AOMIP workshop #12 Jan 14-16, 2009 WHOI Improved modeling of the Arctic halocline with a sub-grid-scale brine rejection parameterization Nguyen, An T.,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Boundary Layer Clouds & Sea Spray Steve Siems, Yi (Vivian) Huang, Luke Hande, Mike Manton & Thom Chubb.
Advertisements

Click to edit the title text format Click to edit the outline text format –Second Outline Level Third Outline Level –Fourth Outline Level »Fifth Outline.
Salt rejection, advection, and mixing in the MITgcm coupled ocean and sea-ice model AOMIP/(C)ARCMIP / SEARCH for DAMOCLES Workshop, Paris Oct 29-31, 2007.
Distribution of waters 71% of earth surface is ocean 4:1 in southern hemisphere 1.5:1 in northern hemisphere.
1 Evaluation of two global HYCOM 1/12º hindcasts in the Mediterranean Sea Cedric Sommen 1 In collaboration with Alexandra Bozec 2 and Eric Chassignet 2.
Role of the Southern Ocean in controlling the Atlantic meridional overturning circulation Igor Kamenkovich RSMAS, University of Miami, Miami RSMAS, University.
Dynamics V: response of the ocean to wind (Langmuir circulation, mixed layer, Ekman layer) L. Talley Fall, 2014 Surface mixed layer - Langmuir circulation.
Modeling the M 2 and O 1 Barotropic and Baroclinic Tides in the Gulf of Mexico Using the HYbrid Coordinate Ocean Model (HYCOM) Flavien Gouillon 1 ; B.
WAIS 2005; Slide number 1. Numerical modelling of ocean- ice interactions under Pine Island Bay’s ice shelf Tony Payne 1 Paul Holland 2,3 Adrian Jenkins.
2005 ROMS Users Meeting Monday, October 24, 2005 Coupled sea-ice/ocean numerical simulations of the Bering Sea for the period 1996-present Enrique Curchitser.
A Regional Ice-Ocean Simulation Of the Barents and Kara Seas W. Paul Budgell Institute of Marine Research and Bjerknes Centre for Climate Research Bergen,
Summary of Current and Ongoing Cold Pool Modeling Research University of Utah/DAQ CAP John Horel, Erik Crosman, Erik Neemann University of Utah Department.
CIRCULATION OF OCEANS.
EGU 2012, Kristine S. Madsen, High resolution modelling of the decreasing Arctic sea ice Kristine S. Madsen, T.A.S. Rasmussen, J. Blüthgen and.
Ensemble-variational sea ice data assimilation Anna Shlyaeva, Mark Buehner, Alain Caya, Data Assimilation and Satellite Meteorology Research Jean-Francois.
Sea Ice Deformation Studies and Model Development
Thermohaline Circulation in the Coupled GISS/HYCOM Climate Simulation Shan Sun NASA/GISS Rainer Bleck Los Alamos National Laboratory.
1.Introduction 2.Description of model 3.Experimental design 4.Ocean ciruculation on an aquaplanet represented in the model depth latitude depth latitude.
Improving the modeling of Arctic sea-ice dynamics through high-resolution satellite data retrievals Principal Investigator: Ronald Kwok (334) Patrick Heimbach,
River plume experiments with HYCOM in an idealized basin Rafael Vergara Schiller Villy Kourafalou University of Miami - RSMAS 11 th HYCOM meeting – Apr.
EFFECT OF SALINITY ON FREEZING AND DENSITY OF WATER.
ECCO (Estimating the Circulation and Climate of the Ocean) Initially funded by NOPP (National Oceanographic Partnership Program) to demonstrate practicality.
Some logistics: meeting web site will eventually include presentations coffee will be served outside meeting.
Validation Analysis of the 0.72˚ HYCOM/CICE run Dmitry Dukhovskoy, Pam Posey, Joe Metzger, Alan Wallcraft, and Eric Chassignet.
1DMS/USM, 2SERF, 3NRL/SSC, 4COAPS/FSU
Imposed versus Dynamically Modeled Sea Ice: A ROMS study of the effects on polynyas and waters masses in the Ross Sea John M. Klinck, Y. Sinan Hüsrevoglu.
Production and Export of High Salinity Shelf Water in a Model of the Ross Sea Michael S. Dinniman Y. Sinan Hüsrevoğlu John M. Klinck Center for Coastal.
WHOI -- AOMIP 10/20/2009 Formation of the Arctic Upper Halocline in a Coupled Ocean and Sea-ice Model Nguyen, An T., D. Menemenlis, R. Kwok, Jet Propulsion.
Arctic System Model workshop III Montreal, Canada, July 17 th, :50 – 11:10 Ocean/Atmosphere observations A. Proshutinsky, WHOI a)Model forcing validation.
The dynamic-thermodynamic sea ice module in the Bergen Climate Model Helge Drange and Mats Bentsen Nansen Environmental and Remote Sensing Center Bjerknes.
Icebergs, Ice Shelves and Sea Ice: A ROMS Study of the Southwestern Ross Sea for Michael S. Dinniman John M. Klinck Center for Coastal Physical.
