May 03, 2007 1 UFE ANALYSIS Old – New Model Comparison Compiled by the Load Profiling Group ERCOT Energy Analysis & Aggregation May 03, 2007.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Oil & Gas Final Sample Analysis April 27, Background Information TXU ED provided a list of ESI IDs with SIC codes indicating Oil & Gas (8,583)
Advertisements

A Two-Level Electricity Demand Model Hausman, Kinnucan, and Mcfadden.
Utah Cost of Service and Rate Design Task Force Seasonality in Costs and Loads Maurice Brubaker June 15, 2005 Salt Lake City, Utah.
ERCOT Analysis of 2005 Residential Annual Validation Using the Customer Survey Results ERCOT Load Profiling Presented to PWG - October 26, 2005.
May 2014 PWG Meeting 2013 UFE Analysis Prepared by Data Aggregation.
Profiling Working Group March 13, PWG Update Report By Ernie Podraza of Reliant Energy ERCOT PWG Chair for COPS Meeting March 13, 2007.
1 ERCOT LRS Precision Analysis PWG Presentation June 28, 2006.
HOW TO MAKE A CLIMATE GRAPH CLIMATE GRAPHING ASSIGNMENT PT.2.
ERCOT Load Research Sampling Round 2 Model Coefficient Updates Additional Evaluations Presented to the PWG on July 28, 2010.
ERCOT Staff Comments Regarding the Proposed Suspension of Residential 2005 Annual Validation RMS Presentation August 10, 2005.
Presented to the PWG Meeting of May 26, 2010
1 Econometric Load Forecasting Peak and Energy Forecast 06/14/2005 Econometric Load Forecasting Peak and Energy Forecast 06/14/2005.
2011 Long-Term Load Forecast Review ERCOT Calvin Opheim June 17, 2011.
TVA Generates Power and sends it down Transmission Lines to Newport Utilities Distribution Substations TVA Newport Utilities Substations Distributes the.
Electric / Gas / Water Eric Fox Oleg Moskatov Itron, Inc. April 17, 2008 VELCO Long-Term Demand Forecast Methodology Overview.
ERCOT 2003 UFE ANALYSIS By William Boswell & Carl Raish AEIC Load Research Conference July 13, 2005.
1 AMS Data Workshop ERCOT Overview of AMS Data Processes June 27, 2014 ERCOT June 27, 2014.
Capacity Forecast Report Sean Chang Market Analysis and Design Suresh Pabbisetty CQF, ERP, CSQA Credit CWG/MCWG September 16, 2015 ERCOT Public.
Compiled by Load Profiling ERCOT Energy Analysis & Aggregation
Analysis of Raleigh’s Drought Triggers May 8, 2013 and.
Updated Cost/Benefit Analysis for PRR Part A/S Bidding Proposed Methodology.
UFE 2003 Analysis June 1, UFE 2003 ANALYSIS Compiled by the Load Profiling Group ERCOT Energy Analysis & Aggregation June 1, 2005.
ERCOT Planning WMS 10/20/2010 Target Reserve Margin and Effective Load Carrying Capability of Installed Wind Capacity for the ERCOT System – Methodology.
April 15, 2003 UFE 2002 ANALYSIS. April 15, 2003 LOAD AND UFE – ERCOT PEAK 2002 This is a graphic depiction of load and UFE on the ERCOT Peak Day for.
1 ERCOT LRS Precision Analysis PWG Presentation February 27, 2007.
Profiling Working Group 1 PWG Update Report By Ernie Podraza of Direct Energy ERCOT PWG Chair Ed Echols Of Oncor ERCOT PWG Vice Chair for COPS Meeting.
1 Market Operations Presentation Board of Director’s Meeting January 22, 2003.
UFE 2005 Analysis 1 UFE 2005 ANALYSIS Compiled by Load Profiling ERCOT Energy Analysis & Aggregation.
Calculation of Net Energy for Load COPS. 2 2 Outline  Definition of Net Energy for Load  How Net Energy for Load is calculated in ERCOT.
Settlement Accuracy Analysis Prepared by ERCOT Load Profiling.
UFE 2008 Analysis 1 UFE 2008 ANALYSIS Compiled by Load Profiling Energy Analysis & Aggregation.
Rocky Mountain Power - Utah Workgroups I and II Load Research and Peak-Hour Forecasting Presented by UTAH INDUSTRIAL ENERGY CONSUMERS Salt Lake City, Utah.
1 UFE Workshop Sponsored by COPS October 19, 2004.
2016 Long-Term Load Forecast
ERCOT UFE Analysis UFE Task Force February 21, 2005.
Comparison of New Load Profile Models 14-Month Models vs 21-Month Models ERCOT Load Profiling Staff.
1 History of UFE (shortened version of presentation provided at UFE Taskforce Workshop on 9/14/2004) UFE Taskforce Meeting February 21, 2006.
Winter Power Supply Adequacy/Reliability Analysis Power Committee Briefing October 17, 2001.
1 ERCOT LRS Sample Design Review PWG Presentation March 27, 2007.
1 Arguments for Continuing Residential Validation Improves Settlement Accuracy Improves UFE Profile Assignment is more correct Arguments to Stop Residential.
MARS 867_03F ROR vs. Settlement vs. 810 Scenarios ERCOT September 2008.
1 ERCOT Load Profile Transition Option 1 – 4 Analysis August 21, 2006.
Analysis of the ERCOT IDR Threshold Requirement Presented by Bill Boswell PWG Meeting May 27, 2009.
09/17/2006 Ken Donohoo ERCOT Peak Day August Initial Settlement Data by Fuel Type.
01/17/ CP Discussion October 16,2002 Retail Market Subcommittee Austin, Texas.
1 Presentation MIT November 14, 2011 Metering Issues Taskforce (MIT) Elimination of Time Error Correction Potential Impact on Wholesale Settlements.
DRG Slides for PWG Update to COPS. 2 Highlights from the DGTF Recommendation - 3 Small DRG applies to generation less than 50 kW –Profiling is applicable.
Temperature Assumptions for Dynamic Ratings in ERCOT CRR Auctions Proposal to differentiate between Day (PeakWD & PeakWE) and Night (Off-peak) October.
PRR 568 – Day 17 to Day 10 Analysis Implementation Recommendation TAC December 2005.
Natural Gas Outlook The Tennessee Regulatory Authority Natural Gas Symposium August 19, 2003 Roy Kass Energy Information Administration (EIA)
Profiling Working Group 1 PWG Update Report By Ernie Podraza of Direct Energy ERCOT PWG Chair Ed Echols Of Oncor ERCOT PWG Vice Chair for COPS Meeting.
PRR 568 – Settlement Timeline September day Analysis COPS October 25, 2005.
Using the Trapezoidal Model to Derate NW Hydro Capacity Resource Adequacy Technical Committee July 25, 2007 Portland, Oregon.
1 A Review of Impacts to UFE and Load Ratio Share Based on AV Profile ID Changes Presented by ERCOT Staff to the Profiling Working Group 10/26/2005.
Price Responsive Load / Retail DR RMS Update Paul Wattles Carl Raish September 1, 2015.
Capacity Forecast Report Fall Update Sean Chang Market Analysis and Design Suresh Pabbisetty CQF, ERP, CSQA Credit CWG/MCWG December 16, 2015 ERCOT Public.
Hypothetical Examples of How Residential Photovoltaic (PV) ESI IDs Could be Settled ERCOT Load Profiling.
Profiling Working Group 1 PWG Update Report By Brad Boles of Cirro Energy ERCOT PWG Vice-Chair for COPS Meeting June 11, 2007.
PWG Profiling Working Group December 18, RMS Presentation by Ernie Podraza, PWG Chair Annual Validation 2002 DLC Implementation.
Distributed Renewable Generation Profiling Methodology ERCOT Load Profiling March 4, 2008.
1 Energy Storage Settlements Consistent with PUCT Project & NPRR461 ERCOT Commercial Market Operations November 2, 2012 – RCWG Meeting.
Calculations of Peak Load Contribution (PLC) AND Network Service Peak Load (NSPL) As of 1/1/2016.
2015 SDG&E PTR/SCTD Evaluation DRMEC Spring 2016 Load Impact Workshop George Jiang May 11 th, 2016 Customer Category Mean Active Participants Mean Reference.
Emergency Response Service Baselines
PLC = Peak Load Contribution (aka “ICAP”)
2018 VELCO IRP Forecast Preliminary results
Seasonal Variance in Corn Futures
FY 2019 Close Schedule Bi-Weekly Payroll governs close schedule
Behavior Modification Report with Peak Reduction Component
Presentation transcript:

May 03, UFE ANALYSIS Old – New Model Comparison Compiled by the Load Profiling Group ERCOT Energy Analysis & Aggregation May 03, 2007

2 UFE Basics Sources of UFE include: ■ Generation Measurement Errors ■ Load - Missing/Erroneous Usage Data - Model Error - Load Profile ID Assignment Error ■ Losses -Model Error - Loss Code Assignment Error  Negative UFE indicates load/losses are overestimated  UFE (unaccounted for energy) is computed as follows: UFE = Generation – (Load + Losses)  UFE % is computed as follows: UFE % = UFE / Generation

May 03, UFE Basics Net Generation for Settlement Interval Interval Data Energy Usage Profiled Energy Usage Non-Interval Data Non-Metered Accounts Losses: Transmission & Distribution UFE GAP > Net Generation Compared to Load Buildup

May 03, Analysis Overview  Objective: Estimate UFE impact for the 48 new profiles models Analyze UFE impacts on an annual basis and across seasons, day-types and time-of-day  Winter (Dec, Jan, Feb) Spring (Mar, Apr)  Summer (May – Sep) Fall ( Oct, Nov) Analysis based on current profile type assignments Analysis window January 1, 2005 – July 31, 2006 Analysis limited to the most recent settlement run for trade date  Create a dataset of usage-sum values Compute the sum of all meter readings with the same Profile Type, Weather Zone, read start date, and read stop date. Based on usage data available and Profile ID assignments in December 2006

May 03,  Create daily profile kWh for new and old models by summing the profile intervals for each day of the analysis window  Apply the daily profile kWh values to the usage-sum data to allocate the usage-sum across the days in the meter reading period Result is daily kWh based on new and old profiles Assumed usage records spanning trade days within the analysis window were completely loaded  Apply new and old profiles to the daily kWh to allocate it to intervals within the day  Sum the profiled interval values across all 48 profile type and weather zone combinations for each interval Result is an old and new version of the total profiled load (for the 48 combinations) for each interval Analysis Overview (continued)

May 03,  Compute the difference between the old and new versions of the total profiled load for each interval Difference = Profiled Load old – Profiled Load new  Add the difference above to UFE (Old UFE) in the interval from the latest settlement run New UFE = Old UFE + Difference All other settlement values thus are held constant Losses were not recalculated … they were also held constant as a simplifying assumption  Proceeded with comparison analysis following the patterns of previous UFE Analysis Reports Analysis Overview (continued)

May 03, UFE on Ercot Peak Day August 23, 2005 Old Models vs New Models

May 03, UFE MWh by Month New Models vs Old Models UFE │UFE│ Abs. UFE MWh for New Models is 13% lower than Old Models

May 03, UFE Cost │UFE Cost│ UFE Cost by Month New Models vs Old Models UFE Cost for New Models is 40% lower than Old Models Abs. UFE Cost for New Models is 19% lower than Old Models

May 03, Statistical Comparisons – Study Period New Models vs Old Models

May 03, Statistical Comparisons - Monthly New Models vs Old Models

May 03, Statistical Comparisons - Monthly New Models vs Old Models

May 03, Statistical Comparisons - Monthly New Models vs Old Models

May 03, Statistical Comparisons - Monthly New Models vs Old Models

May 03, Statistical Comparisons - Monthly New Models vs Old Models

May 03, Statistical Comparisons - Monthly New Models vs Old Models

May 03, Statistical Comparisons - Monthly New Models vs Old Models

May 03, Statistical Comparisons - Monthly New Models vs Old Models

May 03, Statistical Comparisons - Monthly New Models vs Old Models

May 03, Statistical Comparisons - Monthly New Models vs Old Models

May 03, Distribution of UFE MW New Models vs Old Models

May 03, Distribution of UFE Cost New Models vs Old Models UFE Cost = ∑(MCPE × UFE_MWh)

May 03, UFE % by Day of Week New Models vs Old Models Medians, 5 th and 95 th Percentiles compiled over entire analysis period

May 03, UFE % - Average Weekday New Models vs Old Models Medians, 5 th and 95 th Percentiles compiled over entire analysis period

May 03, UFE Cost by Day of Week New Models vs Old Models Medians, 5 th and 95 th Percentiles compiled over entire analysis period

May 03, UFE Cost - Average Weekday New Models vs Old Models Medians, 5 th and 95 th Percentiles compiled over entire analysis period

May 03, UFE % vs Load New Models vs Old Models

May 03, UFE % – Average Weekday New Models vs Old Models

May 03, UFE Cost vs Load New Models vs Old Models

May 03, UFE Cost – Average Weekday New Models vs Old Models

May 03, UFE % vs Load by Season New Models vs Old Models

May 03, UFE % Average Weekday by Season New Models vs Old Models

May 03, UFE Cost vs Load by Season New Models vs Old Models

May 03, UFE Cost – Average Weekday by Season New Models vs Old Models

May 03, UFE % vs ERCOT Load New Models Medians, 5 th and 95 th Percentiles compiled over entire analysis period

May 03, UFE % vs ERCOT Load Old Models Medians, 5 th and 95 th Percentiles compiled over entire analysis period

May 03, UFE Cost vs ERCOT Load New Models Medians, 5 th and 95 th Percentiles compiled over entire analysis period

May 03, UFE Cost vs ERCOT Load Old Models Medians, 5 th and 95 th Percentiles compiled over entire analysis period