L Johnetta Blakely, SR Patel, PF Thall,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Prevention of Contrast-Induced Nephropathy (CIN) Sepehr Khashaei, MD Assistant professor Department of Internal Medicine.
Advertisements

A Comparison of Early Versus Late Initiation of Renal Replacement Therapy in Critically III Patients with Acute Kidney Injury: A Systematic Review and.
Horng H Chen MD on behalf of the NHLBI Heart Failure Clinical Research Network Renal Optimization Strategies Evaluation in Acute Heart Failure (ROSE AHF):
Diuretic Strategies in Patients with Acute Decompensated Heart Failure Diuretic Optimization Strategies Evaluation (DOSE) trial.
Nallasamy K, Jayashree M, Singhi S, Bansal A
CM A pooled safety & efficacy analysis examining the effect of performance status on outcomes in 9 first line treatment trials of 6,286 patients.
SABCS 2011 Metastatic Breast Cancer Shiuh-Wen Luoh MD PhD Clinical Associate Professor Comprehensive Breast Cancer Clinic Hematology and Medical Oncology.
Introduction Discussion CT abdomen 3/3/06 lightheadedness and watery diarrhea. TSH was again less than 0.01, and ACTH less than 5. AST and ALT were 240.
Controversies in Adjuvant Therapy for Pancreatic Cancer Parag Sanghvi M.D. Tasha McDonald M.D. Department of Radiation Medicine OHSU.
Herceptin® (trastuzumab) in combination with chemotherapy: pivotal metastatic breast cancer survival data 1.
Targeting Tumors Using Endogenous Albumin
Linear Regression and Correlation Explanatory and Response Variables are Numeric Relationship between the mean of the response variable and the level of.
Presented by Martin H. Cohen, M.D. at the 27 July 2004 meeting of the Oncologic Drugs Advisory Committee.
Copyright restrictions may apply A Randomized Trial of Nebulized 3% Hypertonic Saline With Epinephrine in the Treatment of Acute Bronchiolitis in the Emergency.
PET after Chemotherapy in Rhabdomyosarcoma Connective Tissue Oncology Society November 19, 2005 Michelle L. Klem, Leonard H. Wexler, Ravinder Grewal, Heiko.
Phase III Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Double-Blind Study of Intravenous Calcium/Magnesium to Prevent Oxaliplatin- Induced Sensory Neurotoxicity, N08CB.
Blood Pressure Lability During Cardiac Surgery Is Associated With Adverse Outcomes Solomon Aronson, Edwin G. Avery, Cornelius Dyke, Joseph Varon, Jerrold.
Sarah Struthers, MD March 19, 2015
Prevention of Pegfilgrastim-induced Bone Pain (PIP): A URCC CCOP Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Trial of 510 Cancer Patients Jeffrey J. Kirshner,
A Phase II Trial of Perifosine in Patients with Chemo-Insensitive Sarcomas Study Update – November 2008 Dejka Araujo, MD MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston,
Power of science implemented in life quality Improvement of the effectiveness of radiation therapy with radiomodification by Polyplatillen and Fluoropyrimidine.
Changes in Renal Function in Patients Treated with Tenofovir DF (TDF) Compared to Nucleoside Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors (NRTIs) Joel E. Gallant,
Results of Docetaxel Plus Oxaliplatin (DOCOX) +/- Cetuximab in Patients with Metastatic Gastric and/or Gastroesophageal Junction Adenocarcinoma: Results.
Targeting VEGF for the Treatment of Colorectal Cancer Herbert Hurwitz Duke University Medical Center Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Predicting toxicity for patients with advanced Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors (GIST) treated with imatinib mesylate : an EORTC/ISG/AGITG randomized trial.
1 1 Using Marginal Structural Model to Estimate and Adjust for Causal Effect of Post- discontinuation Chemotherapy on Survival in Cancer Trials Y. Wang,
NSABP C08 adjuvant colon cancer Best of ASCO, Beirut, July 2009 Prof Eric Van Cutsem, MD, PhD Digestive Oncology Leuven, Belgium.
Case Report and Lit Review: Reduction of Proteinuria in Diabetic Nephropathy with Spironolactone Harry W. Floyd, M.D. Family Medicine Kingstree, South.
Phase III trial of chemotherapy with or without irinotecan in the front-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer in elderly patients. FFCD
CE-1 IRESSA ® Clinical Efficacy Ronald B. Natale, MD Director Cedars Sinai Comprehensive Cancer Center Ronald B. Natale, MD Director Cedars Sinai Comprehensive.
Phase I/II Trial of Docetaxel plus Oxaliplatin and 5-Fluorouracil (D-FOX) in Patients with Untreated, Advanced Gastric or Gastroesophageal Cancer Jaffer.
EARLY PROGRESSION IN PATIENTS WITH HIGH-RISK SOFT TISSUE SARCOMAS AN ANALYSIS FROM A PHASE III RANDOMIZED PROSPECTIVE TRIAL (EORTC 62961/ESHO) OF NEOADJUVANT.
A Novel Score to Estimate the Risk of Pneumonia After Cardiac Surgery
