1 Simulating the phase partitioning of HNO 3, NH 3, and HCl with size- resolved particles over northern Colorado in winter James T. Kelly 1, Kirk R. Baker.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Some recent studies using Models-3 Ian Rodgers Presentation to APRIL meeting London 4 th March 2003.
Advertisements

Nitrogen Deposition at Rocky Mountain National Park: the RoMANS Study Mike Barna Bill Malm Bret Schichtel Kristi Gebhart Air Resources Division National.
Office of Research and Development National Exposure Research Laboratory, Atmospheric Modeling and Analysis Division Changes in U.S. Regional-Scale Air.
Inventory Issues and Modeling- Some Examples Brian Timin USEPA/OAQPS October 21, 2002.
Photochemical Model Performance for PM2.5 Sulfate, Nitrate, Ammonium, and pre-cursor species SO2, HNO3, and NH3 at Background Monitor Locations in the.
Modeled Ammonia Nitrogen Deposition Source Apportionment at Rocky Mountain National Park for RoMANS2 Mike Barna 1 Marco Rodriguez 2 Kristi Gebhart 1 Bret.
CO budget and variability over the U.S. using the WRF-Chem regional model Anne Boynard, Gabriele Pfister, David Edwards National Center for Atmospheric.
Fine-Scale Simulation of Ammonium and Nitrate over the South Coast Air Basin and San Joaquin Valley of California during CalNex-2010 James Kelly, Kirk.
Three-State Air Quality Study (3SAQS) Three-State Data Warehouse (3SDW) 2008 CAMx Modeling Model Performance Evaluation Summary University of North Carolina.
CMAQ and REMSAD- Model Performance and Ongoing Improvements Brian Timin, Carey Jang, Pat Dolwick, Norm Possiel, Tom Braverman USEPA/OAQPS December 3, 2002.
Title EMEP Unified model Importance of observations for model evaluation Svetlana Tsyro MSC-W / EMEP TFMM workshop, Lillestrøm, 19 October 2010.
Christian Seigneur AER San Ramon, CA
Numerical Simulations of Snowpack Augmentation for Drought Mitigation Studies in the Colorado Rocky Mountains William R. Cotton, Ray McAnelly, and Gustavo.
THE REGENTS PARK AND TOWER ENVIRONMENTAL EXPERIMENT REPARTEE 2006 & 2007 Roy M. Harrison University of Birmingham.
Beta Testing of the SCICHEM-2012 Reactive Plume Model James T. Kelly and Kirk R. Baker Office of Air Quality Planning & Standards US Environmental Protection.
Colorado Front Range Emissions Study Regional study of the impact of oil and gas operations on ambient hydrocarbon levels in the Northern Front Range based.
Sources and Processes Affecting the Chemical and Physical Properties of Denver Aerosol during DISCOVER-AQ FRAPPÉ/DISCOVER-AQ Science Team Meeting 4 May.
OMI HCHO columns Jan 2006Jul 2006 Policy-relevant background (PRB) ozone calculations for the EPA ISA and REA Zhang, L., D.J. Jacob, N.V. Smith-Downey,
Modeling Studies of Air Quality in the Four Corners Region National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Cooperative Institute for Research in.
Clinton MacDonald 1, Kenneth Craig 1, Jennifer DeWinter 1, Adam Pasch 1, Brigette Tollstrup 2, and Aleta Kennard 2 1 Sonoma Technology, Inc., Petaluma,
EVALUATION AND IMPROVEMENT OF GAS/PARTICLE MASS TRANSFER TREATMENTS FOR 3-D AEROSOL SIMULATION AND FORECAST Xiaoming Hu and Yang Zhang North Carolina State.
Stephan F.J. De Wekker S. Aulenbach, B. Sacks, D. Schimel, B. Stephens, National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder CO; T. Vukicevic,
1 Using Hemispheric-CMAQ to Provide Initial and Boundary Conditions for Regional Modeling Joshua S. Fu 1, Xinyi Dong 1, Kan Huang 1, and Carey Jang 2 1.
1 Comparison of CAMx and CMAQ PM2.5 Source Apportionment Estimates Kirk Baker and Brian Timin U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park,
On the Model’s Ability to Capture Key Measures Relevant to Air Quality Policies through Analysis of Multi-Year O 3 Observations and CMAQ Simulations Daiwen.
Online measurements of chemical composition and size distribution of submicron aerosol particles in east Baltic region Inga Rimšelytė Institute of Physics.
Comparing Modal and Sectional Approaches in Modeling Particulate Matter in Northern California K. Max Zhang 1, Jinyou Liang 2, Anthony S. Wexler 1 and.
Evaluating ammonia (NH 3 ) predictions in the NOAA National Air Quality Forecast Capability (NAQFC) using in situ aircraft measurements William Battye,
WRAP Experience: Investigation of Model Biases Uma Shankar, Rohit Mathur and Francis Binkowski MCNC–Environmental Modeling Center Research Triangle Park,
Melanie Follette-Cook Christopher Loughner (ESSIC, UMD) Kenneth Pickering (NASA GSFC) CMAS Conference October 27-29, 2014.
PM 2.5 Response to Different Emissions Reductions Scenarios Over São Paulo State, Brazil. Taciana T. de A. Albuquerque a, J. Jason West b, Rita Yuri Ynoue.
