Office of Science Harmonic RF System Technology for Electron Storage Rings Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory John Byrd Workshop on Advanced Low Emittance.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Beam Dynamics in MeRHIC Yue Hao On behalf of MeRHIC/eRHIC working group.
Advertisements

SPEAR3 short pulse development J. Safranek for the SSRL accelerator physics group* Outline: Timing mode fill patterns Short bunches –Low alpha Bunch length.
Linear Collider Bunch Compressors Andy Wolski Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory USPAS Santa Barbara, June 2003.
CornellVideo Talk. Dec page 1 John Byrd Experimental studies of the fast- beam ion instability in the ALS- The Sequel John Byrd Lawrence Berkeley.
S. N. “ Cavities for Super B-Factory” 1 of 38 Sasha Novokhatski SLAC, Stanford University Accelerator Session April 20, 2005 Low R/Q Cavities for Super.
1 BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES NSLS-II ASAC-2007, April. 23, 2007 Injection System with a Booster in Separate Tunnel T. Shaftan for the NSLS-II team.
Design and Performance Expectation of ALPHA accelerator S.Y. Lee, IU 2/26/ Introduction 2. Possible CIS re-build and parameters 3. Issues in the.
Longitudinal motion: The basic synchrotron equations. What is Transition ? RF systems. Motion of low & high energy particles. Acceleration. What are Adiabatic.
Longitudinal instabilities: Single bunch longitudinal instabilities Multi bunch longitudinal instabilities Different modes Bunch lengthening Rende Steerenberg.
Beam-beam studies for Super KEKB K. Ohmi & M Tawada (KEK) Super B factories workshop in Hawaii Apr
RF Stability Working Group Jorn Jacob (ESRF), John Byrd (LBNL) General Issues RF phase and amplitude noise –filtered by cavity and translate into timing.
DESIGN OF A 7-CELLS, HOM DAMPED, SUPERCONDUCTING CAVITY FOR THE STRONG RF FOCUSING EXPERIMENT AT DANE David Alesini, Caterina Biscari, Roberto Boni, Alessandro.
ALPHA Storage Ring Indiana University Xiaoying Pang.
Giuseppe Penco - Valencia 5-6 May Introduction 2  The main challenge of the third generation Synchrotron Light Sources is the increase of the.
A U.S. Department of Energy Office of Science Laboratory Operated by The University of Chicago Argonne National Laboratory Office of Science U.S. Department.
SRF Results and Requirements Internal MLC Review Matthias Liepe1.
NON-SCALING FFAGs: questions needing answers Andy Wolski The Cockcroft Institute, and the University of Liverpool Department of Physics. BASROC-CONFORM.
Beam Instability Workshop, ESRF, 13th - 15th March 2000J. Jacob / 1 Harmonic Cavities:the Pros & Cons Jörn Jacob.
Impedance and Collective Effects in BAPS Na Wang Institute of High Energy Physics USR workshop, Huairou, China, Oct. 30, 2012.
Drive Beam Linac Stability Issues Avni AKSOY Ankara University.
Preliminary design of SPPC RF system Jianping DAI 2015/09/11 The CEPC-SppC Study Group Meeting, Sept. 11~12, IHEP.
Theoretical studies of IBS in the SPS F. Antoniou, H. Bartosik, T. Bohl, Y.Papaphilippou MSWG – LIU meeting, 1/10/2013.
History and motivation for a high harmonic RF system in LHC E. Shaposhnikova With input from T. Argyropoulos, J.E. Muller and all participants.
1Matthias LiepeAugust 2, 2007 LLRF for the ERL Matthias Liepe.
704MHz Warm RF Cavity for LEReC Binping Xiao Collider-Accelerator Department, BNL July 8, 2015 LEReC Warm Cavity Review Meeting  July 8, 2015.
Simulation of Beam Instabilities in SPring-8 T. Nakamura JASRI / SPring-8
RF systems for NSLS-II J. Rose, A. Blednykh, P. Mortazavi and Nathan Towne BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES.
RF system issues due to pulsed beam in ILC DR October 20, Belomestnykh, RF for pulsed beam ILC DR, IWLC2010 S. Belomestnykh Cornell University.
Double RF system at IUCF Shaoheng Wang 06/15/04. Contents 1.Introduction of Double RF System 2.Phase modulation  Single cavity case  Double cavity case.
1 Simulations of fast-ion instability in ILC damping ring 12 April ECLOUD 07 workshop Eun-San Kim (KNU) Kazuhito Ohmi (KEK)
SRF Requirements and Challenges for ERL-Based Light Sources Ali Nassiri Advanced Photon Source Argonne National Laboratory 2 nd Argonne – Fermilab Collaboration.
Overview of Booster PIP II upgrades and plans C.Y. Tan for Proton Source group PIP II Collaboration Meeting 03 June 2014.
Damping Ring Parameters and Interface to Sources S. Guiducci BTR, LNF 7 July 2011.
Review 09/2010 page RF System for Electron Collider Ring Haipeng Wang for the team of R. Rimmer and F. Marhauser, SRF Institute and Y. Zhang, G. Krafft.
The SPS as a Damping Ring Test Facility for CLIC March 6 th, 2013 Yannis PAPAPHILIPPOU CERN CLIC Collaboration Working meeting.
THE DA  NE 3 RD HARMONIC CAVITY A. Gallo, with D. Alesini, R. Boni, S. Guiducci, F.Marcellini, M. Migliorati, L. Palumbo, M. Zobov.
Emittances Normalised r.m.s. Emittances at Damping Ring Extraction Horizontal Emittance (  m) Vertical Emittance (  m)
Beam Dynamics and Instabilities in MEIC Collider Rings Byung C Yunn Jefferson Lab Newport News, Virginia, USA.
Eric Prebys, FNAL.  We consider motion of particles either through a linear structure or in a circular ring USPAS, Hampton, VA, Jan , 2015 Longitudinal.
1 Consequences of RF system failures during LHC beam commissioning T.Linnecar AB-RF.
Electron cloud study for ILC damping ring at KEKB and CESR K. Ohmi (KEK) ILC damping ring workshop KEK, Dec , 2007.
Pushing the space charge limit in the CERN LHC injectors H. Bartosik for the CERN space charge team with contributions from S. Gilardoni, A. Huschauer,
Parameter scan for the CLIC damping rings July 23rd, 2008 Y. Papaphilippou Thanks to H. Braun, M. Korostelev and D. Schulte.
ELENA RF Manipulations S. Hancock. Apart from debunching before and rebunching after cooling, the principal role of the rf is to decelerate the beam and.
KoPAS 2015, IBS, Daejeon July Collective Instabilities (Part 1) John Byrd Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory John Byrd Lawrence Berkeley.
Jørgen S. Nielsen Center for Storage Ring Facilities (ISA) Aarhus University Denmark ESLS XXIII (24-25/ ), ASTRID2 facility 1.
Alexei Fedotov, December 7, Beam parameters and collective effects for pEDM ring (December 7, 2009)
Harmonic system for LHC
Bocheng Jiang SSRF AP group
Design Fabrication and Processing Group H. Padamsee
Longitudinal beam parameters and stability
John Byrd Center for Beam Physics
Cavity-beam interaction and Longitudinal beam dynamics for CEPC DR&APDR 宫殿君
The Strong RF Focusing:
The SPS 800 MHz RF system E. Shaposhnikova for BE/RF
Overview Multi Bunch Beam Dynamics at XFEL
Summary of the ALERT Workshop
CEPC Injector Damping Ring
Compensation of transient RF voltage using a kicker cavity
PETRA IV System design concept Old and new machine
Physics Design on Injector I
Harmonic RF systems for ESRF-EBS - Preliminary considerations -
Passive harmonic cavities for bunch shortening
CEPC Ring RF System Jiyuan Zhai (IHEP) Workshop on the Circular Electron Positron Collider Rome, May 25, 2018.
Harmonic Cavities:the Pros & Cons Jörn Jacob
Kicker and RF systems for Damping Rings
Parameters Changed in New MEIC Design
RF Parameters for New 2.2 km MEIC Design
Evaluation of 1GHz vs 2GHz RF frequency in the damping rings
JLEIC electron ring with damping wigglers
Presentation transcript:

Office of Science Harmonic RF System Technology for Electron Storage Rings Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory John Byrd Workshop on Advanced Low Emittance Rings Technology 17 May

Office of Science Acknowledgements Stefano De Santis Matthias Georgsson (Ph.D. thesis) Jorn Jacob Vincent Serriere (Ph.D. thesis) Giuseppe Penco Michele Svandrlik ALS Physics Group ALERT 6 May

Office of Science Motivation for Harmonic RF Old: emittance is small enough that beam density gives lifetime dominated by large-angle intrabeam (Touschek) scattering. Most low-energy 3GLS have implemented or considered 3HCs. New: Modern lattice designs reduce horizontal emittance by ~2 orders of magnitude, bunch charge densities are high enough that the equilibrium 3-d emittance increases from small-angle intrabeam scattering. How to address this problem with the RF system? – High RF frequency with many small bunches? – Low RF frequency with few large long bunches? – Multiple RF systems with variable length bunches? ALERT 6 May 20143

Office of Science Physics of harmonic RF systems Typical storage ring RF systems typically provide beam power and enough longitudinal focussing to give desired bunch length. By adding harmonic voltage(s), we can shape the bunch longitudinally, useful for a variety of applications. ALERT 6 May Focusing is cancelled at the bunch center For large overvoltage, k opt ~1/n and optimum phase is close to 90 deg.

