Observing Modes from a Software viewpoint Robert Lucas and Philippe Salomé (SSR)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
A Crash Course in Radio Astronomy and Interferometry: 4
Advertisements

Dale E. Gary Professor, Physics, Center for Solar-Terrestrial Research New Jersey Institute of Technology 1 9/25/2012Prototype Review Meeting.
Dale E. Gary Professor, Physics, Center for Solar-Terrestrial Research New Jersey Institute of Technology 1 3/16/2012OVSA Preliminary Design Review.
Twelfth Synthesis Imaging Workshop 2010 June 8-15 Observation Preparation Tool (OPT) Loránt Sjouwerman (NRAO/Socorro)
CSV Plan status Robert Laing ESO Science IPT. 2 Recent changes Complete rewrite to take account of rebaselining and revised delivery schedule Proposal.
HAWCPol / SuperHAWC Software & Operations J. Dotson July 28, 2007.
Current mm interferometers Sébastien Muller Nordic ARC Onsala Space Observatory Sweden Turku Summer School – June 2009.
ALMA Proposal Preparation and Submission Eelco van Kampen European ALMA Regional Centre (ESO, Garching) Thanks to Liz Humphrys, Andy Biggs and Paola Andreani.
Atacama Large Millimeter/submillimeter Array Expanded Very Large Array Robert C. Byrd Green Bank Telescope Very Long Baseline Array.
J.M. Wrobel - 25 June 2002 PROPOSALS 1 PROPOSAL WRITING TUTORIAL Outline 30 minutes: Lecture on Generic Issues 60 minutes: Small Groups Write Proposals.
C. ChandlerEVLA Advisory Committee Meeting September 6-7, Scientific Commissioning Plan Claire Chandler.
Hunt for Molecules, Paris, 2005-Sep-20 Software Development for ALMA Robert LUCAS IRAM Grenoble France.
ADASS XI Sept30-Oct3, 2001 The ALMA Common Software (ACS) as a basis for a distributed software development G.Raffi, G.Chiozzi (ESO), B.Glendenning (NRAO)
ALMA Proposal Preparation and Submission Liz Humphreys European ALMA Regional Centre ESO, Garching Thanks to Andy Biggs, Paola Andreani, Eelco van Kampen.
Firenze, September 2006ASAC Meeting- Computing IPT1 ALMA Computing IPT Science Software Status Update Gianni Raffi, ESO ALMA Science Advisory Committee.
Basic concepts of radio interferometric (VLBI) observations Hiroshi Imai Department of Physics and Astronomy Graduate School of Science and Engineering.
Atacama Large Millimeter/submillimeter Array Expanded Very Large Array Robert C. Byrd Green Bank Telescope Very Long Baseline Array Emmanuel Momjian (NRAO)
DVA Series Work Flow P. Dewdney Apr 15, SPDO DVP Work Flow 2 DVA-1 CPG.
50mm Telescope ACS Course Garching, 15 th to 19 th January 2007 January 2007Garching.
1 ANASAC Meeting – May 20, 2015 ALMA Pipeline Brian Glendenning (for Jeff Kern)
The Atacama Large Millimeter Array (ALMA) Test Facility in Retrospect Debra Shepherd National Radio Astronomy Observatory The ALMA Test Facility (ATF)
Cycle-3 Capabilities and the OT Andy Biggs ALMA Regional Centre, ESO.
Molecular Gas and Dust in SMGs in COSMOS Left panel is the COSMOS field with overlays of single-dish mm surveys. Right panel is a 0.3 sq degree map at.
TelCal Phasing Engine description Draft Robert Lucas
ALMA Integrated Computing Team Coordination & Planning Meeting #2 Santiago, January 2014 Control Group Planning Rafael Hiriart, Control Group Lead.
School of something FACULTY OF OTHER School of Physics & Astronomy FACULTY OF MATHEMATICS & PHYSICAL SCIENCES The Cornish Survey Workshop.
Polarization at IRAM Status and Plans S.Guilloteau Laboratoire d’Astrophysique de Bordeaux.
ALMA Integrated Computing Team Coordination & Planning Meeting #1 Santiago, April 2013 Relational APDM & Relational ASDM models effort done in online.
Atacama Large Millimeter/submillimeter Array Expanded Very Large Array Robert C. Byrd Green Bank Telescope Very Long Baseline Array Using CASA to Simulate.
The ALMA TelCal subsystem Dominique Broguière, Institut de RadioAstronomie Millimétrique (IRAM) TelCal Phasing meeting – Grenoble -10/12/2012.
Doug Tody E2E Perspective EVLA Advisory Committee Meeting December 14-15, 2004 EVLA Software E2E Perspective.
ALMA Pipeline Heuristics Frederic Boone - LERMA Lindsey Davis - NRAO John Lightfoot - UKATC Dirk Muders - MPIfR Christine Wilson - McMaster Friedrich Wyrowski.
F. Levrier (LERMA - ENS) J. Pety (LERMA - IRAM Grenoble) P. Salomé (LERMA - Observatoire de Paris) STAR FORMAT meeting, Heidelberg, 4-5 may 2010 Making.