PM Model Performance & Grid Resolution Kirk Baker Midwest Regional Planning Organization November 2003.
Coupling between the aerosols and hydrologic cycles Xiaoyan Jiang Climatology course, 387H Dec 5, 2006.
Using CMAQ-AIM to Evaluate the Gas-Particle Partitioning Treatment in CMAQ Chris Nolte Atmospheric Modeling Division National Exposure Research Laboratory.
Model Evaluation Comparing Model Output to Ambient Data Christian Seigneur AER San Ramon, California.
Operational Evaluation and Comparison of CMAQ and REMSAD- An Annual Simulation Brian Timin, Carey Jang, Pat Dolwick, Norm Possiel, Tom Braverman USEPA/OAQPS.
Application of the CMAQ-UCD Aerosol Model to a Coastal Urban Site Chris Nolte NOAA Atmospheric Sciences Modeling Division Research Triangle Park, NC 6.
For more information about this poster please contact Gerard Devine, School of Earth and Environment, Environment, University of Leeds, Leeds, LS2 9JT.
Goal: “What are the sources and physical mechanisms that contribute to high ozone concentrations aloft that have been observed in Central and Southern.
William G. Benjey* Physical Scientist NOAA Air Resources Laboratory Atmospheric Sciences Modeling Division Research Triangle Park, NC Fifth Annual CMAS.
1 Impact on Ozone Prediction at a Fine Grid Resolution: An Examination of Nudging Analysis and PBL Schemes in Meteorological Model Yunhee Kim, Joshua S.
Evaluation of Models-3 CMAQ I. Results from the 2003 Release II. Plans for the 2004 Release Model Evaluation Team Members Prakash Bhave, Robin Dennis,
Diagnostic Study on Fine Particulate Matter Predictions of CMAQ in the Southeastern U.S. Ping Liu and Yang Zhang North Carolina State University, Raleigh,
Seasonal Modeling of the Export of Pollutants from North America using the Multiscale Air Quality Simulation Platform (MAQSIP) Adel Hanna, 1 Rohit Mathur,
Office of Research and Development National Exposure Research Laboratory, Atmospheric Modeling and Analysis Division 16 October 2012 Integrating source.
DEVELOPMENT AND APPLICATION OF MADRID: A NEW AEROSOL MODULE IN MODELS-3/CMAQ Yang Zhang*, Betty Pun, Krish Vijayaraghavan, Shiang-Yuh Wu and Christian.
Extending Size-Dependent Composition to the Modal Approach: A Case Study with Sea Salt Aerosol Uma Shankar and Rohit Mathur The University of North Carolina.
Office of Research and Development National Exposure Research Laboratory, Atmospheric Modeling and Analysis Division October 21, 2009 Evaluation of CMAQ.
Evaluation of CMAQ Driven by Downscaled Historical Meteorological Fields Karl Seltzer 1, Chris Nolte 2, Tanya Spero 2, Wyat Appel 2, Jia Xing 2 14th Annual.
1 Modeling challenges in policy-relevant PM assessments in the U.S. Air Quality Applied Sciences Team 10th Semi-Annual Meeting, January 5-7, 2016 James.
Georgia Institute of Technology SUPPORTING INTEX THROUGH INTEGRATED ANALYSIS OF SATELLITE AND SUB-ORBITAL MEASUREMENTS WITH GLOBAL AND REGIONAL 3-D MODELS:
Photochemical grid model estimates of lateral boundary contributions to ozone and particulate matter across the continental United States Kirk Baker U.S.
Operational Evaluation and Model Response Comparison of CAMx and CMAQ for Ozone & PM2.5 Kirk Baker, Brian Timin, Sharon Phillips U.S. Environmental Protection.
A Comparison Study of CMAQ Aerosol Prediction by Two Thermodynamic Modules: UHAERO V.S. ISORROPIA Case study for January 2002 episode Fang-Yi Cheng 1,
Simulation of PM2.5 Trace Elements in Detroit using CMAQ
Predicting PM2.5 Concentrations that Result from Compliance with National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) James T. Kelly, Adam Reff, and Brett Gantt.
Mobile Source Contributions to Ambient PM2.5 and Ozone in 2025
Modeling of regional-scale PCB transport at the Bayonne Peninsula
Development of a Multipollutant Version of the Community Multiscale Air Quality (CMAQ) Modeling System Shawn Roselle, Deborah Luecken, William Hutzell,
16th Annual CMAS Conference
Modeling of regional-scale PCB transport at the Bayonne Peninsula
C. Nolte, T. Spero, P. Dolwick, B. Henderson, R. Pinder
Kirk Baker, Heather Simon, Gobeail McKinley, Neal Fann, Elizabeth Chan
Nitrogen Deposition: Measurement Techniques and Field Studies
Quantification of Lightning NOX and its Impact on Air Quality over the Contiguous United States Daiwen Kang, Rohit Mathur, Limei Ran, Gorge Pouliot, David.
Impact of GOES Enhanced WRF Fields on Air Quality Model Performance
Continuous measurement of airborne particles and gases
J. Burke1, K. Wesson2, W. Appel1, A. Vette1, R. Williams1
Steve Griffiths, Rob Lennard and Paul Sutton* (*RWE npower)
Measurement Needs for AQ Models
Presentation transcript:

1 Simulating the phase partitioning of HNO 3, NH 3, and HCl with size- resolved particles over northern Colorado in winter James T. Kelly 1, Kirk R. Baker 1, Christopher G. Nolte 2, Sergey L. Napelenok 2, William C. Keene 3, and Alexander A. P. Pszenny 4 1 Office of Air Quality Planning & Standards, U.S. EPA, Research Triangle Park, NC 2 Office of Research and Development, U.S. EPA, Research Triangle Park, NC 3 Department of Environmental Sciences, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia 4 Institute for the Study of Earth, Oceans and Space, University of New Hampshire, Durham, NH Image provided by the NOAA/OAR/ESRL PSD, Boulder, CO, USA, from their website at Acknowledgments: Daniel Wolfe, Bruce Bartram, William Dubé, Nicholas Wagner, U.S. EPA Modeling Platform Development Team, Allan Beidler, James Beidler, Chris Allen, Lara Reynolds, and Dr. Daniel Bon

2 Motivation Particle Diameter Gas/particle equilibrium Dynamic gas/particle mass transfer Aitken Accumulation Coarse NH 3, HNO 3, HCl SO 4 2-, Mg 2+, K +, Ca 2+, Na +, NH 4 +, NO 3 -, Cl -, H 2 O H 2 SO 4 Temperature RH CMAQ’s inorganic PM predictions involve the partitioning of species between the gas phase and size-distributed particles Comprehensive evaluations of these predictions are usually not possible due to incomplete observational datasets

3 NACHTT Campaign In Feb-Mar 2011, comprehensive observations of inorganic PM and trace gases were made in CO Observations include o Gas: NH 3, HNO 3, and HCl o Size-segregated PM: SO 4 2-, NH 4 +, NO 3 -, Cl -, Mg 2+, Ca 2+, and K + o Meteorology: T, RH, wind speed and wind direction Full suite of measurements to comprehensively evaluate inorganic aerosol predictions NACHTT: Nitrogen, Aerosol Composition, and Halogens on a Tall Tower *Image provided by the NOAA/OAR/ESRL PSD, Boulder, CO, USA, from their website at BAO Tower NOAA Boulder Atmospheric Observatory tower in Weld County, CO ( °N, °W) *

4 Objectives Primary objective o Comprehensively evaluate CMAQ’s inorganic aerosol predictions for a site influenced by complex meteorology and emissions Secondary objective o Characterize contributions of emission sectors to predictions to the site using the CMAQ-ISAM * source apportionment model *ISAM: Integrated Source Apportionment Model

5 Modeling Air quality modeling o CMAQv5.0.2 o 12 km horizontal resolution o 25 vertical layers o CB05tucl gas-phase chemistry o AERO6 aerosol processes Emissions o NEI11 version 2 o BEISv3.6.1 biogenic emissions o NH 3 bidirectional surface exchange Meteorology o WRF version 3.4, MCIP Boundary conditions o GEOS-Chem version o 2° x 2.5° horizontal resolution Air Quality Modeling Domain w/ BAO Tower Simulations discussed below 1) Base: configuration shown on left 2) x4nh3: NH 3 emissions scaled by four 3) ISAM: CMAQ with Integrated Source Apportionment 4) B-F: brute-force runs using “Base”

