IPC Revision in Practice EPO8 February 2010. MCD revision life-cycle 3-6 months before entry into force Load Revision Concordance List (RCL) and Valid.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Antonios Farassopoulos Head of International Classifications and WIPO Standards Service Global IP Infrastructure Department Combined CPC/FI Introduction.
Advertisements

IPC REFORM Objectives and principal Features Antonios Farassopoulos World Intellectual Property Organization IPC Forum 2006 Geneva.
Revision Policy and Procedure of the reformed IPC Limitations and Perspectives Antonios Farassopoulos - WIPO February 2008.
Title slide European Patent Office The Master Classification Database Jürgen Rampelmann IPC Forum, Geneva 13 February 2006.
The IP5 view on the future of classification IPC Committee of Experts March 2009.
14. Report on the progress of the WIPO IPCRECLASS project IPC Committee of Experts 44 Geneva March 2, 2012 Patrick Fiévet Heat of IT Operations and Support.
IPCRECLASS training Reclassification in the IPC Geneva February 26, 2013 Patrick Fiévet Head of IT Systems Section.
IPC Reform Implementation at the Irish Patents Office.
3.1 Data and Information –The rapid development of technology exposes us to a lot of facts and figures every day. –Some of these facts are not very meaningful.
PATENT SEARCH Patent Awareness Seminar, Mumbai Andreya Fernandes Gopakumar Nair Associates Url:
IPC Working Group 29 - Updates on IT support for the IPC Geneva 14 May, 2013 Patrick Fiévet Head of IT Systems Section.
AIPLA 2012 Annual Meeting Washington 25 October 2012 Worksharing, utilisation and the CPC Niclas Morey Director, International Organisations, Trilateral.
The IPC development plan for the next five years IPC Workshop February 2013 Geneva Antonios Farassopoulos Director, International Classifications and Standards.
Report on IPC-related IT systems IPC Committee of Experts 46 Geneva February 26, 2014 Patrick Fiévet Head of IT Systems Section.
Implementation of the reformed IPC: Slovenia Janez Kukec Mezek Head of Information and Promotion Department Slovenian Intellectual Property Office.
IPC Working Group 30 - Updates on IT support for the IPC Geneva November 6, 2013 Patrick Fiévet Head of IT Systems Section.
SaM Solutions © Confidential IPC Revision Management System Functional Scope & Current Status.
Report on IPC-related IT systems 47th session of the IPC Committee of Experts Geneva April 16, 2015 Patrick Fiévet Head of IT Systems Section.
Plans to Accelerate Revision and Publication Procedure of the IPC IPC Workshop February 2013 Geneva Ning XU IPC Section - WIPO.
IPC Working Group 27- Update on IT support for the IPC Geneva June 7, 2012 Patrick Fievet Head of IT Operations and Support Section.
Third IPC Workshop- Common publication viewer of the IPC, CPC and FI Geneva February 25-26, 2013 Patrick Fiévet Head of IT Systems Section.
Legal Status Data Legal status project and relating developments in CWS Patentscope Users Forum June 18, 2013 Angel López Solanas.
Mail Merge. - A feature supported by many word processors that enables you to generate form letters. - You use mail merge when you want to create a set.
A Centralized Service for Reclassification? Anders Bruun, Swedish Patent & Registration Office IPC Workshop February 4th, 2008.
IPC Reform- Database Implementation Brian Barrington PCT Information Services World Intellectual Property Organization.
P.Fiévet May, 30, WIPO implementation status report- IPC support systems Status report by the International Bureau IPC Reform implementation Geneva,
IPC Working Group 34 - Updates on IT support to the IPC Geneva November 6, 2015 Patrick Fiévet Head of IT Systems Section.
MCD Status Report Trevor Watson4 February Feb 2008 MCD Status Report Some facts and figures about the main MCD processes : loading of new documents.
Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) Pierre Held, EPO & John Salotto, USPTO 14th February 2011 IPC Committee of Experts.
ViciForm – Form Processing Solution Creating Info repositories from documents.
Koichi Matsushita International Patent Classification Section Global Infrastructure Sector Common publication platform for the IPC, CPC and FI February.
IPC reform 2006: WIPO Products and Services for the new IPC Special seminar for patent information vendors World Intellectual Property Organization WIPO.
Introducing EPO PATSTAT EPO Worldwide Patent Statistical Database James Rollinson.
IPC reform 2006: WIPO Products and Services for the new IPC Special seminar for patent information vendors World Intellectual Property Organization WIPO.
Handover of the working Lists management from the EPO to WIPO IPC Committee of Experts 48 Geneva February 25, 2016 Patrick Fiévet Head of IT Systems Section.
WIPO Fourth IPC WORKSHOP
February 2017 JAPAN PATENT OFFICE
Head, IT Systems Section
IPCRECLASS training Reclassification in the IPC
Head, IT Systems Section
Report on IPC-related IT systems IPC Committee of Experts 46
IPC Revision Management (IPCRM) project IPC Committee of Experts 48
February 2018 JAPAN PATENT OFFICE
Head of IT Systems Section
Head, IT Systems Section
Third IPC Workshop- Common publication viewer of the IPC, CPC and FI
Head of IT Systems Section
9.a Report on IPC-related IT systems IPC Committee of Experts 50
IPC Working Group 29 - Updates on IT support for the IPC
Head, IT Systems Section
Current Conflicts and Complications
Head, IT Systems Section
Head of IT Systems Section
PUBLICATION OF IPC NEW FEATURES IN IPC-2009
IPC Working Group 31 - Updates on IT support for the IPC
Overview of Electronic Lifecycle of USPTO Reclassification Projects
Report on IPC-related IT systems IPC Revision Working Group 39
IPC Workshop IPC reclassification workflow and monitoring
International Classifications and Standards Division
Report on IPC-related IT systems IPC Committee of Experts 49
Report on IPC-related IT systems IPC Revision Working Group 40
International Classifications and Standards Division
Head, IT Systems Section
Heat of IT Operations and Support Section
Report on IPC-related IT systems IPC Revision Working Group 38
International Classifications and Standards Division
February 2019 JAPAN PATENT OFFICE
International Classifications and Standards Division
International Classifications and Standards Division
Head of IT Systems Section
Presentation transcript:

IPC Revision in Practice EPO8 February 2010

MCD revision life-cycle 3-6 months before entry into force Load Revision Concordance List (RCL) and Valid Symbols File (VSF) (received from WIPO) Create & distribute working lists to offices according to agreed algorithm for work-sharing Just prior to entry into force Store results from Offices (with auto deactivation) Automatic reclassification of one-to-one correspondences After entry into force Store any further results received Distribute residual working lists as required

Size of working lists so far (number of families)

General findings Revisions prior to 2009 IPC completeness in MCD ~ 80-95% Bigger revisions of 2009 and 2010 figure can be significantly less Systematic approach needed –for complete elimination of residual lists –i.e. ensure reclassification of all documents

Aspects of completeness Various causes for incompleteness: new documents arrive in MCD between creation of working lists and entry into force some offices (e.g. EPO) base reclassification on their own schemes –a different view of scope stored number formats can differ –documents can be missed family composition in MCD may differ from that in other offices –i.e. different interpretation of priority incorrect data stored in MCD

EPO approach Planned EPO method 2 years after a revision enters into force (ensure complete processing of the EPO working lists) select all documents from the WL not yet reclassified send to examiners for classification in ECLA when complete, generate new IPC symbols from ECLA (for all documents in the WL) de-activate all remaining IPC symbols to be revised

Proposed QCTF approach Proposal by the MCD Quality Control Task Force: (part of project QC002) After initial reclassification period –working lists "opened up" for all offices –offices can also reclassify families not in their own working lists after a fixed period –"automatic" reclassification of remaining documents –e.g. assign higher-level symbol

Possible solutions for the future real-time reclassification –move away from exchange of data in batches (xml files) time-consuming inhibits flow of information –Enable reclassification of individual families in real-time more dynamic involvement to greater completeness over a period of time WIKI ? –allow wider access to MCD data in some kind of WIKI environment may increase number of people actively reclassifying helps to fill gaps

IPC Revision in Practice Thank you for your attention