US Army Corps of Engineers Coastal and Hydraulics Laboratory Engineer Research and Development Center Lower Susquehanna River Watershed Assessment SedFlume.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Sediment budget for the 2000 LSSF Experiment, in context of the last half century David J. Topping, David M. Rubin, Nancy J. Hornewer, Gregory G. Fisk,
Advertisements

Irene Seco Manuel Gómez Alma Schellart Simon Tait Erosion resistance and behaviour of highly organic in-sewer sediment 7th International Conference on.
The Effect of the Changing Dynamics of the Conowingo Dam on the Chesapeake Bay Mukhtar Ibrahim and Karl Berger, COG staff Water Resources Technical Committee.
For flow of 1 m/s in round-bottom channel of radius 1 m, what is the Reynold’s number? Is the flow laminar or turbulent? Re < 500 laminar Re > 2000 turbulent.
Permeable Heavy Use Area for Livestock Farms Presentation for Kitsap County DCD, September 28 th, 2006, Lab Test Findings and Calculated Storm Water Performance.
Sensitivity Analysis In deterministic analysis, single fixed values (typically, mean values) of representative samples or strength parameters or slope.
z = -50 cm, ψ = -100 cm, h = z + ψ = -50cm cm = -150 cm Which direction will water flow? 25 cm define z = 0 at soil surface h = z + ψ = cm.
EAS4480 Environ. Data Analysis Project Effects of Physical Properties on Critical Shear Stress of Fine Sediments Becky (Yung-Chieh) Wang April 24 th 2012.
OKLAHOMA STATE UNIVERSITY Biosystems and Agricultural Engineering Department Hydrology 101 OKLAHOMA STATE UNIVERSITY Biosystems and Agricultural Engineering.
Sediment Movement after Dam Removal
2011 Storm impacts on nutrients and sediment in the Susquehanna River Basin Presentation for the Impacts of Tropical Storms Irene and Lee on the Hudson.
Part 3 RECURRENCE FREQUENCY OF FLOODING. River flow data can be shown in a variety of formats on probability plots like that shown here, which relates.
Environmental Fluid Mechanics Laboratory
Cohesive Sediment Algorithms in ROMS and Sediment Test Cases Chris Sherwood 1, Larry Sanford 2, John Warner 1 Bénédicte Ferré 1, Courtney Harris 3, Rich.
GEOTECHNICAL PROPERTIES (CE1203)
Coastal & Port Engineering Considerations of the Jacksonville Harbor Deepening Study Kevin Bodge, Ph.D., P.E. Port & Coastal Engineer Senior Vice President.
US Army Corps of Engineers ® Engineer Research and Development Center West Bay Diversion Evaluation 1-Dimensional Modeling CWPPRA Technical Committee and.
Suspended Load Above certain critical shear stress conditions, sediment particles are maintained in suspension by the exchange of momentum from the fluid.
Sediment transport in wadi systems
Field Methodologies: Detailed Investigation Andrew Simon USDA-ARS National Sedimentation Laboratory, Oxford, MS
Lower Susquehanna River Dam Sediment and Solutions Conowingo Relicensing; LSRWA; MD County Resistance; Solutions; CAC Involvement Thursday November 29.
Streams, rivers and landscape evolution. Q1: List and describe the parts of a stream system (5)? Watersheds: The water–collecting area of a stream or.
US Army Corps of Engineers Coastal and Hydraulics Laboratory Engineer Research and Development Center Lower Susquehanna River Watershed Assessment Two.
Update on the HEC-RAS Reservoir Transport Simulation Mike Langland and Ed Koerkle 03/30/2012.
Academic Background: Ph.D. Student in Water Resources Engineering at the University of Alabama. Currently working on Computational Fluid Dynamics and Physical.
Intro to Geomorphology (Geos 450/550) Lecture 5: watershed analyses field trip #3 – Walnut Gulch watersheds estimating flood discharges.
US Army Corps of Engineers ® Engineer Research and Development Center Coastal and Hydraulics Laboratory Greenup Locks and Dam, Ohio River.
Bathymetry Changes Caused by a Tropical Storm Chris Scheiner and Gary Pelton US Army Corps of Engineers.
Lower Susquehanna River Watershed Assessment Citizens Advisory Committee November 29, 2012 Anna Compton USACE 1.
Big Horn Lake Sediment Management Study. US Army Corps of Engineers Omaha District Study Background Bureau of Reclamation and Omaha District Interagency.
