MODULE II: THE INSTRUMENTS OF JUDICIAL COOPERATION IN CRIMINAL MATTERS IN THE CONTEXT OF THE COUNCIL OF EUROPE.- TUTOR: JOSÉ MIGUEL GARCÍA MORENO Red Europea.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
on Transfer of Sentenced Persons
Advertisements

EUROPEAN INITIATIVES IN THE FIELD OF MUTUAL LEGAL ASSISTANCE IN CRIMINAL MATTERS AND MUTUAL RECOGNITION NEW LEGAL MECHANISM FOR CREATING AN AREA OF FREEDOM,
European payment order Regulation (EC) No 1896/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 December 2006 creating a European order for payment.
Proactive Interventions: Incorporating a Children’s Rights Approach
Slide 1/31 © copyright Standard training programme in judicial cooperation in criminal matters within the European Union Version: 3.0 Last updated:
Purpose MLA and extradition (and other forms of international judicial cooperation) with 3rd countries is part of the external policy of the Union Purpose.
Double jeopardy and Mutual Legal Assistance
Slide 1/32 © copyright Standard training programme in judicial cooperation in criminal matters within the European Union Version: 3.0 Last updated:
1 Competences and Responsibilities of States. 2 Competences and Responsibilities of States State sovereignty Sovereignty as a concept of international.
International Conference/ ‘Steps to freedom’ project Riga, December 2011 International Legal Framework on Alternatives to Detention J.E. KAUTZMANN.
The Area of Liberty, Security and Justice. Objectives Free movement for EU citizens Security and safety in a Europe without borders Figth against international.
INTRODUCTION INTO PRIVATE INTERNATIONAL LAW OF THE EUROPEAN UNION Marko Jovanovic, LL.M. MASTER IN EUROPEAN INTEGRATION Private International Law in the.
Marcelo G. KOHEN Autumn Judicial Settlement of Interstate Disputes.
Slide 1/15 © copyright Standard training programme in judicial cooperation in criminal matters within the European Union Version: 3.0 Last updated:
Border crossing and IMO antiterrorist measures Legal aspects.
Right to Non-Refoulement – Protection Against Expulsion By Kris Spartanska.
1 EXTRADITION AND SYSTEMS OF DELIVERIES Juan Carlos da Silva Judge The High Court of Justice, Bilbao Barcelona, June 2005 ©JuanCarlosdaSilva, 2005.
EU: Bilateral Agreements of Member States
Privacy and security: Is Europe going banana? Jean-Marc Van Gyseghem Head of Unit « Liberties in the information society » CRID – University.
EU: Bilateral Agreements of Member States. Formerly concluded international agreements of Member States with third countries Article 351 TFEU The rights.
European payment order Regulation (EC) No 1896/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 December 2006 creating a European order for payment.
Slide 1/30 © copyright Standard training programme in judicial cooperation in criminal matters within the European Union Version: 3.0 Last updated:
6 December 2010 Judicial cooperation in the EU From mutual legal assistance to mutual recognition Adrienne Boerwinkel Senior Legal Adviser Dutch Ministry.
Course: European Criminal Law SS 2009 Hubert Hinterhofer.
International Cooperation in Criminal Matters Extradition and Mutual Legal Assistance in Transnational Investigations.
Migration Law Schengen Information System by Konrad Wilk.
European arrest warrant and equality of treatment of EU citizens: Croatian example Elizabeta Ivičević Karas University of Zagreb, Faculty of Law.
European Enforcement Order for uncontested claims JUDr. Radka Chlebcová.
Tackling IT crime in a global context: the Convention on Cybercrime 3 years after Julio Pérez Gil University of Burgos, Spain.
Course: European Criminal Law SS 2009 Hubert Hinterhofer.
M O D U L O IV M O D U L E IV. THE PRINCIPLE OF MUTUAL RECOGNITION AND ITS IMPLEMENTATION.
Combatting Transnational Organized Crime through EXTRADITION
