Integrated Modeling for Burning Plasmas Workshop (W60) on “Burning Plasma Physics and Simulation 4-5 July 2005, University Campus, Tarragona, Spain Under.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Glenn Bateman Lehigh University Physics Department

Advertisements

EXTENDED MHD SIMULATIONS: VISION AND STATUS D. D. Schnack and the NIMROD and M3D Teams Center for Extended Magnetohydrodynamic Modeling PSACI/SciDAC.

Where are we in Integrated modeling? S. Jardin Mature 1½ D evolution code packages exist with reduced modules for most processes –Japan: BPSI: (TASK, TOPICS)

Physics Basis of FIRE Next Step Burning Plasma Experiment Charles Kessel Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory U.S.-Japan Workshop on Fusion Power Plant.

ASSOCIATION EURATOM HELLENIC REPUBLIC (and CYPRUS) (HELLAS) FOUNDATION FOR RESEARCH AND TECHNOLOGY-HELLAS NATIONAL CENTRE FOR SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH “DEMOKRITOS”

Korean Modeling Effort : C2 Code J.M. Park NFRC/ORNL In collaboration with Sun Hee Kim, Ki Min Kim, Hyun-Sun Han, Sang Hee Hong Seoul National University.

The Swiss Association vision for the period Presented by M. Q. Tran on behalf of the CRPP.

6 th ITPA MHD Topical Group Meeting combined with W60 IEA Workshop on Burning Plasmas Session II MHD Stability and Fast Particle Confinement General scope.

Cyclic MHD Instabilities Hartmut Zohm MPI für Plasmaphysik, EURATOM Association Seminar talk at the ‚Advanced Course‘ of EU PhD Network, Garching, September.

GTC Status: Physics Capabilities & Recent Applications Y. Xiao for GTC team UC Irvine.

Exploration of Fusion Plasmas Using Integrated Simulations Jill Dahlburg, Naval Research Laboratory Presented by Dale Meade, Princeton University With.

Modeling of ELM Dynamics for ITER A.Y. PANKIN 1, G. BATEMAN 1, D.P. BRENNAN 2, A.H. KRITZ 1, S. KRUGER 3, P.B. SNYDER 4, and the NIMROD team 1 Lehigh University,

T. Hellsten IEA Burning Plasma Workshop, July 2005 Tarragona Spain Integrated Modelling of ICRH and AE Dynamics T. Hellsten, T. Bergkvist, T. Johnson and.

Predictive Integrated Modeling Simulations Using a Combination of H-mode Pedestal and Core Models Glenn Bateman, Arnold H. Kritz, Thawatchai Onjun, Alexei.

M.E. Fenstermacher - Summary of Progress and Outlook for Work Plan in PEP ITPA WG on RMP ELM Control 4/23/09 11:15 PM 1 PEP ITPA Working Group on RMP ELM.

The SWIM Fast MHD Campaign Presented by S. C. Jardin Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory P.O. Box 451 Princeton, NJ Simulation of Wave Interaction.

Advanced Tokamak Plasmas and the Fusion Ignition Research Experiment Charles Kessel Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory Spring APS, Philadelphia, 4/5/2003.

Presented by XGC: Gyrokinetic Particle Simulation of Edge Plasma CPES Team Physics and Applied Math Computational Science.

1 Integrated Simulation Code for Burning Plasma Analysis T.Ozeki, N.Aiba, N.Hayashi, T.Takizuka, M.Sugihara 2, N.Oyama JAERI 、 ITER-IT 2 IEA Large Tokamak.

Calculations of Gyrokinetic Microturbulence and Transport for NSTX and C-MOD H-modes Martha Redi Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory Transport Task Force.

Overview of MHD and extended MHD simulations of fusion plasmas Guo-Yong Fu Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory Princeton, New Jersey, USA Workshop on ITER.

TH/7-2 Radial Localization of Alfven Eigenmodes and Zonal Field Generation Z. Lin University of California, Irvine Fusion Simulation Center, Peking University.

