The GriPhyN Planning Process All-Hands Meeting ISI 15 October 2001.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Presentation by Prabhjot Singh
Advertisements

State of Indiana Business One Stop (BOS) Program Roadmap Updated June 6, 2013 RFI ATTACHMENT D.
Virtual Data and the Chimera System* Ian Foster Mathematics and Computer Science Division Argonne National Laboratory and Department of Computer Science.
Software Modeling SWE5441 Lecture 3 Eng. Mohammed Timraz
A. Arbree, P. Avery, D. Bourilkov, R. Cavanaugh, S. Katageri, G. Graham, J. Rodriguez, J. Voeckler, M. Wilde CMS & GriPhyN Conference in High Energy Physics,
May 9, 2008 Reorganization of the OSG Project The existing project organization chart was put in place at the beginning of It has worked very well.
1 Software & Grid Middleware for Tier 2 Centers Rob Gardner Indiana University DOE/NSF Review of U.S. ATLAS and CMS Computing Projects Brookhaven National.
GRID DATA MANAGEMENT PILOT (GDMP) Asad Samar (Caltech) ACAT 2000, Fermilab October , 2000.
Workload Management Workpackage Massimo Sgaravatto INFN Padova.
CSE 111: Object Oriented Design. Design “To program is human but to design is divine” (WEH)
Workload Management Massimo Sgaravatto INFN Padova.
Lecture Nine Database Planning, Design, and Administration
WRAP Technical Support System Project Update AoH Call October 19, 2005.
Web-based Portal for Discovery, Retrieval and Visualization of Earth Science Datasets in Grid Environment Zhenping (Jane) Liu.
WORKFLOWS IN CLOUD COMPUTING. CLOUD COMPUTING  Delivering applications or services in on-demand environment  Hundreds of thousands of users / applications.
What is Business Analysis Planning & Monitoring?
Chapter 9 Database Planning, Design, and Administration Sungchul Hong.
Database System Development Lifecycle © Pearson Education Limited 1995, 2005.
UML - Development Process 1 Software Development Process Using UML (2)
 Cloud computing  Workflow  Workflow lifecycle  Workflow design  Workflow tools : xcp, eucalyptus, open nebula.
Grappa: Grid access portal for physics applications Shava Smallen Extreme! Computing Laboratory Department of Physics Indiana University.
XCAT Science Portal Status & Future Work July 15, 2002 Shava Smallen Extreme! Computing Laboratory Indiana University.
Chapter 2 The process Process, Methods, and Tools
Key Project Drivers - FY11 Ruth Pordes, June 15th 2010.
10/20/05 LIGO Scientific Collaboration 1 LIGO Data Grid: Making it Go Scott Koranda University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee.
Workload Management WP Status and next steps Massimo Sgaravatto INFN Padova.
HEP Experiment Integration within GriPhyN/PPDG/iVDGL Rick Cavanaugh University of Florida DataTAG/WP4 Meeting 23 May, 2002.
ARGONNE  CHICAGO Ian Foster Discussion Points l Maintaining the right balance between research and development l Maintaining focus vs. accepting broader.
Cluster Reliability Project ISIS Vanderbilt University.
David Adams ATLAS ATLAS Distributed Analysis David Adams BNL March 18, 2004 ATLAS Software Workshop Grid session.
1 School of Computer, National University of Defense Technology A Profile on the Grid Data Engine (GridDaEn) Xiao Nong
Grid Workload Management & Condor Massimo Sgaravatto INFN Padova.
Scalable Systems Software Center Resource Management and Accounting Working Group Face-to-Face Meeting October 10-11, 2002.
OOI CI LCA REVIEW August 2010 Ocean Observatories Initiative OOI Cyberinfrastructure Architecture Overview Michael Meisinger Life Cycle Architecture Review.
GriPhyN Status and Project Plan Mike Wilde Mathematics and Computer Science Division Argonne National Laboratory.
Miron Livny Computer Sciences Department University of Wisconsin-Madison Welcome and Condor Project Overview.
