1 Tunnel implementations (laser straight) Central Injector complex.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Linac-LHC ep Collider Options F. Zimmermann, F. Bordry, H.-H. Braun, O.S. Bruning, H. Burkhardt, A. de Roeck, R. Garoby, T. Linnecar, K.-H. Mess, J. Osborne,
Advertisements

CLIC Energy Stages D. Schulte1 D. Schulte for the CLIC team.
CARE07, 29 Oct Alexej Grudiev, New CLIC parameters. The new CLIC parameters Alexej Grudiev.
Industry and the ILC B Barish 16-Aug May-05ILC Consultations - Washington DC2 Why e + e - Collisions? elementary particles well-defined –energy,
A. Bay Beijing October Accelerators We want to study submicroscopic structure of particles. Spatial resolution of a probe ~de Broglie wavelength.
5 th CLIC X-band collaboration meetingWalter Wuensch16 May 2011 CLIC rf structure program.
Energy and Luminosity reach Our charge asks for evaluation of a baseline machine of 500 GeV with energy upgrade to about 1 TeV. (the “about” came about.
ILCSC Review of ILCSC Parameters Subcommittee Report Parameters subcommittee of the ILCSC Dongchul Son Center for High Energy Physics Kyungpook National.
Future Accelerators at the energy frontier Peter Hansen february 2010 University of Copenhagen.
Summary of AWG4: Beam Dynamics A. Latina (CERN), N. Solyak (FNAL) LCWS13 – Nov 11-15, 2013 – The University of Tokyo, Japan.
1 Welcome to all Outline: CDR status planning information information still needed Goals of meeting and practical information.
ILC BCD Crossing Angle Issues G. A. Blair Royal Holloway Univ. London ECFA ILC Workshop, Vienna 14 th November 2005 Introduction BCD Crossing Angle Rankings.
Future Accelerators at the High Energy Frontier
CLIC Implementation Studies Ph. Lebrun & J. Osborne CERN CLIC Collaboration Meeting addressing the Work Packages CERN, 3-4 November 2011.
Date Event Global Design Effort 1 ILC UPDATE Vancouver to Valencia Ewan Paterson Personal Report to SiD Collaboration Oct 27, 2006.
Global Design Effort 1 Possible Minimum Machine Studies of Central Region for 2009 Reference, ILC Minimum Machine Study Proposal V1, January 2009 ILC-EDMS.
CLIC cost estimate Hans-H. Braun, CLIC-GDE meeting, February 8, 2008  Cost model goals  Methodology  Cost distribution  Future improvements.
Current CLIC Energy Stages D. Schulte1. Main Beam Generation Complex Drive Beam Generation Complex Layout at 3 TeV D. Schulte2.
NLC Status and Milestones D. L. Burke ISG9 KEK December 10-13, 2002.
Luminosity expectations for the first years of CLIC operation CTC MJ.
Status of the Rebaselining D. Schulte for the Rebaselining Team D. Schulte, CLIC Rebaselining, October 2013.
BCD Status: Strengths and Weaknesses Tor Raubenheimer.
Recent news from CLIC C&S WG and CLIC-ILC WG on General Issues Ph. Lebrun CLIC Project Meeting 1 June 2011.
CLIC main activities and goals for 2018 Design and Implementation studies: CDR status: not optimized except at 3 TeV and not adjusted for Higgs discovery,
CLIC survey and alignment 1 CLIC CES meeting STARTSLIDE CLIC SURVEY AND ALIGNMENT Hélène MAINAUD DURAND.
Activities and news Last meeting: 2015 CERN budget allocations as expected, now distributed on accounts Annual report done, and MTP (Medium Term Plan)
1 Physics Input for the CLIC Re-baselining D. Schulte for the CLIC collaboration.
Alors, c’est fini! Et maintenant?. Machine Upgrade in Stages Push LHC performance without new hardware –luminosity →2.3x10 34 cm -2 s -1, E b =7→7.54.
Considerations for the CDR and Strategy Update The current CDR planning focuses on 3 TeV and a downscaled not optimised 500 GeV machine, aiming for completion.
CLIC Energy Stages Meeting D. Schulte1 D. Schulte for the CLIC team.
LC Scope: European View 1- Scope document should define a parameter set for a Linear Collider to be used as the European input to the world wide scope.
CLIC Energy Stages D. Schulte1 D. Schulte for the CLIC team.
LHC-CC Validity Requirements & Tests LHC Crab Cavity Mini Workshop at CERN; 21. August Remarks on using the LHC as a test bed for R&D equipment.
1 Tunnel implementations (laser straight) Central MDI & Interaction Region -Introduction -Feasibility Studies -CDR status -Implementation issues -Plans.
Introdcution to Workpackage/Activity Reflection D. Schulte.
N. Walker, K. Yokoya LCWS ’11 Granada September TeV Upgrade Scenario: Straw man parameters.
Questions from the CLIC accelerator team (D. Schulte, LCD “monthly” 25 Feb. 2013) -> a first attempt to answers 1 25 March 2013.
CLIC - CDR Status (Volume 2) Hermann Schmickler, ILCW2010.
CLIC project 2012 The Conceptual Design Report for CLIC completed – presented in SPC, ECFA and numerous meetings and conferences, also providing basis.
24-July-10 ICHEP-10 Paris Global Design Effort 1 Barry Barish Paris ICHEP 24-July-10 ILC Global Design Effort.
Injector Options for CLIC Drive Beam Linac Avni Aksoy Ankara University.
FCC-FHI 28/1/14 Requirements from Collider Draft parameters just available in EDMS:
1 The next steps – focusing points Define the scope, strategy and cost of the project implementation. Main input: The evolution of the physics findings.
EU accelerator contributions to the IDS … R. Garoby ISS meeting RAL 28/04/2006.
2 February 8th - 10th, 2016 TWIICE 2 Workshop Instability studies in the CLIC Damping Rings including radiation damping A.Passarelli, H.Bartosik, O.Boine-Fankenheim,
H. Matis, S. Hedges, M. Placidi, A. Ratti, W. Turner [+several students] (LBNL) R. Miyamoto (now at ESSS) H. Matis - LARP CM18 - May 8, Fluka Modeling.
CLIC Organogram CLIC Collab. Board L.Rivkin MoU with annexes describing coll. efforts (note: in reality more complicated) CLIC SC (Stapnes) Repr. from.
The Linear Collider Roadmap IWLC2010 CERN October 18, 2010 Rolf-Dieter Heuer CERN.
Photon-Photon Colliders ( Photon-Photon Colliders (  C) Mayda M. Velasco.
Please check out: K. Ohmi et al., IPAC2014, THPRI003 & THPRI004 A. Bogomyagkov, E. Levichev, P. Piminov, IPAC2014, THPRI008 Work in progress FCC-ee accelerator.
CLIC work program and milestones
ILC - Upgrades Nick Walker – 100th meeting
Input to Strategy currently planned
Particle Colliders at CERN present and future
Staging in the TDR.
Beam-beam effects in eRHIC and MeRHIC
CLIC Rebaselining at 380 GeV and Staging Considerations
CLIC Klystron-based Design
Collaboration New collaborators in 2016:
CLIC Study Aim Conceptual design report in 2010
CLIC: from 380 GeV up to 3 TeV Will also study klystron based machine for initial stage.
Measurements, ideas, curiosities
Hong-Jian He Tsinghua University
Requests of Future HEP e+/e-Facilities
LHC Beam Operations Past, Present and Future
LCLS Commissioning Parameters
ATF project meeting, Feb KEK, Junji Urakawa Contents :
Explanation of the Basic Principles and Goals
Barry Barish Paris ICHEP 24-July-10
CLIC Feasibility Demonstration at CTF3
Presentation transcript:

1 Tunnel implementations (laser straight) Central Injector complex

CLIC energy scans (for a single stage) Requirement from physics : vary the c.m. energy for a given CLIC machine. Main options : Early extraction lines : significant hardware modifications needed Reduce gradient : disadvantage: need to scale down bunch charge linearly with gradient for stability, leading to a significant luminosity loss (green) CLIC drive beam scheme: gradient can be reduced while increasing pulse length. A large fraction of the luminosity loss is recovered (black). Modifications to drive beam generation are minimal. Lower gradient can be achieved by switching of phase of incoming drive beam bunches : Drive beam energy after extraction

There are limits to the CLIC performance (luminosity) during an energy scan

What is the physics ? - some production cross-sections - One of many possible models for new physics SM physics, for example top studies should not be forgotten Or whatever your favorite model is …

CMSSM Likelihoods for sparticle thresholds Preliminary

CLIC energy staging 3 TeV Stage Linac 1Linac 2 InjectorComplex I.P. 3 km 20.8 km 3 km 48.2 km Linac 1Linac 2 InjectorComplex I.P. 7.0 km 1 TeV Stage 0.5 TeV Stage Linac 1Linac 2 InjectorComplex I.P. 4 km ~14 km 4 km ~20 km CLIC two-beam scheme compatible with energy staging to provide the optimal machine for a large energy range Lower energy machine can run most of the time during the construction of the next stage. Physics results will determine the energies of the stages. Optimization need to take into many account many others parameters: performance and luminosities at various energies, costs, construction and commissioning times, manufacturing/re-use/move of components, etc CHANGE MIDDLE BOX TO SHOW RANFE 1-2 TEV The drive beam setups can deal with various stages of the machine

Slide about initial stage Start at 250 GeV with transfer line, expand to 400 GeV …

CLIC implementation questions Many questions: Waiting for physics guidance: Current trend are increasing limits on squark/gluino masses (but loop holes exist) – and currently no information about other SUSY particles (can be much lighter in some models) or Higgs (Standard Model or several) – Any wiser after summer conferences ? – Benefits of running close to thresholds versus at highest energy, and distribution of luminosities as function of energy – We assume that we have to be sensitive from a light Higgs threshold (~200 GeV) to multi-TeV, in several stages What are the integrated luminosities needed and what it is the flexibility needed within a stage – Interested in looking in more detail for at least one model in order to make sure the machine implementation plan can cope with whatever will be needed – Complementarity with LHC a key What are reasonable commissioning and luminosity ramp up times ? – LHC will need 3 years to get to 50 fb -1 and collects ~50 fb-1/year at (roughly) How would we in practice do the tunneling and productions/installation of parts in a multistage approach – Cheapest (overall) to do in one go but we don’t know final energy needed, and it is likely that we can make significant technical process before we get to stage 3 (or even 2?) – Timescales for getting into operation, and getting from one stage to another Answers are possible but must be found based on all available information at the time the project is launched

– Goal: Develop a project implementation plan for a Linear Collider : Addressing the key physics goals as emerging from the LHC data With a well-defined scope (i.e. technical implementation and operation model, energy and luminosity), cost and schedule With a solid technical basis for the key elements of the machine and detector Including the necessary preparation for siting the machine at CERN Within a project governance structure as defined with international partners After 2016 – Project Implementation phase: Including an initial project to lay the grounds for full construction (CLIC 0 – a significant part of the drive beam facility) Finalization of the CLIC technical design, taking into accoun the results of technical studies done in the previous phase, and final energy staging scenario based on the LHC Physics results, which should be fully available by the time Further industrialization and pre-series production of large series components with validation facilities CLIC next phases (add more about , and beyond) Final CLIC CDR and feasibility established European Strategy for Particle CERN Council