Japanese Efforts on the Integrated Modeling - Part II : JAEA Contribution - T. Takizuka (JAEA) acknowledgments : T. Ozeki, N. Hayashi, N. Aiba, K. Shimizu,

Challenging problems in kinetic simulation of turbulence and transport in tokamaks Yang Chen Center for Integrated Plasma Studies University of Colorado.

Status of Fusion Theory and Simulation Research in NFRI 6 th J-K Workshop/NIFS/2011 J.Y. Kim.

Integrated Modeling and Simulations of ITER Burning Plasma Scenarios C. E. Kessel, R. V. Budny, K. Indireshkumar, D. Meade Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory.

Discussions and Summary for Session 1 ‘Transport and Confinement in Burning Plasmas’ Yukitoshi MIURA JAERI Naka IEA Large Tokamak Workshop (W60) Burning.

ITER Standard H-mode, Hybrid and Steady State WDB Submissions R. Budny, C. Kessel PPPL ITPA Modeling Topical Working Group Session on ITER Simulations.

PTRANSP Predictive TRANSP Code Plans and Progress Presented by Glenn Bateman Lehigh University On behalf of the PTRANSP collaboration involving: General.

PEPSC Plan for Self-consistent Simulations of Fast Ion Transport with Source and Sink Guoyong Fu Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory.

LH Meeting, Prague 17 December, Integrated Predictive Modelling at JET V. Parail, G. Corrigan, D. Heading, J. Spence, P. Belo, G. Huysmans, F. Imbeaux,

ITPA Meeting, PPPL, April, y1999: two core and two SOL transport codes with about 15 users, who worked locally at JET; y2000: Secondees from.

Towards Comprehensive Simulation of Fusion Plasmas Stephen C. Jardin Princeton University Plasma Physics Laboratory P.O. Box 451, Princeton, NJ Oct.

RF simulation at ASIPP Bojiang DING Institute of Plasma Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences Workshop on ITER Simulation, Beijing, May 15-19, 2006 ASIPP.

Global Stability Issues for a Next Step Burning Plasma Experiment UFA Burning Plasma Workshop Austin, Texas December 11, 2000 S. C. Jardin with input from.

Comparison of Ion Thermal Transport From GLF23 and Weiland Models Under ITER Conditions A. H. Kritz 1 Christopher M. Wolfe 1 F. Halpern 1, G. Bateman 1,

RF codes for Transp Transp User Course 2014 Jim Conboy.

Planned Theory Contributions to the FY’2011 Joint Research Target on Pedestal Research R. J. Hawryluk Thanks to the Pedestal Working Group: C-S Chang,

Implications of TFTR D-T Experiments for ITER R.J. Hawryluk May 23, 2014.

Introduction of 9th ITPA Meeting, Divertor & SOL and PEDESTAL Jiansheng Hu

FOM - Institute for Plasma Physics Rijnhuizen Association Euratom-FOM Diagnostics and Control for Burning Plasmas Discussion All of you.

Kinetic MHD Simulation in Tokamaks H. Naitou, J.-N. Leboeuf †, H. Nagahara, T. Kobayashi, M. Yagi ‡, T. Matsumoto*, S. Tokuda* Joint Meeting of US-Japan.

D. McCune 1 PTRANSP Predictive Upgrades for TRANSP.

STUDIES OF NONLINEAR RESISTIVE AND EXTENDED MHD IN ADVANCED TOKAMAKS USING THE NIMROD CODE D. D. Schnack*, T. A. Gianakon**, S. E. Kruger*, and A. Tarditi*

ITPA Topical Group on MHD, Control, and Disruptions Summary of 5th meeting, Nov. 8-10, 2004 Presented by Ted Strait Workshop on MHD Mode Control Princeton,

B WEYSSOW 2009 Coordinated research activities under European Fusion Development Agreement (addressing fuelling) Boris Weyssow EFDA-CSU Garching ITPA 2009.

Summary CDBM IMAGE meeting, 07 IMAGE SUMMARY IMAGE set up to provide a venue for discussion between the different Integrated Modelling (IM) activities.

Comprehensive ITER Approach to Burn L. P. Ku, S. Jardin, C. Kessel, D. McCune Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory SWIM Project Meeting Oct , 2007.

