENA / LFV ASAS Thematic Network Workshop Toulouse, Is ASAS /ADS-B needed for ANSP strategy?
MFF is a EC Co-funded Programme  MEDITERRANEAN FREE FLIGHT Flight Trials Report ASAS TN2 1st Workshop | September 2005, Malmö Gennaro GRAZIANO 1/32.
DIRECTORATE GENERAL FOR ENERGY AND TRANSPORT Information Day 6th Framework Programme 1st Call for Proposals, 5 Feb. 2003, Brussels ASAS operational improvements:
1 Roma, 3-5 April 2006 – ASAS TN2, 2 nd Workshop, Session 1 – When ASAS meets ACAS When ASAS meets ACAS Thierry Arino (Sofréavia, IAPA Project Manager)
The ESA call for the 9 th Earth Explorer mission (EE9)
What’s New in SPEED APPS 2.3 ? Business Excellence Application Services.
ASSTAR Overview Jean-Marc Loscos, DSNA
Gathering a credible evidence base
Fredrik Barchéus, KTH Lena Mårtensson, KTH Anthony Smoker, IFATCA
Karim Zeghal EUROCONTROL Experimental Centre
Curriculum Mapping… What is it? & Why Map?
Documentation of Assumptions and System Vulnerability Monitoring: the Case of System Theoretic Process Analysis (STPA) Dr. Nektarios Karanikas, CEng, PMP,
ASSTAR Project Overview & User Forum Objectives
DMAIC Analyze, Improve, Control
Bioprocess Engineer NOS Functional Map v4
Presentation transcript:

CARE/ASAS Validation Framework Ros Eveleigh Activity 2 Project Manager NATS

What is Validation ?  More than Simulation & Analysis “The process through which a desired level of confidence in the ability of a deliverable to operate in a real-life environment may be demonstrated against a pre-defined level of functionality, operability and performance.”

What is Validation “The process through which a desired level of confidence in the ability of a deliverable to operate in a real-life environment may be demonstrated against a pre-defined level of functionality, operability and performance.”  Process  Strategy  Guidance Materials

What is Validation “The process through which a desired level of confidence in the ability of a deliverable to operate in a real-life environment may be demonstrated against a pre-defined level of functionality, operability and performance.”  Real-life environment  Scenarios  Operationally realistic, relevant, testing

What is Validation “The process through which a desired level of confidence in the ability of a deliverable to operate in a real-life environment may be demonstrated against a pre-defined level of functionality, operability and performance.”  Functionality, operability & performance  Metrics  System performance, Human performance

Operations Idea Validation Strategy Survey

Validation Techniques  Analytical modelling  Fast-time simulation  Real-time techniques  Real-time simulation  Shadow mode  Operational trials  Survey

Analytical Modelling  “High-Level Fast-Time” techniques  Back of envelope  Excel spreadsheets  Mathematical models  Often specifically developed to solve a particular problem  Quick turn-around

Fast-Time Simulation  Relatively resource “light”  “limited” ATCO participation  small facilities  Models such as RAMS,TAAM, SIMMOD  Wide scope assessment  Time  Geographic extent  Relatively quick study time  Many scenarios

 Operator in the loop  Small scale and large scale  Resource intensive  ATCOs  pseudo-pilots  analysts  developers  engineers  Reduced scenario size  Raises awareness across ATC spectrum Real-Time Simulation

 Simulator installed and linked into ACC  Live inputs  No effect on aircraft behaviour  No control over scenarios explored  Soak testing  Full safety case not required Field Test & Shadow Mode

ASAS Categories  Airborne Traffic Situation Awareness Current ATC rules apply  Airborne Spacing Aircrew given more tasks  Airborne Separation Temporary delegation of separation to aircrew  Airborne Self-separation Full delegation of separation

Validation Framework Requirements  Generic  Across validation techniques  Across ASAS categories  Comprising  Scenario - ‘environment’ for validation  Metrics - what will be measured  Guidelines - assistance to validators and managers  To ensure  Consistency of validation  Comparability of validation

Primary Focus  Provide a structured approach  Ensure consistency of PROCESS  Guidelines  Scenario specification process  System performance metric structure  Human performance metric structure  Route map from EMERALD RTD Plan

Work Packages