Questions that we are facing in forecasting CME’s arrival Yuming Wang & Chenglong Shen STEP USTC 2013.6.15 Croatia.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Global Properties of Heliospheric Disturbances Observed by Interplanetary Scintillation M. Tokumaru, M. Kojima, K. Fujiki, and M. Yamashita (Solar-Terrestrial.
Advertisements

Heliospheric Propagation of ICMEs: The Drag-Based Model B. Vršnak 1, T. Žic 1, M. Dumbović 1, J. Čalogović 1, A. Veronig 2, M. Temmer 2, C. Moestl 2, T.
Forbush Decrease Prediction Based on Remote Solar Observations M. Dumbović, B. Vršnak Hvar Observatory, Faculty of Geodesy, University of Zagreb, Croatia.
Rainer Schwenn Max-Planck-Institut für Aeronomie Katlenburg-Lindau International Solar Cycle Studies 2001 (ISCS), June 13-16, 2001 Longmont, Colorado CME.
On the Space Weather Response of Coronal Mass Ejections and Their Sheath Regions Emilia Kilpua Department of Physics, University of Helsinki
Valbona Kunkel June 18, 2013 Hvar, Croatia NEW THEORITICAL WORK ON FLUX ROPE MODEL AND PROPERTIES OF MAGNETIC FIELD.
By: Estarlyn Hiraldo and Uri-Jaun Hall Contributors: Noe Lugaz, Devin Thomas Introduction Using images from stereo spacecrafts, we predicted arrival.
CAS Key Laboratory of Geospace Environment, USTC The Deflection of 2008 September 13 CME in Heliosphere Space ISEST, Hvar, Croatia,2013 June 17 Collaborators:
Interaction of coronal mass ejections with large-scale structures N. Gopalswamy, S. Yashiro, H. Xie, S. Akiyama, and P. Mäkelä IHY – ISWI Regional meeting.
Strength of Coronal Mass Ejection- driven Shocks Near the Sun and Its Importance in Predicting Solar Energetic Particle Events Chenglong Shen 1, Yuming.
STEREO AND SPACE WEATHER Variable conditions in space that can have adverse effects on human life and society Space Weather: Variable conditions in space.
Assessing the Contribution of Heliospheric Imaging in Improving Space Weather Prediction SHINE Session 6 Simon Plunkett and Doug Biesecker Thursday Morning.
Specification of the broad shell of dense plasma for halo CMEs Xuepu Zhao Stanford University Stanford University EGU Session ST2 Vienna, Austria 25 April.
Forecasting Super CME Disturbances 1.Super CMEs, such as the 2000 July 14, 2003 October 28, 2003 October 29, and 2006 December 13 full halo CMEs, generate.
The Hunt for a Link : Quantitative Connections Between Magnetic Fields and EIT Coronal Wave/CME Properties Prepared by James R. Robertson J.R. In conjunction.
Coronal IP Shocks Nat Gopalswamy NASA/GSFC Elmau CME Workshop, 2003 February 7 Plenary talk Sun Earth.
CAWSES December 10, CMEs H.S. Hudson Space Sciences Lab, UC Berkeley.
CME-driven Shocks in White Light Observations SOHO/LASCO C3 – CME May 5 th, 1999 CME-driven Shock We demonstrate that CME-driven shocks: (1) can be detected.
My 20 Years of Service at Stanford Solar Physics Group I. Improvement of inner boundary condition for data-based coronal models (WSO, MDI, HMI). II. Development.
Relationship Between Magnetic Clouds and Earth-Directed CMEs: Space Weather Research in Stanford Solar Group Xuepu Zhao The Second International Space.
C. May 12, 1997 Interplanetary Event. Ambient Solar Wind Models SAIC 3-D MHD steady state coronal model based on photospheric field maps CU/CIRES-NOAA/SEC.
In both cases we want something like this:
When will disruptive CMEs impact Earth? Coronagraph observations alone aren’t enough to make the forecast for the most geoeffective halo CMEs. In 2002,
February 26, 2007 KIPAC Workshop on Magnetism Modeling/Inferring Coronal And Heliospheric Field From Photospheric Magnetic Field Yang Liu – Stanford University.
C. May 12, 1997 Interplanetary Event. May 12, 1997 Interplanetary Coronal Mass Ejection Event CU/CIRES, NOAA/SEC, SAIC, Stanford Tatranska Lomnica, Slovakia,
The “cone model” was originally developed by Zhao et al. ~10 (?) years ago in order to interpret the times of arrival of ICME ejecta following SOHO LASCO.
Influence of Time-dependent Processes and Background Magnetic Field on Shock Properties N. Lugaz, I. Roussev and C. Downs Institute for Astronomy Igor.
Physics of the relationship of ICMEs to their CME progenitors (Wed AM) Two major efforts are under way to address the structure of CMEs that hit the Earth,
Characterization of Coronal Mass Ejection Deflection using Coronagraph Image Sequences Jenna L. Zink, GMU Undergraduate Research Scholars Program, Rebekah.
Why a Sun-Earth line Coronagraph is Best Doug Biesecker NOAA/SWPC.
Study of Earth-affecting Solar CMEs: Report from ISEST/MiniMax24 WG 4 on Campaign Events David F. Webb Institute for Scientific Research/Boston College.
A = B = C = u – speed of CME.
Evolution of the 2012 July 12 CME from the Sun to the Earth: Data- Constrained Three-Dimensional MHD Simulations F. Shen 1, C. Shen 2, J. Zhang 3, P. Hess.
