Congresso del Dipartimento di Fisica Highlights in Physics 2005 11–14 October 2005, Dipartimento di Fisica, Università di Milano An application of the.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Wave Nature of Light  Refraction  Interference  Young’s double slit experiment  Diffraction  Single slit diffraction  Diffraction grating.
Advertisements

The waves spread out from the opening!
 In our analysis of the double slit interference in Waves we assumed that both slits act as point sources.  From the previous figure we see that the.
BIOP – Center for Biomedical Optics and New Laser Systems Light scattering from a single particle Peter E. Andersen Optics and Fluid Dynamics Dept. Risø.
Electromagnetic Waves G3 Two Source Interference of Waves G4 The Diffraction Grating.
Diffraction of Light Waves
Diffraction See Chapter 10 of Hecht.
The Propagation of Light
Nanoparticle Optics Lab Part II Light Scattering.
1 Laser Beam Coherence Purpose: To determine the frequency separation between the axial modes of a He-Ne Laser All sources of light, including lasers,
Optical Tweezers F scatt F grad 1. Velocity autocorrelation function from the Langevin model kinetic property property of equilibrium fluctuations For.
PHY 1371Dr. Jie Zou1 Chapter 38 Diffraction and Polarization.
PERFORMANCE OF THE DELPHI REFRACTOMETER IN MONITORING THE RICH RADIATORS A. Filippas 1, E. Fokitis 1, S. Maltezos 1, K. Patrinos 1, and M. Davenport 2.
METO 621 Lesson 5. Natural broadening The line width (full width at half maximum) of the Lorentz profile is the damping parameter, . For an isolated.
Physics 1502: Lecture 34 Today’s Agenda Announcements: –Midterm 2: graded soon … –Homework 09: Friday December 4 Optics –Interference –Diffraction »Introduction.
Light Scattering Rayleigh Scattering & Mie Scattering.
1 Chapter 10 Diffraction March 9, 11 Fraunhofer diffraction: The single slit 10.1 Preliminary considerations Diffraction: The deviation of light from propagation.
Chapter 25: Interference and Diffraction
9.12 Diffraction grating • Order of diffraction
Diffraction vs. Interference
Fraunhofer Diffraction
3: Interference, Diffraction and Polarization
Chapter 25 Waves and Particles Midterm 4 UTC
Rayleigh Scattering & Mie Scattering
Figure 2.1 Block diagram of a generic projection imaging system.
The wave nature of light Interference Diffraction Polarization
Lecture 15 Interference Chp. 35 Topics –Interference from thin films –Due to the wave nature of light –Change in wavelength and phase change in a medium.
10/17/97Optical Diffraction Tomography1 A.J. Devaney Department of Electrical Engineering Northeastern University Boston, MA USA
Multiple Scattering in Vision and Graphics Lecture #21 Thanks to Henrik Wann Jensen.
Scattering by particles
Thus, the image formed by lens 2 is located 30 cm to the left of lens 2. It is virtual (since i 2 < 0). 30 The magnification is m = (-i 1 /p 1 ) x (-i.
BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES BIW ’ 06 Lepton Beam Emittance Instrumentation Igor Pinayev National Synchrotron Light Source BNL, Upton, NY.
Principal maxima become sharper Increases the contrast between the principal maxima and the subsidiary maxima GRATINGS: Why Add More Slits?
1. Waves and Particles 2. Interference of Waves
Chapters 21 & 22 Interference and Wave Optics Waves that are coherent can add/cancel Patterns of strong and weak intensity.
PHYS 2022: Observational Astronomy Properties of Light and Optical Observations from the Earth.
Electromagnetic Waves G3 Two Source Interference of Waves G4 The Diffraction Grating G5 X-Ray Diffraction.
The Hong Kong Polytechnic University Optics 2----by Dr.H.Huang, Department of Applied Physics1 Diffraction Introduction: Diffraction is often distinguished.
FIG. 5.1 Multiple scattering is viewed as a random walk of the photon in diffusing wave spectroscopy (DWS)
Interference in Thin Films, final
Diffraction Introduction to Diffraction Patterns
Difference of Optical Path Length Interference Two waves One wave Many waves Diffraction.
