Water Quality Monitoring in the Upper Illinois River Watershed and Upper White River Basin Project 11-500 Brian E. Haggard University of Arkansas.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
TMDL Development Mainstem Monongahela River Watershed May 14, 2014.
Advertisements

Transport of nitrogen and phosphorus from Rhode River watersheds during storm events David Correll, Thomas Jordan, and Donald Weller Water Resources Research,
Water Quality Assessment of Osage Creek & West Fork, White and Kings Rivers 2008 & ½ 2009 Marc Nelson PhD, PE Nelson Engineering.
2009 Water Quality Monitoring Report – Fish Creek Vaughn Hauser, B.Sc. Naomi Parker, B.Sc., BIT, CEPIT.
Nelly Smith EPA Region 6. - Develop or revise bacteria reduction program for consistency with new TMDL requirements and allocations - Develop or revise.
UA Division of Agriculture Arkansas Water Resources Center.
Long-Term Volunteer Lake Monitoring in the Upper Woonasquatucket Watershed Linda Green URI Watershed Watch ,
Peter Sigmann Little Sturgeon Area Property Owners Association Tracking Phosphate in Little Sturgeon Bay Location The Bay of Little Sturgeon is located.
Michael J. Brayton MD/DE/DC Water Science Center Hydrologic Controls on Nutrient and Pesticide Transport through a Small Agricultural Watershed, Morgan.
DESIGNING MONITORING PROGRAMS TO EVALUATE BMP EFFECTIVENESS Funded by grants from USDA- CSREES, EPA 319, NSF Nancy Mesner - Utah State University, Dept.
TECHNICAL COMMITTEE OCTOBER 8-9, 2013 Characterization of Dissolved Solids in the Ohio River.
SENSORS, CYBERINFRASTRUCTURE, AND EXAMINATION OF HYDROLOGIC AND HYDROCHEMICAL RESPONSE IN THE LITTLE BEAR RIVER OBSERVATORY TEST BED Jeffery S. Horsburgh.
SENSORS, CYBERINFRASTRUCTURE, AND WATER QUALITY IN THE LITTLE BEAR RIVER Jeffery S. Horsburgh David K. Stevens, Amber Spackman Jones, David G. Tarboton,
“E. coli, Enterococci and Protozoan Transport in New Mexico Watersheds” G. M. Huey 1 & Meyer, M. L 2 New Mexico Environment Department – Santa Fe, NM New.
Determining the effectiveness of best management practices to reduce nutrient loading from cattle grazed pastures in Utah Nicki Devanny Utah State University,
Seasonal Patterns in the Relative Importance of Organic Acids and Sulfate in Episodic Acidification of Downeast Salmon Rivers By Mark Whiting, Maine DEP.
Brian Haggard Arkansas Water Resources Center UA Division of Agriculture Arkansas Water Resources Center.
Water Quality Monitoring and Parameter Load Estimations in Lake Conway Point Remove Watershed and L’Anguille River Watershed Presented by: Dan DeVun, Equilibrium.
Water Quality Monitoring and Parameter Load Estimations in Lake Conway Point Remove Watershed, L’Anguille River Watershed, and Bayou Bartholomew Presented.
SRRTTF Synoptic Sampling Event August Sample scoping meeting and site reconnaissance on July , 2014 Scope revised to include vessel use,
Overview of Continuous Water-Quality Monitoring. Purpose of Monitoring Define the objectives of the water quality monitoring project 1. Environmental.
Water Quality Monitoring : Galla Creek Bayou Bartholomew L’Anguille River Presented By: The Ecological Conservation Organization.
Water Quality Trends across 319 Monitoring Sites Brian E. Haggard Director, Arkansas Water Resources Center Funding provided by ANRC.
West Fork of the White River Stream Restoration Monitoring Dan DeVun Ecological Conservation Organization (501)
West Fork of the White River Stream Restoration Monitoring Dan DeVun Ecological Conservation Organization (501)
SRRTTF Synoptic Sampling Event August Sample scoping meeting and site reconnaissance on July , 2014 Scope revised to include vessel use,
Developing Monitoring Programs to Detect NPS Load Reductions.
Chowan River TMDL Development and Source Assessment Blackwater River Area October 25, 2004.
Stream water chemistry in three meso-scale hydrologic basins in Eastern Amazonian Ricardo de O. Figueiredo 1, Daniel Markewitz 2, Eric A. Davidson 3, Ewerton.
Nicole Reid, Jane Herbert, and Dean Baas MSU Extension Land & Water Program W. K. Kellogg Biological Station Transparency tube as a surrogate for turbidity,