Interferometry Discuss Group & Python Tutorial Adam Leroy & Scott Schnee (NRAO) February 28, 2014.
Consortium Meeting La Palma October PV-Phase & Calibration Plans Sarah Leeks 1 SPIRE Consortium Meeting La Palma, Oct. 1 – PV Phase and.
Scheduling Blocks: a generic description Andy Biggs (ESO, Garching)
Correlator Growth Path EVLA Advisory Committee Meeting, March 19-20, 2009 Michael P. Rupen Project Scientist for WIDAR.
JVLA capabilities to be offered for semester 2013A Claire Chandler.
Pre-OTS Testing in Penticton Sonja Vrcic Socorro, December 11, 2007.
ALMA Integrated Computing Team Coordination & Planning Meeting #1 Santiago, April 2013 ACA plan Manabu Watanabe National Astronomical Observatory.
ALMA Integrated Computing Team Coordination & Planning Meeting #4 Santiago, November 2014 Telescope Calibration Planning Dominique Broguière.
ASAC Meeting - May 2004 Computing IPT Science Requirements: Status Report Robert Lucas & Debra Shepherd.
02/6/ jdr1 Interference in VLBI Observations Jon Romney NRAO, Socorro ===================================== 2002 June 12.
Dale E. Gary Professor, Physics, Center for Solar-Terrestrial Research New Jersey Institute of Technology 1 9/25/2012Prototype Review Meeting.
2007Sep06 EAC Butler - Software Overview 1 Software Overview Bryan Butler.
Imaging Molecular Gas in a Nearby Starburst Galaxy NGC 3256, a nearby luminous infrared galaxy, as imaged by the SMA. (Left) Integrated CO(2-1) intensity.
Atacama Large Millimeter/submillimeter Array Karl G. Jansky Very Large Array Robert C. Byrd Green Bank Telescope Very Long Baseline Array GBT Control System.
ALMA Integrated Computing Team Coordination & Planning Meeting #1 Santiago, April 2013 Telescope Calibration Planning Dominique Broguiere.
1 KFPA Critical Design Review – Fri., Jan. 30, 2009 KFPA Data Pipeline Bob Garwood- NRAO-CV.
Atacama Large Millimeter/submillimeter Array Expanded Very Large Array Robert C. Byrd Green Bank Telescope Very Long Baseline Array Data Processing Progress.
14 June, 2004 EVLA Overall Design Subsystems II Tom Morgan 1 EVLA Overall Software Design Final Internal Review Subsystems II by Tom Morgan.
Introduction to EVLA Software Bryan Butler. 2006Dec05/06EVLA M&C Transition Software CDR2 EVLA Computing (Terse) History The original EVLA Phase I proposal.
ESO, 17 April 2007ESAC meeting1 ALMA offline User Test 5 Silvia Leurini, ESO.
Atacama Large Millimeter/submillimeter Array Karl G. Jansky Very Large Array Robert C. Byrd Green Bank Telescope Very Long Baseline Array ALMA Pipeline.
L. Young, Synthesis Imaging Summer School, 19 June Spectral Line I Lisa Young This lecture: things you need to think about before you observe After.
M.P. RupenEVLA Advisory Committee Meeting September 6-7, Correlator Test Plan Michael P. Rupen.
Frazer OwenNSF EVLA Mid-Project Review May 11-12, Transition to EVLA
Observations with AMBER  General overview  P2VM  OB preparation with P2PP P2PP / OB / templates Available templates for observation procedure Typical.
Software Requirements for the Testing of Prototype Correlator Sonja Vrcic Socorro, December 11, 2007.
Astrochemistry with the Upgraded Combined Array for Research in Millimeter-wave Astronomy D. N. Friedel Department of Astronomy University of Illinois.
Andreas Horneffer for the LOFAR-CR Team
NRAO VLA Archive Survey
Computing Architecture
Calibration of the ACA System
Observational Astronomy
Observational Astronomy
Scheduling Toolkit Observation Scheduling Boyd Waters, NRAO
EVLA Advisory Committee Meeting
Gustaaf van Moorsel September 9, 2003
Correlator Growth Path
Presentation transcript:

Observing Modes from a Software viewpoint Robert Lucas and Philippe Salomé (SSR)

ESAC Meeting - Garching sep-062 Observing Modes Observing modes are pre-defined ways to use ALMA to obtain science and calibration data. Use of standard modes individually tested for accuracy and efficiency makes operation easier for ALMA observers and for ALMA staff. Choice, definition of standard modes and their order of implementation and commissioning is an important element of observatory development. A sequential implementation of Observing Modes is very important for software deployment and testing, once the basic computing structures are in place.

