1 Report on analysis of PoGO Beam Test at Spring-8 Tsunefumi Mizuno July 15, 2003 July 21, 2003 revised August 1, 2003 updated.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
RHESSI Studies of Solar Flare Hard X-Ray Polarization Mark L. McConnell 1, David M. Smith 2, A. Gordon Emslie 4, Martin Fivian 3, Gordon J. Hurford 3,
Advertisements

Dante Nakazawa with Prof. Juan Collar
Beam-plug under M2 and HCAL shielding studies Robert Paluch, Burkhard Schmidt October 9,
1 ALICE EMCal Electronics Outline: PHOS Electronics review Design Specifications –Why PHOS readout is suitable –Necessary differences from PHOS Shaping.
PMT Calibration Results and the MC simulation Shigeru Yoshida, Chiba University
Rutherford Backscattering Spectrometry
Mar 31, 2005Steve Kahn -- Ckov and Tof Detector Simulation 1 Ckov1, Ckov2, Tof2 MICE Pid Tele-Meeting Steve Kahn 31 March 2005.
RHESSI Studies of Solar Flare Hard X-Ray Polarization Mark L. McConnell 1, David M. Smith 2, A. Gordon Emslie 4, Martin Fivian 3, Gordon J. Hurford 3,
1 Veto Wall Test Hyupwoo Lee MINERvA/Jupiter Group Meeting June 20, 2007.
Review of PID simulation & reconstruction in G4MICE Yordan Karadzhov Sofia university “St. Kliment Ohridski” Content : 1 TOF 2 Cerenkov.
GEANT4 simulations for the Lund R 3 B prototype Douglas Di Julio Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Y. Karadzhov MICE Video Conference Thu April 9 Slide 1 Absolute Time Calibration Method General description of the TOF DAQ setup For the TOF Data Acquisition.
Rutherford Backscattering Spectrometry
Main detector types Multi Pixel Photon Counter (MPPC) and Charge Coupled Devices (CCDs) How does it work? 1. Photon hits a pixel producing electron hole.
Jun 27, 2005S. Kahn -- Ckov1 Simulation 1 Ckov1 Simulation and Performance Steve Kahn June 27, 2005 MICE Collaboration PID Meeting.
27 Jun 2005S. Kahn -- Tof/Ckov Status1 Status of TOF and Ckov Sub- packages in G4Mice Steve Kahn 27 June 2005.
Update on the Gas Ring Imaging Cherenkov (GRINCH) Detector for A 1 n using BigBite Todd Averett Department of Physics The College of William and Mary Williamsburg,
Measurement of the absolute efficiency,
Rate and Gain Measurements of the 1-m long GEM detector Aiwu Zhang EIC tracking R&D weekly meeting.
DAQ_HowTo_ ppt1 How to use DAQ for Argonne Beam Test Tsunefumi Mizuno November 07, 2003 History.
Report on SiPM Tests SiPM as a alternative photo detector to replace PMT. Qauntify basic characteristics Measure Energy, Timing resolution Develop simulation.
The PEPPo e - & e + polarization measurements E. Fanchini On behalf of the PEPPo collaboration POSIPOL 2012 Zeuthen 4-6 September E. Fanchini -Posipol.
Diana Parno – July 22, 2008 January PREx Test Run: Compton Photon Analysis Diana Parno Carnegie Mellon University HAPPEX Collaboration Meeting.
1 Fast Timing via Cerenkov Radiation‏ Earle Wilson, Advisor: Hans Wenzel Fermilab CMS/ATLAS Fast Timing Simulation Meeting July 17,
ArgonneBeamTest_ ppt1 Argonne Beam Test preparation Tsunefumi Mizuno Tuneyoshi Kamae
1 Report on analysis of PoGO Beam Test at Spring-8 Tsunefumi Mizuno July 15, 2003.
ArgonneBeamTest_ ppt1 Argonne Beam Test preparation Tsunefumi Mizuno Tuneyoshi Kamae
1 PoGO spring-8 BeamTest preparation Tsunefumi Mizuno and others June 2, 2003 at teleconference.
PoGO_G4_ ppt1 Study on Key Properties of PoGO by Geant4 Simulator January 28, 2004 Tsunefumi Mizuno History of changes:
Performance limits of a 55  m pixel CdTe detector G.Pellegrini, M. Lozano, R. Martinez, M. Ullan Centro Nacional de Microelectronica, Barcelona, 08193,
We report the result of a beam test on a prototype of Astronomical hard X-ray/soft gamma-ray Polarimeter, PoGO (Polarized Gamma-ray Observer). PoGO is.
Hard X-ray Polarimeter for Small Satellite Design, Feasibility Study, and Ground Experiments K. Hayashida (Osaka University), T. Mihara (RIKEN), S. Gunji,