Physics 203/204 6: Diffraction and Polarization Single Slit Diffraction Diffraction Grating Diffraction by Crystals Polarization of Light Waves.
The Wave Nature of Light
Wave nature of light Light is an electromagnetic wave. EM waves are those waves in which there are sinusoidal variation of electric and magnetic fields.
4.3.5 – – A.S. Due Monday, May 18.
1 PHY Lecture 5 Interaction of solar radiation and the atmosphere.
Muscle, September Light Scattering predictions. G. Grehan L. Méès, S. Saengkaew, S. Meunier-Guttin-Cluzel.
DIFFRACTION AND INTERFERENCE. Specification Topics Interference The concept of path difference and coherence The laser as a source of coherent monochromatic.
Higher Physics – Unit Waves. a a λ λ crest trough Wave Theory All waves transmit energy. The energy of a wave depends on its amplitude. a = amplitude.
Physics 1202: Lecture 26 Today’s Agenda Announcements: –Midterm 2: Friday Nov. 6… –Chap. 18, 19, 20, and 21 No HW for this week (midterm)No HW for this.
Chapter 15 Preview Objectives Combining Light Waves
Diffraction at a single slit a = λ Semi circular wave fronts a = 2 λ First minima & maxima become visible a = 4 λ Diffraction is the spreading of wavefronts.
Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Chapter 35-Diffraction.
Chapter 24 Wave Optics. Young’s Double Slit Experiment Thomas Young first demonstrated interference in light waves from two sources in Light is.
Phys102 Lecture 26, 27, 28 Diffraction of Light Key Points Diffraction by a Single Slit Diffraction in the Double-Slit Experiment Limits of Resolution.
Chapter 35-Diffraction Chapter 35 opener. Parallel coherent light from a laser, which acts as nearly a point source, illuminates these shears. Instead.
The wave nature of light Interference Diffraction Polarization
Chapter 35-Diffraction Chapter 35 opener. Parallel coherent light from a laser, which acts as nearly a point source, illuminates these shears. Instead.
Example: 633 nm laser light is passed through a narrow slit and a diffraction pattern is observed on a screen 6.0 m away. The distance on the screen.
1. Waves and Particles 2. Interference of Waves
Diffraction vs. Interference
LEAD Tutors/Peer Instructors Needed!
Fraunhofer Diffraction
Volume 87, Issue 2, Pages (August 2004)
Fourier Optics P47 – Optics: Unit 8.
Scalar theory of diffraction
Unit 2 Particles and Waves Interference
DIFFRACTION AND INTERFERENCE
Presentation transcript:

Congresso del Dipartimento di Fisica Highlights in Physics –14 October 2005, Dipartimento di Fisica, Università di Milano An application of the Optical Theorem to the sizing of sub-wavelength particles M.A.C. Potenza *, M. Giglio * * Dipartimento di Fisica, Università di Milano From the general theory of scattering, the phase of the scattered wave depends on the particle dimension The removed power is negligible. Nevertheless the interference pattern is visible, and the spherical wave is measured !! Incident plane wave Scattered wave Interference pattern (paraxial approximation) Small particle (with respect to the wavelength) The forward s cattered and transmitted waves are in phase Large particle (the size of the wavelength or larger) The forward scattered and transmitted waves are in quadrature The removed power is appreciable by the intensity at the centre of the pattern. Light scattering from a single particle transmitted power = integral of the interference pattern ABSTRACT We present a novel technique based on the Optical Theorem (OT) for the determination of the size of scattering particles in the sub-wavelength range. When a plane wave impinges on a particle, a scattered spherical wave is generated. The scattered amplitude is in general made up by both in phase and in quadrature components. The OT states that the scattering cross section that describes the integral of the scattered intensity at any angle is proportional to the amplitude of the quadrature component at zero scattering angle. This remarkable result is the consequence of conservation arguments that require that the interference between the scattered wave and the incoming wave should exactly account for the power loss of the incoming beam due to scattering of power in different directions. We show an application of the method in the realistic case where an assembly of particles is present under the incoming beam. The scattered radiation in the far field is then a