Doc.: IEEE 802.15-11-0627-00-004k Submission September 2011 Project: IEEE P802.15 Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
DCN k Submission Jan 2011 Sourav Dey, On-Ramp WirelessSlide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks.
Advertisements

DCN k Submission Jan 2011 Sourav Dey, On-Ramp WirelessSlide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks.
Submission doc.: IEEE g July Howard and Myers, On-Ramp WirelessSlide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal.
Doc.: IEEE b Submission March 2005 Francois Chin, Institute for Infocomm Research (I 2 R) Slide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group.
Doc.: IEEE a TG4a September 20, 2005 L. Reggiani, G.M. Maggio and P. RouzetSlide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal.
k Submission, Slide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [Preliminary Proposal.
Submission L. Li, Vinno;Slide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: Tamed Spread Spectrum.
Doc.: IEEE /270 Submission July 2003 Liang Li, Helicomm Inc.Slide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs)
Doc.: IEEE /514r0 Submission September 2004 Slide 1 Hiroyo Ogawa, NICT Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks.
Doc.: IEEE g Submission September 2009 Tim Schmidl, Texas Instruments Inc.Slide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal.
Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANS) Submission Title: [TG3a Performance Considerations in UWB Multi-Band] Date.
Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [ k Link Budget Considerations] Date.
Doc.: IEEE r1 Submission May 2008 Tuncer Baykas,NICTSlide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs)
Doc.: IEEE /235r0 Submission May 2001 Philips SemiconductorsSlide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs)
Doc.: IEEE xxx a Submission November 2004 Welborn, FreescaleSlide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks.
Doc.: IEEE Submission January 2016 Ed Callaway, ARM, Inc.Slide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs)
Doc.: IEEE a TG4a July 18th 2005 P.Orlik, A. Molisch, Z. SahinogluSlide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area.
1 May 2009 Doc: IEEE g Submission Scott Weikel, Elster Electricty Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks.
Doc.: IEEE g Submission March 2009 Michael SchmidtSlide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks.
Submission doc.: IEEE g June 1, 2009 Howard et al, On-Ramp WirelessSlide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal.
Doc.: IEEE k Submission September 2011 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission.
Doc.: IEEE Submission, Slide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [Preliminary PHY.
Doc.: IEEE g Submission 6 July, 2009 Partha Murali, Redpine Signals Inc.Slide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless.
Doc.: IEEE g Submission December 2009 Tim Schmidl, Texas Instruments Inc.Slide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal.
Doc.: IEEE a Submission May 2005 Francois Chin (I 2 R) Slide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks.
Doc.: IEEE /210r0 Submission May, 2003 C. Razzell, PhilipsSlide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs)
Doc.: IEEE k Submission July 2011 Ted Myers, David A. Howard, Sourav DeySlide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal.
Doc.: IEEE j Submission May 2011 Kiran Bynam, Samsung Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs)
Doc.: IEEE g Submission March 2009 Michael SchmidtSlide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks.
Doc.: IEEE −11−0361−00−004j TG4j Submission May 2011 Liang Li (Vinno)Slide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks.
Doc.: IEEE COEX-02/004r0 Submission 23 January, 2001 James P. K. Gilb, Appairent Technologies Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal.
Doc.: IEEE b Submission Jan 2005 Francois Chin, Institute for Infocomm Research (I 2 R) Slide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group.
Doc.: IEEE /449r0 Submission November 2001 Ed Callaway, Motorola Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs)
July 2009 Slide 1 Michael McLaughlin, DecaWave IEEE f Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs)
Doc.: IEEE /081r0 Submission February 2004 McCorkle, MotorolaSlide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs)
Doc.: IEEE /136r0 Submission March 2001 Ed Callaway, MotorolaSlide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs)
March 2001 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [PHY proposal for the Low Rate Standard]
March t Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [A Simple System Kept Simple]
Submission Title: [TG4a General Framework]
August 2018 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [ w w Fraunhofer IIS proposal.
Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [Preliminary Proposal for FHSS PHY for k]
September 2011 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: A Reed-Solomon Erasure Correction Based.
doc.: IEEE <doc#>
November 18 March 2009 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: Multi-Rate PHY Proposal for the.
doc.: IEEE <doc#>
March, 2001 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: PHY Proposal for the Low Rate Standard.
<month year> doc.: IEEE /244r0 May 2001
doc.: IEEE <doc#>
doc.: IEEE <doc#>
Submission Title: [Compatible DSSS g Network Communications Proposal]
September 2011 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: A Reed-Solomon Erasure Correction Based.
Submission Title: [Harmonizing-TG3a-PHY-Proposals-for-CSM]
March, 2001 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: PHY Proposal for the Low Rate Standard.
doc.: IEEE <doc#>
September 2011 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: A Reed-Solomon Erasure Correction Based.
Submission Title: [Narrow Band PHY Proposal for g]
Submission Title: Bluetooth and b Physical Layer Coexistence
March t Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [A Simple System Kept Simple]
May, 2001 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: PHY Proposal for the Low Rate Standard.
doc.: IEEE <doc#>
Source: [Yafei Tian, Chenyang Yang, Liang Li ]
March, 2003 doc.: IEEE /127r0 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [Alternate PHY.
November 2018 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [ w Fraunhofer IIS proposal performance.
Date Submitted: [March, 2007 ]
doc.: IEEE <doc#>
March t Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [A Simple System Kept Simple]
doc.: IEEE <doc#>
Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [LECIM Coexistence Considerations] Date Submitted:
9-July-2007 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [DecaWave Proposal for TG3c Alternative PHY]
doc.: IEEE <doc#>
Presentation transcript:

doc.: IEEE k Submission September 2011 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: LECIM High Gain DSSS PHY Date Submitted: September 19, 2011 Source: [Sourav Dey, David Howard, Ted Myers] Company [On-Ramp Wireless, Inc.] Address [10920 Via Frontera, Suite 200, San Diego, CA 92127, USA] Voice:[+1(858) ], FAX: [+1(858) ], Re: [LECIM Call For Proposals, DCN: ] Abstract:[Response to LECIM Call For Proposals, DCN: ] Purpose:[High Gain DSSS PHY Proposal] Notice:This document has been prepared to assist the IEEE P It is offered as a basis for discussion and is not binding on the contributing individual(s) or organization(s). The material in this document is subject to change in form and content after further study. The contributor(s) reserve(s) the right to add, amend or withdraw material contained herein. Release:The contributor acknowledges and accepts that this contribution becomes the property of IEEE and may be made publicly available by P

doc.: IEEE k Submission September 2011 Sourav Dey, David A. Howard, Ted MyersSlide 2 LECIM High Gain DSSS PHY Proposal 9/19/2011

doc.: IEEE k Submission PHY Overview Bands –2.4 GHz ISM Band –900 MHZ ISM Band Channels –1 MHz Occupied Bandwidth –2 MHz Channel Spacing September 2011 Sourav Dey, David A. Howard, Ted MyersSlide 3

doc.: IEEE k Submission Reference Modulator Cyclic Redundancy Check Convolutional Code Interleaver Differential BPSK Preamble Variable Spreading Factor DSSS September 2011 Sourav Dey, David A. Howard, Ted MyersSlide 4

doc.: IEEE k Submission Cyclic Redundancy Check CRC-32 –Generator Polynomial: x^32 + x^26 + x^23 + x^22 + x^16 + x^12 + x^11 + x^10 + x^8 + x^7 + x^5 + x^4 + x^2 + x^1 +1 –Industry standard CRC, same as in , , Ethernet, etc. –Strong error detection so very few false packets sent to MAC layer September 2011 Sourav Dey, David A. Howard, Ted MyersSlide 5

doc.: IEEE k Submission Convolutional Code September 2011 Sourav Dey, David A. Howard, Ted MyersSlide 6 Rate ½ Convolutional Code –Octal Generators: (133,171), Constraint Length = 7, Free Distance = 10 –Industry standard code same as in and –Optional tail-biting implementation possible Tail-biting initialization preserves code rate Could be important for small LECIM packets sizes –Boosts receiver sensitivity relative to un-coded D-BPSK –Simple Viterbi/MAP algorithm based decoder

doc.: IEEE k Submission Rate ½ (133,171) Convolutional Code September 2011 Sourav Dey, David A. Howard, Ted MyersSlide 7 Zero-Termination – Terminate input with all zeros –Send 1 extra byte to terminate the codeword  reduces rate Tail-Biting –Initialize shift registers with 7 bits from end of input packet –Don’t need to send extra byte to terminate the codeword

doc.: IEEE k Submission Interleaver Interleaving –Design of interleaver will depend upon supported PPDU size N –Propose a simple Pruned Bit-Reversal Block Interleaver No pruning necessary for codeword sizes that are powers of two Can prune for codeword sizes that are not powers of two –Makes reception robust to bursty interference and channel events September 2011 Sourav Dey, David A. Howard, Ted MyersSlide 8

doc.: IEEE k Submission Pruned Bit-Reversal Interleaver Power of 2 CodewordNon Power of 2 Codeword September 2011 Sourav Dey, David A. Howard, Ted MyersSlide 9

