Page 1 An lepton energy-recovery-linac scalable to TeV Vladimir N. Litvinenko Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY, USA Brookhaven National Laboratory,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Beam Dynamics in MeRHIC Yue Hao On behalf of MeRHIC/eRHIC working group.
Advertisements

Study of the Luminosity of LHeC, a Lepton Proton Collider in the LHC Tunnel CERN June F. Willeke, DESY.
Design Considerations LHC hadron beams: E p =7 TeV E A =E e  Z/A Luminosity O (10 33 ) cm -2 s -1 with Beam Power 100 MW (wall plug) Integrated e ± p.
Cooling Accelerator Beams Eduard Pozdeyev Collider-Accelerator Department.
1 LHeC Considerations for a Lepton Hadron Collider Option for the LHC F. Willeke, BNL The 4th Electron Ion Collider Workshop Hampton University,
LHeC : Linac-Ring Option Hans-H. Braun / CERN  General consideration  Proton ring issues  70 GeV  140 GeV  Polarisation and Positrons  Comparison.
A View from NSF The Early Years of CESR David Berley University of Maryland May 31, 2008 Two Aspects of Cornell’s Success in the International Arena of.
The Large Hadron electron Collider (LHeC) at the LHC F. Zimmermann, F. Bordry, H.-H. Braun, O.S. Brüning, H. Burkhardt, A. Eide, A. de Roeck, R. Garoby,
ERHIC design status V.Ptitsyn for the eRHIC design team.
Luminosity Prospects of LHeC, a Lepton Proton Collider in the LHC Tunnel DESY Colloquium May F. Willeke, DESY.
Beam Dynamics Tutorial, L. Rivkin, EPFL & PSI, Prague, September 2014 Synchrotron radiation in LHC: spectrum and dynamics The Large Hadron Collider (LHC)
V.N. Litvinenko, ElC Collaboration Meeting, Hampton University, May, 2008 Staging of eRHIC Increased Reach in c.m. Energy and Luminosity Vladimir.
MeRHIC Design V.Ptitsyn on behalf of MeRHIC Design team: M. Bai, J. Beebe-Wang, I. Ben-Zvi, M. Blaskiewicz, A. Burrill, R. Calaga, X. Chang, A. Fedotov,
Electron and Ion Spin Dynamics in eRHIC V. Ptitsyn Workshop on Polarized Sources, Targets and Polarimetry Charlottesville, VA, 2013.
Thomas Roser RHIC Open Planning Meeting December 3-4, 2003 RHIC II machine plans Electron cooling at RHIC Luminosity upgrade parameters.
LEP3 RF System: gradient and power considerations Andy Butterworth BE/RF Thanks to R. Calaga, E. Ciapala.
PST05 Workshop, Nov 14-17, 2005 M. Farkhondeh 1 Polarized Electron Sources for Future Electron Ion Colliders M. Farkhondeh, Bill Franklin and E. Tsentalovich.
The LHC: an Accelerated Overview Jonathan Walsh May 2, 2006.
Peter Paul 12/16/06e-A Collider concept1 Brief History of the e-A Collider Concept Peter Paul BNL/SBU.
Highly HOM-damped cavities S. Belomestnykh Brookhaven National Laboratory and Stony Brook University March Washington, DC FCC Week 2015.
18 th International Spin Physics Symposium Polarized Beams at EIC V. Ptitsyn.
Thomas Roser EIC collaboration workshop MIT, April 6, 2007 eRHIC Design eRHIC Schemes R&D Items Cost and Schedule.
1 Energy recovery linacs Sverker Werin MAX-lab 8 July 2003.
Workshop on High Average Power & High Brightness Beams UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, November 8 – 10, 2004 D. Kayran, I. Ben-Zvi, D.S. Barton, D. Beavis, M. Blaskiewicz,
1 Options for low energy spin manipulation Ken Moffeit, SLAC 2009 Linear Collider Workshop of the Americas 29 September to 3 October 2009 K. Moffeit, D.
CASA Collider Design Review Retreat HERA The Only Lepton-Hadron Collider Ever Been Built Worldwide Yuhong Zhang February 24, 2010.
880.P20 Winter 2006 Richard Kass 1 The Large Hadron Collider LHC is located at CERN CERN is located near Geneva Part of CERN is in France The LHC collides.
Accelerator Group for LHeC LHeC Meeting at CERN; October Questions raised by Max  does the e-ring fit into the tunnel?  can one bypass ATLAS and.