# 3564 Neurotoxicity with FULV versus FLOX in patients with stage II and III carcinoma of the colon: Results of NSABP Protocol C-07 S Land 1,2, J Kopec.
Table 1. Prediction model for maximum daily dose of buprenorphine-naloxone in a 12-week treatment condition Baseline Predictors Maximum Daily Dose Standardized.
E2100 A Randomized Phase III Trial of Paclitaxel versus Paclitaxel plus Bevacizumab as First- Line Therapy for Locally Recurrent or Metastatic Breast Cancer.
Acknowledgements This report differs from the submitted abstract due to further subdivision of patients into analytic and non- analytic, and focus on the.
OCEANS: A Randomized, Double- Blinded, Placebo-Controlled Phase III Trial of Chemotherapy with or without Bevacizumab (BEV) in Patients with Platinum-
Inotuzumab Ozogamicin (IO; CMC544), a CD22 Monoclonal Antibody Attached to Calicheamycin, Produces Complete Response (CR) plus Complete Marrow Response.
C-1 Pegfilgrastim (Neulasta  ) Oncologic Drugs Advisory Committee Pediatric Subcommittee October 20, 2005 Amgen Inc.
1 CONFIDENTIAL – DO NOT DISTRIBUTE ARIES mCRC: Effectiveness and Safety of 1st- and 2nd-line Bevacizumab Treatment in Elderly Patients Mark Kozloff, MD.
Cooperative Clinical Trials with 13-Cis-Retinoic Acid in Neuroblastoma Katherine K. Matthay, M.D University of California, San Francisco Children’s Oncology.
Low Dose Decitabine Versus Best Supportive Care in Elderly Patients with Intermediate or High Risk MDS Not Eligible for Intensive Chemotherapy: Final Results.
EORTC OSN/CTOS11 Safety of Caelyx combined with ifosfamide in previously untreated adult patients with advanced or metastatic soft tissue sarcomas. Final.
1 A Randomized, Multi-Center Phase III Trial of Irinotecan in Combination with Three Different Methods of Administration of Fluoropyrimidine with Celecoxib.
1 Presented by Martin Cohen, M.D. at the Pediatric Oncology Subcommittee of the Oncologic Drugs Advisory Committee.
Chemoimmunotherapy with Fludarabine (F), Cyclophosphamide (C), and Rituximab (R) (FCR) versus Bendamustine and Rituximab (BR) in Previously Untreated and.
Phase II Trial of R-CHOP plus Bortezomib Induction Therapy Followed by Bortezomib Maintenance for Previously Untreated Mantle Cell Lymphoma: SWOG 0601.
R-CHOP with Iodine-131 Tositumomab Consolidation for Advanced Stage Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma (DLBCL): Southwest Oncology Group Protocol S0433 Friedberg.
Journal Club Dr. Eyad Al-Saeed Radiation Oncology 12 January, 2008.
The University of Texas - MD Anderson Cancer Center
Erlotinib plus Gemcitabine Compared with Gemcitabine Alone in Patients with Advanced Pancreatic Cancer: A Phase III Trial of the National Cancer Institute.
Results of a Phase 2, Multicenter, Single-Arm Study of Eribulin Mesylate as First-Line Therapy for Locally Recurrent or Metastatic HER2-Negative Breast.
ANCO 2006 ASH UPDATE MDS Joseph M. Tuscano, M.D. UC Davis Cancer Center.
Daunorubicin VS Mitoxantrone VS Idarubicin As Induction and Consolidation Chemotherapy for Adults with Acute Myeloid Leukemia : The EORTC and GIMEMA Groups.
Single-agent nab-Paclitaxel Given Weekly (3/4) as First-line Therapy for Metastatic Breast Cancer (An International Oncology Network Study, #I )
Randomized phase III trial of gemcitabine and cisplatin vs. gemcitabine alone inpatients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer and a performance status.
Summary Author: Dr. C. Tom Kouroukis, MD MSc FRCPC
NCI/CTEP 7435: Eribulin Active, Tolerable in Urothelial Cancer CCO Independent Conference Highlights of the 2015 ASCO Annual Meeting* May 29 - June 2,
Vahdat L et al. Proc SABCS 2012;Abstract P
Presented By Luca Malorni at 2017 ASCO Annual Meeting
OPTIMIZING TREATMENT FOR ADVANCED OVARIAN CANCER:
Goede V et al. Proc ASH 2014;Abstract 3327.
Dose-finding designs incorporating toxicity data from multiple treatment cycles and continuous efficacy outcome Sumithra J. Mandrekar Mayo Clinic Invited.
Reviewer: Dr. Sunil Verma Date posted: December 12th, 2011
Vitolo U et al. Proc ASH 2011;Abstract 777.
First efficacy and safety results from XELOX-1/NO16966, a randomised 2x2 factorial phase III trial of XELOX vs FOLFOX4 + bevacizumab or placebo in first-line.
LBA-4 A Randomized Phase III Study of Ibrutinib (PCI-32765)-Based Therapy Vs. Standard Fludarabine, Cyclophosphamide, and Rituximab (FCR) Chemoimmunotherapy.
LV5FU2-cisplatin followed by gemcitabine or the reverse sequence in metastatic pancreatic cancer: Preliminary results of a randomized phase III trial (FFCD.
Adjuvant chemotherapy after potentially curative resection of metastases from colorectal cancer. A meta-analysis of two randomized trials E Mitry, A Fields,
Presentation transcript:

