RCWG Update to WMS May 6, 2015 1. Real-Time Mitigation During Exceptional Fuel Events Option 3 – Increase MOC’s during Cold Weather Events When ERCOT.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
QSE Managers Working Group Meeting Notes 9 April, 2010 Report to WMS 21 April, 2010 David Detelich - Chairperson.
Advertisements

RCWG Update to WMS April 9, VCMRR-VC for Cancellation of RUC Committed Resources Paragraph (3) of Nodal Protocol Section regarding Cancellation.
Texas Nodal © Electric Reliability Council of Texas, Inc. All rights reserved. 1 Split Generation Resources (SGRs) (Also known as Jointly Owned.
RCWG Update to WMS July 8, VCMRR008 - Alignment with NPRR700, Utilizing Actual Fuel Cost in Startup Offer Caps NPRR700 approved at May 2015 WMS.
MCWG Update to WMS Loretta Martin LCRA, Chair Josephine Wan AE, Vice Chair 03/05/
ERCOT RMR Deployment and Cost Proposals By: Matt Mereness and Ino Gonzalez.
NPRRs NPRR680 Allow QSEs to Self-Arrange AS Quantities Greater Than Their AS Obligation. This Nodal Protocol Revision Request (NPRR) proposes to allow.
May 29, 2014 Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) Update to RMS Kathy Scott June 3, 2014 TAC Update to RMS 1.
ERS Procurement Methodology 09/04/2013 ERS Workshop Presented By: ERCOT Staff.
Real Time Mitigation During Exceptional Fuel Cost Events.
July 30, 2015 TAC Meeting Update to COPS Michelle Trenary August 12, 2015.
Overview of FIP Issues in the RUC, Verifiable Cost, and other Nodal Market Processes January 28, 2009 WMS Meeting.
NPRR 511 and QSGR MOC ERCOT Settlements Meeting Title: WMS Date: March 13, 2013.
Settlement of Mothballed RMR Resources for System Capacity November 15, 2011 RDTF Meeting Ino González ERCOT November 14, 2011.
Report to TAC February In Brief Chair and Vice-Chair for 2009 Chair and Vice-Chair for 2009 Working Group Reports Working Group Reports QMWG QMWG.
Guidelines for Verification of Resource Specific Fuel Adders RCWG Paul Vinson.
January 14, New logic and invoices used in January 2015 when closing out December 2014 New Bill Determinants: CRRBAFA- CRR Balancing Account Fund.
Market Mitigation Concept Group Update Jim Galvin April 26, 2004.
Protocol Revision Subcommittee Sandy Morris October 6, 2011.
Mitigated Offer Cap Presented to: NATF Date: September 29, 2009 By: Mark Patterson, Manager Market Operations Support (ERCOT) 1September 29 NATF Meeting.
Revisiting the Mitigation Proposal Clayton Greer Constellation Power Source.
Presentation to WMS Regarding PRR 731- Fuel Oil Index Price (FOIP) Larry Gurley July 18, 2007.
March 26, 2015 Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) Update to RMS Kathy Scott April 7, 2015 TAC Update to RMS 1.
RCWG Update to WMS July 10, General Update Agenda Items for Today: Fuel Adder NPRR 485-(no vote) Variable O&M for Technology Types (vote) Seasonal.
Texas Nodal © Electric Reliability Council of Texas, Inc. All rights reserved. 1 Verifiable Costs Process TPTF Meeting Nov 28, 2007 Ino Gonzalez.
NPRR385, Security Violation Analysis and Reporting and Negative Price Floor WMS Meeting February 15, 2012.
E x p e r i e n c e C o m m i t m e n t SM ERCOT Nodal – Fuel Cost Analysis Verifiable Cost Working Group October 6, 2008.
1 Impact Assessment of Parking Deck NPRRs/SCRs/NOGRRs Phase 1 March 2011.
1 Impact Assessment of Parking Deck and New NPRRs/SCRs Phase 1 February 2011.
RCWG Update to WMS December 5, General Update Agenda Items for Today: Verifiable Cost Manual clarifications (vote) White Paper on Long Term Fuel.
QMWG – Feb. 26, 2014 Discussion topic: NPRR585 Clarification of Administrative Pricing Requirements for Self-Committed Combined Cycle Combustion Turbines.
Quick Start Resource – Payment for Start-Up at less than LSL Current NPRR language: ( 8) If a QSGR comes On-Line as a result of a Base Point less than.
