Pharmacokinetic Modeling of Environmental Chemicals Part 2: Applications Harvey J. Clewell, Ph.D. Director, Center for Human Health Assessment The Hamner.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Dosimetry in Risk Assessment and a bit More Mel Andersen McKim Conference QSAR and Aquatic Toxicology & Risk Assessment June 27-29, 2006.
Advertisements

Mechanisms of Thyroid Toxicity Kevin M. Crofton Neurotoxicology Division National Health and Environmental Effects Laboratory US Environmental Protection.
Trichloroethylene (TCE) Toxicity Values Update Waste Site Cleanup Advisory Committee Meeting March 27, 2014 C. Mark Smith Ph.D., M.S. Deputy Director Office.
Regulatory Toxicology James Swenberg, D.V.M., Ph.D.
Chemical Carcinogens – workplace risk assessment and health surveillance Tiina Santonen Paide.
Creative DedicatedExperts PCBs: Real World Considerations Exposure and Toxicity Diane M. Silverman, PhD.
William H. Farland, Ph.D. Acting Deputy Assistant Administrator for Science Office of Research and Development U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY Biomarkers:
NSF/ANSI STANDARD 61 FRAMEWORK FOR RISK ASSESSMENTS For use by Toxicology Sub-committee only Please do not copy or distribute.
1 Some Deterministic Models in Mathematical Biology: Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic Models for Toxic Chemicals Cammey E. Cole Meredith College March.
Module 8: Risk Assessment. 2 Module Objectives  Define the purpose of Superfund risk assessment  Define the four components of the human health risk.
Exposure Assessment Thanks to Marc Rigas, PhD for an earlier version of this lecture Much of the materials is drawn from Paustenbach, DJ. (2000) The practice.
Copyright 2002 Marc Rigas Issues in Exposure Assessment Marc L. Rigas, Ph.D. National Exposure Research Laboratory, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.
What Do Toxicologists Do?
Environmental Health XV. Risk Assessment Shu-Chi Chang, Ph.D., P.E., P.A. Assistant Professor 1 and Division Chief 2 1 Department of Environmental Engineering.
Introduction of Cancer Molecular Epidemiology Zuo-Feng Zhang, MD, PhD University of California Los Angeles.
Risk Assessment II Dec 9, Is there a “safe” dose ? For effects other than cancer:
Michael H. Dong MPH, DrPA, PhD  readings Toxicology and Risk Assessment (3rd of 10 Lectures on Toxicologic Epidemiology)
Risk Assessment: A Conceptual Introduction
Overall Objectives Demonstrate the existence of new modalities of toxic tissue injury with increasing dose using a series of representative case examples.
ILSI Risk Science Institute Acrylamide Toxicity: Research to Address Key Data Gaps Presented by Dr. Stephen S. Olin ILSI Risk Science Institute.
EPA’s cancer risk assessment guidelines: General overview Jim Cogliano, Ph.D. United States Environmental Protection Agency* Office of Research and Development.
Lecture #3 Hazards and their effects. Epidemiology = The study of the distribution and causes of disease and injuries in human populations. – Epidemiologists.
Committee on Carcinogenicity (COC) Approach to Risk Assessment of Genotoxic Carcinogens David H. Phillips* COC Chairman Descriptive vs. Quantitative.
BASELINE RISK ASSESSMENT OVERVIEW Dawn A. Ioven Senior Toxicologist U.S. EPA – Region III 4 April 2012.
Photo image area measures 2” H x 6.93” W and can be masked by a collage strip of one, two or three images. The photo image area is located 3.19” from left.
(IAQ). What is Risk Assessment? Risk assessment: provides information on the health risk Characterizes the potential adverse health effects of human exposures.
Dr. Manfred Wentz Director, Hohenstein Institutes (USA) Head, Oeko-Tex Certification Body (USA) AAFA – Environmental Committee Meeting November 10, 2008.
TRAINING FOR THE HEALTH SECTOR
Examining Bioaccumulation & Biomagnification: Implications for Ecosystems and Human Health.
