Libby Dam June 2006 Spill: Total Dissolved Gas Monitoring.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Upstream and Downstream Passage of American Eels at the Medway Project, Penobscot River, Maine Scott Hall ————————————— PPL Maine, LLC Milford, Maine Steve.
Advertisements

Application of the Continuous Slope-Area Method for Determining Stream Discharge and Development of Rating Curves in Ephemeral Channels Navajo Nation Hydroclimate.
Yellowtail Dam & Bighorn Lake Billings, Montana October 18, 2007 RECLAMATION Managing Water in the West.
John H. Kerr Dam and Reservoir John H. Kerr Dam and Reservoir U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Wilmington District.
Watershed Dams in Georgia 1. –357 Total –195 High Hazard (NRCS) –NRCS constructed – owned by local sponsors –Most built between 1950s-1970s for flood.
Erik Strandskov and Joshua C. Galster Dept. of Earth & Environmental Studies, Montclair.
TMT Presentation March 31, 2010 Scott English Water Quality Program Manager NWD Reservoir Control Center.
Streamflow and Runoff The character, amount, and timing of discharge from a basin tells a lot about flow paths within the basin Therefore, important to.
US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® Methods for Determining Maximum Flood Elevations Landward of Failed Levees: An Example from the Great Missouri.
Design of Optimum Selective Withdrawal Operation for Temperature Management at Round Butte Dam, Lake Billy Chinook, Oregon Presentation to WEFTEC 2000.
Computational Modeling of Flow over a Spillway In Vatnsfellsstífla Dam in Iceland Master’s Thesis Presentation Chalmers University of Technology 2007.
® Cumberland River Basin 2007 Hydrologic & Hydraulic Drought Joy Broach – Aquatic Biologist Planning Branch - Environmental Section SWPBA Tennessee November.
Assessment of gravel transport characteristics of the upper Santa Ana River Scott Wright and Toby Minear USGS California Water Science Center Sacramento,
Notes on river discharge measurements
Conowingo Hydroelectric Power Station and Muddy Run Pump Storage Facility Welcomes the Citizens Advisory Committee.
CHARACTERISTICS OF RUNOFF
US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® Weather, Runoff, and Water Quality Summary Water Year 2010 Steven B. Barton, P.E. Chief, Reservoir Control.
Hydrological Information System Module 20 – Integrated Reservoir Monitoring System.
Figure 1. Photograph looking upstream at the south fish ladder and training spill from bay 18, Bonneville Dam, April 4, Spill bay 18 South fish ladder.
Long Term Storage Long term storage means to store water during high inflows years for the benefit of low inflows years. Long term storage means to store.
IDWR Water Supply Meeting May 12, 2011 NRCS Snow Survey Measuring Lost Lake SNOTEL Site, elevation 6,110 feet, along the NF Clearwater and St Joe Divide.
Merowe Dam: Details of Site & Engineering Design Suzanne Young February 19, 2004.
31 DECEMBER VARIABLE FLOOD CONTROL DRAFT FOR LIBBY RESERVOIR U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Northwestern Division, North Pacific Region.
THE IMPORTANCE OF REAL-TIME DATA DURING AN OPERATIONAL RIVER FLOOD EVENT Ronald Horwood National Weather Service Northeast River Forecast Center Taunton.
Colorado River Basin Water Supply Out look Lake Powell Lake Mead.
Reservoir and Diversion Data CBRFC Stakeholder Forum July 31, 2012.
Overview of the draft Pend Oreille River Total Dissolved Gas Total Maximum Daily Load Paul J. Pickett, P.E. Transboundary Gas Group Castlegar, BC October.
Federal Columbia River Power System Operations Planning.
One Corps Serving The Army and the Nation Tulsa District The Tulsa District Corps of Engineers and Its Cooperative Partners.
Lower Snake Modeling and LGR Monitoring Year 1 Report Summary Christopher Cook BPA Project
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers TMT Annual Review Weather and Water Summary Presented by Karl Kanbergs USACE, Water Management Division December 7, 2011.