Dopamine May Decrease Nephrotoxicity in Patients Receiving High-Dose Ifosfamide L Johnetta Blakely, SR Patel, PF Thall, X Wang, TA Simmons, JL Beach, TL Armen, LL Chen, MA Burgess, JC Trent, and RS Benjamin UT MD Anderson Cancer Center Houston, United States

Background Ifosfamide is one of the most commonly used and most effective chemotherapeutic agents for sarcoma Complications with high-dose ifosfamide: Renal Toxicity Neurotoxicity Neutropenia / Fever

Background Dopamine Low doses have been shown to increase blood flow and GFR Some evidence suggests a renal protective effect in cancer patients receiving immunotherapy

Giving Dopamine with Ifosfamide: Rationale and Possible Benefits Decrease in “subclinical” nephrotoxicity Decrease in clinical nephrotoxicity Decrease in other adverse side effects Decrease in length of hospital stay Increase in the initial dose and possibly subsequent doses of ifosfamide Increase in cure rate and expected survival

Methods Randomized phase III study in progress, with 34/36 patients enrolled 2 patients were excluded from this analysis due to abnormal baseline renal function The full data, including creatinine level over 3 courses of therapy, on 29 patients currently are available. These data were used for this statistical analysis

Methods: Chemotherapy Ifosfamide 2000 mg/m2 in 500 ml NS over 2 hr q 12 h x 7 doses Mesna 400 mg/m2 mixed w. first Ifosfamide dose Simultaneously, start mesna 2400 mg/m2 in 2 liters D5W w. 150 mEq/l Sodium Acetate + 20 mEq/l K Acetate over 24 hrs daily x 4 days via pump Dopamine Patients randomized to receive or not receive dopamine 3mcg/kg/min after 4 hours of IV fluids Ifosfamide was given at a dose of 14gm/m2 divided in 7 doses. The loading dose of mesna was given with the 1st dose of ifosfamide. The remainder of mesna was given simultaneously with alkaline fluids.