 Drinking-Water Standards  History  Key Definitions  How Standards are Developed  Current Issues Confronting Developers of Standards.
Approaches for Evaluating the Relevance of Multiroute Exposures in Establishing Guideline Values for Drinking Water Contaminants Kannan Krishnan, Université.
INTRODUCTION TO TOXICOLOGY SIDNEY GREEN, PH.D. DEPARTMENT OF PHARMACOLOGY COLLEGE OF MEDICINE HOWARD UNIVERISTY.
Physiologically Based Models of the Lung S. Moll H. Meyer S. Mielordt Seminar Pharmakokinetik - Mathematische Modelle und ihre Anwendung - WS 03/04 FU.
Methylene Chloride a case study for Dose-Dependent Transitions Raymond M. David, Ph.D. Eastman Kodak Company © Eastman Kodak Company, 2005.
Animal Studies and Human Health Consequences Sorell L. Schwartz, Ph.D. Department of Pharmacology Georgetown University Medical Center.
A Novel Bottom Up Approach to Bounding Potential Human Cancer Risks from Endogenous Chemicals Thomas B. Starr, PhD TBS Associates, Raleigh NC SOT RASS.
Risk Assessment Nov 7, 2008 Timbrell 3 rd Edn pp Casarett & Doull 7 th Edn Chapter 7 (pp )
Juan Alguacil, MD Huelva University Brussels, 26 June 2012 Limits on Occupational Exposure Limits for Carcinogens 8th Seminar on workers’ protection &
Biomarkers Biomarkers - markers in biological systems with a sufficently long half-life which allow location where in the biological system change occur.
MAIN TOXICITY TESTING. TESTING STRATEGIES A number of different types of data are used in order to establish the safety of chemical substances for use.
Determining Risks to Background Arsenic Using a Margin – of – Exposure Approach Presentation at Society of Risk Analysis, New England Chapter Barbara D.
The Hamner Institutes for Health Sciences | SOT Meeting March 9, 2011 Update on Formaldehyde Case Study: Adaptation of the Biologically Based Dose Response.
Air Toxics Risk Assessment: Traditional versus New Approaches Mark Saperstein BP Product Stewardship Group.
1 Some Deterministic Models in Mathematical Biology: Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic Models for Toxic Chemicals Cammey E. Cole Meredith College January.
Part 1d: Exposure Assessment and Modeling Thomas Robins, MD, MPH.
TOXICOLOGY OCCUPATIONAL HAZARDS CHEMICAL PHYSICAL ERGONOMIC PSYCHOLOGIC BIOLOGIC.
NUATRC/TCEQ Air Toxics Workshop October Air Toxics Air Toxics: What We Know, What we Don’t Know, and What We Need to Know Human Health Effects –
RISK DUE TO AIR POLLUTANTS
Development of a Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic Model to Quantitate Biomarkers of Exposure to Organophosphorus Insecticides.
The Future of Chemical Toxicity Testing in the U.S.
Perspective on the current state-of-knowledge of mode of action as it relates to the dose response assessment of cancer and noncancer toxicity Jennifer.
Office of Research and Development National Center for Environmental Assessment Human Health Risk Assessment and Information for SRP July 28, 2009 Reeder.
Key Concepts on Health Risk Assessment of Chemical Mixtures.
HEX-Tox paper reading Tue Hye Young Choi.
Acute Toxicity Studies Single dose - rat, mouse (5/sex/dose), dog, monkey (1/sex/dose) 14 day observation In-life observations (body wt., food consumption,
Risk CHARACTERIZATION
1 Risk Assessment for Air Toxics: The 4 Basic Steps NESCAUM Health Effects Workshop Bordentown, NJ July 30, 2008.
Risk Assessment of Exposure to Trihalomethanes: Use of Biomonitoring Equivalents and Biomonitoring Data from NHANES Lesa L. AylwardRichard A. Becker Sean.
DOSE-RESPONSE ASSESSMENT
CHAPTER 5 Occupational Exposure Limits and Assessment of Workplace Chemical Risks.
FIFRA SAP Meeting February 2, 2010
Biologic Monitoring A. H. Mehrparvar, MD
Risk Assessment Dec 4 -6, 2006.
Introduction to Environmental Engineering and Science (3rd ed.)
THE DOSE MAKES THE POISON
Risk Assessment Dec 7, 2009 Timbrell 3rd Edn pp 16-21
Case Study: Risk – Risk Comparison n-Propyl Bromide vs
with support from J.A. Swenberg & R. Budinsky
Introduction to Risk Assessment
Presentation transcript:

Pharmacokinetic Modeling of Environmental Chemicals Part 2: Applications Harvey J. Clewell, Ph.D. Director, Center for Human Health Assessment The Hamner Institutes for Health Sciences Research Triangle Park, North Carolina

I.Application of PBPK Models in Risk Assessments Based on Animal Studies - vinyl chloride - trichloroethylene II.Application of PBPK Models to Understand the Health Implications of Human Biomonitoring Data - methylmercury - perfluorooctanoic acid TODAY’S TOPICS

Part 1: RISK ASSESSMENT “The characterization of the potential adverse effects of human exposures to environmental hazards.” - National Academy of Sciences, 1983

Risk Assessment Questions Qualitative: Is the chemical potentially harmful under ANY conditions? Quantitative: At what human exposure concentration does the RISK become SIGNIFICANT?

“All substances are poisons; there is none which is not a poison. The right dose differentiates a poison and a remedy.” –- Paracelsus, “Dancing with proper limitations is a salutary exercise, but when violent and long continued in a crowded room it is extremely pernicious, and has hurried many young people to the grave.” -- A. Murray, M.D., 1826 The Dose is Important

Four Components of Risk Assessment (National Academy of Sciences, 1983) AgentEffect ?? Hazard Identification Risk Characterization AgentDose ?? Exposure Assessment Dose Risk ?? Dose Response Assessment

Key Definitions In Contemporary Human Health Risk Assessment Default – A generic, conservative (safe-sided) approach, for use when chemical-specific information is lacking Mode of Action - in a broad sense, the critical sequence of events involved in the production of a toxic effect by a chemical Dosimetry – Estimation of the tissue exposure to the form of the chemical (e.g., a reactive metabolite) that is most directly related to the toxic effect

absorption, distribution, metabolism, excretion local metabolism, binding reactivity, DNA adducts, receptor activation cytotoxicity, DNA mutation, increased cell division toxicity, cancer Steps in a Toxic Mode of Action Exposure Tissue Dose Molecular Interactions Early Cellular Effects Toxic Responses

Mode of Action Considerations Parent Chemical (ethylene oxide) vs. Stable Metabolite (trichloroacetic acid from trichloroethylene) or Reactive Metabolite (methylene chloride) Physical effect (acute neurotoxicity of solvents) vs. Reactivity (formaldehyde) or Receptor Binding (dioxin) Direct Genotoxicity (mutations from vinyl chloride adducts) vs. Indirect (oxidative stress) or Nongenotoxic (arsenic inhibition of DNA repair)

Role of PBPK Modeling in Risk Assessments for Chemicals Define the relationship between external concentration or dose and an internal measure of (biologically effective) exposure: in experimental animals in subjects from human studies in the population of concern

Application of Pharmacokinetics in Risk Assessment Underlying Assumption: Tissue Dose Equivalence Effects occur as a result of tissue exposure to the toxic form of the chemical. Equivalent effects will be observed at equal tissue exposure/dose in experimental animals and humans. Appropriate measure of tissue dose depends critically on the mode of action for the effect of the chemical.

Steps for Incorporating PBPK Modeling in Human Health Risk Assessment  Identify toxic effects in animals or human populations  Evaluate available data on mode(s) of action, metabolism, for compound and related chemicals  Describe potential mode(s) of action  Propose relationship between response and tissue dose  Develop/adapt an appropriate PBPK model  Estimate tissue dose during toxic exposures with model  Estimate risk in humans based on assumption of similar tissue response for equivalent target tissue dose