Discussion “International Cooperation: Service of Documents, Taking of Evidence” – Practical Implementation of Regulations No 1393/2007 and No 1206/2001.
Data Protection Privacy in the Digital Age: the UN General Assembly Resolution Sophie Kwasny, 16 October th International Conference, Mauritius.
Taking of evidence within the European Union Council regulation no 1206/2001 on cooperation between the courts of Member States in the taking of evidence.
MODULE II: THE INSTRUMENTS OF JUDICIAL COOPERATION IN CRIMINAL MATTERS IN THE CONTEXT OF THE COUNCIL OF EUROPE.- TOPIC 4 THE 1959 CONVENTION ON MUTUAL.
Seminar on Migration Legislation Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Guatemala 15 – 16 February 2007.
United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees INTERNATIONAL REFUGEE LAW
20 October 2008Maria Lundberg, NCHR1 JUR 5710 Institutions and Procedures CASE OF SOERING v. THE UNITED KINGDOM (Application no /88) 07 July 1989.
European Arrest Warrant – Actual Challenges
1. common courts military courts administrative courts tribunals The Supreme Court The Supreme Administrative Court The Constitutional Tribunal and The.
Criminal Law Lecture 5 Sources  Criminal Code (CAP 154) – Includes all major offences and criminal responsibility  Criminal Procedure Law (CAP 155)
OTHER COUNCIL OF EUROPE CONVENTIONS INTRODUCTION.
Experience of Slovenia in implementation of European Arrest Warrant
ACCESSION TO COUNTER- TERRORISM CONVENTIONS PORTFOLIO COMMITTEE FOR SAFETY AND SECURITY
Workshop on strengthening international legal cooperation among OSCE Member States to combat transnational organized crime (Vienna, 7-9 April 2008) United.
M O N T E N E G R O Negotiating Team for the Accession of Montenegro to the European Union Working Group for Chapter 31 – Common Foreign, Security and.
HUMAN RIGHTS LAW. Ahmed T. Ghandour.. HUMAN RIGHTS IN EUROPE I.
Caritas of Archdiocese of Prague Migration Centre Joint Staff Training Event Meeting in Prague 23 th – 27 th 2015.
Lost in Translations – An Examination of the Legal & Practical Problems Associated with the Implementation (or Non-Implementation) of Directive 2010/64/EU.
TAIEX SEMINAR JUDICIAL COOPERATION IN CRIMINAL MATTERS: TWENTY YEARS OF SHARING EU EXPERTISE 3 June, 2016 Dr. Anna Fiodorova Working group II EaP session.
Workshop on strengthening international legal cooperation among OSCE Member States to combat transnational organized crime (Vienna, 7-9 April 2008) Extradition.
František Nonnemann Skopje, 9th October 2012 JHA DP aspects related to provision of information about public figures in CZ.
Ethical and legal aspects of organ donation; the Santiago Convention
Privacy in the Digital Age: the UN General Assembly Resolution
International cooperation in criminal matters legal framework and examples from practice - Macedonian experiences Ohrid
Treatment of Foreigners under International Law
Dr. Željko Karas Police College, Zagreb (Croatia)
Recognition and enforcement of foreign judgments and arbitral awards in Russia Roman Zaitsev, PhD, Partner 05/09/2018.
INTRODUCTION INTO PRIVATE INTERNATIONAL LAW OF THE EUROPEAN UNION
INTERNATIONAL LEGAL COOPERATION
Directive 2016/800 on procedural safeguards for children suspected or accused in criminal proceedings Steven Cras Political Administrator, General Secretariat.
Function of the International Court of Justice (ICJ):
Daniel BERNARD Federal Prosecutor of Belgium CICERO FOUNDATION SEMINAR
Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of the Child on a communications procedure (New York, 19 December 2011) The Hague, 4 June 2012 Legal.
Functional immunity (only for official acts)
Eurojust Presentation outline I. What is Eurojust? II. Objectives and competences III. Legal framework IV. Tasks and Powers V. Eurojust in action VI. Role.
European arrest warrant – in theory
Refugees in International Humanitarian Law
PROCURA DELLA REPUBBLICA v. M.
Presentation transcript:

MODULE II: THE INSTRUMENTS OF JUDICIAL COOPERATION IN CRIMINAL MATTERS IN THE CONTEXT OF THE COUNCIL OF EUROPE.- TUTOR: JOSÉ MIGUEL GARCÍA MORENO Red Europea de Formación Judicial (REFJ) European Judicial Training Network (EJTN) Réseau Européen de Formation Judiciaire (REFJ)

EXTRADITION: THE COUNCIL OF EUROPE CONVENTION OF1957 European Convention on Extradition of 13 December 1957  Territorial Scope All Council of Europe countries (except Monaco and San Marino), Israel and the Republic of South Africa.  Protocols First Additional Protocol of 17 October 1975, in force since 20 August Second Additional Protocol of 17 March 1978, in force since 5 June1983.

EXTRADITION: THE COUNCIL OF EUROPE CONVENTION General Rules (I): General obligation to grant extradition of persons sought for an offence or for the carrying out of a sentence or detention order (Article 1). Extradition shall be granted in respect of offences punishable under the laws of the requesting Party and of the requested Party (principle of dual criminality) above a minimum limit set in the Convention: sentence or detention order involving deprivation of liberty for a maximum period, in general, of at least one year, or a sentence or detention order involving deprivation of liberty for at least four months in a specific case (Article 2).

EXTRADITION: THE COUNCIL OF EUROPE CONVENTION General Rules (II):  Extradition is ruled out in relation to: Offences regarded by the requested party as a political offence or as an offence connected with a political offence (Article 3.1). Requests made in order to prosecute or punish a person on account of his race, religion, nationality or political opinions (Article 3.2) Offences under military law which are not offences under ordinary criminal law (Article 4)  The requested state may refuse extradition of its nationals (Article 6), but At the request of the requesting party it will submit the case to its competent authorities in order that proceedings may be taken against a particular national (principle of aut dedere aut judicare).

EXTRADITION: THE COUNCIL OF EUROPE CONVENTION General Rules (III):  Other cases of optional exclusion or refusal of extradition (Articles 7 to 11): When the jurisdiction of the requested state and that of the requesting state coincide. When the person sought has been the object of a final judgment issued by the competent authorities of the requested party (principle of ne bis in idem). When the person claimed has become immune by reason of lapse of time from prosecution or punishment. If the offence for which extradition is requested is punishable by death.

EXTRADITION: THE COUNCIL OF EUROPE CONVENTION General Rules (IV):  Rule of speciality (Article 14): It prevents the extradited person from being proceeded against, sentenced, detained or otherwise restricted in his personal freedom in the requesting state for any offence committed prior to his surrender, other than that for which he was extradited, except in the following cases: - when the party which surrendered him consents - when that person, having had an opportunity to leave the territory of the Party to which he has been surrendered, has not done so within 45 days of his final discharge, or has returned to that territory after leaving it.

EXTRADITION: THE COUNCIL OF EUROPE CONVENTION  General Rules (V):  Re-extradition to a third state (Article 15) The consent of the requested party is necessary when the person is sought in respect of offences committed before his surrender to the requesting state. The consent of the requested party will not be necessary if the surrendered person, having had an opportunity to leave the territory of the Party to which he has been surrendered, has not done so within 45 days of his final discharge, or has returned to that territory after leaving it.

EXTRADITION: THE COUNCIL OF EUROPE CONVENTION General Rules (VI): The request shall be in writing and shall be supported by: conviction and sentence or detention order, statement of the offences for which extradition is requested, copy of the relevant enactments and description of the person claimed (Article 12) Communication via the corresponding Ministries of Justice, without excluding use of diplomatic channels, originally envisaged in Article 12.1 (Article 5 of the Second Additional Protocol to the Convention) The provisional arrest of the person sought may be requested in urgent cases (Article 16) The extradition and provisional arrest procedures are governed solely by the law of the requested state (Article 22)