Presented by: 1. A measure of how easily a fluid (e.g., water) can pass through a porous medium (e.g., soils) 2 Loose soil - easy to flow - high permeability.
Tributary Modeling and Coastal Mapping w.r.t. Watershed Planning in the Great Lakes US Army Corps of Engineers Detroit District Great Lakes Hydraulics.
The modeling of the channel deformations in the rivers flowing into permafrost with an increase in ambient temperature E. Debolskaya, E. Zamjatina, I.Gritsuk.
Bedload-transport measurements with geophones
Evaluation of Potential Impacts of Uranium Mining on Drinking Water Sources in the Roanoke River Basin Assessment Approach Presentation to Roanoke River.
Modeling in the USACE US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® Bruce Ebersole U. S. Army Engineer Research and Development Center Coastal & Hydraulics.
Timeline Impaired for turbidity on Minnesota’s list of impaired waters (2004) MPCA must complete a study to determine the total maximum daily load (TMDL)
Surface Water Supplies Joe Zulovich Extension Agricultural Engineer Commercial Agriculture Program.
Section 13.1 Streams and Rivers
 These two agents: erosion and deposition are the most important agents that affect weathered materials.  Erosion involves the physical removal of weathered.
US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® Tools for Assessing the Fate of Dredged Material Speaker: Joseph Gailani Research Hydraulic Engineer Research.
The Structure of Hydrosphere
Robert M. Hirsch, Research Hydrologist, USGS September 6, 2012 Nitrogen, Phosphorus, and Suspended Sediment fluxes from the Susquehanna River to the Bay.
Development, Testing and Application of the Multi-Block LTFATE Hydrodynamic and Sediment Transport Model Earl J. Hayter See instructions for customizing.
Harrisburg Flood Inundation Mapping Project – Many Agencies Working Together USACE Flood Risk Management and Silver Jackets Workshop 23 August 2012 Presented.
Morphological Modeling of the Alameda Creek Flood Control Channel Rohin Saleh, Alameda County Flood Control District Søren Tjerry, Ph.D., DHI Portland,
Interill Erosion. Interill Detachment and Sediment Delivery to Rills.
US Army Corps of Engineers ® Engineer Research and Development Center West Bay Diversion Evaluation Integration of Results 6 Month Progress ERDC West Bay.
1 INTRODUCTION TO “Stratigrafia” The code in the workbook “stratigrafia” computes - longitudinal profiles; - water surface elevation; - sediment transport.
Meredith Shiflet. Outline Watershed mapping Structure Design Irrigation Water management Erosion modeling.
Learning objectives To understand why the Hjulstrom curve is a logarithmic graph To interpret the Hjulstrom curve.
Effects of N Loadings from Dairy Cows to the Susquehanna River Effects of N Loadings from Dairy Cows to the Susquehanna River Austin Weidner CE394K : GIS.
Sediment Transport Modelling Lab. The Law of the Wall The law of the wall states that the average velocity of a turbulent flow at a certain point is proportional.
US Army Corps of Engineers Coastal And Hydraulics Laboratory Engineer Research & Development Center Morganza to the Gulf of Mexico Numerical Model Study.
Channel Processes and Hjulstrom’s Curve
Anthony Alvarado, PE, CFM National Hydraulic Engineering Conference
FE: Geotechnical Engineering
The Role of Grain Dynamics in the Onset of Sediment Transport
UPDATE ON FHWA’S IN-SITU SCOUR TESTING DEVICE (ISTD)
Presentation to Roanoke River Basin Bi-State Commission March 31, 2010
DEP Citizen Advisory Committee October 17, 2017
Hydrology.
Exercise 1: Fenton River Floodplain Exercise
Conowingo Dam Update Presented to the Citizens Advisory Committee
Status Nearly 30 scenarios completed for NAB and CBP over a year’s effort. Report on application of CBEMP in preparation. October time frame for draft.
Lower Susquehanna River Watershed Assessment
SIEVE RIVER: SIMULATION OF THE 19/11/1999 FLOW EVENT
Lower Susquehanna River Watershed Assessment
HEC-RAS US Army Corps of Engineers Hydrologic Engineering Center
Enforcement Advocacy Stewardship Education
Presentation transcript:

US Army Corps of Engineers Coastal and Hydraulics Laboratory Engineer Research and Development Center Lower Susquehanna River Watershed Assessment SedFlume Findings and Initial 2D Sediment Model Results Conowingo Pond Conowingo Dam Susquehanna Flats S1

US Army Corps of Engineers Coastal and Hydraulics Laboratory Engineer Research and Development Center Lower Susquehanna River Watershed Assessment Topics: SedFlume Field Activities and Data Analysis Preliminary Sediment Transport Results with SedFlume Data S2

US Army Corps of Engineers Coastal and Hydraulics Laboratory Engineer Research and Development Center Lower Susquehanna River Watershed Assessment SedFlume Description Field – Portable Laboratory Flume Used to Evaluate Erosion Rate and Critical Shear of Cohesive Sediments S3

US Army Corps of Engineers Coastal and Hydraulics Laboratory Engineer Research and Development Center Lower Susquehanna River Watershed Assessment S4 SedFlume Operations

US Army Corps of Engineers Coastal and Hydraulics Laboratory Engineer Research and Development Center Lower Susquehanna River Watershed Assessment S5 Description of Sediment Coring Process

US Army Corps of Engineers Coastal and Hydraulics Laboratory Engineer Research and Development Center Lower Susquehanna River Watershed Assessment S6 Sampling Locations in Conowingo Reservoir

US Army Corps of Engineers Coastal and Hydraulics Laboratory Engineer Research and Development Center Lower Susquehanna River Watershed Assessment S7 SedFlume Analysis Core Lengths Varied From Approximately 6 – 12 inches The Entire Core was Analyzed Erosion Rate Coefficients and Exponents Evaluated by Layer Along with Critical Shear Stress for Erosion Core Bulk Density and Particle Size Distribution Evaluated

US Army Corps of Engineers Coastal and Hydraulics Laboratory Engineer Research and Development Center Lower Susquehanna River Watershed Assessment S8 SedFlume Analysis Results

US Army Corps of Engineers Coastal and Hydraulics Laboratory Engineer Research and Development Center Lower Susquehanna River Watershed Assessment S9 Example of SedFlume Results

US Army Corps of Engineers Coastal and Hydraulics Laboratory Engineer Research and Development Center Lower Susquehanna River Watershed Assessment S10 Core Physical Properties Bulk Density Range – 1320 kg / m 3 to 1500 kg / m 3 Sediment Fractions Sand: 10% - 45% Silt: 50% - 82% Clay: 5% - 9%

US Army Corps of Engineers Coastal and Hydraulics Laboratory Engineer Research and Development Center Lower Susquehanna River Watershed Assessment S11 SedFlume Data Assigned by Material Type in Model Model Domain Divided into Areas Based on Change in Properties Three Layers Assigned in Model Using Average SedFlume Data Average Sediment Size Fractions Assigned to Layers

US Army Corps of Engineers Coastal and Hydraulics Laboratory Engineer Research and Development Center Lower Susquehanna River Watershed Assessment S12 Material Designation in AdH Model

US Army Corps of Engineers Coastal and Hydraulics Laboratory Engineer Research and Development Center Lower Susquehanna River Watershed Assessment 2D Model Development – 2008 Bathymetry S13

US Army Corps of Engineers Coastal and Hydraulics Laboratory Engineer Research and Development Center Lower Susquehanna River Watershed Assessment S14 Preliminary Sediment Transport Simulation Evaluate the 2008 – 2011 Susquehanna River Flows Period of Record Includes the September 2001 Tropical Storm Lee Event Sediment Inflows Estimated From Previous HEC-6 Modeling

US Army Corps of Engineers Coastal and Hydraulics Laboratory Engineer Research and Development Center Lower Susquehanna River Watershed Assessment S – 2011 Susquehanna Flow Record

US Army Corps of Engineers Coastal and Hydraulics Laboratory Engineer Research and Development Center Lower Susquehanna River Watershed Assessment S16 Sediment Rating Curve for 2008 – 2011 Simulation

US Army Corps of Engineers Coastal and Hydraulics Laboratory Engineer Research and Development Center Lower Susquehanna River Watershed Assessment S17 Simulated Sediment Load in and out of Conowingo Reservoir: 2008 – 2011 Total In: 12 million tons Total Out: 16.6 million tons Net Scour: 4.6 million tons Assumptions: Top 1 ft layer critical Shear = 2 Pa Below 1 ft layer critical shear = 4 Pa

US Army Corps of Engineers Coastal and Hydraulics Laboratory Engineer Research and Development Center Lower Susquehanna River Watershed Assessment S18 Computed Bed Shear Stress for 300,000 cfs

US Army Corps of Engineers Coastal and Hydraulics Laboratory Engineer Research and Development Center Lower Susquehanna River Watershed Assessment S19 Computed Bed Shear Stress for 400,000 cfs

US Army Corps of Engineers Coastal and Hydraulics Laboratory Engineer Research and Development Center Lower Susquehanna River Watershed Assessment S20 Computed Bed Shear Stress for 600,000 cfs

US Army Corps of Engineers Coastal and Hydraulics Laboratory Engineer Research and Development Center Lower Susquehanna River Watershed Assessment S21 Bed Change After the 2008 – 2011 Simulation