Applications of PBPK Modeling in Human Risk Assessment by Regulatory Agencies  Methylene Chloride (EPA, OSHA, ATSDR, Health Canada)  2-Butoxy Ethanol (EPA, Health Canada)  Vinyl Chloride (EPA)  Chloroform (Health Canada)  Dioxin (EPA)  Trichloroethylene (EPA)  Perchloroethylene (EPA)  Isopropanol (EPA)

Considering Pharmacokinetic and Mechanistic Information in Cancer Risk Assessment Examples: Easy: Vinyl Chloride Hard: Trichloroethylene

Example 1: Vinyl Chloride Used to produce plastics; formed in groundwater from bacterial degradation of other contaminants Cross-species correspondence of a rare tumor type: liver angiosarcoma in mouse, rat, and human (workers). Carcinogenic at doses with no evidence of toxicity DNA-reactive, mutagenic Likely to be carcinogenic even at low doses Considering Pharmacokinetic and Mechanistic Information in Cancer Risk Assessment

Metabolism of Vinyl Chloride Dose metric: concentration of chloroethylene epoxide

PBPK Model for Vinyl Chloride (Clewell et al. 2001) Dose metric: production rate of reactive metabolite per gram liver

Rats -- Pharmacokinetics

Rats -- Metabolism

Human -- Subject A

Human -- Subject B

Comparison of Cancer Risk Estimates for Vinyl Chloride Basis Old EPA -- Animal PBPK -- Animal PBPK -- Human (Epidemiology) Inhalation (1 ug/m 3 ) 84.0 x x x Drinking Water (1 ug/L) 54.0 x x 10 -6

Example 2: Trichloroethylene Popular solvent for degreasing ; replaced by perchloroethylene for dry cleaning Lung and liver tumors in mice but not rats; kidney tumors in rats but not mice Equivocal human evidence (contradictory studies) Tumors generally associated with toxicity Little evidence of direct interaction with DNA Unlikely to be carcinogenic at low doses Considering Pharmacokinetic and Mechanistic Information in Cancer Risk Assessment

PBPK Model for TCE (Clewell and Andersen, 2004) QP CI CX VMTB, KMTB KADKAS KTSD KTDPDose CVG QG QTB CVTB CA QC CV QC QF CVF QR CVR QS CVS KF VM, KM QL CVL Alveolar Blood Alveolar Air Tracheo-Bronchial Tissue Lung Toxicity Fat Tissue Rapidly Perfused Tissue Slowly Perfused Tissue Stomach LumenGut Lumen Gut Tissue Liver Tissue Kidney ToxicityLiver Effects

Comparison of Linear Cancer Risk Estimates (per million) for Vinyl Chloride and TCE Basis Vinyl Chloride: Old EPA PBPK -- Animal PBPK -- Human TCE: Old EPA PBPK -- Animal Inhalation (1 ug/m 3 ) Drinking Water (1 ug/L) So… low-dose risk estimates using PBPK modeling would seem to suggest that TCE is a more potent carcinogen than vinyl chloride! (What’s wrong with this picture?)

PBPK modeling can only go so far… Also need an understanding of the toxic mechanism to interpret low-dose risks

Issue: –Detection of chemicals in human blood (“chemical trespass”) –Uncertain relationship to doses in animal toxicity studies Goal: –Reconstruct exposures –Compare to regulatory guidelines (MCL, RfD, etc) Tools: –Pharmacokinetic (PBPK) models –Monte Carlo analysis of exposure variability and sampling uncertainty Products: –Margins of safety –Objective interpretation of biomonitoring data Part 2: Use of PBPK Modeling to Interpret Human Biomonitoring Data

Relationship of Human Biomonitoring Data to Animal Toxicity Data Chemical concentrations in human blood from biomonitoring studies Human exposures (Chemical concentrations in environment) Chemical concentrations in animal blood in toxicity studies Animal exposures (Administered doses in toxicity studies) Pharmacokinetic modeling Pharmacokinetic Modeling Traditional risk assessment Margin of safety Forward dosimetry Reverse dosimetry

Accidental poisoning episode –Iraq – 1972 Seed grain, treated with methylmercury fungicide, inadvertently used to prepare bread Exposures continued over 1- to 3-month period Symptoms (late walking, late talking, neurological performance) observed in children of asymptomatic mothers exposed during pregnancy Reconstructing Exposure with a PBPK Model: An Example with Methylmercury