M. Dugger, February Triplet polarimeter study Michael Dugger* Arizona State University *Work at ASU is supported by the U.S. National Science Foundation.
Dec.11, 2008 ECL parallel session, Super B1 Results of the run with the new electronics A.Kuzmin, Yu.Usov, V.Shebalin, B.Shwartz 1.New electronics configuration.
Neutron detection in LHe ( HMI run 2004) R.Golub, E. Korobkina, J. Zou M. Hayden, G. Archibold J. Boissevain, W.S.Wilburn C. Gould.
Experimental Nuclear Physics Some Recent Activities 1.Development of a detector for low-energy neutrons a. Hardware -- A Novel Design Idea b. Measure the.
Status of New TPC( Ⅱ ) Performance Study Yohei Nakatsugawa LEPS Meeting in Taiwan.
Progress report of the GLAST ACD Beam Test at CERN (Backsplash study) simulation and analysis Tsunefumi Mizuno, Hirofumi Mizushima (Hiroshima Univ.) and.
SPI-ACS EM MeasurementsCornelia Wunderer, MPESPI-Team Meeting, Paris, SPI - ACS EM Scientific Measurements August 19 - September 4, 1998 at.
1. 2 Contents The “Tsubame” Project Description of Hard X-ray Polarimeter (HXCP) Results of X-ray Beam Test Summary.
1 Study of scintillator/PMT properties for PoGO experiment August 25, PoGO Teleconference Tsunefumi Mizuno BGO Transmission.
RF background, update on analysis Rikard Sandström, Geneva University MICE Analysis phone conference, October 30, 2007.
PoGO_collimator_ ppt1 Study of PoGO background dependence on the collimator material/slow scintillator threshold April 21, 2004 Tsunefumi Mizuno.
SPHENIX EMCAL R&D Craig Woody BNL sPHENIX Design Study Meeting September 7, 2011.
PoGO_G4_ ppt1 Study of optimized fast scintillator length for the astronomical hard X- ray/soft gamma-ray polarimeter PoGO November 1, 2004 Tsunefumi.
Development of a pad interpolation algorithm using charge-sharing.
PoGO_G4_ ppt1 Study of BGO/Collimator Optimization for PoGO August 8th, 2005 Tsunefumi Mizuno, Hiroshima University/SLAC
CsI Veto Detector Performance Study He Dao DMRC. Tsinghua University For KIMS Collaboration.
PoGOLiteMC_ ppt 1 Updated MC Study of PoGOLite Trigger Rate/BG January 30, 2007 Tsunefumi Mizuno (Hiroshima Univ.)
ArgonneResult_ ppt1 Comparison of data and simulation of Argonne Beam Test July 10, 2004 Tsunefumi Mizuno
CdTe prototype detector testing Anja Schubert The University of Melbourne 9 May 2011 Updates.
ArgonneResult_ ppt1 Results of PoGO Argonne Beam Test PoGO Collaboration meeting at SLAC, February 7, 2004 Tsunefumi Mizuno
1 Report on analysis of PoGO Beam Test at Spring-8 Tsunefumi Mizuno July 15, 2003 July 21, 2003 revised.
O Tsunefumi Mizuno, Tuneyoshi Kamae, Jonny Ng, Hiroyasu Tajima (SLAC), John W. Mitchell, Robert Streitmatter (NASA GSFC), Richard C. Fernholz, Edward Groth.
Geometry of the ACD Beam Test at CERN (2002) Tsunefumi Mizuno Overview of the Setup: p.2 ACD tile configuration: pp.3-4 Sn Calorimeter:
6:th IWORID, Glasgow, Scotland, July 2004 Energy Dependence in Dental Imaging with Medipix 2 Börje Norlin & Christer Fröjdh Mid Sweden University.
ICARUS T600: low energy electrons
Scintillator testing in Prague (update from Aussois)
The PSD at Pb-Pb run PSD drawbacks at Ar beam
The Lund R3B prototype: In-beam proton tests and simulations
Upgrade of the scintillator testing station in Prague
MoNA detector physics How to detect neutrons. Thomas Baumann NSCL.
Huagen Xu IKP: T. Randriamalala, J. Ritman and T. Stockmanns
June 1, 2004 Tsunefumi Mizuno Expected Modulation Factor of PoGO calculated with Geant4 Simulator with PoGO-fix June 1, 2004 Tsunefumi.
BNL electronics: first tests
Single trigger, no target
Timing Counter Sept CSN I, Assisi 2004 Giorgio Cecchet.
Sergey Abrahamyan Yerevan Physics Institute APEX collaboration
HyCal Energy Calibration using dedicated Compton runs
G0 Beam Polarization T. Horn, D. Gaskell Jefferson Lab
Presentation transcript:

1 Report on analysis of PoGO Beam Test at Spring-8 Tsunefumi Mizuno July 15, 2003 July 21, 2003 revised August 1, 2003 updated

2 Detector/Beam configuration (1) Incident beam goes from +y to –y Polarization vector of incident beam: along x-axis Beam size (for detector): a circle of 2.68cm diameter Expected beam energy (for detector):83.6 keV (incident beam of 100keV is scattered at 90 degree; this direction picks up the minor component of incident beam whose polarization vector is along z-axis) Expected polarization vector (for detector): along z-axis We used an Al block instead of a foil to get an appropriate S/N ratio, and decreased the beam rate by a factor of ~100 (from ~10^13Hz down to ~10^11Hz) to prevent pile-up (<=5kHz at the center scintillator). Trigger rate was Hz and the background rate (measured with Pb block placed in front of the collimator) was Hz. (Rate had changed as incident beam rate varied, I think.) Beam(100keV) polarization vector Collimator (Pb with smaller hole) Collimator (Pb with bigger hole) x y Scatterer (Al block) (Pb sheet)

3 Detector/Beam configuration (2) y z Id: Expected polarization vector 26.8mm 49mm hexagonal scintillators 20cm long Beam direction Scattered beam goes from +x to –x Beam size: a circle of 2.68cm diameter Expected polarization vector: along z-axis Expected beam energy:83.6 keV (incident beam of 100keV is scattered at 90 degree) Right figure corresponds to the rotation angle of 0 degree. We rotated the detector. rotation angle

4 Detector/Beam configuration (3) left) detectors mounted and collimators. This photo was taken outside the beam area. bottom) Al block scatterer. Photos are collected in

5 DAQ block diagram Trigger condition: any one of surrounding scintillators are with hit. Trigger thresholds were set at ~20 keV. Following 7 were counted with visual scaler. Live time is calculated as (7)*(2)/(1) 1)OR output 2)Gata Generator output 3)PMT2 discriminator output 4)PMT3 discriminator output 5)PMT5 discriminator output 6)PMT6 discriminator output 7)CLK(100kHz)

6 Run summary Data are stored in calibration with 241Am for PMT1 (before beam test): run16_p.txt. Shaper gains (for all PMTs) were adjusted to give ~3V for 60keV. 0 degree run/bg: run17_p.txt and run18_p.txt 30 degree run/bg: run19_p.txt and run20_p.txt 15 degree run/bg: run21_p.txt and run22_p.txt 180 degree run/bg: run23_p.txt and run24_p.txt bg without beam: run25_p.txt calibration with 241Am (after beam test): run26_p.txt scaler data: Scaler.dat Data files with _p are peak data and without are waveform data (binary). Integration time was ~1200s for all runs, ~600s for bg. runs (Pb block was placed in front of the collimator) and ~300s for bg. run without beam.

7 Calibration run (1) PMT/scint 1 PMT/scint 2 PMT/scint 3 PMT/scint 4 A gain of PMT1 might be shifted during the test. (from ~3V to ~2.7V)

8 Calibration run (2) PMT/scint 5 PMT/scint 6 PMT/scint 7 PMT/scint 4 PMT/scintillator of #4 is taken by ch4(upper card) and ch8(lower card) and gives consistent spectra -> DAQ itself works well.

9 Energy spectrum of each scint. (1) sim. of 0 degree Event selection: Central scintillator and one of surrounding scintillators are with hit (detection threshold is set at 3keV). Total deposit energy is above 45 keV. Geant4 simulation results of 1M run with 100% polarized 83keV beam are presented. Here, energy resolution (FWHT) is assumed to be 35% at 60keV, typical values seen in the calibration run (run26). As far as I know, Geant4 (of version 4) has minor bug in polarization process and scattered X-ray behaves as if it were not polarized. Since this bug hampers the modulation, we had expected that we could observe the difference in spectra of at least by a factor of 2 in the beam test. ch1 ch2 ch3 ch5 ch6 ch7

10 Energy spectrum of each scint. (2) 0 degree 30 degree Energy scale of ch1 might have been shifted during the test and not appropriate for 0 degree run (see page 5). For other PMT/scintillators, no significant difference (modulation) is observed. ch1 ch2 ch3 ch1 ch2 ch3 ch5 ch6 ch7 ch5 ch6 ch7 Event selection: Central scintillator and one of surrounding scintillators are with hit (detection threshold is set at 3keV). Total deposit energy is above 45 keV.

11 Energy spectrum of each scint. (3) 15 degree 180 degree No significant difference (modulation) is observed. ch1 ch2 ch3 ch1 ch2 ch3 ch5 ch6 ch7 ch5 ch6 ch7 Event selection: Central scintillator and one of surrounding scintillators are with hit (detection threshold is set at 3keV). Total deposit energy is above 45 keV.

12 Total energy deposition Beam energy was expected to be 83.6 keV (100keV is scattered at 90 degree), but was ~70 keV. -> main component might be double scattered photons or something unexpected and be unpolarized. G4 simulationrun23: 180 degree Event selection: Central scintillator and one of surrounding scintillators are with hit (detection threshold is set at 3keV)

13 Summary Gain of PMT/scint. #1 seemed to have changed during the test; We have adjusted shaper gain so that 60keV peak comes to 3V, but that of PMT#1 was 2.7V in the calibration run (run26). For other PMT/scintillators, no significant difference (modulation) is observed in spectra. This might be due to that the beam (after 90degree scattering) was not what we expected. Mean energy(70keV) is lower than calculation (100keV->83.6keV).