David Hume (1711-1776) An Inquiry Concerning Human Understanding Revised, 11/21/03.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
How do we know what exists?
Advertisements

Frontiers of Western Philosophy Empiricism
PHIL 101 DAY 3 Epistemology Day 2 Maymester 2007.
© Michael Lacewing A priori knowledge Michael Lacewing
Today’s Outline Hume’s Problem of Induction Two Kinds of Skepticism
HUME AND EMPIRICISM  David Hume – Scottish philosopher – Epistemological approach set out in two key works:  A Treatise of Human Nature.
Charting the Terrain of Knowledge-1
© Michael Lacewing Hume’s scepticism Michael Lacewing
EmpiricismEmpiricism. Concept Empiricism All concepts from experience; none innate Hume: “... all our ideas are nothing but copies of our impressions,
David Hume Ideas and Thinking Low force and vivacity Conception, volition, memory, imagination, etc. Impressions Feeling High force and.
RATIONALISM AND EMPIRICISM: KNOWLEDGE EMPIRICISM Epistemology.
Hume on Taste Hume's account of judgments of taste parallels his discussion of judgments or moral right and wrong.  Both accounts use the internal/external.
What is the issue? SubjectObject IdeaEvent MindWorld Experiencer Experienced Inner Outer MeIt SubjectObject IdeaEvent MindWorld Experiencer Experienced.
David Hume ( )  Fame as a philosopher (for Treatise and Enquiry) followed fame as an historian (for A History of Britain)
Knowledge empiricism Michael Lacewing
Empiricism: David Hume ( ) Our knowledge of the world is based on sense impressions. Such “matters of fact” are based on experience (i.e., a posteriori.
Rationalism: Knowledge Is Acquired through Reason, not the Senses We know only that of which we are certain. Sense experience cannot guarantee certainty,
HUME 1 BEHOLD THE RADICAL EMPIRICIST. David Hume Historian Economist Psychologist Philosopher.
© Michael Lacewing Plato and Hume on Human Understanding Michael Lacewing
CHAPTER FIVE: THE SOURCES OF KNOWLEDGE P H I L O S O P H Y A Text with Readings ELEVENTH EDITION M A N U E L V E L A S Q U E Z.
More categories for our mental maps  How we understand knowledge has repercussions for how we understand our place in the world.  How we understand.
Epistemology Revision
© Michael Lacewing Reason and experience Michael Lacewing
Benchmark 40 I can find the missing side of a right triangle using the Pythagorean Theorem.
Section 11.6 Pythagorean Theorem. Pythagorean Theorem: In any right triangle, the square of the length of the hypotenuse equals the sum of the squares.
The Pythagorean Theorem. The Parts of a right triangle a b c l egs hypotenuse a² + b² = c².
David Hume’s Skepticism The nature of ideas and reasoning concerning ‘matters of fact’
Introduction to Philosophy Lecture 5 The Ontological Argument By David Kelsey.
Hume’s Epistemology Melchert, Norman. “Unmasking the Pretensions of Reason” The Great Conversation: A Historical Introduction to Philosophy. Second edition.
 If I were to ask you to define the words “white and cold” what would you say?  If I were to ask you to describe the word “pain” how would you do it?
1 The Empiricists: Hume Theory of Ideas Soazig Le Bihan - University of Montana.
© Michael Lacewing Hume and Kant Michael Lacewing co.uk.
L ECTURE 14: H UME ’ S R ADICAL E MPIRICISM. T ODAY ’ S L ECTURE In Today’s Lecture we will: 1.Recap our investigation into empiricist theories of knowledge.
David Hume Often called a ”radical empiricist.”  Impressions give rise to ideas.  Ideas are “less lively” copies of impressions.  There are no ideas.
An Inquiry Concerning Human Understanding
Introduction to Philosophy Lecture 5 The Ontological Argument By David Kelsey.
Chapter 1: Square Roots and the Pythagorean Theorem Unit Review.
Pythagorean Theorem – Prove It! Converse of Pythagorean Theorem 1.) Is a triangle with side measures of 30, 40, and 50 units a right triangle? Prove it!
The Pythagorean Theorem
M May Pythagoras’ Theorem The square on the hypotenuse equals the sum of the squares on the other two sides.
 Theorem - A general proposition not self-evident but proved by a chain of reasoning.  In math… a theorem is an idea that can be proven true by logical.
Critical Social Theory “[O]ur age is … the age of enlightenment, and to criticism everything must submit” Kant, Critique of Pure Reason.
KANT ON THE SYNTHETIC A PRIORI
1/9/2016 Modern Philosophy PHIL320 1 Kant II Charles Manekin.
L ECTURE 15: C ERTAINTY. T ODAY ’ S L ECTURE In Today’s Lecture we will: 1.Review Hume’s radical empiricism and its consequences 2.Outline and investigate.
Lecture №1 Role of science in modern society. Role of science in modern society.
The Pythagorean Theorem Use the Pythagorean Theorem to find the missing measure in a right triangle including those from contextual situations.
1 John Locke’s Theory of Knowledge ( ). 2 Empiricist All knowledge is derived from experience.
1. 2 David Hume’s Theory of Knowledge ( ) Scottish Empiricist.
The Cosmological Argument Today’s lesson will be successful if: You have revised the ideas surrounding the cosmological argument and the arguments from.
The Search for Knowledge
Hume’s Fork A priori/ A posteriori Empiricism/ Rationalism
Knowledge Empiricism 2.
Hume’s Fork A priori/ A posteriori Empiricism/ Rationalism
Skepticism David Hume’s Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding and John Pollock’s “Brain in a vat” Monday, September 19th.
O.A. so far.. Anselm – from faith, the fool, 2 part argument
7.2 The Pythagorean Theorem and its Converse
Skepticism David Hume’s Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding
Michael Lacewing Hume and Kant Michael Lacewing © Michael Lacewing.
Pythagorean Theorem.
Plato and Hume on Human Understanding
5.7: THE PYTHAGOREAN THEOREM (REVIEW) AND DISTANCE FORMULA
David Hume Trust Your Senses
Pythagorean Theorem a²+ b²=c².
Thinking about knowledge
CONVERSE of the Pythagorean Theorem If a2 + b2 = c2, then the
Pythagoras’ Theorem.
Warm Up:.
The Pythagorean Theorem
Converse to the Pythagorean Theorem
Presentation transcript:

David Hume ( ) An Inquiry Concerning Human Understanding Revised, 11/21/03

Anthem1 Anthem2

1. Sensation & the Origin of Ideas The contents of the mind: (1) ideas & (2) impressions (sensations & feelings) -- Ideas (concepts, beliefs, memories, mental images, etc.) are faint & unclear; impressions are strong & vivid. Ideas are derived from impressions: All ideas are copies of impressions. The meaning of ideas depends on impressions

The empirical criterion of meaning "From what impression is that alleged idea derived?" No impression, no meaning? No impression, no foundation in reality?

The Nature & Limits of Human Knowledge

Two kinds of ideas (or judgments) "Hume's Fork" "All the objects of human reason or inquiry may naturally be divided into two kinds: relations of ideas and matters of fact".

Ideas Judgments concerning relations of ideas Judgments concerning matters of fact ("Hume's Fork")

Judgments concerning relations of ideas  Intuitively or demonstrably certain  Discoverable by thought alone [a priori]  Cannot be denied without contradiction *Hume's examples: Pythagorean Theorem or 3 x 5 = 30  2

On a right triangle, the square of the hypotenuse is equal to the sum of the squares of the other two sides The Pythagorean Theorem 5' 4' 3' (hypotenuse) = 5 2 ( = 25)

Judgments concerning matters of fact  "Every judgment concerning matters of fact can be denied without contradiction" (e.g., "the sun will not rise tomorrow").  Neither intuitively nor demonstrably certain  Not discoverable by thought alone [a priori], but rather on the basis of sense experience [a posteriori] More specifically,

All judgments concerning matters of fact are based on.... the more fundamental] belief that there is "a tie or connection" between cause & effect.

And why do we believe that there is a "tie or connection" between cause & effect? Answer: The belief arises entirely from experience [a posteriori, not a priori], namely, the experience of finding that two events (cause & effect) are "constantly conjoined" with each other.

It is not logically necessary that a particular effect follows a particular cause; it is just a fact of experience. This view leads to Hume's discussion of....