Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics (CCLM^2) Developing Teacher Leaders for Transitioning Instruction and Assessment to the Common Core State.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Trends In National Education Policy That will be Impacting the Reading Community.
Advertisements

Core Standards Update on Activities Looking towards Supporting Teacher Decision Making.
Office of Staff Development Benefits for Private School Students and Teachers from Title II, Part A Anne Arundel County Public Schools March 3, 2005.
Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Disclaimer Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics (CCLM^2)
In August, the historic CORE district waiver was approved allowing these districts to pursue a new robust and holistic accountability model for schools.
Briefing: NYU Education Policy Breakfast on Teacher Quality November 4, 2011 Dennis M. Walcott Chancellor NYC Department of Education.
ESEA FLEXIBILITY WAIVER Overview of Federal Requirements August 2, 2012 Alaska Department of Education & Early Development.
THE OFFICE OF EDUCATOR QUALITY Missouri Department of Elementary and Secondary Education August 15, 2011 Missouri Model Teacher and Leader Standards.
Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Disclaimer Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics (CCLM^2)
The Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA) as reauthorized by The No Child Left Behind Act (NCLB) Benefits to Private School Students and Teachers.
Oklahoma State Department of Education Mathematics and Science Partnerships Program Title II, Part B Competitive Grant Program No Child Left.
Mathematics Developmental Education in Texas Institutions of Higher Education Survey of Best Practices Adoption January 2003 Texas Higher Education Coordinating.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Tom Torlakson, State Superintendent of Public Instruction The CA Department of Education, Professional Learning Support.
Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Linking Assessment Targets to Instructional Tasks and DOK This.
Mathematics and Science Partnership Grant Title IIB Information Session April 10, 2006.
Graduating Senior Exit Survey Lindsay Couzens, M.S. And Bea Babbitt, Ph.D. Academic Assessment 1.
Pt3 Mentoring & Technology Summer Institute 2002.
ESEA FLEXIBILITY RENEWAL PROCESS: FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS January29, 2015.
RTLB Principal and Cluster Management Induction Expectations and Support February 2012.
Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Disclaimer Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics (CCLM^2)
Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics (CCLM^2) Project
© 2013 K12 Insight Central Office Climate Survey Results Las Cruces Public Schools March , 2013.
Mathematics/Science Partnerships U.S. Department of Education: New Program Grantees.
Wendy C. Crone, Assistant Professor University of Wisconsin - Madison January 17, 2001Symposium on New Faculty for the Academy of the 21 Century The Structure.
Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Disclaimer Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics (CCLM^2)
Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics Project, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, Summer 2013 Disclaimer Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics.
Welcome to Glover Middle School! A Title I Educational Community.
MATH/SCIENCE PARTNERSHIP BASICS The U.S. Department of Education´s Mathematics and Science Partnerships (MSP) program is administered by the Academic Improvement.
Full Implementation of the Common Core. Last Meeting Performance Tasks Smarter Balanced Assessment Consortium Upcoming Accountability Measure Strong teaching.
Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Disclaimer Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics (CCLM^2)
Title II Part A of NCLB IMPROVING TEACHER QUALITY GRANT PROGRAM.
Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Disclaimer Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics (CCLM^2)
Changes in Community Informational Meeting March 10, 2014.
Comprehensive Educator Effectiveness: New Guidance and Models Presentation for the Virginia Association of School Superintendents Annual Conference Patty.
The Improving Teacher Quality State Grants Program California Postsecondary Education Commission California Mathematics & Science Partnership 2011 Spring.
What Works: Research-Based Best Practices in Developmental Education A Presentation by Ruth Dalrymple and Marilyn Mays based on Hunter R. Boylan’s work.
No Child Left Behind Math and Science Partnerships Title II Part B.
Mathematics and Science Partnerships, Title II, Part B, NCLB.
Milwaukee Mathematics Partnership External Evaluation Schools and School Leadership Report by Tanya Suarez, Suarez & Associates June 9, 2005.
Data from End of the Year Intern and Cooperating Teacher Survey UNH Department of Education.
Mathematics and Science Partnerships: Summary of the Performance Period 2008 Annual Reports U.S. Department of Education.
Marjorie Hall Haley, PhD - GMU1 NO CHILD LEFT BEHIND The reauthorized elementary and secondary education act.
Federal Update: Part II NASDTEC Allison Henderson, Westat June 7, 2015.
New York State Staff/Curriculum Development Network S/CDN September 22, 2005.
Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Disclaimer Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics (CCLM^2)
JANUARY 12,  My Voice Staff Survey Results: % in agreement StatementSEP 10 JUN 11 I feel valued for my unique skills and talents5042 School is.
Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Disclaimer Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics (CCLM^2)
Mathematics and Science Partnerships: Summary of the Performance Period 2008 Annual Reports U.S. Department of Education.
Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Disclaimer Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics (CCLM^2)
Welcome CCLM^2 School Year Partners.
Little Mill Middle School Title I Parent Involvement We can’t do it without you! Presenters: Kimberly DeRose, Parent Coordinator Kari Shepherd, Lead Title.
Common Core Leadership in Mathematics Project, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Common Core Leadership in Mathematics Developing Leaders to Support the.
1 NO CHILD LEFT BEHIND The reauthorized elementary and secondary education act.
Disclaimer Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics (CCLM^2) Project University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, 2013–2014 This material was developed for.
Common Core Leadership in Mathematics Project, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Common Core Leadership in Mathematics Developing Leaders to Support the.
Lead Teach Learn PLC Fundamental I: Core Curriculum & Instruction Session 2.
Supporting Secondary-to-Postsecondary Collaboration To Support Rigorous, Effective Instruction Planning for the 2016 GEAR UP Summer Institute February.
Core Common Assessment at the Elementary Math Level and Critical Thinking Skills Ximena D. Burgin, Ed.D. Brent E. Wholeben, Ph.D. Office of Research, Evaluation.
Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Disclaimer Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics (CCLM^2)
Data from End of the Year Intern and Cooperating Teacher Survey UNH Department of Education.
Minnesota Assessment Conference What Does the Future Hold in Assessment Policy? Session A14.
Surfacing MP6, MP7 and MP 5 Core Mathematics Partnership
Pathways to Teacher Leadership in Mathematics
Smarter Balanced Assessment Items
CCLM CCLM Project Web Site.
Does the board perform all of its duties?
CCLM CCLM Project Web Site.
Schoolwide Programs.
Common Core Leadership in Mathematics Developing Leaders to Support the Transition to the Common Core State Standards for Mathematics University of.
NC Mathematics and Science Partnership Program
Presentation transcript:

Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics (CCLM^2) Developing Teacher Leaders for Transitioning Instruction and Assessment to the Common Core State Standards for Mathematics Project Evaluation

Funding Agency Wisconsin Improving Teacher Quality (WITQ) Grant Competition for Institutions of Higher Education in Wisconsin Federal Funds: ESEA Title II, Part A (NCLB) U.S. Department of Education Program Officer: Phil Makurat

WITQ Program Evaluation Evaluator: Campbell Associates Contacts: William Campbell & Ramona Gunter ( s from: Pre-Institute Survey June 2013 Post-Institute SurveyJuly 2013 Post-Project SurveyMay 2014 Surveys will be ed to you, then please return them as indicated in the .

CCLM Project Survey Project Survey Part A: Smarter Balanced (26 items) Part B: Leadership for Assessment (11 items) Write the number that reflects your level of agreement: 1 = Strongly Disagree 6 = Strongly Agree

Formative Assessment Practices Survey: 5 Key Areas Overall reflection on first rating: 1.I have the most knowledge and skill in these areas: 2.I want to work on these areas: Overall reflection on first rating: 1.I have the most knowledge and skill in these areas: 2.I want to work on these areas:

Formative Assessment Practices Survey Write the number that reflects your practice: 0Uncertain:I am uncertain about what this means. 1Not at all: I don’t or can’t do this, or this doesn’t happen in my classroom. 2Beginning: I do this infrequently, or this happens infrequently in my classroom. 3Partially: I do this sometimes, or this happens sometimes in my classroom. 4Completely:I do this regularly, or this happens on an ongoing/as needed basis in my classroom.