CMDI Software Components. MD Service Delivers services for the Catalog & Search GUI – Query – Populate UI Acts as a WS and exposes the query and “queryModel()*”

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Dr. Leo Obrst MITRE Information Semantics Information Discovery & Understanding Command & Control Center February 6, 2014February 6, 2014February 6, 2014.
Advertisements

August 6, 2009 Joint Ontolog-OOR Panel 1 Ontology Repository Research Issues Joint Ontolog-OOR Panel Discussion Ken Baclawski August 6, 2009.
Putting the Pieces Together Grace Agnew Slide User Description Rights Holder Authentication Rights Video Object Permission Administration.
CLARIN Metadata & ISO DCR Daan Broeder. Max-Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics TKE ES05 Workshop, August 14th Dublin.
ISOcat Data Category Registry Defining widely accepted linguistic concepts Menzo Windhouwer 1CLARIN-NL MD tutorial, September 2009.
Advanced Metadata Usage Daan Broeder TLA - MPI for Psycholinguistics / CLARIN Metadata in Context, APA/CLARIN Workshop, September 2010 Nijmegen.
From CLARIN Component Metadata to Linked Open Data
Flexible Syntax and Concept Registries as a basis for Metadata Daan Broeder TLA - MPI for Psycholinguistics & CLARIN Metadata in Context, APA/CLARIN Workshop,
The Language Archive – Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics Nijmegen, The Netherlands Metadata Component Framework Possible Standardization Work.
TLA/CLARIN CLAVAS Use Cases: Overview CMDI integration – Metadata editing Resource Annotation Kinship data.
The current state of Metadata - as far as we understand it - Peter Wittenburg The Language Archive - Max Planck Institute CLARIN Research Infrastructure.
Dublin Core application profiles in context Thomas Baker 22 October 2009 Knowledge Organization Systems: Managing to the Future A joint CENDI/NKOS Workshop.
Logics for Data and Knowledge Representation SPARQL Protocol and RDF Query Language (SPARQL) Feroz Farazi.
CLARIN-NL First Call Jan Odijk CLARIN-NL Kick-off Meeting Utrecht, 27 May 2009.
JICSIT/ITAIC 2011 Keynote 1 Yinong Chen (Ph.D.) Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona Service-Oriented Computing.
CLARIN-NL Second Open Call Jan Odijk CLARIN-NL Call 2 Info-session Amsterdam, 26 Aug 2010.
Agenda CMDI Workshop 9.15 Welcome 9.30 Introduction to metadata and the CLARIN Metadata Infrastructure (CMDI) 10.15Coffee 10.30Use of ISOCat within CMDI.
ISOcat demo and providing RELcat input Menzo Windhouwer The Language Archive tla.mpi.nl Data Archiving and Networked Solutions
Moving Cataloguing into the 21 st Century Presentation given at the CLA pre-conference Shaping Tomorrow’s Metadata with RDA June 2, 2010 by Tom Delsey.
Metadata & CMDI CLARIN Component Metadata Infrastructure Daan Broeder et al. Max-Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics CLARIN NL CMDI Metadata Tutorial.
The Language Archive – Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics Nijmegen, The Netherlands Why should we invest in DWF? Peter Wittenburg CLARIN Research.
The MMI Tools Carlos Rueda Monterey Bay Aquarium Research Institute OOS Semantic Interoperability Workshop Marine Metadata Interoperability Project Boulder,
METADATA HARMONISATION SDMX Training BANK INDONESIA SEPTEMBER 2015 YOGYAKARTA, INDONESIA.
CLARIN Metadata Infrastructure Component Metadata and intermediate solutions Daan Broeder Claus Zinn Dieter van Uytvanck - Max-Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics.
Meta Tagging / Metadata Lindsay Berard Assisted by: Li Li.
CLARIN for Linguists Portal & Searching for Resources Jan Odijk LOT Summerschool Nijmegen,
1 Open Ontology Repository: Architecture and Interfaces Ken Baclawski Northeastern University 1.
11 CMDI/ISOcat And Semantic Operability Ineke Schuurman ISOcat content coördinator CLARIN-NL Menzo Windhouwer ISOcat system administrator Utrecht
STASIS Technical Innovations - Simplifying e-Business Collaboration by providing a Semantic Mapping Platform - Dr. Sven Abels - TIE -
LEXUS a flexible web based lexicon tool LEXUS a flexible web based lexicon tool, august 21 th, 2005 Marc Kemps-Snijders Peter Wittenburg
The Language Archive – Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics Nijmegen, The Netherlands NP CMDI-1 Metadata Component Framework New Standardization.
CLARIN Issues Peter Wittenburg MPI for Psycholinguistics Nijmegen, NL.
Technology – Broad View Aspects that play a role when integrating archives leave the details of some core topics to the 2. day Bernhard Neumair:Base Technologies.
A Data Category Registry- and Component- based Metadata Framework Daan Broeder et al. Max-Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics LREC 2010.
CLARIN-NL Requirements and Desiderata Jan Odijk CLARIN-NL Call 3 Info-session Utrecht, 25 Aug 2011.
The data standards soup … Is the most exciting topic you can dream of.
Data Management Planning Session Kevin Gomes Michael Meisinger Arcot Rajasekar Michael Wan October 19, 2007.
Metadata Registries Registry: authoritative, centrally controlled store of information – W3C Web Services Glossary, 2004
Beyond ISOcat 20 June 2013CLARIN-NL ISOcat tutorial1.
The Language Archive – Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics Nijmegen, The Netherlands TLA/MPI requirements for a Semantic Registry.
Agenda CMDI Tutorial 9.30 Welcome & Coffee Introduction to metadata and the CLARIN Metadata Infrastructure (CMDI) 10.30CMDI & ISO-DCR 10.50The CMDI.
ISO TC 37/CLARIN SEMANTIC DATA REGISTRY WORKSHOP UTRECHT, DECEMBER ISOcat: Metadata Registry SUE ELLEN WRIGHT DECEMBER 2013.
WEB SERVICE DESCRIPTION LANGUAGE (WSDL). Introduction  WSDL is an XML language that contains information about the interface semantics and ‘administrivia’
CLARIN Concept Registry: the new semantic registry Ineke Schuurman, Menzo Windhouwer, Oddrun Ohren, Daniel Zeman
CLARIN Requirements for a Semantic Registry Daan Broeder The Language Archive – MPI Ineke Schuurman CLARIN-NL/VL – KU Leuven & Utrecht.
Creating & Testing CLARIN Metadata Components A CLARIN-NL project Folkert de Vriend Meertens Institute, Amsterdam 18/05/2010.
Sources of inspiration Discussions in DFT Use Cases Discussions in DF Use Cases „Paris“ Document Comments on „PARIS“ document Urgently need “Basic and.
ONLINE SERVICES FOR ACCESSING PHC MICRODATA POPULATION AND HOUSEHOLD CENSUS QUERY SYSTEM APPLICATION (1992, 2002 and 2011 CENSUSES)
The library is open Digital Assets Management & Institutional Repository Russian-IUG November 2015 Tomsk, Russia Nabil Saadallah Manager Business.
IULA-UPF repositories: management, integration, how to survive Marta Villegas.
Repository Registries Agenda 11.30Welcome & State of the Discussion Is it all one – is it all different? Peter & Herman and commenters 12.10Actions to.
ISO TC 37/CLARIN DISCUSSION UTRECHT, DECEMBER 9/ Thinning Down a Bloated Cat SUE ELLEN WRIGHT DECEMBER 2013.
A Data Category Registry- and Component- based Metadata Framework Daan Broeder et al. Max-Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics LREC 2010.
SALUS Semantic Middleware SALUS Advisory Board Meeting - January 17, 2013.
#SummitNow Super Size Your Search 14 th November 2013 Fran Alvarez (Zaizi)
GEOSS Common Infrastructure (GCI) The GEOSS Common Infrastructure allows Earth Observations users to search, access and use the data, information, tools.
IPDA Registry Definitions Project Dan Crichton Pedro Osuna Alain Sarkissian.
Marc Kemps-Snijders Menzo Windhouwer Sue Ellen Wright
Broad Functional Classification a Data Type Registry Use Case
Session 3A: Catalog Services and Metadata Models
An Overview of Data-PASS Shared Catalog
Core Task Status, AR Doug Nebert September 22, 2008.
Wsdl.
Training course on Euro SDMX Registry
Pilot project training
The Re3gistry software and the INSPIRE Registry
SDMX Reference Infrastructure Introduction
The JISC IE Metadata Schema Registry
A Tool to Support Ontology Creation based on Incremental Mini-Ontology Merging Zonghui Lian Supported by.
SDMX IT Tools SDMX Registry
Presentation transcript:

CMDI Software Components

MD Service Delivers services for the Catalog & Search GUI – Query – Populate UI Acts as a WS and exposes the query and “queryModel()*” APIs Uses expandQuery() from Semantic mapping Uses Component Registry & MD Repository MD service Semantic Mapping Service Relation Registry Catalog Search GUI Joint CLARIN MD Repos. DCR TEI DCMI

MD Service What APIs are currently defined? What APIs are being build?

Relation Registry I Store triples of concepts/data categories identifiers and relation types Also support relation types already provided in the DCR – IsValueOf, broaderConceptOf Registration of recognized concept registries Support for sets of relations “owned” by persons or projects. Fallback to “default” bundle Set of APIs to support other SW components Simple GUI for management and debugging MD service Semantic Mapping Service Relation Registry Catalog Search GUI Joint CLARIN MD Repos. DCR TEI DCMI

Relation Registry II Store triples of two concepts /data categories identifiers and a relation type Identifiers: PIDs Relation types: isA, broaderConcept, isKindOf, isValueOf May choose to delegate relation to the DCR??? MD service Semantic Mapping Service Relation Registry Catalog Search GUI Joint CLARIN MD Repos. DCR TEI DCMI

Relation Registry III Support for bundles of relations “owned” by persons or projects. Fallback to “default” bundle Merge sets of relations? Persistency of relation sets? Persistency of relations? MD service Semantic Mapping Service Relation Registry Catalog Search GUI Joint CLARIN MD Repos. DCR TEI DCMI

Relation Registry VI Set of APIs to support other SW Components API: set/get relations based on: “relation”, “set”, “Term”, …? API: import/export sets of relations API: register accepted concept registries. Simple GUI for management and debugging: Browse through the relations by set. Edit relations by hand MD service Semantic Mapping Service Relation Registry Catalog Search GUI Joint CLARIN MD Repos. DCR TEI DCMI

Semantic Mapping Service I Allow metadata queries to be mapped on MD components using different terminology. Depends on: – the granularity of concepts in the DCR – Required return precision Use expansion: – In: normalized query – Out: list of “equivalent” queries Normalized query language concept seems to have faded since use of SRU MD service Semantic Mapping Service Relation Registry Catalog Search GUI Joint CLARIN MD Repos. DCR TEI DCMI

Expansion dimensions Use of relations – Not use DCR nor RR – Use DCR – Use DCR + RR Use of context – Use no context Actor.name == xyz -> name == xyz – Use context Actor.name == xyz -> Participant.fullname == xyz Actor Name Particip Fullname Birth ……

Expansion & Relations No expansion. “Name” and “Fullname” are never mapped because they are different terms Use only DCR and other concept registries – “Name” and “Fullname” are mapped if both refer to same concept “Identifier” Use also DCR and RR (equivalence only) – “Name” and “Fullname” are mapped even when they refer to separated concepts but the RR knows: “Fullname” isA “Name” Use DCR and RR (including all relation types) – “Name” and “Fullname” are mapped even if the RR only contains “Fullname” isKindOfA “Name”

Expansion & Context Semantic Mapping Service Family.Actor.Name Group.Actor.Name Household.Participant.Fullname Relation Registry DCR Family isX Group Family isX Household Actor isX Participant Name isX Fullname Query: Family.Actor.Name = xyz Name Fullname context No context

Semantic Mapping Service II – API: registering concept registries & RRs – only the DCR has a standardized API for the others we need bridges (DC, TEI) Now we think to put them in the DCR anyway – API: expand query. – API: return related concepts catalog GUI ( and debugging) – API: ??? MD service Semantic Mapping Service Relation Registry Catalog Search GUI Joint CLARIN MD Repos. DCR TEI DCMI

Semantic Mapping Service III Normalized query specs: – Fullname = “Jan van Dongen” – Actor.language = “French” – Family.Actor.Name = “xyz” For speed: – Semantic mapping service has to build up tables of all terms used in the descriptions and their related concepts – Possibility renew cache MD service Semantic Mapping Service Relation Registry Catalog Search GUI Joint CLARIN MD Repos. DCR TEI DCMI