Office of Science Harmonic RF systems (cont.) The bunch shape can be calculated from the resulting distortion of the potential well. In the bunch lengthening case, the single particle motion is highly nonlinear and a large tune spread is introduced. potential and bunch distribution for optimal lengthening. bunch distribution potential ALERT 6 May RF bucket height slightly lower

Office of Science Harmonic RF systems (cont.) ALERT 6 May Bunch lengthening effects very sensitive to phase of HC when focusing is gone. Example for ALS2 ±5 deg phase offset

Office of Science Harmonic RF systems (cont.) ALERT 6 May Flattening of potential well induces large synchrotron frequency spread, providing large Landau damping.  Q s ~0.3 Tune spread ranges from 0.01 (no HC) to 0.3 at optimal bunch lengthening. This should be strong enough to damp all HOM driven instabilities.

Office of Science Landau Damping Theory Much work done in 1980’s. Example Krinsky and Wang, Particle Accelerators 17 (1985). ALERT 6 May Landau damping rate is approximately half of (angular) frequency spread.

Office of Science Bunch shortening using HCs The harmonic voltage can be phased to add the focussing of the main RF. Since the focussing is reactive, a passive (i.e. idling) cavity can be used to generate the voltage. Very economical method for reaching short bunches. Increased focusing gives higher SB and MB instability threshold. ALERT 6 May 20149

Office of Science Overstretching Increasing the harmonic voltage past a flat potential well creates multiple fixed points in the RF bucket. ALERT 6 May Interesting? Yes. Useful? Better lifetime increase. What is the effect on transverse head-tail instabilities? Penco and Svandrlik PRSTAB 9, (2006)

Office of Science Passive Cavity Operation Because the harmonic voltage is almost completely reactive (90 deg out of phase with beam), we can use the beam to drive the harmonic cavity. ALERT 6 May  For a fixed cavity Q, it is possible to achieve the optimum lengthening for one current. The optimum harmonic voltage and phase are given by ~1/n ~0 (90 deg) For high Q cavity, the beam induced voltage is given by

Office of Science Passive Cavity with Variable Current If the beam current varies with time (sans topoff), the bunch lengthening varies with current. ALERT 6 May To find optimum tuning position, plot lifetime improvement vs. resonant frequency for several beam currents for a fixed beam-induced voltage. Byrd and Georgsson, PRSTAB 4, (2001).

Office of Science Passive bunch shape vs current ALERT 6 May

Office of Science Transients beam loading effects The unequal filling of the ring (i.e. gaps) create a transient loading of the main and harmonic RF systems, causing bunches to be at different RF phases (i.e. different arrival times.) I time t0 time  For the main RF only, this effect is small (few degrees). With the HCs, the effect is much larger. This affects both the lifetime improvement and operation of the multibunch feedback systems. t0 ALERT 6 May

Office of Science Observation of Large Phase Transients Unequal fill or gap of 20-25% (users’ demand) aggravates this problem. 272/328 bunch pattern320/328 bunch pattern 2 cavities in Landau mode 3 parked at ±1.5*f0 3 cavities in Landau mode 2 parked at ±2.5*f0 This result was NOT expected and not reported in prior literature. We began an investigation to understand the effect. 20 deg

Office of Science Cavity mode as parallel LRC resonator Cavity excited well below bandwidth looks like inductor with R/Q=  r L The transient effect can be roughly described as the transient effect in an inductor. See pubs for detailed analysis. ALERT 6 May

Office of Science Transient Measurements for SC HC ST/SLS SuperHC (2 cell cavity R/Q=88 Ohm) ALERT 6 May Penco and Svandrlik PRSTAB 9, (2006)

Office of Science Main and Harmonic Cavity Options First, consider 3 different main RF frequencies: 100, 352, 500 MHz. – Well developed RF power amplifiers exist for all 3 frequencies. SS PA are better developed at lower frequencies. – Bunch length ~f -1/2. Short bunches are harder to achieve at lower frequency. – For equal beam current, bunch charge is ~f -1 and peak current ~f -1/2. Therefore IBS effects are worse at lower frequency. Second, consider both passive and active systems at 3 rd, 4 th, and 5 th harmonics. Cavity can be either NCRF or SCRF. ALERT 6 May

Office of Science Passive or Active HC? ALERT 6 May 2014 ActivePassive NCRF Requires input coupler Requires RF source and controller Can reach optimum BL at any current Multiple cavities Lower cost Only “optimum” bunch lengthening at most at a single high current (maybe nowhere) Higher total R/Q for transients Multiple cavities SCRF Requires SC infrastructure Requires input coupler Requires RF source and controller Can reach optimum BL at any current Lower R/Q for transients One or two cells Requires SC infrastructure Never reaches optimum BL (always 90 deg phase) Lower R/Q for transients One or two cells

Office of Science HC design considerations Total voltage of V rf /n. Usually between MV. Number of cells determined by and R/Q/cell and voltage/cell limit Wide tuning range – In operation at least 0.5*f rev – Parking: at least 2*f rev Damping or control of HOMs ALERT 6 May NCRF R/Q~80 Ohm limited by large beam pipe Two tuners (TM010 and TM110) Gradient/voltage limited by surface power density. Harder at higher frequency. SCRF R/Q~40 Ohm/cell Strong HOM damping One tuner Voltage easily reached with 1 or 2 cell design.

Office of Science NCRF Harmonic cavity examples ALERT 6 May Bessy-II ALS

Office of Science SCRF Harmonic Cavity Examples NSLS-II (Courtesy Jim Rose) ALERT 6 May  -mode Decrease R/Q by increasing iris radii Decrease wakefield loss in ferrite by increasing beampipe (ferrite) radii  /2 E-fields

Office of Science SCRF Harmonic Cavity Examples Elettra/SLS Super 3HC (Courtesy Michele Svandrlik) ALERT 6 May

Office of Science SCRF Harmonic Cavity Examples BESSY-II (not yet installed?) ALERT 6 May

Office of Science APSU Active SC HC Study The APSU is an upgrade of the APS. The are considering an active SCRF harmonic cavity. – Energy loss per turn ≈ 2.6 MeV, main RF voltage = 4.5 MV. – Harmonic voltage for optimum potential-well flattening is 0.9 MV with 79 degree detuning angle at the 4th harmonic RF (1408 MHz). – With this harmonic voltage, 4-fold beam lifetime improvement is expected. – To operate at 79  detuning angle, fundamental-mode couplers are necessary. Active-mode operation is chosen for the range of beam currents from 50 mA to 200 mA. ALERT 6 May Courtesy Sanghoon Kim, Mike Kelly, and Peter Ostroumov

Office of Science SC Harmonic Cavity in Active Mode SC single cell cavity – Modified from the ILC-shape single cell cavity: larger beam tube to extract HOMs from the cavity. – Rather low gradient in SC cavity: E peak ≈ 17 MV/m, B peak ≈ 35 mT. Active-mode operation with various beam currents – For the optimum harmonic voltage and suppression of the Robinson instability, frequency tuning, adjustable RF coupler, and external RF power are required. – Two 20 kW RF couplers and 10 kW RF source will be required. S. Kim, M.P. Kelly, S.V. Kutsaev, P.N. Ostroumov, ANL Physics Division

Office of Science Current study for ALSU ALSU is an initiative towards an ultralow (50 pm) upgrade of the ALS and incorporates several “new” features: on-axis injection, beam swap-out. 10 nsec risetime assumed. ALSU requires bunch lengthening to avoid emittance blowup from IBS. We are performing a study to characterize HC requirements and beam dynamics effects for ALSU. We welcome collaborators in this process. ALERT 6 May

Office of Science ALSU RF Options ALSU is considering two RF options ALERT 6 May MHz NC Main RF/1500 MHz SC passive HC Well understood system. Requires bunch trains with 10 nsec gaps. Transient effects? Requires addition of SC RF infrastructure. Allows bunch shortening mode. 100 MHz Main RF/500 MHz NC active HC Uses half of existing 500 MHz active system as harmonic. Requires addition of new 100 MHz RF system (ala MAXIV) Unclear if compatible with existing beam instrumentation (BPMs, etc) Bunch spacing 10 nsec compatible with kicker risetime. No gaps needed. Longer bunches better for vacuum system and instabilities. Reversion to 500 MHz possible for short bunch mode.

Office of Science Summary Harmonic cavities are a useful tool for controlling bunch shapes in light sources. Considered to be essential for lower energy MBA lattices to counteract IBS emittance growth. The reduction of longitudinal focusing makes the bunch shape very sensitive to variations in the harmonic cavity phase. – Hybrid filling modes will be tricky if harmonic cavities are required. Symmetric filling patterns are best. – Scale of transient effects is proportional to R/Q of harmonic cavity. Harmonic cavities provide huge increase in longitudinal Landau damping. All rings see damping of LCBI in uniform fill patterns (negligible transient effects.) Unclear how much damping of HOMs is required if Landau damping is always present. Harmonic cavity technology well-developed. New developments in active 1.5 GHz RF. ALERT 6 May