2015 LHeC Coordination Group meeting 2 nd October 2015 Oliver Brüning, CERN1 ERL Demonstrator for LHeC: Critical issues -Choice of multi-turn ERL configuration.
ERHIC Conceptual Design V.Ptitsyn, J.Beebe-Wang, I.Ben-Zvi, A.Fedotov, W.Fischer, Y.Hao, V.N. Litvinenko, C.Montag, E.Pozdeyev, T.Roser, D.Trbojevic.
Summary of the Accelerator Working Group 1st ECFA LHeC Workshop; 1-3 September 2008, Divonne 1 First discussions started at CERN at the end of last year.
ERHIC design status V.Ptitsyn for the eRHIC design team.
Operated by JSA for the U.S. Department of Energy Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility 1 Alex Bogacz EIC14 Workshop, Jefferson Lab, March 20,
Review 09/2010 page RF System for Electron Collider Ring Haipeng Wang for the team of R. Rimmer and F. Marhauser, SRF Institute and Y. Zhang, G. Krafft.
Thomas Roser EIC AC meeting November 3-4, 2009 EIC Accelerator R&D Strategy and Programs Thomas Roser/Andrew Hutton BNL / Jefferson Lab R&D program is.
Polarization in ELIC Yaroslav Derbenev Center for Advanced Study of Accelerators Jefferson Laboratory EIC Collaboiration Meeting, January 10-12, 2010 Stony.
Starting cost discussion Vladimir N. Litvinenko Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, NY, USA Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY, USA Center for.
1 V. N. Litvinenko, 1st ECFA-CERN LHeC Workshop, Divonne-les-Bains, France, September 2, Vladimir N. Litvinenko Collider-Accelerator Department,
F. Willeke, Snowmass Luminosity Limitations of e-p Colliders Extrapolation from HERA Experience Examples for IR Layout LINAC-Ring Limitations HERA.
Page 1 A route to LHeC with luminosity Linac-ring design, including stability Vladimir N. Litvinenko Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY, USA.
Future Circular Collider Study Kickoff Meeting CERN ERL TEST FACILITY STAGES AND OPTICS 12–15 February 2014, University of Geneva Alessandra Valloni.
P OSSIBILITIES FOR MAINTAINING AA AND PP CAPABILITIES IN PARALLEL WITH E RHIC V. Ptitsyn Collider-Accelerator Department BNL RHIC and AGS Users Meeting,
T. Atkinson*, A. Matveenko, A. Bondarenko, Y. Petenev Helmholtz-Zentrum Berlin für Materialien und Energie The Femto-Science Factory: A Multi-turn ERL.
Introduction of Accelerators for Circular Colliders 高亮度 TAU-CHARM 工厂 & 先进光源, 2014/09.
J. Osborne LHeC Linac Design Issues Frank Zimmermann 10 December 2010.
WG2: Beam Dynamics, Optics and Instrumentation – Summary
eRHIC Design and R&D From RHIC to eRHIC
Beam-beam effects in eRHIC and MeRHIC
Perspective on future challenges for very high energy hadron colliders
R&D Topics for FOA Funding Proposals
Measurements, ideas, curiosities
Beam-beam R&D for eRHIC Linac-Ring Option
An lepton energy-recovery-linac scalable to TeV Vladimir N
Synchrotron Ring Schematic
CEPC-SppC Accelerator CDR Copmpletion at the end of 2017
CASA Collider Design Review Retreat Other Electron-Ion Colliders: eRHIC, ENC & LHeC Yuhong Zhang February 24, 2010.
Overview of SRF system of Ring and Linac (1)
Other issues and concepts under study Conclusions References
Some CEPC SRF considerations
Oliver Brüning Vladimir N Litvinenko
A Superconducting Proton/Electron Linac
Why is the CBETA Important for the Electron Ion Colliders?
Explanation of the Basic Principles and Goals
AC Power for a Super-B Factory
Power Consideration of CEPC
CEPC SRF Parameters (100 km Main Ring)
Comments to the Report of the Community Review of EIC Accelerator R&D for the Office of Nuclear Physics, February 13, 2017 (60 pages) By Haipeng Wang,
Jiquan Guo, Haipeng Wang
MEIC Alternative Design Part V
ELIC: An Electron – Light Ion Collider based at CEBAF
Presentation transcript:

Page 1 An lepton energy-recovery-linac scalable to TeV Vladimir N. Litvinenko Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY, USA Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, NY, USA Center for Accelerator Science and Education V.N. Litvinenko, FCC Week, WDC, March 24, 2015 I present a conceptual design of Linear Energy Recovery Linac operating electron or positrons beams with energies scalable to TeV. Normally energy recovery is associated with bending the lepton beam, which results in prohibitively large energy loss for synchrotron radiation. In my scheme these losses are circumvented.

Page 2 Content Energy limitations by recirculating ERLs – Power of SR – Standard “Head-on” linear energy recovery… HOMs, multiple beam-beam effects Two scalable schemes – Energy transfer by a single p-beam – Energy transfer by multiple e-beams is also possible but more cumbersome V.N. Litvinenko, FCC Week, WDC, March 24, 2015

Page 3 Why CW linac? Synchrotron radiation limits top e+e- energies even in FCC: in relevant units it is Using linac-ring collider removes one of beam- beam limits and can provide for much higher luminosity Preserves polarization during acceleration CW e-beam is needed – for colliding hadron beam stability – for for luminosity and avoiding pile-up in detectors V.N. Litvinenko, FCC Week, WDC, March 24, 2015

Page 4 Why Linear ERL? It is simple – 100 GW level of SR power for 1 mA beam Or GW level of TeV ionizing radiation at the beam dump ERL with recirculating arcs has SR power even larger than storage ring of the same size – hence V.N. Litvinenko, FCC Week, WDC, March 24, 2015 ~ W/A for 1 TeV e-ebeam and R=8.85 km (C~80 km)

Page 5 IP Recirculating ERL with N passes V.N. Litvinenko, FCC Week, WDC, March 24, 2015

Page 6 Linear ERL nearly 100% Energy recovery -> 2 linacs What to do with the energy? Accelerating De-accelerating No power-imposed limitations either on the energy or beam current. V.N. Litvinenko, FCC Week, WDC, March 24, 2015

Page 7 What to do with the energy? Feed it back? Accelerating De-accelerating e-beam current is ~ 1 A Energy of e-beam is ~ 100 GeV Power to transfer ~ 100 GW Best RF coupler does 1 MW -> 2 x 100,000 couplers, 100,000 high precision waveguides…. – simply out of this world. Especially for SRF cavities with Q~10 10 & micro-phonics! Waveguides? V.N. Litvinenko, FCC Week, WDC, March 24, 2015

Page 8 From CTF Landau & Lifshitz On linac axis it is energy independent “Off-axis” it is energy independent V.N. Litvinenko, FCC Week, WDC, March 24, 2015

Page 9 Why not an “Head-on” ERL? as originally proposed by M. Tigner “Head-on” works naturally for low rep-rate or pulsed schemes – otherwise beams collide head-on thousands of time through the entire length of the accelerator and are destroyed… Or requires transverse displacement, which excites transverse HOMs and generate time-dependent transverse fields -> SR+ emittnce degradation V.N. Litvinenko, FCC Week, WDC, March 24, 2015 M. Tigner Il Nuovo Cimento Series 10 1 Giugno 1965, Volume 37, Issue 3, p. 1228

Page % Energy recovery Period between = 2*(Linac+train) Question – what is maximum transient loading? Adding a beam in opposite direction to carry the power V.N. Litvinenko, FCC Week, WDC, March 24, 2015

Page % Energy recovery Period between = 2*(Linac+train) V.N. Litvinenko, FCC Week, WDC, March 24, 2015

Page % Energy recovery Period between = 2*(Linac+train) Question – what is maximum transient loading? V.N. Litvinenko, FCC Week, WDC, March 24, 2015

Page % Energy recovery Period between = 2*(Linac+train) V.N. Litvinenko, FCC Week, WDC, March 24, 2015

Page % Energy recovery Period between = 2*(Linac+train) V.N. Litvinenko, 2 nd LHeC Workshop, Divonne, September 1-3, 2009

Page 15 Natural option of high energy high current ERL: proton beam is used to carry the energy Polarized sourceDump Energy flux is carried out by a proton beam Synchrotron radiation is reduced ~10 13 fold to watt level 100% energy recovery Lepton beam acceleration Proton beam return loop Proton beam deceleration Proton beam acceleration Lepton beam deceleration V.N. Litvinenko, FCC Week, WDC, March 24, 2015

Page 16 Conclusions If TeV-range lepton beam is needed for ep collider – it can be build using linear energy recovery linac Energy recovery is accomplished by a proton beam Synchrotron radiation in reduced ~10 13 fold Cost of the TeV-scale linac is a non-trivial consideration V.N. Litvinenko, FCC Week, WDC, March 24, 2015

Page 17 Back up

Page 18 Nearly 100% energy recovery LHeC II - E e = … GeV N=6-15 Polarized sourceDump V.N. Litvinenko, 2 nd LHeC Workshop, Divonne, September 1-3, 2009 N x 10 GeV section accelerator N x 10 GeV section decelerator Source Dump Energy flux is carried out by 10 GeV beams Synchrotron radiation a determined by energy of the returning beams. Losses grow linearly with the energy of the HE beam

Page 19 HOMs used for BBU simmulation 19 Comparison of BNL1 and BNL3 dipole HOM’s BNL1 BNL3