doc.: IEEE k Submission Differential BPSK Binary Phase Shift Keying (BPSK) –Higher order modulation, like QAM and QPSK, undoes processing gain by requiring much higher SNR Differential modulation –Allows the option of building a simple non-coherent receiver with a 3dB loss of receiver sensitivity relative to coherent BPSK September 2011 Sourav Dey, David A. Howard, Ted MyersSlide 10

doc.: IEEE k Submission BER Curves for Coded BPSK and DBPSK September 2011 Sourav Dey, David A. Howard, Ted MyersSlide 11

doc.: IEEE k Submission Preamble Preamble is fixed proportion of PHY packet –Composed of 16 symbols per PPDU –Need to design a symbol sequence with good auto-correlation properties Uses of the Preamble –Timing recovery –Frequency recovery –Channel estimation September 2011 Sourav Dey, David A. Howard, Ted MyersSlide 12

doc.: IEEE k Submission Preamble Design Brute force search over all 16 symbol BPSK sequences for one with minimum RMS side-lobes (in its autocorrelation function) x = [ ] September 2011 Sourav Dey, David A. Howard, Ted MyersSlide 13 Auto-correlation

doc.: IEEE k Submission Direct Sequence Spreading Gold Codes for PN sequences –Large family of parameterizable spreading codes –Good periodic cross-correlation and off-peak auto-correlation properties –Used for cell separation in WCDMA Can use different Gold Codes to separate –Different Networks  Network Coexistence –Different Collectors  Multiple Collectors on Network –Different Endpoints  Multiple Endpoints on Collector September 2011 Sourav Dey, David A. Howard, Ted MyersSlide 14

doc.: IEEE k Submission Gold Codes Derived as the binary addition (XOR) of two “preferred” m-sequences m = Length of LSFR n = 2 m -1 = Length of Gold Sequence n+2 = Total Gold Sequences = {a,b,a*b, a*Tb, a*T 2 b, …} Can parameterize by the initial state of the lower LFSR = T k b September 2011 Sourav Dey, David A. Howard, Ted MyersSlide 15

doc.: IEEE k Submission Gold Codes Generators: –p1(x) = x 25 + x –p2(x) = x 25 + x 24 + x 23 + x m = 25, n = 33,554,431, n+2 = 33,554,433 t(m) = 8193, t(m)/R(0) = September 2011 Sourav Dey, David A. Howard, Ted MyersSlide 16

doc.: IEEE k Submission More DSSS Benefits Multipath Mitigation –RAKE receiver with MRC is known to do a good job for DSSS –Advanced receivers can use more sophisticated techniques Coherence Time Mitigation –As long as symbols on the order of coherence time can get time diversity across a PHY packet Interference Mitigation –DSSS provides robust co-channel and adjacent channel rejection to all sorts of interference, wideband, narrowband, pulsed September 2011 Sourav Dey, David A. Howard, Ted MyersSlide 17

doc.: IEEE k Submission Variable Spreading Factors September 2011 Sourav Dey, David A. Howard, Ted MyersSlide 18 Chips per Coding Symbol Processing Gain (dB) Required Carrier-to- Noise (dB) Receiver kTb (dBm) Data Rate bits/sec(KB/day) bps bps ms bps bps bps bps bps bps bps bps bps160 Reference receiver characteristics: Post De-spread SNR = 3 dB, 5 dB Noise Figure

doc.: IEEE k Submission Variable Spreading Factor Benefits Link Asymmetry –LECIM links can have asymmetric interference and transmit power between collector and endpoint –Can use spreading factor selection to balance the link budget between uplink and downlink Varied loss between endpoints –Spreading factor selection can adapt so endpoints use minimum necessary spreading factor Changing Link Conditions –Spreading factors (and transmit power) can adapt dynamically as channel and interference conditions change Battery Life –Adaptive spreading factor selection minimizes the Tx time September 2011 Sourav Dey, David A. Howard, Ted MyersSlide 19

doc.: IEEE k Submission Fragmentation 20 Sourav Dey, David A. Howard, Ted Myers High Gain DSSS PHY Fragmentation “Lower” MAC e “Upper” MAC Proposed in k Already standardized MAC PHY September 2011

doc.: IEEE k Submission Fragmentation Benefits Any low data rate PHY, like this one, would be helped by shorter PPDU than current e MAC –Better for coexistence –Better for interference robustness –Better for channel variation tracking –Better for battery life/power consumption Propose PPDU size of 16 bytes-20 bytes –PHY as presented is currently is agnostic to size of PPDU September 2011 Sourav Dey, David A. Howard, Ted MyersSlide 21

doc.: IEEE k Submission Conclusion Low Throughput Extremely Low Receiver Sensitivity High Link Budget September 2011 Sourav Dey, David A. Howard, Ted MyersSlide 22