1 EduLink S MultiFrequencySmartLink SX Importance of FM Systems and Product Overview Evert Dijkstra, Phonak Communications, Murten, Switzerland.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Introduction to Cochlear Implants for EI Service Providers Roxanne J. Aaron, MA, CCC-A, FAAA The Moog Center for Deaf Education March 2005.
Advertisements

The benefit of using the Microlink MLx and MLxS FM radio aid systems, over distance and in noise, with the Nucleus ESPrit 3G speech processor Sarah Flynn.
Improving audibility as a foundation for better speech understanding Pamela Souza, PhD Northwestern University Evanston, IL.
Radio Aids used in research studies Phonak Microvox Connevans 220 Connevans Genie Sennheiser Microport Phonic Ear 471R/ 475T Phonic Ear Solaris Phonak.
Hearing matters: What stops children hearing well in the classroom? Harvey Dillon National Acoustic Laboratories.
Freedom Processor for Nucleus CI24 The South of England Cochlear Implant Centre Experience Roberta Buhagiar, Sarie Cross and Julie Eyles 1 Aided Thresholds.
Room Acoustics: implications for speech reception and perception by hearing aid and cochlear implant users 2003 Arthur Boothroyd, Ph.D. Distinguished.
Dodo Youyou Hearhear Meme? The Listening Environment Molly Lyon, M.A., CCC-A/SP LSLS AVEd Via Christi Hospitals January 21, 2011.
Universidad de La Laguna EVALUATION OF THE BENEFITS OF FM SYSTEMS IN COCHLEAR IMPLANTS AND HEARING AID USERS Barajas, J.J. (3), Mora, R. (2), Fernández,
Vera W. Hendrix Sara McConatha Alabama Institute for Deaf and Blind “Effective Practices for Teaching Deaf and Hard of Hearing Students in Inclusive Settings”
Interrupted speech perception Su-Hyun Jin, Ph.D. University of Texas & Peggy B. Nelson, Ph.D. University of Minnesota.
“The Effects of Classroom Amplification Systems on Early Elementary Students’ Academic Achievement, Attending Behavior, and Their Ability to Hear Their.
TOPIC 4 BEHAVIORAL ASSESSMENT MEASURES. The Audiometer Types Clinical Screening.
1 New Technique for Improving Speech Intelligibility for the Hearing Impaired Miriam Furst-Yust School of Electrical Engineering Tel Aviv University.
The use of FM systems with Cochlear Implants- How has research had an impact on practice? Sarah Flynn and Elizabeth Wood South of England Cochlear Implant.
1 Recent development in hearing aid technology Lena L N Wong Division of Speech & Hearing Sciences University of Hong Kong.
Discussion and Conclusions 9 of the 10 subjects were able to discriminate speech better with the radio aid at 1m, 3m and 10m than with out the radio aid.
Deborah Edwards, MS,CCC-A Dawn Ruley, AuD, CCC-A Advanced FM: Programming & Verification.
Auditory Processing Disorder “A riddle wrapped in a mystery inside an enigma.”
Technology for Hearing Impairments
Technology For Hearing Devices Part V-A
Matthew Bysouth Educational Audiologist
FM System Christine Lorch Students listen to their teachers and other students for at least 75% of the day. Having the assistance of adaptive technology.
Fitting and Evaluation of FM Systems for Cochlear Implant Users Linda M. Thibodeau.
What they asked... What are the long term effects of fitting bilateral amplification simultaneously (both aids on Day #1) versus sequentially (the second.
Comparisons of Word Recognition Performance in Normal-Hearing Children A Pilot Project by Tiffany Skinner and Stephanie Taylor Spring 1999.
The Freedom Cochlear Implant: Another Innovation from Cochlear Children with Cochlear Implants on their Way to Inclusion Дети с кохлеарными имплантатами.
CSD 5400 REHABILITATION PROCEDURES FOR THE HARD OF HEARING Educational Management of Hard- of-Hearing and Deaf Children Assistive Listening Devices.
C ENTRAL A UDITORY P ROCESSING D ISORDERS AND A SSISTIVE L ISTENING D EVICES R EVIEW.
SPED 537 ECSE Methods Multiple Disabilities Ch 6 Deborah Chen, Ph.D. California State University, Northridge March 27-28, 2006.
Ruth Litovsky University of Wisconsin Madison, WI USA Brain Plasticity and Development in Children and Adults with Cochlear Implants
METHODOLOGY INTRODUCTION ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS LITERATURE Low frequency information via a hearing aid has been shown to increase speech intelligibility in noise.
Speech Perception 4/4/00.
By Luisa and Noriko. Description of class  Language Proficiency level: low intermediate  Class size: 12 students  Age: 15 to 25  Native Language background:
© 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 1  Two Major Types  Language disorders include formulating and comprehending spoken messages. ▪ Categories:
creating sound value TM Spatial release from masking deficits in hearing-impaired people: Is inadequate audibility the problem? Helen.
Ann Morrison, Ph.D..  effects/59/mp3/607974_SOUNDDOGS__su.m p3 effects/59/mp3/607974_SOUNDDOGS__su.m.
A Study of Assisting Hearing-Impaired Students in Identifying Mandarin Tones by Using Modified Pitch Contours Adviser: Dr. Yeou - Jiunn Chen Presenter:
Hearing Research Center
Functional Listening Evaluations:
Staffan Hygge Noise, memory and learning (Buller, minne och inlärning) Staffan Hygge Environmental Psychology Department of Building, Energy and Environmental.
Katherine Morrow, Sarah Williams, and Chang Liu Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX
Tools for optimizing the installation of warning sounds in noisy workplaces Chantal Laroche, Christian Giguère, Rida Al Osman and Yun Zheng 2010 NHCA Conference.
Optimizing Auditory Development in Infants with Hearing Loss and Cognitive Disability Kathryn Arehart, Ph.D. 1, Christine Yoshinaga-Itano, Ph.D. 1 and.
Motion Perception Deficits and Reading Impairment It’s the noise, not the motion A. Sperling, Z-L. Lu, F. Manis & M. Seidenberg.
Figures for Chapter 8 Candidacy Dillon (2001) Hearing Aids.
Can You Hear Me Now? Benefits of Frequency-Modulated (FM) Systems for Adults and Children Using Cochlear Implants: A Meta-Analytic Approach Mary Pat Kleineck,
Audiology in Schools What to expect Jennifer Famularo Craig, Au.D., CCC-A.
Date of download: 5/27/2016 Copyright © 2016 American Medical Association. All rights reserved. From: The Importance of High-Frequency Audibility in the.
What can we expect of cochlear implants for listening to speech in noisy environments? Andrew Faulkner: UCL Speech Hearing and Phonetic Sciences.
Dr Guita Movallali. How does Cued Speech help speech? Speech is much more complex than the ability to make speech sounds. It is necessary to know how.
Harvey Dillon Carolyn Mee Testing hearing is child’s play John SeymourJesus Cuauhtemoc.
Metro Regional Program
4aPPa32. How Susceptibility To Noise Varies Across Speech Frequencies
Copyright © American Speech-Language-Hearing Association
Copyright © American Speech-Language-Hearing Association
D I S C U S S I O N & C O N C L U S I O N
Project 1. Assistive Device
Copyright © American Speech-Language-Hearing Association
Evaluation of Classroom Audio Distribution and Personal FM Systems
Copyright © American Speech-Language-Hearing Association
Fondazione Istituto Italiano di Tecnologia, Genoa, Italy
Copyright © American Speech-Language-Hearing Association
Only quality controlled induction loops are fit for the future
FM Hearing-Aid Device Checkpoint 2
FM Hearing-Aid Device Checkpoint 3
Brain Mechanisms in Early Language Acquisition
Today’s Topics Introduction to basic FM concepts Equipment overview:
Speechreading Perry C. Hanavan.
Introduction to Soundfield Systems
Presentation transcript:

1 EduLink S MultiFrequencySmartLink SX Importance of FM Systems and Product Overview Evert Dijkstra, Phonak Communications, Murten, Switzerland

2 EduLink S MultiFrequencySmartLink SX Outline  Introduction FM systems  State-of-the art FM systems for hearing impaired children, adults, and CI recipients  State-of-the art FM systems for children with Auditory Processing Disorders, Attention Deficit and Learning Disabilities  Conclusions

3 EduLink S MultiFrequencySmartLink SX Introduction Noise Reverberation Distance Three factors deteriorate the Signal-to-Noise ratio and therefore the speech perception

4 EduLink S MultiFrequencySmartLink SX Noise Many of our daily activities are happening in a noisy environment

5 EduLink S MultiFrequencySmartLink SX HL and additionally required SNR Necessary SNR for 50% recognition of sentences (adults) Average hearing loss in dB Signal-to-Noise ratio in dB (Ref.: normal hearing) Killion, 1997

6 EduLink S MultiFrequencySmartLink SX Difference in SNR between children and adults Curves compare adult and infant sound discrimination in noise - normal hearing Children are at a greater disadvantage than adults Noise has greatest impact on children during the period of language acquisition Infants 8-11 months Adults Nozza et al., Signal-to-Noise Ratio (dB) Proportion correct

7 EduLink S MultiFrequencySmartLink SX Echo All rooms cause echos; depending on building materials some more than others

8 EduLink S MultiFrequencySmartLink SX Field Study Helfer & Wilber  Comparison scores for different ages  With S/R = 10 dB  Words with/without meanings

9 EduLink S MultiFrequencySmartLink SX Meaningful Words

10 EduLink S MultiFrequencySmartLink SX Meaningless words

11 EduLink S MultiFrequencySmartLink SX Distance Distance (Meter) dB Noise floor Recordings: (

12 EduLink S MultiFrequencySmartLink SX Effect of distance on normal hearing children and adults  All children are at a disadvantage when listening to a distant speaker or in background noise  Hearing impaired children have an even greater disadvantage in these environments Adapted from Johnson 1996 Age Group Word recognition up-close in quiet (1.8 m) Word recognition with distance &noise (7 m) 4 years 5 years 6 years Adult 88.3% 94.3% 98% 99.3%97.0% 86.7% 84% 67% Normal hearing children and adults

13 EduLink S MultiFrequencySmartLink SX Available technologies?  Key Question: Are there technologies that can simultaneously restore the required SNR, avoid the impact of echo’s and overcome the distance ?  Answer today: Only one, I.e. FM technology  Answer tomorrow: Most likely only one, I.e. FM technology

14 EduLink S MultiFrequencySmartLink SX Principle of FM FM

15 EduLink S MultiFrequencySmartLink SX Fieldstudy with 48 adults Source: Valente, 2002

16 EduLink S MultiFrequencySmartLink SX Settings for fieldstudy SuperZoom (2 directional microphones) Zoom (1 directional microphone) Wide-Angle (1 omnidirectional microphone) TX3 Claro-FM

17 EduLink S MultiFrequencySmartLink SX (SD) 4.3 dB Source: Valente, 2002

18 EduLink S MultiFrequencySmartLink SX Evolution of FM receivers Body-worn MicroLink MLx Focus: Robustness Focus: Miniaturization Focus: Standardization Focus: Flexibility MLxS iLink Focus: Integration 2005