PBPK Model for Gestational Exposure to Methylmercury Clewell et al. 1999, Shipp et al. 2000

Effect of Changes in Fetal and Maternal Physiology on Dosimetry Non-human primates exposed to a constant daily dose of methylmercury during gestation

Exposure Reconstruction With a PBPK Model Iraqi woman exposed during pregnancy to grain contaminated with methylmercury Estimated exposure: 42 ug/kg/day EPA Reference Dose: 0.1 ug/kg/day

Exposure Reconstruction for perfluoro-octanoic acid Perfluoro-octanoic acid (PFOA) is used in the production of “non-stick” surface coatings; it is also a by-product of the production of water- and grease-repellent finshes PFOA is highly persistent compound that has been found in human blood and in the environment, raising public concerns regarding the possible effects of exposure In this study, a pharmacokinetic model of PFOA was used to estimate exposures in a population exposed to high concentrations of PFOA in drinking water and in a group of workers exposed to PFOA in the workplace

Schematic for a physiologically-motivated renal resorption pharmacokinetic model for PFOA

Predicted time course of PFOA in plasma at different exposure levels Occupational exposure ng/kg/day: * 46 Environmental exposure * Estimated safe exposure based on effects in animal studies Serum PFOA Concentration (ng/mL) Blood levels in general population: 5 ng/mL)

(Clewell et al., 2004) Transplacental exposure to dioxin in maternal blood Dilution of infant dioxin concentration by rapid growth Different fractional volume of fat between male and female effects dioxin concentration Application of PBPK Modeling to Predict the Effect Of Age-Dependent PK on Dioxin Blood Levels Predicted blood levels assuming a constant daily exposure throughout life

Summary: Use of PBPK Modeling in Risk Assessments for Environmental Chemicals Pharmacokinetics can be used to improve the accuracy of extrapolations across species, and to estimate exposures associated with human biomonitoring results BUT: Mechanistic data is essential for the selection of the appropriate dose metric to use in pharmacokinetic modeling as well as for the selection of the appropriate approach for characterizing the dose-response below the range of experimental observation of toxic effects

Physiological Pharmacokinetic Modeling Applications References Andersen, M.E., Clewell, H.J. III, Gargas, M.I., Smith, F.A., and Reitz, R.H. (1987). Physiologically-based pharmacokinetics and the risk assessment process for methylene chloride. Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol. 87, 185 Clewell, H.J., III and Andersen, M.E Applying mode-of-action and pharmacokinetic considerations in contemporary cancer risk assessments: An example with trichloroethylene. Crit Rev Toxicol 34(5): Clewell, H.J., Gearhart, J.M., Gentry, P.R., Covington, T.R., VanLandingham, C.B., Crump, K.S., and Shipp, A.M Evaluation of the uncertainty in an oral Reference Dose for methylmercury due to interindividual variability in pharmacokinetics. Risk Anal 19: Clewell, H.J., Gentry, P.R., Covington, T.R., Sarangapani, R., and Teeguarden, J.G Evaluation of the potential impact of age- and gender-specific pharmacokinetic differences on tissue dosimetry. Toxicol. Sci. 79: Clewell, H.J., Gentry, P.R., Gearhart, J.M., Allen, B.C., Andersen, M.E., Comparison of cancer risk estimates for vinyl chloride using animal and human data with a PBPK model. Sci. Total Environ. 274 (1-3), 37–66. Shipp, A.M., Gentry, P.R., Lawrence, G., VanLandingham, C., Covington, C., Clewell, H.J., Gribben, K., and Crump, K Determination of a site-specific reference dose for methylmercury for fish-eating populations. Toxicol Indust Health 16(9-10): Tan, Y.-M., Liao, Kai H., Conolly, R.B., Blount, B.C., Mason, A.M., and Clewell, H.J Use of a physiologically based pharmacokinetic model to identify exposures consistent with human biomonitoring data for chloroform. J. Toxicol. Environ. Health, Part A, 69: