Space Systems LaboratoryMassachusetts Institute of Technology SPHERES Development of Formation Flight and Docking Algorithms Using the SPHERES Testbed.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Simulating Ground Support Capability for NASAs Reusable Launch Vehicle Program Kathryn E. Caggiano Peter L. Jackson John A. Muckstadt Cornell University.
Advertisements

MBD in real-world system… Self-Configuring Systems Meir Kalech Partially based on slides of Brian Williams.
Autonomous Sensor and Control Platform Rover Tae Lee Josh Reitsema Scott Zhong Mike Chao Mark Winter.
November 2003 KC-135 SPHERES flight test results Mark O. Hilstad, Simon Nolet, Dustin Berkovitz, Alvar Saenz-Otero, Dr. Edmund Kong, and Prof. David W.
WPI CS534 Showcase Jeff Martin. * Computer Software on Deep Space 1 * Used to execute plans/mission objectives * Model based * Constraint based * Fault.
Orbital Operations – 2 Rendezvous & Proximity Operations
ISS Institutional DTN Overview for CCSDS
Laura Jones Swati Mohan 11/21/14. ◦ Different class of ACS hardware and software  Limited mass, power, processing ◦ Different dynamical regime  Testbeds.
Parth Kumar ME5643: Mechatronics UAV ATTITUDE AND HEADING HOLD SYSTEM.
Surrey Space Centre, University of Surrey, Guildford, Surrey, GU2 7XH ESA Wireless Sensor Motes Study George Prassinos, SSC, University of Surrey.
On-Orbit Assembly of Flexible Space Structures with SWARM Jacob Katz, Swati Mohan, and David W. Miler MIT Space Systems Laboratory AIAA
November 21, 2014 Mars Cubesat/Nanosat Workshop Flux-Pinned Interfaces for Martian Applications Laura Jones G&C Systems Engineer, Jet Propulsion Laboratory,
SpaceDrone: Bringing Spacecraft Flight Software Closer to Earth
Experimental CDIO Capstone Course 1 S T U F F a t e l l i t e e s t b e d n t e t h e r e d o r m a t i o n l y i n g f o r.
Controlled Autonomous Proximity Technology with flUx pinning & Reconfiguration Experiments CAPTURE: David Bayard, Laura Jones, and Swati Mohan Jet Propulsion.
The Pursuit for Efficient S/C Design The Stanford Small Sat Challenge: –Learn system engineering processes –Design, build, test, and fly a CubeSat project.
Mobile Distributed 3D Sensing Sandia National Laboratories Intelligent Sensors and Robotics POC: Chris Lewis
Maximizing ISS Utilization for Small Satellite Deployments and External Hardware/Sensor Testing Photo credit: NASA.
National Aeronautics and Space Administration General ICD information for SDRs For consideration for EDS Development Sandra Johnson NASA Glenn.
DISTRIBUTION AMONG INDUSTRIES Space industry Power industry Rail transportation Different industries.
1 Formation Flying Shunsuke Hirayama Tsutomu Hasegawa Aziatun Burhan Masao Shimada Tomo Sugano Rachel Winters Matt Whitten Kyle Tholen Matt Mueller Shelby.
Tielong Zhang On behalf of the CGS Team in the Institute of Geology and Geophysics, Chinese Academy of Science Spacecraft System and Payload China Geomagnetism.
Attitude Determination and Control System (ADCS)
Technology Input Formats and Background Appendix B.
20a - 1 NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center Attitude Control System (ACS) Eric Holmes, Code 591 Joe Garrick, Code 595 Jim Simpson, Code 596 NASA/GSFC August.
Requirements and Operations Team Industry Day Briefing 17 January, 2002.
Space-Based Network Centric Operations Research. Secure Autonomous Integrated Controller for Distributed Sensor Webs Objective Develop architectures and.
Sérgio Ronaldo Barros dos Santos (ITA-Brazil)
1 SpaceX proprietary data constituting “Confidential Information” under applicable agreements. Tim Hughes Vice President & Chief Counsel.
SPHERES ISS Flight Preparation & Hardware Status 08 July 2002 Steve Sell Stephanie Chen
Page No. 1 Kelvin Nichols Payload Operations and Integration Center EO50 Delay Tolerant Networking (DTN) Implementation on the International Space Station.