Abstract Background Conclusion Stream Bed Morphology and Discharge Rates of Deckers Creek Data was collected at 5 different points along a 100 meter transect.
US Army Corps of Engineers ® Engineer Research and Development Center Coastal and Hydraulics Laboratory Greenup Locks and Dam, Ohio River.
Impact of data quality on watershed management—Need for automatic watershed monitoring By: M. J. Abedini and P. Karimaghaei.
Middle Fork Project Flow and Temperature Modeling (Status Report) November 4, 2008.
MA BF REFERENCE CURVES Objective Develop bankfull regional curves and equations for estimating bankfull width, mean depth, cross-sectional area, and discharge.
Impacts of temporal resolution and timing of streambed temperature measurements on heat tracing of vertical flux Paper No. H11D-1228 INTRODUCTION 1D heat.
Processing of a Fine Sediment Pulse after Dam Removal Sediment Budget and Longitudinal Trends Chiloquin Dam Removal – Sprague River Matt Cox, Desiree Tullos,
Bi-Op Measure 143 Water Temperature Modeling and Data Collection Plan For Lower Snake River Basin “The Action Agencies shall develop and coordinate with.
BUILDING STRONG ® PORTLAND DISTRICT 1. BUILDING STRONG ® PORTLAND DISTRICT 2 BiOp Performance Standards for Dam Passage Survival RPA RM&E Actions - Strategy.
Middle Fork Project Project Description April 25, 2006.
Ponds 6, 7 & 8 Design Update Napa Sonoma Marsh Restoration Group Meeting USGS San Pablo Field Station Office, Building 505, Mare Island April 17, 2008.
The Louis Berger Group, Inc. A Transboundary Approach to Mitigating Total Dissolved Gas in the Columbia River Basin Mark W. Killgore, P.E.
Levees Artificial levees prevent floods Usually made with fine-grained sediments that are easily eroded in floods Higher-quality levees mix coarse.
Sammamish River Diel Dissolved Oxygen and pH Study September 21, 2005.
Channel Flow Routing Reading: Applied Hydrology Sections 8.4, , 9.7.
Martin Rule Curve Study Ashley McVicar, APC Maurice James, Water Resources Consulting LLC.
US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® Physical and Numerical Model Study of Montgomery Locks and Dam, Ohio River Allen Hammack, Howard Park, Cecil.
Analysis of Slide Impacts on the North Fork Stillaguamish River Floodplain For Snohomish County May 5, 2014.
FLOOD ROUTING Siti Kamariah Md Sa’at School of Bioprocess Engineering, UniMAP.
Dam Removal as a Solution to Increase Water Quality Matthew Nechvatal, Tim Granata Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering and Geodetic Science.
US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® Mark Twain Lake Water Control Manual Update Joan Stemler St. Louis District Water Control.
NON-TREATY STORAGE AGREEMENT “Introduction to Operations and the Non Treaty Storage Scenarios” Presenter: Jim Gaspard.
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Wilmington District Real-Time Conservation Pool Storage Accounting for the Falls Lake Project.
Martin Rule Curve Study Ashley McVicar, APC Maurice James, Water Resources Consulting LLC.
The Orange County Water District Riverbed Filtration Pilot Project Jason Keller 1, Michael Milczarek 1, Greg Woodside 2, Adam Hutchinson 2, Robert Rice.
Wanapum Dam Total Dissolved Gas Characterization Evaluation of the Wanapum Dam Fish Bypass (WFB) 2008.
Relationships Between River Variables and Salmon Survival Correlation Analysis and Box and Whisker Plots.
Wyoming Association of Rural Water Systems Harry LaBonde Jr, P.E. Director Wyoming Water Development Office April 19, 2016.
Libby Flows and Kootenai River White Sturgeon
Management of Flood Waters through Mcphee Reservoir
Hydrological Information System
Kootenai River / Kootenay Lake Burbot Conservation Strategy
Taum Sauk Dam Failure Missouri, 2005
Fall Chinook Management Measures
Summary In addition to the oceans, where else is water found on Earth?
Little Bear River 100-Year Storm Flood
Patrick Tara, Jeff Vomacka, Mark Ross
Kootenai River / Kootenay Lake Burbot Conservation Strategy
Eightmile Creek Barrier Assessment
Presentation transcript:

Libby Dam June 2006 Spill: Total Dissolved Gas Monitoring

Libby Dam June 2006 Spill Introduction –Corps of Engineers project –Spill occurred between June 8 – June 27, 2006 –Spillway discharge 1.5 to 31 kcfs –Total project discharge 25.5 to 55 kcfs –TDG monitoring vs. TDG exchange study –Limited monitoring scope

Libby Dam June 2006 Spill Project Site – Libby Dam Headwater project. Straight concrete gravity gate controlled dam, 370 feet high and 2,887 feet long, located at RM on the Kootenai River. Built by the COE ( ) for flood control. Selective withdrawal system used to maintain downstream temperatures. Full pool elevation 2459 ft, spillway crest 2405 ft. –Lake Koocanusa Reservoir is approximately 90 miles long. Provides 4.98 million acre-feet of storage. –Kootenai River

Location of Libby Dam and Lake Koocanusa in the Kootenai River Basin.

Libby Dam June 2006 Spill Study Design –Real Time Monitoring Station LBQM at USGS tailwater gage Located 0.6 miles downstream on left bank to capture maximum TDG –Automated Loggers Transect of 3 instruments at Thompson Bridge (Station TMPSN1-3), located immediately downstream of Libby Dam to measure lateral TDG distribution One instrument located 8.5 miles downstream at a constriction in the Kootenai River (Station HAUL) represents mixed river conditions One instrument located in back eddy of spill (Station SPW3) –Parameters Total dissolved gas (TDG) Temperature Depth Operating Conditions –Spill occurred between June 8 – June 27 –Spillway discharge 1.5 to 31 kcfs –Total discharge 25.5 to 55 kcfs

Libby Dam June 2006 Spill Sampling Period – Real Time Station Station LBQM operational June 8 to 27, 2006 –Automated Loggers Station TMPSN1-3 operational June 18 to 27, 2006 –Data from June 14 to June 18 were invalid due to insufficient sampler depth Station HAUL operational June 14 to 27, 2006 Station SPW3 operational June 20 and 21, 2006

TDG Sampling Stations in the Kootenai River Near Libby Dam HAUL TMPSN LBQM SPW Full Time Station Part Time Station 1 Mile

TMPSN3 TMPSN2 TMPSN1 LBQM SPW3 TDG Sampling Stations in the Kootenai River Immediately Below Libby Dam Full Time Station Part Time Station 0.25 Mile

TMPSN1TMPSN2TMPSN3 LBQM TDG monitoring stations at Libby Dam tailwater SPW3

Libby Dam discharge June Libby Dam June 2006 Spill

Water Quality Sampling Instruments –Real Time Station Hydrolab MiniSonde 4a TDG sensor/Common Sensing barometer Geomation Model 2380 DCP, Solar Power Radio transmission station Measurements collected every hour –Logger Stations Hydrolab DataSonde 4 and MiniSonde 4a Automated wireless logging Deployed on bottom of river Measurements logged on 30-minute intervals –Calibration COE data quality criteria Pre and post deployment Laboratory calibrations Field calibrations Libby Dam June 2006 Spill

Pre and post deployment TDG calibration information Libby Dam June 2006 Spill

Lateral and longitudinal TDG gradients were apparent in the Kootenai River at all spillway flows –Maximum TDG saturations along the left channel bank –Lowest TDG saturations associated with powerhouse flows along the right channel bank –Mixing of powerhouse flows and riverine processes caused diminishing TDG saturations downstream Maximum TDG saturation at TMPSN1 (133%), at LBQM (131%), and at HAUL (120%)

Libby Dam June 2006 Spill Spillway Releases Resulted in Elevated of TDG Pressures in Kootenai River –TDG saturation at station TMPSN1 and LBQM were similar during 2006 spill Abrupt increase ( %) in TDG Pressure as a function of Spill kcfs Little increase ( %) in TDG pressure as a function of spill 6-15 kcfs Mild Increase ( %) in TDG Pressure as a Function of Spill kcfs –TDG saturation at station LBQM was at or below the Montana standard of 110% at spillway releases less than 2 kcfs –TDG saturation at station HAUL represented nearly well mixed conditions

Libby Dam June 2006 Spill Observed total dissolved gas saturation versus total spillway discharge at Libby Dam, June 2006.

 P=231.75(1-exp( Qsp)) TDG sat =(  P+BP)/BP*100 R 2 =0.96  P=TDG Pressure – BP (mm Hg) Qsp=total Spillway Discharge (kcfs) BP = Barometric Pressure (mm Hg) Observed and calculated stilling basin total dissolved gas saturation versus total spillway discharge at Libby Dam, summer 2002.

Relationship between observed and calculated Station HAUL total dissolved gas saturation versus total spillway discharge at Libby Dam, June Libby Dam June 2006 Spill

Conclusions –Fixed monitoring station at Libby Dam (LBQM) was representative of river conditions for TDG –Strong lateral gradient in TDG saturations in the Kootenai River below Libby Dam at all spillway flows –Maximum TDG saturations observed at Thompson Bridge (133%) –Kootenai River nearly well mixed at station HAUL with a maximum TDG saturation of 120% Libby Dam June 2006 Spill