Ruth Pordes, Fermilab CD, and A PPDG Coordinator Some Aspects of The Particle Physics Data Grid Collaboratory Pilot (PPDG) and The Grid Physics Network.
Grid Workload Management Massimo Sgaravatto INFN Padova.
Pegasus: Mapping Scientific Workflows onto the Grid Ewa Deelman Center for Grid Technologies USC Information Sciences Institute.
© 2012 xtUML.org Bill Chown – Mentor Graphics Model Driven Engineering.
Virtual Data Grid Architecture Ewa Deelman, Ian Foster, Carl Kesselman, Miron Livny.
Datasets on the GRID David Adams PPDG All Hands Meeting Catalogs and Datasets session June 11, 2003 BNL.
Modeling Component-based Software Systems with UML 2.0 George T. Edwards Jaiganesh Balasubramanian Arvind S. Krishna Vanderbilt University Nashville, TN.
Fifth Lecture Hour 9:30 – 10:20 am, September 9, 2001 Framework for a Software Management Process – Life Cycle Phases (Part II, Chapter 5 of Royce’ book)
17 th October 2005CCP4 Database Meeting (York) CCP4(i)/BIOXHIT Database Project: Scope, Aims, Plans, Status and all that jazz Peter Briggs, Wanjuan Yang.
GEON2 and OpenEarth Framework (OEF) Bradley Wallet School of Geology and Geophysics, University of Oklahoma
GRID Overview Internet2 Member Meeting Spring 2003 Sandra Redman Information Technology and Systems Center and Information Technology Research Center National.
CASTOR evolution Presentation to HEPiX 2003, Vancouver 20/10/2003 Jean-Damien Durand, CERN-IT.
LIGO- G Z GriPhyN All-Hands Meeting LSC Member Institution (UT Brownsville) 1 GriPhyN Education and Outreach Joe Romano University of.
DGC Paris WP2 Summary of Discussions and Plans Peter Z. Kunszt And the WP2 team.
The principles of an object oriented software development process Week 04 1.
G Z LIGO's Physics at the Information Frontier Grant and OSG: Update Warren Anderson for Patrick Brady (PIF PI) OSG Executive Board Meeting Caltech.
District Leadership Module Preview This PowerPoint provides a sample of the District Leadership Module PowerPoint. The actual Overview PowerPoint is 73.
1 - 1 Systems Analysis and Design, Key Ideas Many failed systems were abandoned because analysts tried to build wonderful systems without understanding.
Virtual Data Management for CMS Simulation Production A GriPhyN Prototype.
GriPhyN Project Paul Avery, University of Florida, Ian Foster, University of Chicago NSF Grant ITR Research Objectives Significant Results Approach.
GriPhyN Management Mike Wilde University of Chicago, Argonne Paul Avery University of Florida GriPhyN NSF Project.
Status of Globus activities Massimo Sgaravatto INFN Padova for the INFN Globus group
April 25, 2006Parag Mhashilkar, Fermilab1 Resource Selection in OSG & SAM-On-The-Fly Parag Mhashilkar Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory Condor Week.
Grid Status - PPDG / Magda / pacman Torre Wenaus BNL DOE/NSF Review of US LHC Software and Computing Fermilab Nov 29, 2001.
T EST T OOLS U NIT VI This unit contains the overview of the test tools. Also prerequisites for applying these tools, tools selection and implementation.
Grid Activities in CMS Asad Samar (Caltech) PPDG meeting, Argonne July 13-14, 2000.
1 CMS Virtual Data Overview Koen Holtman Caltech/CMS GriPhyN all-hands meeting, Marina del Rey April 9, 2001.
CMS Experience with the Common Analysis Framework I. Fisk & M. Girone Experience in CMS with the Common Analysis Framework Ian Fisk & Maria Girone 1.
CIM Modeling for E&U - (Short Version)
U.S. ATLAS Grid Production Experience
IEEE Std 1074: Standard for Software Lifecycle
Object Oriented Analysis and Design
Pegasus and Condor Gaurang Mehta, Ewa Deelman, Carl Kesselman, Karan Vahi Center For Grid Technologies USC/ISI.
Status of Grids for HEP and HENP
Presentation transcript:

The GriPhyN Planning Process All-Hands Meeting ISI 15 October 2001

Meeting Goals Clarify our vision and direction –Know how we can make a difference! Map that vision to each experiment –Develop concrete examples of what we want to build Coordinate our research programs Shape toolkit to challenge-problem needs Coordinate overlapping technologies Organize as coordinated subteams with specific missions and defined points of interaction

Meeting Plan Meeting Goals –Discuss our needs; detail our year 2 plan –Create visible, demonstrable, useful results this (project) year Review of Architecture An in-depth look at virtual data and request mgmt Breakouts to focus on technologies Breakouts to focus on experiments Determine toolkit and testbed needs Shape concrete challenge problems –ask: when we’re done building what we propose, what value will we bring to the experiments? –create deliverables that will capture the imagination (and commitment) of the experiments

Refining the Project Plan Current draft is only a framework –team members need to create the real plan Approach: –Vision > VDT > Experiment Plans > CS Proposal: –Vision, framework: needs your input –Miron

Project Plan Responsibilities –VDT: Miron –ATLAS: Jenny –CMS: Rick –LIGO: Albert –SDSS: Jim –Testbed: tbd –CS Research: tbd GOAL: An accepted plan by Fri Nov 2

Project Flow

Project Activities Vision Focusing Experiment Analysis –Use cases, statistics, distributions, data flow patterns, tools, data types, HIPO Architectural Refinement Research –Attach both specific and general problems –Focus and coordinate Toolkit design and development Testbed construction –Two types: GR and GD Challenge Problems Result Integration – the goal!

Architecture Identify new functional modules that need to be created for GriPhyN –Monitoring service, –Request Planner –Virtual Data Catalog service Define how we will connect and integrate our solutions, e.g.: –Virtual data language –DAGman graphs

Technology Focus Talks Breakouts –Monitoring –Virtual data –Replica location –Job execution

Technology: Virtual Data Catalog Structures Catalog manipulation language (VDL) Complex Semantic issues –Transformation signatures –Derivation generation –Fuzzy dependencies and data equivalence

Technology: Replica Location Explore schema Explore distributed replica location service Explore interfaces to metadata databases

Technology: Job Planning and Execution Connections between Condor and Globus Roles of RSL and ClassAds Role of DAGman job desc. language Where planner fits in – key issue Requirements for data staging and storage management – tied to execution plan

Monitoring Drives research Drives planning modules One of the keys to scalability

Experiments Analysis goals –Identify existing data sources –Identify gaps and how to fill them –Identify one person responsible Challenge Problems –Identify a sequence for Y2 and items for Y3-5 Planning goals –Identify a project coordinator responsible for the coordination and plan production: one person

Experiment Specifics ATLAS: Using data challenge progressions; focus on analysis phase rather than simulation-production CMS: Virtual data for MOP, then high throughput and automated planning LIGO: Need to move into more complex LDAS operations and start tracking virtual data –Explore issues of tracking data dependencies that are derived from extensive searches SDSS: starting with cluster finding application –Goldmine of use-case info waiting for analysis of processing to date – need some CS detectives!

Experiment Plan Template Analysis of Experiment IT process Testbed / infrastructure construction VDT deployment Challenge Problem Cycles –Identify and analyze the problem –Communicate and negotiate VDT needs –Design and construct the solution –Negotiate and perform integration

Experiment plan details Analysis documents Infrastructure plans VDT feature requests VDT deployments Challenge problem analysis Challenge solution designs Challenge result (research publications) Challenge solution integration, usage, and support plans

Research VD Representation, provenance, transformation signatures, data generation paradigms Request Planning and Execution –Striving for increasingly greater resource leverage with increasing both ower AND transparency –Monitoring – tieing it all together –Fault tolerance – keeping it all running! User interfaces –How to access the power of the datagrid Scalability: more data, faster

Infrastructure / testbeds Need to create a testbed team within GriPhyN Hope to leverage resources from the GRIDS center Need to create a separate project plan for this activity In this meeting, we should identify requirements for this effort

Meeting Tips Designate both a leader and note taker for all sessions Share the bandwidth / airtime! Call out items that should be noted in the minutes Identify action items Track issues to take offline or devote later sessions to; identify a path to resolution We *can* adjust the schedule as makes sense – suggest this if you see the need your slides to