PERSISTENT SURVEILLANCE FOR PIPELINE PROTECTION AND THREAT INTERDICTION International Plan for ELM Control Studies Presented by M.R. Wade (for A. Leonard)

1 A Proposal for a SWIM Slow-MHD 3D Coupled Calculation of the Sawtooth Cycle in the Presence of Energetic Particles Josh Breslau Guo-Yong Fu S. C. Jardin.

Steady State Discharge Modeling for KSTAR C. Kessel Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory US-Korea Workshop - KSTAR Collaborations, 5/19-20/2004.

Physics Analysis and Flexibility Issues for FIRE NSO PAC-2 Meeting January 17-18, 2001 S. C. Jardin with input from C.Kessel, J.Mandrekas, D.Meade, and.

Integrated Simulation of ELM Energy Loss Determined by Pedestal MHD and SOL Transport N. Hayashi, T. Takizuka, T. Ozeki, N. Aiba, N. Oyama JAEA Naka TH/4-2.

045-05/rs PERSISTENT SURVEILLANCE FOR PIPELINE PROTECTION AND THREAT INTERDICTION Taming The Physics For Commercial Fusion Power Plants ARIES Team Meeting.

M. Greenwald, et al., APS-DPP 2006 Density Peaking At Low Collisionality on Alcator C-Mod APS-DPP Meeting Philadelphia, 10/31/2006 M. Greenwald, D. Ernst,

SMK – APS ‘06 1 NSTX Addresses Transport & Turbulence Issues Critical to Both Basic Toroidal Confinement and Future Devices NSTX offers a novel view into.

IMP3 1 RITM – code Computation with stiff transport models presented by D.Kalupin 12th Meeting of the ITPA Transport Physics (TP) Topical Group 7-10 May.

Integrated Modeling for Burning Plasmas Workshop (W60) on “Burning Plasma Physics and Simulation 4-5 July 2005, University Campus, Tarragona, Spain Under.

BOUT++ Towards an MHD Simulation of ELMs B. Dudson and H.R. Wilson Department of Physics, University of York M.Umansky and X.Xu Lawrence Livermore National.

Nonlinear Simulations of Energetic Particle-driven Modes in Tokamaks Guoyong Fu Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory Princeton, NJ, USA In collaboration.

NSTX Meeting name – abbreviated presentation title, abbreviated author name (??/??/20??) Goals of NSTX Advanced Scenario and Control TSG Study, implement,

Integrated Plasma Simulations C. E. Kessel Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory Workshop Toward an Integrated Plasma Simulation Oak Ridge, TN November 7-9,

Transport Model with Global Flow M. Yagi, M. Azumi 1, S.-I. Itoh, K. Itoh 2 and A. Fukuyama 3 Research Institute for Applied Mechanics, Kyushu University.

6 th ITPA MHD Topical Group Meeting combined with W60 IEA Workshop on Burning Plasmas Summary Session II MHD Stability and Fast Particle Confinement chaired.

FPT Discussions on Current Research Topics Z. Lin University of California, Irvine, California 92697, USA.

Overview of PPPL Field Work Proposal Opportunities in Macroscopic Stability J. Menard for the MHD Science Focus Group Tuesday, November 22, 2005 Supported.

J. Menard for the MHD Science Focus Group Tuesday, November 22, 2005

Investigation of triggering mechanisms for internal transport barriers in Alcator C-Mod K. Zhurovich C. Fiore, D. Ernst, P. Bonoli, M. Greenwald, A. Hubbard,

Influence of energetic ions on neoclassical tearing modes

Integrated Modeling for Burning Plasmas

Presentation transcript:

Integrated Modeling for Burning Plasmas Workshop (W60) on “Burning Plasma Physics and Simulation 4-5 July 2005, University Campus, Tarragona, Spain Under the Auspices of the IEA Large Tokamak Implementing Agreement Discussion Session S. C. Jardin Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory

Progress towards a comprehensive theory/model for burning plasmas in ITER/DEMO Whole Device Modeling Codes Extended MHD and Energetic Particles Turbulence Simulations Edge-Plasma Integrated Modeling RF, NBI,  -particle, Impurities, and Fueling Sources

