Research activities at the University of Zagreb Predrag Kvasnička.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
SISMA: Workshop finaleASI, 4 maggio 2011 Il Progetto Progetto SISMA: razionale, attività e principali risultati Roberto Sabadini Università degli Studi.
Advertisements

Risk Assessment and Mapping Experiences through DIPECHO in Central Asia Regional Consultative Meeting November 2009 Bishkek, Kyrgyz Republic.
7-8 April 2011VGIRisk Workshop Università degli Studi di Cagliari Dipartimento di Geoingegneria e Tecnologie Ambientali Dipartimento di Ingegneria del.
INSPIRE and flood directive reporting: important issues to raise Manuela Pfeiffer WISE GIS/IT-Workshop 7.5./ Copenhagen.
Large Scale Mapping of Groundwater Resources Using a Highly Integrated Set of Tools Verner H. Søndergaard Geological Survey of Denmark and Greenland, Denmark.
Loma Prieta Earthquake Mourad Amouri Nicolas Rodriguez.
WHAT COULD BE THE NEXT EARTHQUAKE DISASTER FOR JAPAN  A difficult question, but ---  It is the one that was being asked long before the March 11, 2011.
RECOVERY and RECONSTRUCTION after the PAKISTAN EARTHQUAKE CHOOSING OPTIONS THAT WILL FACILITATE LONG-TERM RECOVERY THE OCTOBER 8, 2005 DISASTER.
Improvement and Harmonization of BSHAP Earthquake Catalogue [ Compilation of data, comparison with SHARE-GEM catalog ] Ines Ivančić Croatian Seismological.
University “Ss. Cyril and Methodius” Skopje, Republic of Macedonia
Use of Paleoseismic Data in Seismic Hazard Analysis: Examples from Europe K.Atakan and A.Ojeda Institute of Solid Earth Physics University of Bergen Allégt.41,
Slovenian National Building and Civil Engineering Institute
Modeling Seismic Response for Highway Bridges in the St. Louis Area for Magnitude 6.0 to 6.8 Earthquakes J. David Rogers and Deniz Karadeniz Department.
Amir M. Kaynia Norwegian Geotechnical Institute (NGI) Norwegian Univ. of Science & Tech. (NTNU) FORUM FOR PROMOTION OF SOIL DYNAMICS IN INDIA Roorkee,
“Site and Supporting Facilities”
Earthquakes Presented you to by the Hazard Committee Madeline Galac Nicole Barstrom.
Structural Damage and Response to Historic California Tsunamis By Orville T. Magoon Coastal Zone Foundation Seismic Safety Commission Workshop May 15,
C-LIEGE Contract N°: IEE/10/154/SI Project duration: from 1 st June 2011 to 30 st November 2013 Date of creation: 4 th July 2011 Clean Last mile.
PRIMER Dr. Walter Hays Global Alliance For Disaster Reduction
European Federation of Geologists The role of geology In Environmental Impact Assessments (EIAs)
New Madrid Earthquake By: Julie Dillon and Caroline Miller.
The role of the GEO Geohazards Community of Practice for the Supersites Initiative The role of the GEO Geohazards Community of Practice for the Supersites.
EuropeAid 1 ACP-EU Water Facility 4th World Water Forum MEXICO March 2006 Mr Antonino Crea Head of Water and Sanitation Sector Infrastructure Unit.
PILOT PROJECT: External audit of quality assurance system on HEIs Agency for Science and Higher Education Zagreb, October 2007.
Seismic Hazard Assessment for the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
A 21 ST CENTURY LOOKBACK WILL SUSTAIN A COMMUNITY’S FOCUS ON DISASTER RESILIENCE Walter Hays, Global Alliance for Disaster Reduction, University of North.
DEPARTMENT FOR GEOTECHNICS AND SPECIAL STRUCTURES Laboratory for dynamics of soils and foundations University Ss. Cyril and Methodius in Skopje Institute.
Dr. James Martin-Hayden University of Toledo Department of Earth, Ecological and Environmental Sciences Using knowledge of Earth and Changes to: –Quantify.
GEO Geohazard Supersites Current Status and key challenges EGU 2013 Vienna Supersites Splinter Meeting.
Using knowledge of Earth and Changes to: –Locate and characterize geologic resources –Quantify material properties used for engineering –Investigating.
Engineering Geology and Seismology
Web-based Class Project on Rock Mechanics
DRINKADRIA MEETING IN NEUM MAY, Agenda DRINKADRIA NEUM MEETING – MAY, The project is co-funded by the European Union, Instrument.
University of Zagreb Aleksa Bjeliš Vice-rector for science and development 29 October 2004.
The Role of Groundwater in Geologic Hazards W. Richard Laton, Ph.D., RG Assistant Professor, Department of Geological Sciences, CSUF.