December 18, 2014 Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) Update to RMS Kathy Scott January 6, 2015 TAC Update to RMS 1.
1 Reliability Deployment Task Force (RDTF Meeting) December 20 th 2011 December 20, 2011.
Protocol Revision Subcommittee Presentation to the ERCOT Technical Advisory Committee June 3, 2010.
RCWG Update to WMS July 11, Alternatives to Address Negative Prices At its June meeting, WMS directed RCWG to bring back something to vote on. RCWG.
August 28, 2014 Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) Update to RMS Kathy Scott September 9, 2014 TAC Update to RMS 1.
RMR Task Force Decision Points for ERCOT Technical Advisory Committee April 3, 2003.
Resource Cost Working Group October 7, 2015 WMS Update.
DAM Overview: Processes & Tools in the DAM Shams Siddiqi, Ph.D. Crescent Power, Inc. (512) April 2, 2008.
Resource Cost Working Group December 2, 2015 WMS Update.
July 30, 2015 Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) Update to RMS Kathy Scott August 4, 2015 TAC Update to RMS 1.
Texas Nodal © Electric Reliability Council of Texas, Inc. All rights reserved. 1 Nodal Verifiable Costs Process WMS Meeting May 15, 2007 Ino.
NPRRs 663NPRR Ancillary Service Insufficiency Actions. This Nodal Protocol Revision Request (NPRR) specifies the actions ERCOT will take to ensure sufficient.
NPRR 617 Overview and Justifications. Overview Current protocols place restrictions on Day-Ahead Three-Part Supply Offers – Part 1 (Startup Offer) – capped.
August 27, 2015 Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) Update to RMS Kathy Scott September 1, 2015 TAC Update to RMS1.
WMS Meeting, October 10, RCWG Continuing Efforts  NPRR 747 Price Correction No consensus on this issue  RCWG needs additional guidance on the.
DAM Self-Commitment Issues & Solutions, Part 2 Shams Siddiqi, Ph.D. (512) April 21, 2008.
RUC Startup Discussion. Problem The RUC language in the Nodal Protocols allows little or no ability for a generator to recover risk associated with operating.
1/07/2014 QMWG – RUC and AS update QMWG – ERCOT Update ERCOT Market Analysis.
Texas Nodal © Electric Reliability Council of Texas, Inc. All rights reserved. 1 Verifiable Costs for Nodal WMS Meeting.
Resource Adequacy Task Force (RATF) Update to WMS October 8, 2013.
December 2010 Wholesale Market Subcommittee Report to Technical Advisory Committee.
Texas Nodal © Electric Reliability Council of Texas, Inc. All rights reserved. 1 Verifiable Costs Process Settlement and Data Aggregation Working.
June 26 and July 31, 2014 Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) Update to RMS Kathy Scott August 5, 2014 TAC Update to RMS 1.
Utilization of Fuel Costs in Ercot Markets Ino González RCWG Meeting 2/24/2016.
Texas Nodal © Electric Reliability Council of Texas, Inc. All rights reserved. 1 Reliability Unit Commitment (RUC) Settlements Business Requirements.
Overview of FIP Issues in the RUC, Verifiable Cost, and other Nodal Market Processes November 12, 2008 VCWG Meeting.
Settlement of Ancillary Service Infeasibility ERCOT QMWG April 15, 2016.
May 28, 2015 and June 30, 2015 Information Session TAC Meeting Update to COPS Michelle Trenary, July 15, 2015.
Reliability Must Run Resources for Summer Slide 2 RMR for Summer 2011 RMR Contracts for Mothballed Units ERCOT has signed RMR Agreements with two.
ERCOT Market Education Market Role in Emergency Operations OTS 2016.
Fuel Cost Components in the Fuel Adder
Exceptional Fuel Costs in LMP
Fuel Cost Components in the Fuel Adder
Resource Cost Working Group
General Overview Of Resource Costs
RTDF Overview of Data Analysis & Status of “Consesus Items”
Fuel Cost Components in the Fuel Adder
Resource Cost Working Group
Presentation transcript:

RCWG Update to WMS May 6,

Real-Time Mitigation During Exceptional Fuel Events Option 3 – Increase MOC’s during Cold Weather Events When ERCOT issues a cold weather event and is allowed to procure more reserves through a SASM, increase the mitigated offer cap (MOC’s) multipliers in (e) by Retain manual make-whole process if higher MOC’s are not adequate to compensate for Resource fuel costs Rationale: Increase MOC’s during periods when the risk of gas price spikes is higher and provide headroom to reflect exceptional fuel costs in LMPs. Keep manual make-whole process as a backstop. May be an overly broad solution 2

Real-Time Mitigation During Exceptional Fuel Events Option 3 proposed multipliers: During ERCOT cold weather event, increase the mitigated offer cap multipliers in (e) by (e)The multipliers for paragraphs (b)(ii) and (c)(ii) above are as follows: (i)1.60 for Resources running at a ≥ 50% capacity factor for the previous 12 months; (ii)1.65 for Resources running at a ≥ 30 and < 50% capacity factor for the previous 12 months; (iii)1.70 for Resources running at a ≥ 20 and < 30% capacity factor for the previous 12 months; (iv)1.75 for Resources running at a ≥ 10 and < 20% capacity factor for the previous 12 months; (v)1.80 for Resources running at a ≥ 5 and < 10% capacity factor for the previous 12 months; (vi)1.90 for Resources running at a ≥ 1 and < 5% capacity factor for the previous 12 months; and (vii)2.00 for Resources running at a less than 1% capacity factor for the previous 12 months 3

NPRR/VCMRR - Utilizing Actual Fuel Costs in Startup Offer Caps Background: At Nodal implementation, realized that RUC make-whole didn’t consider revenues from breaker close to LSL To correct, reduced startup costs by approximating revenues using Proxy Heat Rate Problem – Startup offers caps are artificially low for DAM and RUC procurement Proposed NPRR/VCMRR: Use actual fuel costs in startup offer caps (i.e. remove PHR adjustment) Continue to use PHR adjustment in RUC Make-Whole Payment calculations (implement with NPRR617 Energy Offer Flexibility) Vote? 4

NPRR/VCMRR - EOC Caps for Make- Whole for “Other” Resources Background: NPRR560 established caps for Energy Storage Resources (ESRs), such as Compressed Air Energy Storage To reduce system impact, ESRs are classified as “Other” In protocols, “Other” resources have a $0/MWh EOC cap for Make-Whole Calculation In VCM, ESRs do not have a cap, as approved Proposed NPRR/VCMRR: Sets EOC Cap for Make-Whole Calculation for “Other” resources to the SWCap Creates “Wind” resource category with $0/MWh cap (aligns with current practice) PhotoVoltaic (PVGR) with $0/MWh cap (per NPRR588) ERCOT will report annually to WMS the % of DAM and RUC Make-Whole Payments calculated for “Other” resources Vote? 5

Minimum Fuel Requirement Cost in Fuel Adder Calculation ERCOT seeking clarification on allocating minimum gas transportation costs in the fuel adder calculation Background: Resource can elect to submit an “actual” fuel adder instead of the default $0.50/MMBtu Resource must submit documentation to ERCOT for verification Costs must be “clearly attributable to the resource” Options to allocate minimum requirement costs 1.Allocate to resource usage only, excluding third-party and storage 2.Allocate to resource and third-party usage, excluding storage 3.Allocate across all activity on transportation contract Vote? 6

General Update Methodology for verifying exceptional fuel costs for coal EMR End of Life Cycle Verifiable Costs

APPENDIX 8

Real-Time Mitigation During Exceptional Fuel Events Overview of NPRR664 Resource can designate a Fuel Index Price (FIPR) of HSC, Waha or weighted-average Includes Real-Time Make-Whole Payment provision for exceptional fuel cost events – Exceptional event: Actual price paid for delivered fuel must be greater than the FIPR plus the fuel adder plus a threshold fuel price of $2/MMBtu – Uplift allocated by LRS NPRR664 Approval – Authorized manual workaround to implement Make-Whole Payment for this winter, to be discontinued on May 1, 2015 – ERCOT to revisit the rank and priority with TAC before project initiation 9

Real-Time Mitigation During Exceptional Fuel Events Option 1 - Continue with manual implementation of NPRR 664 Rationale: Number of exceptional fuel events may be too small to justify significant system changes at this time Continue with manual calculation of make-whole payments Lower the priority for implementation of Index Fuel Prices Revisit if manual process becomes too burdensome 10

Real-Time Mitigation During Exceptional Fuel Events Option 2 - Pursue “Exceptional Fuel Cost flag” concept Resource will not be mitigated if it sets an exceptional fuel cost “flag”, submitted with its Energy Offer Curve (EOC) If set, Resource will be subject to verification of the exceptional fuel costs used in its EOC Rationale: Exceptional fuel costs would be reflected in LMP’s, possibly eliminating need for make-whole and new index fuel prices (i.e. NPRR664) 11