ESAC Meeting - Garching sep-063 Observing Modes of two kinds Observer Modes: –Open to the general science observer –Aimed at obtaining general science data –Examples: Single-field mapping with interferometry OTF single-dish maps Full mapping of sky area with long, short, zero spacings Observatory Modes: –For the observatory staff –Aimed at obtaining array calibration data used by science projects –Examples: Measure antenna precise positions Measure pointing models Check antenna surface accuracy with holography

ESAC Meeting - Garching sep-064 How do we define Observing Modes? Basic modes defined by the hardware, e.g. : –Correlators: ACA/Baseline, correlation and autocorrelation, or autocorrelation only, polarizations, resolution, bandwidths… –Continuum detectors: integration time –Local oscillators: Frequency switching, side band separation/rejection –Nutator: beam switching –Antenna: OTF scanning, individual pointings … –WVR receivers: apply mode (model, empirical)… Note: These are not independent as e.g. some switching choices may restrict correlator configuration Definitions of simple modes are based on the science goal, with sub-modes defined when there are hardware options, mainly dictated by the calibration strategy –Example: a single dish continuum map may use OTF scanning with or without beam switching; a line map may use spatial referencing or frequency switching. For many science goals a combination of simple modes are needed: –Example: extended source mapping will need short spacing, total power, long spacing data, that are obtained sequentially using basic simple modes. Simple Modes –Produce a single science result obtained in a rather simple way Example: single field interferometry map –For the general user –Aimed at producing science data –Simple:, OTF total power map –Complex: simultaneous measurement of short spacings and zero spacing maps combined extended object map (including both single- dish and short/zero spacings, or multi-configuration data)

ESAC Meeting - Garching sep-065 The structure of a Project One ObsUnitSet is aimed at a science result (e.g., one image) One ObsUnitSet applies a simple observing mode A ObsUnitSet may need one ore more SchedBlocks to be observed (e.g. several configurations There can also be several ObsUnitSets in a project, as several science results may be required, with (may be) different modes. A complex observing mode uses several simple modes Thus there can be several ObsUnitSets in an ObsUnitSet (hierarchy of observing modes).

ESAC Meeting - Garching sep-066 Standard Observer Mode: Simple/Complex Example: 1.Simple Standard Mode: single field interferometer map One ObsUnitSet, one or a few SB, which may be repeated 2.Complex Standard Mode: extended object map Uses the hierarchy of ObsUnitSets: One ObsUnitSet for an interferometer map –interferometer pointed mosaic One ObsUnitSet for an interferometer map –ACA single-dish and short-spacing map Top Level ObsUnitSet produces final combined map This complexity affects the OT, scheduling, pipeline, but not Control, Quick Look, or On-line calibration

ESAC Meeting - Garching sep-067 Standard Observer Mode Contents Parameters (defaults when possible) to be defined in the Observing Tool: –Observing parameters Area to be mapped Spectral definition from science point of view Quality parameters (sensitivity, dynamic range…) resulting in scheduling constraints –Pipeline parameters and options Should be minimal, we leave to standard observing mode heuristics what can be decided in an automated way –SB definition policy, as specific rules for each mode may be needed Standard Mode observing script: –One per simple mode and per kind of SB generated in that mode –Actually controls the observations Standard mode data reduction script (pipeline heuristics) And naturally user documentation.

ESAC Meeting - Garching sep-068 Observing Tool Snapshot

ESAC Meeting - Garching sep-069 An example SchedBlock The contents of the Scheduling Block are stored in an xml file. This contains all the information needed to schedule it, and execute it; in particular the reference to a standard mode script that will perform the actual observing on the telescope.

ESAC Meeting - Garching sep-0610 Observing Script Commands (in Control Command Language) in order to: –Recover user’s input parameters (SB content) –Frequency setup, correlator setup commands, using the SB content as input –Real time choices (e.g. which calibrators) –Perform calibrations as needed: Some calibrations are in Observing Mode SB script: pointing, focus, amplitude, phase,… –With script logic to decide when to calibrate More expensive calibrations, e.g. BandPass calibration –Check if calibration exists already (query Calibration Data Base) –Perform calibration if needed –Recover calibration results from on-line calibration (TelCal) –Observing cycles; stop when conditions met (e.g. time elapsed).