1 Earthquake Hazard Update April 21, 2015 NMSZ ROC.
Social science for the Integrated Assessment of environmental risks and problems. DAY 2: robust science to support decisions on large scale risks Dr. J.
Research Cooperation between NGI and IITR (Geotech EQ Eng. aspects) By B.K. Maheshwari Department of Earthquake Engineering Indian Institute of Technology.
Earthquake forecasting using earthquake catalogs.
ENVIRONMENT – Natural Resources Expert in applied Remote Sensing, Earth Observation & GIS Strong experience in international projects SME Phone: +32 (0)
EFDRR Our Goal… Good HFA Exchanges 1.Describe some exchanges that have taken place and any results. 2.Analyse the results of the questionnaire. 3.Make.
Presentation on Bhutan’s Seismic Network System
Loss-Estimation Modeling of Earthquake Scenarios for Each County in Nevada Using HAZUS-MH Nevada Bureau of Mines and Geology Open-File Report 06-1 University.
Reconnaissance in Chiba after “The 2011 off the Pacific coast of Tohoku Earthquake” Mohsin U. Qureshi and Ikuo Towhata Department of Civil Engineering,
George Crawford, Washington Emergency Management Division June 25,2007 UW Educational Outreach – Tsunami Science & Preparedness Program (Su 07) Sponsored.
A Scientific Network for Earthquake, Landslide and Flood Hazard Prevention The Project.
HFA Progress and Updates Consultative Meeting of National Disaster Platform on Feb 17, 2013 Jishnu Subedi Institute of Engineering Tribhuvan University.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey The Earthquake is Inevitable: The Disaster is Not.
09 March Liquefaction Elected Member Workshop SmartGrowth, TCC Chambers 10 April 2013 Lq. = Liquefaction effects ( inc. lateral spread) Ls= lateral.
Today's Alps tomorrow: risks, resources and opportunities Side Programme – Risk Management Tuesday 20 th June 2006, 9:00 – 11:00 CatchRisk - mitigation.
Foundations and Earthwork Stott Bushnell, Cathryn Cecil, Tyler Cecil, and Craig Fowler – BFCC Engineering Residential foundations are very stiff, often.
“IP Universities” Istanbul, May 16 to 18, 2012 Albert Long Hall, BOGAZICI UNIVERSITY Mr. Pedro Cartagena Technical Adviser SPTO. Madrid, Spain.
DIPARTIMENTO TUTELA AMBIENTALE PROTEZIONE CIVILE THE GEOLOGIST’S GROUP OF ROME Francesco La Vigna Climate Change Risk Assessment Network Workshop
Application procedure From theory to practice Dieter H. Henzler, Steinbeis-Transfercenter Cultural Resources Management, Berlin.
1 Emergency Rescue Services GIS web applications for natural disasters Three modern web-based applications EMERGENCY_RESCUE_SERVICES_FIELD.
GIS APPLICATIONS IN EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING: NORTHWEST TURKEY
Microzonation Study of Soil Liquefaction Potential and Damage Wei F. Lee Taiwan Construction Research Institute Ming-Hung Chen National Center for Research.
ANT11 Presentation, October, 10-13, 2011 David Vardiman Project Engineer Geotechnical Design and Excavation 1 Sanford Lab at Homestake, Lead, SD 4850L.
National Protection and Rescue Directarate EU PROMETHEUS 2014 KICK OFF MEETING 9-10 April, Brussels.
RISKS CONSORTIUM Seismic and volcanic risks Ciência 2010 Lisboa, 5-6 Julho, 2010.
Center of Excellence in Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering and Soil Dynamics at IIT Roorkee A.Personnel 1.Relevant Faculty of Civil, Earthquake, Mechanical.
Responsibilities of researchers Asking ourselves what responsibilities do we have towards the scientific community and society? Research is regulated by.
ADVANCED EARTHQUAKE RESISTANT DESIGN SUMIT KUMAR CIVIL ENGG. HALDIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY UNDER GUIDANCE OF:- PROF. M.M.BAG.
Plate movement Earthquake = sudden release of energy in the Earth’s crust that creates seismic waves. They are measured by the Richter Scale,
Elected Member Workshop
When the Big One Comes A Study of Hazards Associated with a Major Earthquake Along Utah’s Highly-Populated Wasatch Front Authored by Kevin Franke Civil.
Nick Bonvoisin Secretary to the Convention on the
Dr. Praveen K. Malhotra, P.E.
End-Users Needs in Seismic Hazard Analysis
Qualitative landslide risk assessment in New Zealand
Presentation transcript:

Research activities at the University of Zagreb Predrag Kvasnička

MEETING - Croatian participants University of Zagreb, –Faculty of Mining Geology and Petroleum Engineering (sponsor) –Faculty of Science, Department of Geophysics University of Rijeka, –Faculty of Civil Engineering (sponsor) Croatian Institute for Civil Engineering, Zagreb (sponsor) Geokon-Zagreb (sponsor?) Croatian Waters, Rijeka Geokod, Zagreb (sponsor)

MEETING - Croatian invited speakers University of Los Angeles, California, USA –professor Mladen Vučetić University of Ljubljana, Slovenia, EU –professor Mihael Ribičič Italian participants: Università degli Studi del Molise, Termoli Università degli Studi di Salerno, Lecce

GENERAL The project goal is to study, in a multidisciplinary and innovative way, the problems of vulnerability assessment of effects of earthquakes in urban areas. To this goal => integrating all geophysical, geological, geotechnical, structural and urban information that can contribute to the definition of damage scenarios. In geotechnical engineering, all the proposed procedures and methods must be supported by: –proper soil characterization, by means of –proper investigation, without which the geological and geotechnical models might produce unrealistic values.

GENERAL The results of investigation will be presented in zonation maps for seismic-geotechnical hazard, with zones having approximately equal hazard towards seismic events. The process of making such maps is continual, and maps should be renewed from time to time. The scope of the project is making available to local administrations a teritorial information platform supporting the different stages of management of seismic vulnerability.

In the Line no. 3 of MEETING for the Croatian side, the plan is to provide the authorities of two selected urbanized areas with the guidelines for preparatory works for making seismic zonation in accordance with EC8 It was decided to refer to the cities of Zagreb and Dubrovnik: –Zagreb, because it is a big and highly populated city –Dubrovnik, because it is sited in a highly seismogenetic area and due to presence of historically and archeologically relevant buildings. GENERAL

Detailed proposal for Croatian activities 1. Subjects of investigation 2. Expected results of investigation 3. Mid-term meeting (Dubrovnik workshop)

1. SUBJECTS OF INVESTIGATION

GROUND MOTIONLANDSLIDESLIQUEFACTIONSTRUCTURESMATERIALS CRO activity CRO activity IT activity IT activity ASSESMENT CRO activity CRO activity IT activity IT activity ZONATION CRO activity CRO activity CRO activity IT activity IT activity GUIDELINES GEOLOGY/GEOTECHNICSCIVIL ENGINEERING HAZARD/RISK MITIGATION EARTHQUAKE EFFECTS MEETING: subjects of investigation

2. EXPECTED RESULTS OF INVESTIGATION

assessment, zonation, guidelines state-of-the art reports review of Croatian practice GIS database: geology, seismotectonics, seismology, slope instability/landslides, geotechnical boreholes, hazard zones database of boreholes and soil properties zonation criteria reccomendations

assessment, zonation, guidelines state-of-the art reports; review of Croatian practice; GIS database: geology, seismotectonics, seismology, slope instability/landslides, geotechnical boreholes, hazard zones; database of boreholes and soil properties; zonation criteria; recommendations. Dubrovnik workshop, Feb 2008 Campobasso workshop, June 2008 Research period, Jan-June 2008

What has been done until now?

First “vizual” contact: 4th International Conference on Earthquake Geotech. Engineering, Thessaloniki, June 2007 Filippo Santucci de Magistris Leo Matešić Predrag Kvasnička Giuseppe Lanzo

MEETING, kick-off meeting, Termoli, November 2007 Università degli Studi del Molise

Termoli, Residenza Sveva Snježana Mihalić Želimir Veinović

Mid-term results logo web page Preparatory works for Workshop-1, Dubrovnik Preparatory works for Geotechnical-seizmical zonation of pilot areas, according to EC 8 Contacts with Croatian authorities Audit by Croatian Ministry of Regional Integrations – activities approved

3. Mid-term meeting (Dubrovnik workshop)

Theme 1Characteristics of investigation area Theme 2 Geotechnical data bases: repositories for hazard zonation Theme 3 Seismic hazard in urban areas Theme 4 Application of Eurocode 8 Workshop themes:

Why Dubrovnik? Something about recent strong earthquake near Dubrovnik

Montenegro earthquake, April 1979 Magnitude, M=7,0 Richter Epicenter, the sea bottom, km away from the coast (between Bar and Ulcinj) Similar to earthquake in Dubrovnik, 1667

Hotel Slavija, Slovenska plaža (Slavic beach) Budva – weak columns Montenegro earthquake, April 1979

The house near the Bojana river in Boka kotorska bay -liquefaction House settled several tens of centimeters. Sand flew inside like water Montenegro earthquake, April 1979

Boka kotorska liquefaction Montenegro earthquake, April 1979