Quantum Two 1. 2 Many Particle Systems Revisited 3.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Quantum One: Lecture 1a Entitled So what is quantum mechanics, anyway?
Advertisements

Quantum One: Lecture 6. The Initial Value Problem for Free Particles, and the Emergence of Fourier Transforms.
Commutators and the Correspondence Principle Formal Connection Q.M.Classical Mechanics Correspondence between Classical Poisson bracket of And Q.M. Commutator.
Quantum One: Lecture 5a. Normalization Conditions for Free Particle Eigenstates.
Quantum One: Lecture More about Linear Operators 3.
Quantum One: Lecture 4. Schrödinger's Wave Mechanics for a Free Quantum Particle.
Quantum One: Lecture Postulate II 3 Observables of Quantum Mechanical Systems 4.
Quantum One: Lecture 16.
Quantum One: Lecture 3. Implications of Schrödinger's Wave Mechanics for Conservative Systems.
The Postulates of Quantum Mechanics
Quantum One: Lecture Canonical Commutation Relations 3.
Wavefunction Quantum mechanics acknowledges the wave-particle duality of matter by supposing that, rather than traveling along a definite path, a particle.
X y z z′ R (  1,  2,  3 ) = 11 y′ 11 =x′ 22 22 22 x′′ z′′ =y′′ 33 y′′′ z′′′ = x′′′ 33 33.
PHYS Quantum Mechanics PHYS Quantum Mechanics Dr Gavin Smith Nuclear Physics Group These slides at:
Spin and addition of angular momentum
PHYS Quantum Mechanics PHYS Quantum Mechanics Dr Sean Freeman Nuclear Physics Group These slides at:
Chapter 3 Formalism. Hilbert Space Two kinds of mathematical constructs - wavefunctions (representing the system) - operators (representing observables)
4. The Postulates of Quantum Mechanics 4A. Revisiting Representations
Quantum One: Lecture 7. The General Formalism of Quantum Mechanics.
Quantum One: Lecture 8. Continuously Indexed Basis Sets.
States, operators and matrices Starting with the most basic form of the Schrödinger equation, and the wave function (  ): The state of a quantum mechanical.
6. Second Quantization and Quantum Field Theory
MSEG 803 Equilibria in Material Systems 6: Phase space and microstates Prof. Juejun (JJ) Hu
Physics 3 for Electrical Engineering
Photon angular momentum and geometric gauge Margaret Hawton, Lakehead University Thunder Bay, Ontario, Canada William Baylis, U. of Windsor, Canada.
Chang-Kui Duan, Institute of Modern Physics, CUPT 1 Harmonic oscillator and coherent states Reading materials: 1.Chapter 7 of Shankar’s PQM.
Angular Momentum in Quantum Mechanics Other ways of thinking about tranformations 2-d rotations in QM Angular Momentum in 3-d: Oscillator Basis Wave functions.
Quantum One: Lecture Representation Independent Properties of Linear Operators 3.
Ch 3 Quantum Mechanics of Electrons EE 315/ECE 451 N ANOELECTRONICS I.
Quantum Two 1. 2 Angular Momentum and Rotations 3.
Quantum Two 1. 2 Evolution of Many Particle Systems 3.
Quantum Two 1. 2 More About Direct Product Spaces 3.
Quantum Two 1. 2 Motion in 3D as a Direct Product 3.
Phy 303: Classical Mechanics (2) Chapter 3 Lagrangian and Hamiltonian Mechanics.
Quantum Two 1. 2 Many Particle Systems: An Introduction to Direct Product Spaces 3.
5. Quantum Theory 5.0. Wave Mechanics
Quantum Two 1. 2 Angular Momentum and Rotations 3.
Quantum New way of looking at our world. Classical vs Quantum Typically a student develops an intuition about how the world works using classical mechanics.
1 Reading: QM course packet Ch 5 up to 5.6 SUPERPOSITION, MEASUREMENT, NORMALIZATION, EXPECTATION VALUES.
Utrecht University Gerard ’t Hooft and Isaac Newton Institute, December 15, 2004.
Monday, Apr. 4, 2005PHYS 3446, Spring 2005 Jae Yu 1 PHYS 3446 – Lecture #16 Monday, Apr. 4, 2005 Dr. Jae Yu Symmetries Why do we care about the symmetry?
Chapter 9 Spin. Total angular momentum Let us recall key results for the total angular momentum 6.B.2 6.C.1.
5. The Harmonic Oscillator Consider a general problem in 1D Particles tend to be near their minimum Taylor expand V(x) near its minimum Recall V’(x 0 )
Chapter 3 Postulates of Quantum Mechanics. Questions QM answers 1) How is the state of a system described mathematically? (In CM – via generalized coordinates.
1 Reading: QM Course packet – Ch 5 BASICS OF QUANTUM MECHANICS.
Quantum Two 1. 2 Angular Momentum and Rotations 3.
Systems of Identical Particles
Q. M. Particle Superposition of Momentum Eigenstates Partially localized Wave Packet Photon – Electron Photon wave packet description of light same.
Quantum One.
Quantum One.
QM1 Concept Test 9.1 Consider the following statements for the product space of two spin systems:
4. The Postulates of Quantum Mechanics 4A. Revisiting Representations
Quantum One.
Quantum One.
Chapter 9 Spin.
Quantum One.
Quantum One.
Quantum One.
Quantum One.
Quantum One.
QM1 Concept test 8.1 If the total spin quantum number for the system is
Quantum Two.
QM1 Concept test 1.1 Consider an ensemble of hydrogen atoms all in the ground state. Choose all of the following statements that are correct. If you make.
QM1 Concept Test 9.1 Consider the following statements for the product space of a two spin-1/2 system:
Choose all of the following observables for which it will be convenient to use the coupled representation to find the probabilities of different outcomes.
Quantum Two.
16. Angular Momentum Angular Momentum Operator
Vector Review Scalars are magnitudes without direction.
Quantum One.
Quantum One.
Presentation transcript:

Quantum Two 1

2

Many Particle Systems Revisited 3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

Thus, we write Thus, the quantum mechanical description in the position representation involves a single wave function but it is not simply a complex number assigned to each point in space. Indeed, it is a simultaneous function of the position coordinates of all the particles in the system. 16

Thus, we write Thus, the quantum mechanical description in the position representation involves a single wave function but it is not simply a complex number assigned to each point in space. Indeed, it is a simultaneous function of the position coordinates of all the particles in the system. 17

Thus, we write Thus, the quantum mechanical description in the position representation involves a single wave function but it is not simply a complex number assigned to each point in space. Indeed, it is a simultaneous function of the position coordinates of all the particles in the system. 18

Thus, we write Thus, the quantum mechanical description in the position representation involves a single wave function but it is not simply a complex number assigned to each point in space. Indeed, it is a simultaneous function of the position coordinates of all the particles in the system. 19

Thus, we write Thus, the quantum mechanical description in the position representation involves a single wave function but it is not simply a complex number assigned to each point in space. Indeed, it is a simultaneous function of the position coordinates of all the particles in the system. 20

21

22

23

24

Comment: There is also no particular reason to work in the many particle position representation. Indeed, in the state space associated with each particle, there are many different choices of basis sets to choose from. Thus, from the momentum eigenstates we can construct the direct product basis of the many particle momentum representation, which obey and in terms of which 25

Comment: There is also no particular reason to work in the many particle position representation. Indeed, in the state space associated with each particle, there are many different choices of basis sets to choose from. Thus, from the momentum eigenstates we can construct the direct product basis of the many particle momentum representation, which obey and in terms of which 26

Comment: There is also no particular reason to work in the many particle position representation. Indeed, in the state space associated with each particle, there are many different choices of basis sets to choose from. Thus, from the momentum eigenstates we can construct the direct product basis of the many particle momentum representation, which obey and in terms of which 27

Comment: There is also no particular reason to work in the many particle position representation. Indeed, in the state space associated with each particle, there are many different choices of basis sets to choose from. Thus, from the momentum eigenstates we can construct the direct product basis of the many particle momentum representation, which obey and in terms of which 28

Comment: There is also no particular reason to work in the many particle position representation. Indeed, in the state space associated with each particle, there are many different choices of basis sets to choose from. Thus, from the momentum eigenstates we can construct the direct product basis of the many particle momentum representation, which obey and in terms of which we may expand in terms of a momentum wave function 29

30

31

32

33

34

35

36

37

38

39

40

How about particles with spin? We just follow the rules, and see what happens. For N spin-1/2 particles moving in 3D, for example, we have individual state spaces that now take into account the spin degrees of freedom, i.e., which allows for direct product states in the combined space, obeying and in terms of which we can expand an arbitrary state. 41

How about particles with spin? We just follow the rules, and see what happens. For N spin-1/2 particles moving in 3D, for example, we have individual state spaces that now take into account the spin degrees of freedom, i.e., which allows for direct product states in the combined space, obeying and in terms of which we can expand an arbitrary state. 42