Methods: Chemotherapy IV Fluids D5W + 150 mEq /l Sodium Acetate + 4 mEq/l MgSO4 + 40 mEq / l K Acetate + 20 mEq / l KCl at 125 ml / hr for 4 hr prior to and continuing with chemotherapy and mesna At completion of MESNA infusion, increase IV fluid rate to 250 ml / hr Daily adjustments to keep patient alkaline and balance electrolytes An additional 3 liters of alkaline IVF is given with the mesna infusion. Once the mesna infusion was complete the alkaline IVF is increased to a total of 6 liters a day. We watch electrolytes closely and make daily adjustments to the IVF to balance electrolytes.

Patient Characteristics 29 patients randomized 13 (45%) received dopamine 16 (55%) received no dopamine Age Median 35 years Range 18 - 62 Sex 10 (34%) females 19 (66%) males

Statistical Methods Daily creatinine level was measured during and immediately after ifosfamide over 3 cycles of therapy, 21 days per cycle A longitudinal mixed effects linear regression model was fit, accounting for : Variation of Creatinine, over time within cycle Patient Age Baseline Creatinine Treatment (Dopamine vs. No Dopamine) Within-Patient Correlation, among the repeated creatinine measurements

Predicted Creatinine Levels Over Cycle 1 for a 30-year-old Patient with Baseline Creatinine Level 0.8 Results 95% confidence intervals given by vertical lines This is an example of the type of plot seen. The bar shows +/- SE at each time point. 3. Fix Age = 30, Cycle =1 and baseline creatinine level = 0.8. The curve shown is for the “No Dopamine” Group. Make point: The line is curvilinear and so is best estimated by a quadratic function of time over each cycle.

Predicted Creatinine Levels for the Dopamine and No Dopamine Groups by Age (30 vs 52 ) and Baseline Creatinine Level (0.8 vs 1.1 ) in Cycle 1 No Dopamine Dopamine This set of curves shows the effect of age and baseline creatinine during cycle 1. The dashed curve is the group without dopamne. The solid curve is the group with dopamine. Note first that in each panel, the no dopamine group has higher creatinine levels. The effect of age, seen by moving from left to right, also increases creatinine levels to a minor degree. The effect of baseline creatinine , seen by moving from the top panel to the bottom panel is much greater than the age effect.

Predicted Creatinine Levels for the Dopamine and No Dopamine Groups by Age (30 vs 52 ) and Baseline Creatinine Level (0.8 vs 1.1 ) in Cycle 2 No Dopamine Dopamine Similar findings are seen on course 2…..

Predicted Creatinine Levels for the Dopamine and No Dopamine Groups by Age (30 vs 52 ) and Baseline Creatinine Level (0.8 vs 1.1 ) in Cycle 3 No Dopamine Dopamine and on course 3. Note that for all courses, all ages, and all baseline creatinine levels, the patients treated with dopamine did better.

Fitted Linear Mixed Model for Creatinine Levels Statistical Results Fitted Linear Mixed Model for Creatinine Levels Variable Coefficient SE P-value Time x Cycle — < 0.0001 Baseline Creatinine 0.788 0.067 Age 0.002 0.001 0.103 Dopamine -0.082 * 0.031 0.014 Creatinine level is obviously a time-dependent variable. There is no significant cumulative toxicity during the 3 cycles. Baseline creatinine is the most highly correlated variable with subsequent creatinine levels, and the effect of age, separate from its correlation with baseline creatinine is not significant. The coefficient measures the the magnitude of the effect. A positive value is correlated with higher creatinine. A negative value with lower creatinine, Note that dopamine gives significant protection (p=0.014), but the magnitude of the dopamine effect is only about 1/10 that of the effect of baseline creatinine. * A negative sign corresponds to a lower creatinine level

Ignoring Baseline Creatinine Accounting for Baseline Creatinine Dopamine No Dopamine No Dopamine Dopamine Ignoring baseline creatinine, the dopamine group is slightly worse than the no-dopamine group, but the curves are statistically indistinguishable. 2.In contrast, correcting for baseline creatinine, the dopamine effect is highly significant. P = 0.715 P = 0.014

Conclusions Dopamine may offer significant protection from ifosfamide nephrotoxicity The relative magnitude of the effect of baseline creatinine on subsequent creatinine levels is approximately 10-fold that of dopamine If we had ignored baseline creatinine in our model, we would have missed the beneficial effects of dopamine