.1 RESEARCH & TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT CENTER SYSTEM AND INFORMATION SCIENCES JHU/MIT Proprietary Titan MESSENGER Autonomy Experiment.
Space Engineering 2 © Dr. X Wu, Space Engineering 2 Lecture 1.
Guidance and Navigation
Space Exploration Technologies Corporation Spacex.com Space Exploration Technologies Corporation Spacex.com.
SPHERES MIT Space Systems Laboratory Cambridge, MA 2006-Aug-08 Synchronized Position Hold, Engage, Reorient, Experimental Satellites.
16.412J/6.835 Intelligent Embedded Systems Prof. Brian Williams Rm Rm NE Prof. Brian Williams Rm Rm NE43-838
SPHERES MIT Space Systems Laboratory Cambridge, MA 2006-Aug-08 Synchronized Position Hold, Engage, Reorient, Experimental Satellites.
SPHERES 0-G Autonomous Rendezvous and Docking Testbed Presented To DARPA Orbital Express December 2000 MIT Space Systems Laboratory David W. Miller (617)
Page 1 Remote Interaction With Machines Principal Investigator: Vincenzo Liberatore Task Number: NAG Case Western Reserve University September 18,
USNA-203 Space Communications International Educational Network … Classroom Experience Navy SERB: 28 Aug 2002 Lt Col Billy R. Smith, Jr., USAF USNA Small.
Space Systems LaboratoryMassachusetts Institute of Technology SPHERES Design Principles for the Development of Space Technology Maturation Laboratories.
SPHERES Reconfigurable Control Allocation for Autonomous Assembly Swati Mohan, David W. Miller MIT Space Systems Laboratory AIAA Guidance, Navigation,
Space Exploration Technologies Corporation Spacex.com Space Exploration Technologies Corporation Spacex.com.
Flight Testing Small Satellites Through High Altitude Ballooning Presented by Zach Henney 18 April 2015.
Intelligent Distributed Spacecraft Infrastructure Earth Science Vision Session IGARSS 2002 Toronto, CA June 25, Needs for an Intelligent Distributed.
ST5 PDR June 19-20, Section 4.0 Future Status James A. Slavin Project Scientist 5 Space Technology “Tomorrow’s Technology Today” GSFC.
Communication, Navigation, and Networking reConfigurable Testbed (CoNNeCT): An International Space Station National Lab Ann P. Over Project Manager NASA.
NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter Ground System Requirements.
Human Exploration of Mars Design Reference Architecture 5
Melak Zebenay > EPOS- A Robotics-Based Hardware in-the-Loop Simulator for Simulating Satellite RvD Operations >Aug 30, 2010 Slide 1 Control Strategy of.
The Space in Aerospace and Ocean Engineering Courses HokieSat Labs Vomit Comet New Projects Chris Hall, Randolph 224D
Space Systems Laboratory Massachusetts Institute of Technology AUTONOMY MIT Graduate Student Open House March 24, 2000.
Space Systems LaboratoryMassachusetts Institute of Technology SPHERES Alvar Saenz-Otero Synchronized Position Hold Engage Reorient Experimental Satellites.
Final Version Gary Davis Robert Estes Scott Glubke Propulsion May 13-17, 2002 Micro Arcsecond X-ray Imaging Mission, Pathfinder (MAXIM-PF)
Mini Autonomous Flying Vehicle CASDE is part of the National effort to develop a Micro Air Vehicle. CASDE has chosen a Mini Vehicle, in the short term,
Fuzzy Controller for Spacecraft Attitude Control CHIN-HSING CHENG SHENG-LI SHU Dept. of Electrical Engineering Feng-Chia University IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON.
Space Robotics Seminar On
SLS Derived Vertical Habitat
USNA Standard CubeSat Bus USNA-P1 CubeSat (USNA-14)
NASA Satellite Servicing Evolution
NASA Satellite Servicing Evolution Human – Robot – Human
Overview 3 2 Introduction Design Analysis Fabrication Testing
ISS Institutional DTN Overview for CCSDS
The Space Race How it all Began.
The Space Race How it all Began.
Autonomous Operations in Space
Mark Suder
Key Benchmarks in a LEO Economy Robert L. Curbeam Jr.
Presentation transcript:

Space Systems LaboratoryMassachusetts Institute of Technology SPHERES Development of Formation Flight and Docking Algorithms Using the SPHERES Testbed Prof. David W. Miller MIT Space Systems Laboratory Allen Chen, Alvar Saenz-Otero, Mark Hilstad, David W. Miller

Space Systems LaboratoryMassachusetts Institute of Technology SPHERES Introduction SPHERES: Synchronized Position Hold Engage Reorient Experimental Satellites SPHERES is a cost-effective, risk-tolerant, interactive testbed operated inside the ISS for the development and maturation of formation flight and autonomous rendezvous and docking technologies (autonomy, control, and metrology). Multi-vehicle Testbed - long duration micro-gravity environment allows 6DOF per vehicle and close proximity maneuvers representative of envisioned missions: TPF, Starlight, TechSat 21, Orbital Express, and Mars Sample Return. Cost-effective - replenishable consumables, IFM and observations by crew reduce operation costs; data (up)downlink and video coverage expedites algorithm design; reconfigurable and upgradeable hardware accommodates new technologies. Risk-tolerant - ill-behaved algorithms can be stopped and corrected without affecting future operations. Allows software to mature from conception to flight quality without danger of mission failure.

Space Systems LaboratoryMassachusetts Institute of Technology SPHERES Design Philosophy Experimental Research in a micro- Gravity Environment Allows: –Demonstration and validation. –Repeatability and reliability. –Determination of simulation accuracy. –Realization of performance limitations. –Discovery of new physical phenomena. –Understanding of operational drivers. Laboratory Attributes: –Delineates between generic and test- specific equipment. –Allows reconfiguration of hardware for mission-specific equipment. –Supports extended investigations with multiple experiment iterations. –Accommodates unforeseen failures in a risk tolerant environment. –Provides software reconfiguration for rapid changes of algorithms. –Enhances the iterative research process via interaction and observation by humans. –Supports multiple investigators. If one cannot simulate the space environment in the laboratory, simulate the laboratory environment in space.

Space Systems LaboratoryMassachusetts Institute of Technology SPHERES SPHERES Testbed SPHERES free-flier units –Up to 3 units can be used simultaneously (with possible upgrade to more units). –Each independent unit contains propulsion, power, wireless communications, metrology, and processing sub-systems. –Sensors and actuators provide full state vector (6DOF, 12 states) of each unit. Laptop unit –ISS standard PC laptop serves as a base station for software reconfiguration and telemetry downloads. STG Metrology STS –Provides access to the Ku-band for ISS to ground communications. Communications –Satellite-to-satellite (STS) for formation/docking control. –Satellite-to-ground (STG) for telemetry download and software upload. Metrology –Four external metrology transmitters, mounted to the body of the ISS, create frame of reference.

Space Systems LaboratoryMassachusetts Institute of Technology SPHERES SPHERES Testbed Structures –Aluminum internal frame, covered with Lexan panels. Propulsion –Cold-gas thruster system using CO2 at 70psig. –Micro-machined custom nozzles attached to electric solenoid valves. Metrology –IR/Ultrasound ranging system resembles GPS within ISS environment (1Hz). –6DOF IMU system for high frequency data (50Hz). Avionics –C40 DSP Main Processor (will be upgraded to a C6701) Power –16 AA batteries

Space Systems LaboratoryMassachusetts Institute of Technology SPHERES Testbed Validation KC-135 Reduced Gravity Airplane –Full 6DOF dynamics –Short duration Tests Performed (2/01 and 3/01) –System checkouts –Single SPHERE attitude control –Master/Slave formation flight 2D Laboratory Experiments –Long duration 2D tests (3DOF) –Can use fixed supplies instead of consumables –Preliminary low-cost testing prior to KC or ISS deployment Tests Performed (ongoing) –Master/Slave formation flight –Docking algorithms

Space Systems LaboratoryMassachusetts Institute of Technology SPHERES Formation Flight KC-135 Frame Follower –Master unit attached to KC-135 frame. –Slave commanded to follow the rotation of the Master: should remain oriented with frame. –10Hz STS communications of full attitude state (3 angles and 3 angular rotations). –Slave must recover from initial deployment.

Space Systems LaboratoryMassachusetts Institute of Technology SPHERES Docking Research 2D Docking Demonstrations –Cooperative docking: Master unit awaits the arrival of the slave with full actuation to align docking port. –Slave unit starts with initial attitude offset, aligns itself with the master, and then translates to perform the docking. –10Hz STS communications of full 2D state (4 position, 2 attitude).

Space Systems LaboratoryMassachusetts Institute of Technology SPHERES Team Capability MIT Space Systems Laboratory –David W. Miller Formation flight, rendezvous and docking research in support of Techsat21, ST-3, Terrestrial Planet Finder Design and PI of 0-g dynamics and controls laboratories –MODE STS-40, 48, 62 –DLS on MIR –MACE STS-67, 106, ISS –Jonathan P. How Formation flight, differential GPS, robust control –Brian Williams Spacecraft autonomy, remote agent, Livingstone autonomous model-based diagnosis on DS-1 Payload Systems Incorporated –Developer and integrator of experiments in human-rated space platforms (Shuttle, MIR, ISS) The fact that our facilities have more reflights & first flights is testimony to the versatility of, and demand for, our dynamics and controls laboratories

Space Systems LaboratoryMassachusetts Institute of Technology SPHERES Conclusions SPHERES has demonstrated operation as a Formation Flight and Docking Algorithm testbed in 2D and KC-135 environments. –KC-135 experiments validated the operation of SPHERES in a 6DOF environment. –2D Laboratory testing provided initial insight into communications requirements for Formation Flight systems –2D Demonstrations of both Formation Flight and Docking Algorithms are ongoing. ISS Deployment in early 2003 –Manifested in Flight 12A.1 of the ISS for April 2003 (with possible 11A launch) –Minimum mission span of 6 months. Programmatic Status –DARPA (AF) Orbital Express Program In-space assembly, upgrade, and servicing –NASA Goddard Space Flight Center Formation Flight Algorithms. –NASA Starlight, ST6, and Terrestrial Planet Finder missions. –Capture of Mars sample return vehicles.