ESAC Meeting - Garching sep-0611 Example of script (holography)

ESAC Meeting - Garching sep-0612 Example ExecBlock (ASDM) Holography ASDM Two of 24 tables, mostly in xml format: Pointing table, TotalPower table are stored in binary format for efficiency.

ESAC Meeting - Garching sep-0613 Tentative list of Simple Observer Modes (1) 1.Pointed interferometer mosaic map 2.On-the-fly interferometer mosaic map 3.Pointed single-dish map 1.Position switched spectral/continuum 2.Beam switched spectral/continuum 3.Frequency switched spectral 4.On-the-fly single-dish map 1.Position switched spectral/continuum 2.Beam switched spectral/continuum 3.Frequency switched spectral

ESAC Meeting - Garching sep-0614 Tentative list of Simple Observer Modes (2) 5.Simultaneous pointed interferometer / single dish mosaic map 1.Position switched spectral/continuum 2.Beam switched spectral/continuum 3.Frequency switched spectral 6.Simultaneous on-the-fly interferometer / single dish mosaic map 1.Position switched spectral/continuum 2.Beam switched spectral/continuum 3.Frequency switched spectral These are the ACA modes of course; more complexity may be actually involved…

ESAC Meeting - Garching sep-0615 Observatory Modes 1.Transmitter holography 2.Astronomical holography 3.Optical pointing model 4.Radio pointing model 5.Antenna position measurements 6.Axes offset measurement 7.Focus model (using holography) 8.Delays 9.Receiver band pointing offsets 10.Beam shape determination 11.Primary feed illumination (size and offsets) 12.Primary amplitude calibration (standard flux calibrators) 13.… any other, found necessary during commissioning

ESAC Meeting - Garching sep-0616 Observing Mode Development Start with simple observer modes –How many standard observer modes? –If too many, gets too complicated for user –If too few, they get complicated –E.g. single field interferometry and pointed mosaic are probably one mode. Position switch and frequency switch in Single-dish are two modes. Observatory Modes are needed first –Optical pointing, Holography In CIPT the modes are developed both –at the instrument level (control, correlator subsystems) –at the observatory level (end-to-end approach) in function-based teams. They are the object of Integrated User Tests (e.g. optical pointing at the ATF).

ESAC Meeting - Garching sep-0617 Modes for Commissioning This sets in practice an order of priorities, according to needs for antenna acceptance and commissioning plan, e.g.: 1.Single Dish Holography 2.Optical Pointing 3.Single Dish with Total Power detectors only –No nutator, then nutator –Focus checking, beam maps –Radio Pointing model determination 4.Single Dish with Correlator –Position, Beam, Frequency switching 5.Interferometry –Baseline measurement –Interferometer holography

ESAC Meeting - Garching sep-0618 Observer Modes Implementation We need to work on the science modes in parallel with the commissioning –we need ultimately to commission the science modes one after the other Work first on single-field interferometry –using hardware simulation at the array level, for an end-to end approach (OT to Off-line data reduction) before the whole hardware is available Further work will soon involve single-dish modes. Naturally the order of priority of implementation and testing of observer modes is a science issue.

ESAC Meeting - Garching sep-0619 Present Status: Observatory Modes Optical Pointing implemented, and tested March –A report on the integrated user testing is available –Actually bad weather did not allow a full science checking at the time Transmitter Holography implemented (still to be tested; hw expected in 2007-Sep. at ATF) –Control software ready and tested in simulation –Data reduction identical to that used in Antenna Evaluation –Data format now converted to new ALMA Science Data Model (ASDM).

ESAC Meeting - Garching sep-0620 Present Status: Single Field Interferometry Implemented in simulation, waiting for hardware to be ready at ATF –While first fringes should be reached soon, the end-to-end software will not be used (or desired) to obtain them. Real tests of end-to-end software with hardware will start only at that point. Next Stage (end of October) should include, in simulation mode: –a target source –several phase calibrations, with on-line phase interpolation between them –Main development areas: Validate the ASDM: from DataCapture to Off-Line Filler LO phase and delay tracking Shift Log prototype implementation –Secondary development areas: Usage of standard mode scripts Feedback of on-line calibration results Performance validation of ASDM Quick-Look display of Calibration results

ESAC Meeting - Garching sep-0621 Next Observer Modes Need to define priorities for Single-Dish –Should have simple single dish modes to test the antennas (2007/2008) –Should also aim particularly towards the main science modes for ACA single-dish (science input needed): Relative priorities of simple and combined switching modes. Pointed Mosaics –Really a variation of the single field interferometry, but more complex for OT and pipeline OTF Mosaics –Probably not for Early Science –When we can do this end-to-end we’re in a good shape.