Assessing Predictions of CME Time- of-Arrival and 1 AU Speed to Observations Angelos Vourlidas Vourlidas- SHINE
A Catalog of Halo Coronal Mass Ejections from SOHO N. Gopalswamy 1, S. Yashiro 2, G. Michalek 3, H. Xie 3, G. Stenborg 2, A. Vourlidas 4, R. A. Howard.
Magnetic Storm Generation by Various Types of Solar Wind: Event Catalog, Modeling and Prediction N. S. Nikolaeva, Yu.I. Yermolaev, and I. G. Lodkina Space.
RECREATING THE THREE DIMENSIONAL STRUCTURE OF INTERPLANETARY CORONAL MASS EJECTIONS Timothy A. Howard and S. James Tappin AGU Fall Meeting, December,
On the February 14-15, 2011 CME-CME interaction event and consequences for Space Weather Manuela Temmer(1), Astrid Veronig(1), Vanessa Peinhart(1), Bojan.
Arrival time of halo coronal mass ejections In the vicinity of the Earth G. Michalek, N. Gopalswamy, A. Lara, and P.K. Manoharan A&A 423, (2004)
New STEREO/SECCHI Processing for Heliospheric Transients David F. Webb ISR, Boston College, MA, USA New England Space Science Consortium.
Geoeffectiveness of Solar and Interplanetary Events Yuri I. Yermolaev, Michail Yu. Yermolaev, Georgy N. Zastenker, Anatoli A. Petrukovich, Lev M. Zelenyi.
2004 September 11CAWSES Theme 2 Meeting, Beijing Solar Sources of Geoeffective Disturbances N. Gopalswamy NASA/GSFC Greenbelt, MD
1 Machine Learning and Data Mining for Automatic Detection and Interpretation of Solar Events Jie Zhang (Presenting, Co-I, SCS*) Art Poland (PI, SCS*)
Lessons for STEREO - learned from Helios Presented at the STEREO/Solar B Workshop, Rainer Schwenn, MPS Lindau The Helios.
Forecast of Geomagnetic Storm based on CME and IP condition R.-S. Kim 1, K.-S. Cho 2, Y.-J. Moon 3, Yu Yi 1, K.-H. Kim 3 1 Chungnam National University.
ESMP-14 Dublin Li Feng, Bernd Inhester, Yuming Wang, Fang Shen, Chenglong Shen, Weiqun Gan 1. Max Planck Institute for Solar System Research, Germany 2.
Fast Magnetosonic Waves and Global Coronal Seismology in the Extended Solar Corona Ryun Young Kwon, Jie Zhang, Maxim Kramar, Tongjiang Wang, Leon Ofman,
11. Assessing the Contribution of Heliospheric Imaging, IPS and other remote sensing observations in Improving Space Weather Prediction Bernie Jackson,
Improving Space Weather Forecasts Using Coronagraph Data S.P. Plunkett 1, A. Vourlidas 1, D.R. McMullin 2, K. Battams 3, R.C. Colaninno 4 1 Naval Research.
Publications in Comparative Magnetospheres Siscoe, G. L.: Towards a comparative theory of magnetospheres, in Solar System Plasma Physics, Vol. II, edited.
1 Global magnetic connectivity in the Hollween events of 2003 (Zhang et al. 2007; Zhou et al. 2006)
Modeling of CME-driven Shock propagation with ENLIL simulations using flux-rope and cone-model inputs Using observations from STEREO/SECCHI and SOHO/LASCO,
What we can learn from the intensity-time profiles of large gradual solar energetic particle events (LGSEPEs) ? Guiming Le(1, 2,3), Yuhua Tang(3), Liang.
Laboratoire de Physique des Plasmas S OLAR E VENTS TOWARDS THE E ARTH IN 2002 B.Schmieder (1), N. Cornilleau-Wehrlin (1), K. Bocchialini (2), M. Menvielle.
The ICME’s magnetic field and the role on the galactic cosmic ray modulation for the solar cycle 23 Evangelos Paouris and Helen Mavromichalaki National.
Xie – STEREO SWG – Dublin – March 2010 Low Mass Coronal Mass Ejections Missed by STEREO A/B or LASCO and Associated ICMEs H. Xie 1,2, O. C. St. Cyr 2,
A tool for improved space weather predictions: the CME expansion speed. Max-Planck-Institut für Aeronomie Katlenburg-Lindau Germany Instituto Nacional.
Shocks in the IPS Wageesh Mishra Eun-kyung Joo Shih-pin Chen.
Solar Origins of the October November 2003 Extreme Events N. Gopalswamy NASA/GSFC SHINE 2004 WG3 Thursday, June 1 Big Sky, Montana Photo.
The CME geomagnetic forecast tool (CGFT) M. Dumbović 1, A. Devos 2, L. Rodriguez 2, B. Vršnak 1, E. Kraaikamp 2, B. Bourgoignie 2, J. Čalogović 1 1 Hvar.
1 Pruning of Ensemble CME modeling using Interplanetary Scintillation and Heliospheric Imager Observations A. Taktakishvili, M. L. Mays, L. Rastaetter,
The COMESEP Space Weather Alert System Luciano Rodriguez on behalf of the COMESEP Consortium (European Commission FP7 Project )
Manuela Temmer Institute of Physics, University of Graz, Austria Tutorial: Coronal holes and space weather consequences.
Detecting, forecasting and modeling of the 2002/04/17 halo CME Heliophysics Summer School 1.
Coronal Seismology Based on EUV Waves P. F. Chen , China.
Lessons learnt from the STEREO Heliospheric. Imagers: Tracking
Predicting the Probability of Geospace Events Based on Observations of Solar Active-Region Free Magnetic Energy Dusan Odstrcil1,2 and David Falconer3,4.
Forecasting the arrival time of the CME’s shock at the Earth
Phillip Hess Jie Zhang, Dusan Odstrcil
The Second International Space Weather Symposium
Presentation transcript:

Questions that we are facing in forecasting CME’s arrival Yuming Wang & Chenglong Shen STEP USTC Croatia

Forecasting of CME’s geoeffectiveness 1.Hit the Earth? 2.When? 3.How strong? CME arrival  Size  Direction  Velocity

Q1: Hit the Earth? SSize DDirection Wang et al. JGR, 2011

Deflected propagation in corona (e.g., Gopalswamy et al., 2003; Wang et al., 2011; Shen et al. 2011; Gui et al., 2011; )

Deflected propagation in IP space (Wang et al., 2004, 2006)

Can be a reason of:  Fact 1: Not all of geomagnetic storms or ICMEs can be tracked back to theirs CME sources (Webb et al., 2000; Yermolaev et al., 2005; Zhang et al., 2007; Schwenn et al., 2005)  Fact 2: Not all of front-side CMEs can encounter the Earth (Wang et al., 2002; Yermolaev et al., 2005; Wang et al., 2006)

Shen et al., in preparation, 2013 Q2: When hit? DDirection VVelocity

Distance = 1 AU + Δ (see also: Moestl & Davies, 2013) Shen et al., in preparation, 2013

 Size Angular width  Direction Halo, full halo  Velocity Projected speed Q3: How to get these information? If no STEREO

Projection effect may be significant Full halo CMEs Thernisien et al., 2006; 2011 Shen et al., JGR, submitted, 2013 (see also e.g., Howard et al., 1982; Burkepile et al., 2004; Vrsnak et al., 2007; Howard et al., 2008; Wang et al., 2011)

Q4: How to get de-projected parameters? Some promising models:  Size --- Cone model  Direction --- Cone model + Deflection model  Velocity --- Cone model + Drag model

Problem 1: Velocity = Span angle A challenge for cone model

Problem 2: Brightness = CME + SW Wang et al., JGR, 2011 Lugaz et al., 2005; Riley et al., 2008

A challenge for drag model (e.g., Chen 1996; Cargill et al., 1996; Vrsnak & Gopalswamy 2002; Cargill 2004) Mass and size are usually over-estimated.

Simplified drag model (Vrsnak & Gopalswamy, 2002; Maloney & Gallagher, 2010) CME mass CME cross-section CME size drag coefficient

Core Questions:  How to decompose velocity and span angle?  How to decompose CME and SW? Q4: How to get de-projected parameters? Q3: What are the key parameters and how to get? Q2: When hit? Q1: Hit the Earth?

Core Questions:  How to decompose velocity and span angle?  How to decompose CME and SW? BrightnessMassVelocity ?

STEP University of Science and Technology of China (USTC)  Deflection  CME interaction/collision  CME arrival prediction Models: Ice-cream cone model HAF model Deflection model CME internal property inversion model

Data products

Thanks for attention