Whole Device Modeling Codes New initiatives now planned or underway Japan: BPSI: ( TASK, TOPICS ) EU: JET initiative (ASTRA, CRONOS, JETTO), Integrated Modeling Task Force DINA/CRONOS coupling US: NTCC (modules library), PTRANSP (TSC/TRANSP + …), FSP (not yet begun) – (also BALDUR, ONETWO, CORSICA) Need for more sophisticated modules in most areas Turbulent Transport models need to be improved/ quantified Extended MHD and energetic particle effects Scrape-off-layer, ELMs, and pedestal Need better particle/impurity transport models General need for better benchmarking. Submit ITER plasmas to ITPA Profile Database

Extended MHD and energetic Particles Need to further develop 3D Nonlinear Extended MHD codes and validate on existing experiments. Sawtooth: Full 3D nonlinear sawtooth simulation now possible for small tokamaks, not yet for ITER. Good semi-analytical models available (Porcelli model) ELMs: Some progress (BOUT-Snyder, JOREK-Huysmans, NIMROD- Brennan, M3D-Strauss) Not yet a full 3D ELM simulation for even small tokamaks. Good semi-analytical models being developed. (including ideal- MHD/Enhanced transport model with MARG2D in TOPICS) NTMs: Not yet a full 3D NTM simulation. Modified Rutherford equation (semi-analytical) models widely used. Resistive Wall Modes: Not yet a full 3D nonlinear model. Locked Mode Threshold: Not yet a fundamental model TAE: 3D Hybrid particle/fluid simulation model possible for short times and weakly nonlinear behavior…full nonlinear integration with thermal particles not yet possible. Disruption Modeling: Axisymmetric modeling in fairly good shape, 3D modeling just beginning

Turbulence Simulations Focus is presently on core turbulence: ITG, ETG, ITG/ETG coupling, finite beta effects, transition from Bohm to gyro-Bohm, turbulence spreading need to develop long-time (transport timescale) predictive simulation capability Calculation of particle diffusivities from transport simulations turbulence and neoclassical simulation integration mechanisms for transport barrier formation pedestal region and core-edge simulation integration how to couple with whole-device-modeling codes impurities and helium ash transport may be possible to extend Gyrokinetics codes to include MHD, Wave Heating, and Plasma Edge

Edge-Plasma Integrated Modeling Full 3D predictive edge model is lacking Numerous edge codes exist to provide qualitative understanding and quantitative results for specific phenomena edge transport: CSD, SONIC, UEDGE, SOLPS (B2-Eirene),EDGE2D-NIMBUS… kinetic edge turbulence: PARASOL, DALF … collisional edge turbulence: BOUT, … local codes: erosion/depositon ERO, Coupled Core-Edge COCONUT:JETTO-SANCO-EDGE2D-NIMBUS, SOLPS beginning (disruptions, ELMs) semi-analytical/emperical NTCC PEDESTAL module increasing evidence that ELMs are triggered by current-driven MHD modes MARG2D ELM model incorporated into TOPICS Fusion Simulation Projects proposed to study integrated edge-plasma Many issues remain: L-H transition and pedestal physics nonlinear ELM crash, transport, and pedestal recovery density limit and impurity transport material erosion including redeposition and dust formation- work in progress to integrate plasma and plate (SOLPS5-B2)—need to characterize mixed materials Move physics from edge transport codes into edge turbulence codes Need to include drifts into edge transport codes, and to move to 1D neoclassical

RF, NBI,  -particle, and fueling Sources RF   -particles  ion distribution function Fisch Comprehensive suites of RF and neutral beam codes exist Integrated computations between full-wave ICRF and FP solvers are underway, but not yet in routine use Integrated modeling that combines advanced ICRF antenna modules with full-wave solvers are underway RF and NB source modules have been combined with WDM codes, but generally not the most advanced RF packages. RF/FP Codes need to be coupled to MHD codes in order to simulate instability control Modeling of Mode Conversion physics in ITER scale plasma not yet possible Need to incorporate all RF and NB systems together with FP for ions and electrons self-consistently, and with energetic particle MHD Coupling of SPOT(  -particles) and DELPHINE(LH wave propag. and absorp., el. Distrib. Func.) in CRONOS framework