Seasonal evolution of the surface mixed layer Meri Korhonen.
1 Marginal Thermobaric Stability in the Weddell Sea Miles McPhee McPhee Research Company.
Summary of January 2007 ECCO2 meeting Overview and Motivation ECCO, ECCO-GODAE, ECCO2 (Wunsch, MIT) The only way to understand the complete, global,
Hydrosphere – Physical basis of climate spring 2011
Paris, EU-THOR, Nov25-26, 2009 Response of the North Atlantic Circulation to the realistic and anomalous wind stress Yongqi Gao, Helge Drange, Mats Bentsen.
Contribution of MPI to CLIMARES Erich Roeckner, Dirk Notz Max Planck Institute for Meteorology, Hamburg.
AOMIP status Experiments 1. Season Cycle 2. Coordinated - Spinup Coordinated - Analysis Coordinated 100-Year Run.
ECCO2: Ocean state estimation in the presence of eddies and ice (preparing MITgcm and adjoint for next-generation ECCO) A first ECCO2 solution was obtained.
Click to edit the title text format Click to edit the outline text format –Second Outline Level Third Outline Level –Fourth Outline Level »Fifth Outline.
0 cm/s 50 ECCO2: Eddying-ocean and sea-ice state estimation Objective: synthesis of global-ocean and sea-ice data that covers full ocean depth and that.
Assimilation of Sea Ice Concentration Observations in a Coupled Ocean-Sea Ice Model using the Adjoint Method.
Assessment of the ECCO2 optimized solution in the Arctic An T. Nguyen, R. Kwok, D. Menemenlis JPL/Caltech ECCO-2 Team Meeting, MIT Sep 23-24, 2008.
A Green’s function optimization on the CS510 grid - develop and calibrate model configuration and parameterizations - experiment with cost function terms.
Adjoint modeling in cryosphere Patrick Heimbach MIT/EAPS, Cambridge, MA, USA
Interannual to decadal variability of circulation in the northern Japan/East Sea, Dmitry Stepanov 1, Victoriia Stepanova 1 and Anatoly Gusev.
Nansen Environmental and Remote Sensing Center Modifications of the MICOM version used in the Bergen Climate Model Mats Bentsen and Helge Drange Nansen.
15 Annual AOMIP Meeting. WHOI, 1- 4 November 2011 Numerical modeling of the Atlantic Water distribution in the upper Arctic Ocean: Sensitivity studies.
The effect of tides on the hydrophysical fields in the NEMO-shelf Arctic Ocean model. Maria Luneva National Oceanography Centre, Liverpool 2011 AOMIP meeting.
The North Atlantic Inflow to the Arctic Ocean from observations and high ‐ resolution modelling Yevgeny Aksenov 1, Sheldon Bacon 1, George Nurser 1, Vladimir.
Numerical modeling of Atlantic and Pacific waters dynamics Elena Golubeva Institute of Computational Mathematics and Mathematical Geophysics Siberian Branch.
Assessing the U.S. Navy Coupled Ice-Ocean Model vs. Recent Arctic Observations David A. Hebert 1, Richard Allard 1, Pamela Posey 1, E. Joseph Metzger 1,
Progress and Assessment of the Arctic subpolar gyre State Estimate (ASTE) An T. Nguyen, Patrick Heimbach, Ayan Chaudhuri, Gael Forget, Rui M. Ponte, and.
Impacts of Vertical Momentum Mixing in an Arctic Ocean Model Youyu Lu 1, Greg Holloway 2, Ji Lei 1 1 Bedford Institute of Oceanography 2 Institute of Ocean.
Michael Steele Polar Science Center / APL University of Washington Jan 14, 2009 AOMIP WHOI Mechanisms of Upper Ocean Warming in the Arctic and the Effect.
Michael Steele Polar Science Center / APL University of Washington Oct 20, 2009 WHOI Arctic Ocean Freshwater: past, present, & future Michael Steele.
Brines and Frazil ice formation by Jean-Claude Gascard UPMC/LOCEAN/CNRS/IPSL.
Outline of the talk Why study Arctic Boundary current? Methods Eddy-permitting/resolving simulations Observational evidence Mechanisms of the current.
Coupling ROMS and CSIM in the Okhotsk Sea Rebecca Zanzig University of Washington November 7, 2006.
Wind-driven halocline variability in the western Arctic Ocean
Pacific water transport in the Arctic Ocean simulated
Mixed Layer Depth in the Arctic Seas
Mesoscale eddies and shelf-basin exchange in the western Arctic Ocean
Nguyen, An T. , D. Menemenlis, R
AOMIP and FAMOS are supported by the National Science Foundation
Marie-Noëlle HOUSSAIS
Climate Science Centre, CSIRO Ocean and Atmosphere
John (Qiang) Wang, Paul G. Myers, Xianmin Hu, Andrew B.G. Bush
Liping Zhang, Thomas L. Delworth, Will Cooke, and Xiaosong Yang
Presentation transcript:

AOMIP workshop #12 Jan 14-16, 2009 WHOI Improved modeling of the Arctic halocline with a sub-grid-scale brine rejection parameterization Nguyen, An T., D. Menemenlis, R. Kwok, submitted to JGR Oceans

AOMIP workshop #12 Jan 14-16, 2009 WHOI AOMIP results [Holloway, 2007]

AOMIP workshop #12 Jan 14-16, 2009 WHOI Previous Works Fig.4: Numerical result of salt rejected into a density-stratified fluid. The salt plume of horizontal extent b reaches the neutral buoyancy depth z before spreading out horizontally. Figure is taken from [Smith, 1998]. b~200m z~40m Duffy et al. [1997, 1999] in the Southern Ocean: Antarctic Intermediate Water

AOMIP workshop #12 Jan 14-16, 2009 WHOI Previous Works z b [Smith and Morison, 1998][Helfrich, 1994]

AOMIP workshop #12 Jan 14-16, 2009 WHOI Brine Rejection Fig.4: Numerical result of salt rejected into a density-stratified fluid. The salt plume of horizontal extent b reaches the neutral buoyancy depth z before spreading out horizontally. Figure is taken from [Smith, 1998]. b~200m z~40m  Sea-ice retains 33% of salt  67% of salt rejected back to the ocean  Rejected salt s(z) is distributed down to bottom of mixed layer z=D according to: A: constant of normalization n, D: parameters to be determined

AOMIP workshop #12 Jan 14-16, 2009 WHOI Brine Rejection Fig.4: Numerical result of salt rejected into a density-stratified fluid. The salt plume of horizontal extent b reaches the neutral buoyancy depth z before spreading out horizontally. Figure is taken from [Smith, 1998]. b~200m z~40m Density structure :  d  /dz in mixed layer: to kg/m 3 /m  d  top of halocline ~ to kg/m 3 /m 04 Feb 1992

AOMIP workshop #12 Jan 14-16, 2009 WHOI MITgcm Fig.4: Numerical result of salt rejected into a density-stratified fluid. The salt plume of horizontal extent b reaches the neutral buoyancy depth z before spreading out horizontally. Figure is taken from [Smith, 1998]. b~200m z~40m ECCO2: High- Resolution Global- Ocean and Sea-Ice Model Ocean model: ~ 18km horizontal, 50 vertical levels volume-conserving, C-grid Surface BC’s: ECMWF / ERA-40 based Initial conditions: optimized bathymetry: GEBCO KPP mixing [Large et al., 1994] Sea ice model: C-grid, ~ 18km 2-catergory zero-layer thermodynamics [Hibler, 1980] Viscous plastic dynamics [Hibler, 1979] Initial conditions: Polar Science Center Snow simulation: [Zhang et al., 1998]

AOMIP workshop #12 Jan 14-16, 2009 WHOI ECCO2 Arctic Solution Fig.4: Numerical result of salt rejected into a density-stratified fluid. The salt plume of horizontal extent b reaches the neutral buoyancy depth z before spreading out horizontally. Figure is taken from [Smith, 1998]. b~200m z~40m

