By Rachel Coleman.  “ The head of any federal agency having direct or indirect jurisdiction over a proposed federal or federally assisted undertaking.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Procedural Safeguards
Advertisements

ODOT’s Section 106 Training
Cultural Resources Categorical Exclusion Training Class.
Presented by: The Ohio Department of Transportation 1 36 CFR Part 800 Protection of Historic Properties Section 106 Managing the Environmental & Project.
The Section 106 Review Process: Introduction and Overview
Preservation Tax Incentives for Historic Buildings A Joint Program of the following agencies: Department of the Treasury Internal Revenue Service Department.
Program Alternatives under 36 CFR Part 800 Dave Berwick Army Affairs Coordinator Advisory Council on Historic Preservation.
Geothermal Projects and Indian Tribes: Dealing with Cultural Resources Issues Michael P. O’Connell Stoel Rives LLP O R.
Section 106, Section 4(f) and You!: The Role of Consulting Parties in Transportation Projects Kevin Mock, Historic Preservation Specialist Pennsylvania.
Introduction to Historical Resources and Section 106 Division of Historical Resources (DHR) NH Department of Cultural Resources State Historic Preservation.
NATIONAL HISTORIC PRESERVATION ACT of 1966 as amended Garry J. Cantley Regional Archeologist Bureau of Indian Affairs.
Section 106 The reasons, the actions, the participants.
The Fly in the Ointment: Consultation Under Section 106 and Other Laws Related to Historic Preservation Peacekeeper Conference, 1985.
Office of Inspector General (OIG) Internal Audit
Dealing With Section 106: The Good, The Bad, and the Ugly.
NHPA, Section 106, and NEPA Highlights and Misconceptions.
Environmental Review Todd Levine Architectural historian, environmental reviewer, Connecticut Freedom Trail coordinator, Washington- Rochambeau Revolutionary.
Federal Preservation Activities: Part 1. What did With Heritage So Rich (1965) and the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966 provide to administer.
A BEGINNERS GUIDE TO SUCCESSFUL COMPLETION OF THE SECTION 106 REVIEW PROCESS TENNESSEE STATE HISTORIC PRESERVATION OFFICE: REVIEW AND COMPLIANCE SECTION.
Connecticut Department of Transportation Bureau of Policy & Planning.
Sacred Sites. Documentation Documentation: Forest Supervisor or Ranger District Offices may document Sacred site (s) information in a variety of ways.
Ohio Historic Preservation Office
Section 106 Processes A Guide to the Ideals and Reals of CRM.
Driving Indiana’s Economic Growth. Management and Preservation of Indiana's Historic Bridges: A Programmatic Approach Thanks to Mead & Hunt & FHWA-IN.
THE FOUR STEP SECTION 106 PROCESS: AN INTRODUCTION TENNESSEE STATE HISTORIC PRESERVATION OFFICE REVIEW AND COMPLIANCE SECTION All reproduction rights reserved.
COSCDA Workshop Renovation, Reconstruction and Renewal of Historic Properties and Neighborhoods Section 106 and Programmatic Agreements Overview.
Monroe Executed Programmatic Agreement The Army’s Responsibilities Include: Identify Significant Viewsheds (initiated)-18 Months =Oct 2010 Cultural Landscape.
U.S. Department of Education Privacy Initiatives Kathleen M. Styles Chief Privacy Officer U.S. Department of Education April 18, 2011.
Acquisition, Technology and Logistics Ms. Maureen Sullivan Federal Preservation Officer Office of the Deputy Under Secretary of Defense (Installations.
Mitigation in the Section 106 Process Dave Berwick Army Program Manager Advisory Council on Historic Preservation.
Productive SB 18 Consultation Michelle LaPena, Esq. LaPena Law Corporation 2001 N Street, Suite 100 Sacramento, CA (916)
Bilingual Students and the Law n Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 n Title VII of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act - The Bilingual Education.