Development of a Watershed-to- Very-Near-Shore Model for Pathogen Fate and Transport Sheridan K. Haack Atiq U. Syed Joseph W. Duris USGS, Lansing, MI.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Water-Quality Monitoring: Data Collection and Analysis Strategies for Designing Program.
Focus Group Meeting: September 27, 2013 Truckee River Water Quality Standards Review.
112.3 Jessica L. Feeser, M. Elise Lauterbur & Jennifer L. Soong Research Project for Systems Ecology (ENVS 316), Fall ’06 Oberlin College, Oberlin OH BackgroundFindings.
Water Quality Monitoring and Constituent Load Estimation in the Kings River near Berryville, Arkansas 2009 Brian E. Haggard Arkansas Water Resources Center.
Water Quality Sampling, Analysis and Annual Load Determinations for Nutrients and Solids on the Ballard Creek, 2008 Arkansas Water Resources Center UA.
Ric Lawson Watershed Planner Huron River Watershed Council MiCorps Staff.
1 Factors influencing the dynamics of excessive algal blooms Richard F. Ambrose Environmental Science and Engineering Program Department of Environmental.
Sammamish River Diel Dissolved Oxygen and pH Study September 21, 2005.
USGS Kansas Water Science Center
Climate Sensitivity of Thinleaf Alder Growth in Interior Alaska: Implications for N-Fixation Inputs to River Floodplains Dana Nossov 1,2, Roger Ruess 1,
Adem.alabama.gov ADEM’s Monitoring Summary Reports Alabama – Tombigbee CWP Stakeholders Meeting Montgomery, Alabama 3 February 2010 Lisa Huff – ADEM Field.
A Project to Reduce Bacteria in Texas Waterways: Lone Star Healthy Streams Larry A. Redmon 1, Kevin L. Wagner 2, Robert K. Lyons 3, and Garrett Norman.
Water Quality in Tryon Creek Initial Results from Portland’s Revised Watershed Monitoring Approach.
Coles Creek Watershed Assessment and Education Summary The Coles Creek Watershed, located in the southwestern quadrant of the state of Mississippi, with.
Water Quality Monitoring and Parameter Load Estimations in L’Anguille River Watershed and Deep Bayou Presented by: Dan DeVun, Equilibrium
Background As number of species varies with volume (Taylor, 1997, and others), how is assemblage stability affected when isolated pools shrink during summer?
Focus Group Meeting: November 12, 2013 Truckee River Water Quality Standards Review.
EPA HWI Comments on CA Assessment June 26, 2013 HSP Call 2 major categories of comments: – Report writing (we will work on this) – Content/Analysis/Discussion.
Detecting Ecological Effects of Development in the Wappingers and Fishkill Watersheds Karin Limburg, Karen Stainbrook, Bongghi Hong SUNY College of Environmental.
Continuous Water- Quality Monitoring. Continuous Water Quality Monitoring Advantages Needed in rapidly changing systems Provides better understanding.
Brian Haggard Director Arkansas Water Resources Center Funding provided by ANRC through Beaver Water District.
Site # 11.5: Middle Fork Feather River above confluence with Grizzly Creek Sierra Valley Dissolved Oxygen Study Summer 2008 Update Upper Feather River.
Watershed Monitoring *Background Watershed Stewardship Plan-2004 Gap Projects IRWMP-Dec Policies SFEI study-2007 Joint TC/WC meeting-June 2010 *Proposed.
Eric Ferguson King County Department of Natural Resources and Parks November 4, 2015 Existing Conditions Assessment.
Water Quality Sampling, Analysis and Annual Load Determinations for the Illinois River at Arkansas Highway 59 Bridge, 2008 Brian E. Haggard Arkansas Water.
Watershed Management Plan Summary of 2014 Activities/Progress Presented by: Matthew Bennett, MS December 2014.
Sustainable Development Goal for Water: Indicator 6.3.2
Annual Membership Meeting Water Quality Report 2010
Characterization of Dissolved Solids in the Ohio River
Reducing sediment & nutrient losses from intensive agriculture Restoring eutrophic shallow lakes Pastoral agriculture is the dominant land use in New.
Chloride in Urban Streams in Maine
Dave Clark and Michael Kasch
Emily Saad EAS 4480 Oral Presentation 27 April 2010
Continuous Surrogate Monitoring for Pollutant Load Estimation in Urban Water Systems Anthony A. Melcher, USU Civil and Environmental.
Nebraska Water Quality Index
Lake Elsinore and Canyon Lake TMDL Water Quality Monitoring Update – Summary August 15, 2017.
Debra S. Baker and Donald G. Huggins
Little River Ditches Watershed Monitoring
Marco island water quality monitoring
Presentation transcript:

Water Quality Monitoring in the Upper Illinois River Watershed and Upper White River Basin Project Brian E. Haggard University of Arkansas

Objectives 1.Collect water samples at ~20 sites to estimate constituent loads and evaluate trends in water chemistry, Upper Illinois River Watershed (UIRW) and Upper White River Basin (UWRB). 2.Collect water samples across eight streams to measure E. coli and evaluated numbers against applicable water quality standards, UIRW 3. Evaluate dissolved oxygen changes from day to night in Leatherwood Creek and Kings River, UWRB. WATER CHEMISTRY BACTERIA DO

Objective 1 Water Chemistry Sampling Sites

Water Chemistry Methods Collect water samples at 19 sites from July 2011 – June samples per project year during base and storm flow conditions Grab samples either in-stream or using alpha style horizontal sampler Analyzed for TN, NO 3 -N, TP, SRP, TSS, Cl and SO 4 following approved QAPP Estimated constituent loads using regression models that account for discharge, time and seasonality Evaluated monotonic trends or linear increases or decreases in constituent concentrations after adjusting for flow

Water Chemistry Results: How do loads vary spatially? – Constituent loads generally following discharge patterns, that is increase with increasing discharge. – Constituent loads tend to increase with increasing watershed area. – Constituent loads reflect watershed specific hydrology and characteristics. – So, what we are really interested in is how are things changing over time?

Results – Trends for N, P, TSS Water Chemistry

Results – Trends for Cl & SO 4

Objective 2 Pathogens Sampling Sites 10 Reaches 7 Streams Osage Creek Little Osage Creek Spring Creek Clear Creek Muddy Fork Baron Fork Illinois River

Pathogens Methods Water samples collected 8 or 9 times during the primary contract season (May through September) in 2012, 2013 and Water samples collected in sterile containers and kept on ice. Water samples were analyzed for E. coli in AWRC WQ laboratory, certified for bacteria. E. coli enumerated as most probable number of colonies per 100 mL (col/100 mL). Data evaluated against APCEC Regulation 2, based on percent exceeding applicable value. We delineated the riparian zone to estimate land use, e.g. pasture land use close to the stream within a select distance upstream.

Pathoge ns Results APCEC Regulation 2 E. coli numbers should not exceed the applicable limit* in more than 25% of the water samples collected in no less than 8 samples taken during the primary contact season. The *limits are: -Illinois River (ecologically sensitive waterbody, Neosho Mucket mussel)  298 col/100 mL -All other streams  410 col/100 mL

Pathoge ns Results Applicable Limits: -Illinois River  298 col/100 mL -All other streams  410 col/100 mL E. coli numbers varied Spatially Temporally Little Osage Creek had E. coli numbers that exceeded limit. One site on the Illinois River exceeded limit every year (IR028D) Overall, thumbs up!

Pathogens Why are these sites high? We looked at the relation between elevated levels of E. coli and pasture land in riparian zone. The only sites where E. coli numbers exceeded the applicable limits had more than 50% pasture land in the riparian zone. E. coli seems to be a localized issue, likely driven by cattle access to streams. There is on-going work trying to track the source.

Objective 3 Dissolved Oxygen Sampling Sites Two Sampling Sites Two Reaches Two Different Streams Leatherwood Creek Kings River

Data sondes were calibrated in the lab. Data sondes were deployed in the field and record data for over 72 hours. Four deployments per year (for 3 years): two during critical season (May-Sept) two during primary season (Sept-May) Measured dissolved oxygen, pH, temperature and conductivity Dissolved Oxygen Methods

APCEC Regulation 2 Primary Season – all streams must have DO at or above 6 mg/L Critical Season – the DO limit is based on watershed area - LC mg/L ( 1 cfs) - LC mg/L (10 to 100 mi 2 ) - KR mg/L (10 to 100 mi 2 ) - KR02 – 6 mg/L (>100 mi 2 ) An example of the data is displayed to the right, showing diurnal DO variations and how sites and reaches differ. Dissolved Oxygen Results Critical season Primary season

APCEC Regulation 2 Primary Season – all streams must have DO at or above 6 mg/L. Critical Season – the DO limit is based on watershed area - LC mg/L ( 1cfs) - LC mg/L (10 to 100 mi 2 ) - KR mg/L (10 to 100 mi 2 ) - KR02 – 6 mg/L (>100 mi 2 ) Potential DO violations were variable across sites and reaches. Dissolved Oxygen Results

All of this data was collected through the 319 program funding. Questions?