AOMIP workshop #12 Jan 14-16, 2009 WHOI ECCO2 Arctic Solution Fig.4: Numerical result of salt rejected into a density-stratified fluid. The salt plume of horizontal extent b reaches the neutral buoyancy depth z before spreading out horizontally. Figure is taken from [Smith, 1998]. b~200m z~40m

AOMIP workshop #12 Jan 14-16, 2009 WHOI Sensitivity Experiments Fig.4: Numerical result of salt rejected into a density-stratified fluid. The salt plume of horizontal extent b reaches the neutral buoyancy depth z before spreading out horizontally. Figure is taken from [Smith, 1998]. b~200m z~40m Table.1 1: Nansen Basin 2: Amundsen Basin 3: Makarov Basin 4: Canadian Basin 5: Chukchi Cap Data: SCICEX BGEP

AOMIP workshop #12 Jan 14-16, 2009 WHOI Results: mixed layer depth Fig.4: Numerical result of salt rejected into a density-stratified fluid. The salt plume of horizontal extent b reaches the neutral buoyancy depth z before spreading out horizontally. Figure is taken from [Smith, 1998]. b~200m z~40m A0’ 0m50m A0 Table.1 A0’ 2006 A A0 1992

AOMIP workshop #12 Jan 14-16, 2009 WHOI Results: Amundsen Basin Fig.4: Numerical result of salt rejected into a density-stratified fluid. The salt plume of horizontal extent b reaches the neutral buoyancy depth z before spreading out horizontally. Figure is taken from [Smith, 1998]. b~200m z~40m Table.1 SCICEX, 2000

AOMIP workshop #12 Jan 14-16, 2009 WHOI Results: Canadian Basin Fig.4: Numerical result of salt rejected into a density-stratified fluid. The salt plume of horizontal extent b reaches the neutral buoyancy depth z before spreading out horizontally. Figure is taken from [Smith, 1998]. b~200m z~40m Table.1 BGEP 2003

AOMIP workshop #12 Jan 14-16, 2009 WHOI Results: Fig.4: Numerical result of salt rejected into a density-stratified fluid. The salt plume of horizontal extent b reaches the neutral buoyancy depth z before spreading out horizontally. Figure is taken from [Smith, 1998]. b~200m z~40m Blue: off Red: on

AOMIP workshop #12 Jan 14-16, 2009 WHOI Concern: Heat content Fig.4: Numerical result of salt rejected into a density-stratified fluid. The salt plume of horizontal extent b reaches the neutral buoyancy depth z before spreading out horizontally. Figure is taken from [Smith, 1998]. b~200m z~40m [Holloway, 2007]

AOMIP workshop #12 Jan 14-16, 2009 WHOI Summary Fig.4: Numerical result of salt rejected into a density-stratified fluid. The salt plume of horizontal extent b reaches the neutral buoyancy depth z before spreading out horizontally. Figure is taken from [Smith, 1998]. b~200m z~40m brine rejection:  realistic MLD (compared to climatology)  best fit to CTD observations in all basins  reproduces halocline  improve vertical stratification in Eurasian Basin background diffusivity = m 2 /s  too much artificial vertical mixing reduce  eliminates vertical mixing  optimized = m 2 /s

AOMIP workshop #12 Jan 14-16, 2009 WHOI Coordinated experiment

AOMIP workshop #12 Jan 14-16, 2009 WHOI Model: Fig.4: Numerical result of salt rejected into a density-stratified fluid. The salt plume of horizontal extent b reaches the neutral buoyancy depth z before spreading out horizontally. Figure is taken from [Smith, 1998]. b~200m z~40m  KPP, back-ground diffusivity = m 2 /s  Forcings: ERA40/ECMWF  BCs: WOA05 or global solutions  IC: WOA05  Brine Rejection:  A package in the MITgcm  Mixed layer depth (MLD): determined based on d  /dr  When sea-ice forms  salt rejected  buoyancy terms in KPP  distribute buoyancy down to MLD A0’ 2006

AOMIP workshop #12 Jan 14-16, 2009 WHOI Data: Fig.4: Numerical result of salt rejected into a density-stratified fluid. The salt plume of horizontal extent b reaches the neutral buoyancy depth z before spreading out horizontally. Figure is taken from [Smith, 1998]. b~200m z~40m  SCICEX  BGEP  ASOF