How about particles with spin? We just follow the rules, and see what happens. For N spin-1/2 particles moving in 3D, for example, we have individual state spaces that now take into account the spin degrees of freedom, i.e., which allows for direct product states in the combined space, obeying and in terms of which we can expand an arbitrary state. 43

How about particles with spin? We just follow the rules, and see what happens. For N spin-1/2 particles moving in 3D, for example, we have individual state spaces that now take into account the spin degrees of freedom, i.e., which allows for direct product states in the combined space, obeying and in terms of which we can expand an arbitrary state. 44

How about particles with spin? We just follow the rules, and see what happens. For N spin-1/2 particles moving in 3D, for example, we have individual state spaces that now take into account the spin degrees of freedom, i.e., which allows for direct product states in the combined space, obeying and in terms of which we can expand an arbitrary state. 45

How about particles with spin? We just follow the rules, and see what happens. For N spin-1/2 particles moving in 3D, for example, we have individual state spaces that now take into account the spin degrees of freedom, i.e., which allows for direct product states in the combined space, obeying and in terms of which we can expand an arbitrary state. 46

How about particles with spin? We just follow the rules, and see what happens. For N spin-1/2 particles moving in 3D, for example, we have individual state spaces that now take into account the spin degrees of freedom, i.e., which allows for direct product states in the combined space, obeying and in terms of which we can expand an arbitrary state. 47

We write: Thus, the quantum mechanical description of this system requires the specification of a wave function having components associated with the different possible spin configurations of the system: 48

We write: Thus, the quantum mechanical description of this system requires the specification of a wave function having components associated with the different possible spin configurations of the system: 49

We write: Thus, the quantum mechanical description of this system requires the specification of a wave function having components associated with the different possible spin configurations of the system: 50

We write: Thus, the quantum mechanical description of this system requires the specification of a wave function having components associated with the different possible spin configurations of the system: 51

Thus, although it may get notationally more complicated, there is no real impediment to applying the postulates of quantum mechanics to the state spaces and state vectors of systems of many particles, even those with internal (e.g., spin) degrees of freedom. In this last example, the basic rules governing the construction of the direct product space imply that all operators (spin and spatial) associated with any particle in the system automatically commute with those of any other particle Thus, computation of quantities of interest, while it may lead to complicated multi-dimensional integrals, is nonetheless straightforward to understand and interpret. In the next segment, we briefly consider the typical Hamiltonian and the subsequent evolution of many particle systems, focusing on the surprisingly useful case of a system of non-interacting particles. 52

Thus, although it may get notationally more complicated, there is no real impediment to applying the postulates of quantum mechanics to the state spaces and state vectors of systems of many particles, even those with internal (e.g., spin) degrees of freedom. In this last example, the basic rules governing the construction of the direct product space imply that all operators (spin and spatial) associated with any particle in the system automatically commute with those of any other particle. Thus, computation of quantities of interest, while it may lead to complicated multi-dimensional integrals, is nonetheless straightforward to understand and interpret. In the next segment, we briefly consider the typical Hamiltonian and the subsequent evolution of many particle systems, focusing on the surprisingly useful case of a system of non-interacting particles. 53

Thus, although it may get notationally more complicated, there is no real impediment to applying the postulates of quantum mechanics to the state spaces and state vectors of systems of many particles, even those with internal (e.g., spin) degrees of freedom. In this last example, the basic rules governing the construction of the direct product space imply that all operators (spin and spatial) associated with any particle in the system automatically commute with those of any other particle. Thus, computation of quantities of interest, while it may lead to complicated multi-dimensional integrals, is nonetheless straightforward to understand and interpret. In the next segment, we briefly consider the typical Hamiltonian and the subsequent evolution of many particle systems, focusing on the surprisingly useful case of a system of non-interacting particles. 54

Thus, although it may get notationally more complicated, there is no real impediment to applying the postulates of quantum mechanics to the state spaces and state vectors of systems of many particles, even those with internal (e.g., spin) degrees of freedom. In this last example, the basic rules governing the construction of the direct product space imply that all operators (spin and spatial) associated with any particle in the system automatically commute with those of any other particle. Thus, computation of quantities of interest, while it may lead to complicated multi-dimensional integrals, is nonetheless straightforward to understand and interpret. In the next segment, we briefly consider the typical Hamiltonian and the subsequent evolution of many particle systems, focusing on the surprisingly useful case of a system of non-interacting particles. 55

56