1 ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING CULTURAL RESOURCES LAWS AND REGULATIONS CH 5 CH 5 HO # 13, 13a, 13b
Positive Train Control Infrastructure: Section 106 Review Process under the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation’s May 2014 Program Comment For More.
Nadine Peterson Preservation Planner NH Division of Historical Resources Lynne E. Monroe Preservation Company Christopher W. Closs Christopher W. Closs.
Annual Training for County Election Officials NC State Board of Elections August 14, 2012.
Integrating Other Laws into BLM Planning. Objectives Integrate legal requirements into the planning process. Discuss laws with review and consultation.
Section 106: Historic Preservation Review and Compliance as it relates to the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 “How Can State Agencies Assist.
PSO Overview for (name of organization’s) PSES Workgroup (Presenter) (Date) 1 **For internal use by Center for Patient Safety PSO Participants. May not.
Historical Resources SURVEY SAVVY Marie Nelson State Historian II OHP-Survey/CLG Coordinator Sep 07 – Chico.
American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 Energy Efficiency and Conservation Block Grant Program Small City and County Grant Kick-Off Meeting California.
1 Historic Preservation Webinar "Reporting Through PAGE and to PMC"
Categorical Exclusion Training Class
Historic Preservation Memoranda of Agreement. What is an MOA? As part of the Section 106 review process, it is an agreement among an agency official,
INTRODUCTION TO STATE AND FEDERAL HISTORIC PRESERVATION LAWS Hawaii Revised Statutes, Chapter 6E National Historic Preservation Act, Section 106.
NEPA and Section 106: An Introduction WISDOT MEETING NOVEMBER 3-4, 2015.
South Dakota State Historic Preservation Office and the Nebraska National Forests and Grasslands July 24, 2013 National Grasslands Visitor Center.
Medical Research in Times of Bioterrorism - OHRP’s Perspective Michael A. Carome, M.D. Associate Director for Regulatory Affairs Office for Human Research.
Cultural Resources office — St. Louis Planning & Urban Design Agency an introduction.
Suzanne Derrick Technical Director – Cultural Resources FCC Section 106 Process and the Archeology of Tower Siting Panelist Presentation May 4, 2016.
Internal Audit Section. Authorized in Section , Florida Statutes Section , Florida Statutes (F.S.), authorizes the Inspector General to review.
Executive Order Environmental Stewardship and Transportation Infrastructure Project Reviews Priority Issues.
Integration of National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) and National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA) NEPA and NHPA A Handbook for Integrating NEPA and.
The National Register. The National Register of Historic Places The National Register of Historic Places is authorized by Section 101 (a)(1)(A)of the.
Welcome to the Public Comment Hearing on the Proposed Regulatory Update to the California Environmental Quality Act AB 52, Gatto (2014) Heather Baugh Assistant.
Anth January 2012.
National Treasures: Brownfields and the National Historic Preservation Act Brownfields 2006 Boston, MA.
101 New London Road Newark, Delaware
Anthropological and Archaeological Ethics
Pedestrian Survey.
Monte Mills Alexander Blewett III School of Law University of Montana
Section 106 Consulting Parties Meeting
Midterm Review Public Archaeology.
Cultural Resources Categorical Exclusion Training Class – Presented by the Office of Environmental Services.
Navigating the SHPD Review Process
National Historic Preservation Act
Protecting What We Love Building What We Need – The “H” Factor
National Historic Preservation Act
National Historic Preservation Act
National Historic Preservation Act
Presentation transcript:

By Rachel Coleman

 “ The head of any federal agency having direct or indirect jurisdiction over a proposed federal or federally assisted undertaking at any state and the head of any department or independent agency having an authority to license any undertaking shall, prior to the approval of the expenditure of any federal funds on the undertaking or prior to the issuance of any license, as the case may be, take into account the effect of the undertaking on any district, site, building, structure or object that is included in or eligible for inclusion for the National Register. The head of any such federal agency shall afford the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation, established under Title II of this act, a reasonable opportunity to comment with regard to such undertaking.”

 The standard review process is spelled out in federal regulations issued by the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation, entitled "Protection of Historic Properties." The regulations appear in the U.S. Code of Federal Regulations at 36 CFR Part 800.  The process involves 5 basic steps:

 The Federal agency responsible for an undertaking begins by identifying the historic properties the undertaking may affect. To do this, the agency first reviews background information and consults with the State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) and others who may know about historic properties in the area. Based on this review, the agency determines what additional surveys or other field studies may be needed, and conducts those studies. If properties are found that may be eligible for inclusion in the National Register of Historic Places, but have not yet been included, the agency evaluates them against criteria published by the National Park Service, which maintains the Register. This evaluation is carried out in consultation with the SHPO, and if questions arise about the eligibility of a given property, the agency may seek a formal determination of eligibility from the Secretary of the Interior.

 If historic properties are found, the agency then assesses what effect its undertaking will have on them. Again, the agency works with the SHPO, and considers the views of others. The agency makes its assessment based on criteria found in the Council's regulations and can make one of three determinations: ◦ No effect: the undertaking will not affect historic properties; ◦ No adverse effect: the undertaking will affect one or more historic properties, but the effect will not be harmful; ◦ Adverse effect: the undertaking will harm one or more historic properties.

 If an adverse effect will occur, the agency consults with the SHPO and others in an effort to find ways to make the undertaking less harmful. Others who are consulted, under various circumstances, may include local governments, Indian tribes, property owners, other members of the public, and the Council. Consultation is designed to result in a Memorandum of Agreement (MOA), which outlines measures agreed upon that the agency will take to reduce, avoid, or mitigate the adverse effect. In some cases, the consulting parties may agree that no such measures are available, but that the adverse effect must be accepted in the public interest.

 The Council may comment during Step 3 of the process by participating in consultation and signing the resulting MOA. Otherwise, the agency obtains Council comment by submitting the MOA to the Council for review and acceptance. The Council can accept the MOA, request changes, or opt to issue written comments. If consultation was terminated, the council issues its written comments directly to the agency head, as the agency head had requested.

 If an MOA is executed, the agency proceeds with its undertaking under the terms of the MOA. In the absence of an MOA, the agency head must take into account the Council's written comments in deciding whether and how to proceed.

 Section 106 requires federal agencies to take into account the effects of their undertakings on historic properties.  Section 106 regulations define "undertaking" as a "project, activity or program funded in whole or part under the direct or indirect jurisdiction of a Federal agency..." 36 CFR (l)(1).

 The Management of Cultural Resources.  But what does this mean?  The following slides include the various areas covered under Cultural Resources Management (as found in one of the documents in your assigned reading for this week)

 Anthropology  Archaeology  Ethnology and Ethnohistory

 Geographic Information System  Global Positioning System  Information Resources Management

 Blacksmithing  Crafts Training  Stained Glass  Timber Framing

 African-American Studies  Alaska Native Studies  American Indian Studies  Asian-American Studies  Hispanic-American Studies  Native Hawaiian Studies

 History of Science  History of Technology  History of Engineering

 Architectural Conservation  Architectural Treatments  Documentation of Historic Structures  Hazardous Materials  Historic Architecture  Historic Building Materials  Historic Preservation  Historic Preservation Education  Interior Design  Rehabilitation/Standards  Preservation Management  Specific Building/Structure Types

 Archives  Collections Management and Care  Conservation

 What are our cultural resources? ◦ Our history, studies of various ethnic groups and their practices and history, our historic buildings, archeological work on various sites, folklife and arts and crafts, objects and documents from our past, etc.  Our goal is to maintain them, interpret them, and pass them on to future generations.

 The National Park Service is the steward of many of America’s most important cultural resources. These resources are categorized as archeological studies, cultural landscapes, ethnographic resources, historic and prehistoric structures, and museum collections. The Service’s cultural resource management program involves: ◦ Research to identify, evaluate, document, register and establish basic information about cultural resources and traditionally associated peoples. ◦ Planning to ensure that management processes for making decisions and setting priorities integrate information about cultural resources and provide consultation and collaboration with outside entities; and ◦ Stewardship to ensure that cultural resources are protected, receive treatments to achieve desired conditions, and are made available for public understanding and enjoyment.  We approach cultural resources management in an interdisciplinary manner to ensure that all resources receive proper professional attention. This includes methods of inventory, collection, analysis and preservation of cultural resources.