speckle field, with the intensity that fluctuates as a consequence of the stochastic interference between individual scattered waves. If the scattered intensity is collected fairly close to the scattering sample, and the incoming beam is wide enough, then low visibility speckle field is generated due to the interference between the weak scattered fields and the powerful transmitted beam. The method relies on the statistical analysis of these low visibility fringes due to the heterodyning between scattered field and the transmitted beam that acts as a self referencing local oscillator. The statistical processing of the instantaneous speckle distribution consists of the evaluation of the two dimensional power spectrum of the intensity distribution. It will be shown that the spectrum exhibits a multiple zero structure, from which an accurate estimate of the amplitude of the quadrature term can be performed. Spherical, calibrated polystyrene colloidal particles have been used. The results have been compared with the theoretical predictions based on Mie scattering functions and the OT. The data show a continuous variation of the phase of the scattered amplitude from zero to p/2 as the particle diameter is changed from well subwavelength values to many microns sizes, as expected from the OT as one moves from the Rayleigh scattering regime to the diffraction regime. Excellent accuracy for the subwavelength diameters determination is reported. Extinction factor Q ext = σ/πa 2 Complex scattered field (normalized by πa 2 ) Phase lag of the forward scattered wavefront Relative refractive index: m = 1.55 (typical for airborne particles) Relative refractive index: m = 1.18 (polystyrene in a water suspension) diameter um x = ka diameter um x = ka diameter um diameter um diameter um Re[S(0)] Im[S(0)] diameter um Re[S(0)] Im[S(0)] EXPERIMENTAL APPARATUS AND DATA ANALYSIS The measurements have been performed by the self referencing optical system scketched in the figure. A plane wave transilluminates a monodisperse, dilute particle suspension and the transmitted beam falls over the plane of a CCD camera, acting as a local oscillator for the scattered wavefornts. The intensity distribution is the stochastic sum of the intensities of all the elementary interference patterns generated by each particle in the sample. 100 nm 300 nm 1000 nm 300 nm “An experiment by which this spherical wave can be observed is impossible, for a telescope (…) sees the primary and secondary source in the same direction: their images coincide” (Van de Hulst) Light scattering from a collection of particles The intensity profile is the sum of the elementary patterns 100 nm600 nm2000 nm Single interference pattern Power spectrum of the speckle field Radial profile of the power spectum Despite the speckled appearance, the power spectrum of the intensity distribution provides the information about the phase Laser source Collimating lens Sample cell CCD sensor EXPERIMENTAL RESULTS Comparison of the positions of the extrema in the radial profiles of the measured power spectra to the expected values. Water suspensions of 400 nm, 600 nm, 1000 nm, 2000 nm in diameter have been used in a cell 2 mm thick. Different sample-sensor distances have been used. Light is transmitted E0E0 If E 0 >> E S :I = | E 0 | 2 + E 0 E S * + E 0 * E S + E S 2 scattered ESES by the sample The signal E S is heterodyned by the transmitted field E 0 E S being stochastic, by averaging over a number of realizations of the speckle field I i (x,y), we have: = | E 0 | 2 = I 0 that is the transmitted field plus the static stray light ! Good accordance to the expected positions of the maxima and minima. No free parameters are present to fit the dephasing values. The dephasing of the scattered waves depends on the particle size accordingly to the Mie Theory. The method has been filed for PCT patent in 2005 ( University of Milan ) Diameter 2000 nm z = 29 mm Diameter 1000 nm z = 29 mm Diameter 600 nm z = 29 mm Diameter 400 nm z = 147 mm Diameter 2000 nm z = 62 mm Diameter 600 nm z = 62 mm A few particles Many particles (speckles) The extrema positions depend on the dephasing value. Due to the interference, the dephasing of the scattered wave reduces the field amplitude in the forward direction. This accounts for the power scattered away: conservation of the energy ! The particle cross section is: OPTICAL THEOREM