6 Site Location ~33 km Denver Greeley BAO Tower o ~33 km north of Denver o Southwest of numerous animal feedlots o East of Front Range o Sampling from 22-m agl NH 3 emissions o Elevated in region with animal feedlots and Denver (see figure) Challenging conditions o Diverse emission sources and complex terrain RMNP Colors indicate average NH 3 emissions in model cells BAO: Boulder Atmospheric Observatory RMNP: Rocky Mountain National Park

7 Inorganic Trace Gases NH 3 observations are underpredicted in Base simulation but predicted reasonably well in x4nh3 simulation HNO 3 observations are underpredicted in both simulations, more severely in x4nh3 HCl observations are substantially underpredicted in both simulations

8 Inorganic PM Components NH 4 + is underpredicted in both cases; NH 4 + predictions for x4nh3 are improved compared with Base but are closer to Base than to measurements Little difference in SO 4 2- predictions for the Base and x4nh3 cases (as expected); both simulations underpredict infrequent high SO 4 2- measurements NO 3 - is underpredicted in Base case; NO 3 - predications are improved in x4nh3 case Cl - and Na + are underpredicted; Ca 2+, Mg 2+, and K + are overpredicted

9 PM Size Distributions Distributions of NO 3 - (and NH 4 + and SO 4 2- ) agree reasonably with observations but are shifted to slightly larger diameters Na + distributions are predicted well but coarse Na + is underpredicted; coarse Cl - is underpredicted Ca 2+ (and Mg 2+ and K + ) is overpredicted in all size fractions Note: outlier points not shown in figure for clarity

10 Total Levels (Gas + Particle) Large underestimate of observed total ammonium (NH 3 +NH 4 + ) in Base; better agreement in x4nh3 Observed total nitrate (HNO 3 +NO 3 - ) is moderately underestimated in Base; slightly better agreement for x4nh3 Large underestimate of observed total chloride (HCl+Cl - ) in Base; slightly better agreement for x4nh3

11 Gas Fraction (Gas / Total) Total ammonium partitions mostly to the gas phase in all cases; close agreement between observations and x4nh3 estimates Total nitrate partitions too much to the gas phase in Base and too much to the particle phase in x4nh3 Total chloride partitions too much to the gas phase in Base; close agreement between observations and x4nh3 estimates

12 Source Apportionment Agricultural sector is largest contributor to NHx Mobile sources are largest contributors to HNO 3 & NO 3 - EGUs are largest contributors to SOx Area fugitive dust is largest contributor to fine particle Ca 2+ RWC is largest contributor to fine particle K + Boundaries are largest contributors to fine Na + and Cl -

13 Contributions of RWC to K + Good agreement in spatial patterns and magnitude of residential wood combustion contributions to fine-mode K + Percent contribution of RWC to fine mode K + at the BAO site is 34% for CMAQ-ISAM and 33% for brute-force

14 Boundary Contribution to NO 3 - General agreement in spatial patterns of the contribution of boundary NOy to fine-mode NO 3 - concentrations Percent contribution of boundary NOy to total NO 3 - at the BAO site is 14% for CMAQ-ISAM and 7% for brute-force

15 Summary CMAQ predictions capture the general features of observed distributions of gas mixing ratios, size-distributed particle concentrations, and gas-particle partitioning fractions CMAQ-ISAM source apportionment estimates are consistent with expectations based on major emission sectors and provide useful insights in some cases Areas for improvement have been identified o NH 3 emissions, presumably from nearby animal feedlots, to help address NHx underpredictions, which appear to be related to emissions and transport o Flux and speciation of fugitive and windblown dust emissions to help address mineral cation overpredictions and chloride underpredictions o NOy boundary conditions in Alberta, Canada region o Additional testing of CMAQ-ISAM and comparison with other source apportionment methods is warranted for secondary PM o Better representation of terrain-influenced winds with finer-scale modeling to improve temporal characteristics of predictions

16 Additional Slides

17 Conceptual Meteorology Evening Day Denver Downslope Events S. Platte River Meteorology is influenced by terrain o Daytime upslope flows in Rocky foothills o Nocturnal drainage flows along South Platte River valley o Downslope wind events associated with synoptic forcing

18 Meteorology (a) (b) Generally light and variable winds captured by model (Fig. a) High speed westerlies captured by the model; model does not replicate high speed northeasterlies (Fig. a) Modeled winds too frequent from west; too infrequent from northeast (Fig. b)