Dustin Yocum, MA Institutional Review Board University of Illinois HUMAN SUBJECTS RESEARCH.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
IRB Issues in Medical Education Research – OHRP Perspective American Association of Colleges of Osteopathic Medicine 2 nd Annual Meeting – June 24-26,
Advertisements

QI project or research? Thomas F. Byrd M.D. HRRC Chair Subcommitees 2 and 4 December 3, 2013.
Marian University is sponsored by the Sisters of St. Francis, Oldenburg. Human Subjects Research and the Marian University Institutional Review Board (IRB)
Human Subjects Protections, Concepts, and Procedures Office of Research and Sponsored Programs Tom Lombardo, Ph.D., Director, Research Integrity & Compliance.
THE UW HEALTH SCIENCES IRB S OVERVIEW PRACTICAL REGULATORY ISSUES IN HUMAN SUBJECTS RESEARCH.
Top Ten Investigator Responsibilities When Conducting Human Subjects Research Thanks to Ada Sue Selwitz, Univ. of Kentucky and PRIM&R (Public Responsibility.
Human Subjects & Research Understanding the protection of human subjects, HSRC, and the nature of the process.
 Daylene Meuschke, Ed.D Barry Gribbons, Ph.D RP Conference: April 2, 2013.
Exempt Research Mary Banks BS, BSN IRB Director CRC IRB and BUMC IRB.
Protecting Human Participants in Research syr
 Federal regulations specify “engagement” at the institutional level  Cornell has a Federalwide Assurance specifying its commitment to comply with regulations.
Human Subjects Research Dr. John S. Irvine Chairperson, NMSU Institutional Review Board for Human Subjects Research
Human Subject Protection Judith Birk IRB Health / Behavioral Sciences.
Cornell Evaluation Network The Use of Human Participants in Research Office of Research Integrity and Assurance ~ May 14, 2007.
Educational Research and the VCOM Institutional Review Board
Avoiding the Pitfalls of an IRB Submission Chris Ayres Chair, Institutional Review Board Social & Behavioral Science & Chair, Department of Kinesiology,
What is your Acronym IQ? ASC DOC DOS FYS SACS NEH NIH OSHA IRB TGIF.
INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW BOARD HISTORY AND ETHICS. 2 Ethical History : Holocaust : Nuremburg Trials 1964: Declaration of Helsinki :
9/17/09 6/20/20131 Introduction to the UIUC Institutional Review Board – Library Summer Workshop June 20, 2013 June 20, 2013 Ron Banks- Human Subjects.
What is your Acronym IQ? ASC DOC DOS FYS SACS NEH NIH OSHA IRB TGIF.
May I have your permission please? The consent process: What, Where, When, Who and Why Valerie Smith OHRP IRB Program Manager
1 Developed by: U-MIC To start the presentation, click on this button in the lower right corner of your screen. The presentation will begin after the.
1 Ethics of Working with Human Subjects (BIOL/CHEM 397 ) Header image designed by Michelle Jordan, UMBC Creative Services, 2009.
Protecting Human Participants in Your Research and Classroom Projects NAU Institutional Review Board
SLCL Human Subjects Review Committee. Who we are Four faculty from SLCL: – Melissa Bowles, Chair (SIP) – José Ignacio Hualde (Linguistics/SIP) – Jennifer.
RESPONSIBLE CONDUCT IN HUMAN SUBJECTS RESEARCH MARGARITA M. CARDONA DIRECTOR OF SPONSORED RESEARCH Institutional Review Board.
SUNY Oswego Human Subjects Committee Last Revised 10/28/2011.
Privacy and Confidentiality. Definitions n Privacy - having control over the extent, timing, and circumstances of sharing oneself (physically, behaviorally,
The Institutional Review Board: A Community College Toolkit Dr. Geri J Anderson.
Office of Research Integrity and Compliance March 2011.
IRB BASICS: Issues in Ethics and Human Subject Protections Prepared by Ed Merrill Department of Psychology November 12, 2009.
The Linguistics Department Institutional Review Board Committee Silvina Montrul, chair Fred Davidson Irene Koshik Ryan Shosted September 22, 2008.
Adam Mills Human Subjects Office September 18, 2015 IRB Basics.
A step-by-step guide to help you determine if your research protocol is required to be reviewed by the Lindenwood University IRB INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW BOARD.
Institutional Review Board Procedures and Implications After the applied dissertation committee has approved the proposal and the IRB package, the student.
Marian University is sponsored by the Sisters of St. Francis, Oldenburg. Human Subjects Research and the Marian University Institutional Review Board (IRB)
Institutional Review Board Issues for Classroom Research Sharon McWhorter IRB Administrator, The University of Akron (With assistance from Phil Allen,
Human Subjects Review: Policies and Procedures. Why A Human Subjects Review? It is the policy of this University that all researchers undertaking studies.
Human Subjects Research Nellie Quezada-Aragon, Director Office of Compliance Dr. Luis A. Vazquez, Chair NMSU Institutional Review Board
NAVIGATING THE IRB PROCESS University Institutional Review Board California State University, Stanislaus.
TUN IRB: The Basics February 26, IRB Function Review human-subject research Ensure the rights & welfare of human subjects are adequately protected.
What Institutional Researchers Should Know about the IRB Susan Thompson Senior Research Analyst Office of Institutional Research Presented at the Texas.
CUNY Human Research Protection Program (HRPP) School of Professional Studies April 18, 2013
Case Studies: Puzzles in Human Research Kevin L. Nellis, M.S., M.T. (A.S.C.P.) Program Analyst, Program for Research Integrity Development and Education.
WELCOME to the TULANE UNIVERSITY HUMAN RESEARCH PROTECTION OFFICE WORKSHOP for SOCIAL/BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH (March 2, 2010) Tulane University HRPO Uptown.
 Epidemiology -- Research – or Not Research? Medical Research Summit March Tom Puglisi, PhD.
Joni Barnard IRB Information Session: EHE Workshop 10/13/2015.
Human Subjects Research at Mines Colorado School of Mines New Faculty Orientation November 20, 2015.
Research Ethics Office of Research Compliance. Responsible Conduct of Research (RCR) Covers 9 content areas –Animal Subjects (IACUC) –Human Subjects (IRB)
Doing IRB Right … Together JOHN POTTER, OD, MA Chair, Institutional Review Board.
Created by Steve Martin, PA-C IRB Application Received Exempt Complete Yes No Mississippi College IRB Application Process Determine Review Category Expedited.
Does My Project Require HRPP/IRB Review? Research Human Subject Engagement HUMAN RESEARCH PROTECTION PROGRAM (HRPP) OFFICE.
Protecting Human Subjects Overview of the Issues Applications to Educational Research The IRB Process.
What is exempt research? Angela Bain, IRB Administrator
Submitting human subjects research
Ethics in Social Psychology
University of Central Florida Office of Research & Commercialization
IRB Educational Session - IRB Regulations and Types of Review
Submitting human subjects research
Does My Project Require HRPP/IRB Review?
This takes approximately 5 minutes or less from start to finish
Intro to Projects – Research with Human Subjects
What types of research are exempt and ohrp guidance on exemptions
Jeffrey M. Cohen, Ph.D. Associate Dean,
CUNY Human Research Protection Program (HRPP)
Common Rule Update: Exempt categories UT IRB
IRB Educational Session - IRB Regulations on Expedited Review
Human Participants Research
Office of Research Integrity and Protections
Research with Human Subjects
Presentation transcript:

Dustin Yocum, MA Institutional Review Board University of Illinois HUMAN SUBJECTS RESEARCH

 Discuss what an Institutional Review Board (IRB) does  Find out why the IRB exists  Discuss the regulations and classifications  Discuss the application process  Discuss the elements of informed consent  Field questions OBJECTIVES

 Independent Review and Oversight Committee  Board of experts in conducting research  Uphold federal, state, and local regulations  Review research applications for ethical standards  Purpose of the IRB is to facilitate safe and ethical research with human subjects conducted by UIUC students, faculty, and staff WHAT DOES THE IRB DO?

 Examples of research with serious ethical issues  Tuskeegee Syphilis Study  Human Radiation Exeperiments  Milgram Study  Willowbrook State School Hepatitis Study WHY DOES THE IRB EXIST?

 45 CFR 46 – Common Rule - Regulations for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research  Basic regulations established in 1974  Adopted by 16 federal agencies as the Common Rule in 1991  Proposed changes in the regulations being reviewed FEDERAL REGULATIONS

 Respect for Persons  Individual autonomy, above the value of the research, to society or to any individual person  Protection of individuals with reduced autonomy  Beneficence  Do not harm, regardless of benefits  Maximize benefits and minimize the risk of doing harm  Risk–benefit analysis should justify all risks  Justice  Equitable subject selection and distribution of research benefits and burdens BELMONT PRINCIPLES

 Physical harm  Emotional distress, Psychological Trauma  Invasion of Privacy, Loss of Confidentiality involving:  Embarrassment, Loss of Social Status  Risk to Reputation, Employment, Financial Standing, Insurability  Criminal or Civil Liability WHAT POSSIBLE HARM?

 The investigator is ultimately responsible for protecting the subject.  The use of human volunteers in research is a privilege, not a right.  Society’s trust in the research process determines funding, support, regulation INVESTIGATOR RESPONSIBILITIES

 Research – A systematic investigation, including research development, testing and evaluation, designed to develop or contribute to generalizable knowledge.  Human Subject - A living individual about whom an investigator (whether professional or student) conducting research obtains:  (1) data through intervention or interaction with the individual, or  (2) identifiable private information. WHAT IS HUMAN SUBJECTS RESEARCH?

 Intervention  Includes both physical procedures by which data are gathered (for example, venipuncture) and manipulations of the subject or the subject’s environment that are performed for research purposes (45 CFR (f)).  Interaction  Includes communication or interpersonal contact between investigator and subject (45 CFR (f)). WHAT IS HUMAN SUBJECTS RESEARCH?

 Private Information  Information about behavior that occurs in a context in which an individual can reasonably expect that no observation or recording is taking place  Information which has been provided for specific purposes by an individual and which the individual can reasonably expect will not be made public (for example, a medical record)  Private information must be individually identifiable (i.e., the identity of the subject is or may readily be ascertained by the investigator or associated with the information) in order for obtaining the information to constitute research involving human subjects. WHAT IS HUMAN SUBJECTS RESEARCH?

 Not Human Subjects Research  Exempt  45 CFR (b)  45 CFR (b) Children  Expedited (New and Continuing Cases)  45 CFR  No more than minimal risk and/or minor changes  Full IRB (New and Continuing Cases) LEVELS OF REVIEW

 In order to be considered human subjects research the activity must:  be systematically designed to contribute to generalizable knowledge  obtain information about living individuals  involve intervention or interaction  be individually identifiable  involve private information NOT HUMAN SUBJECTS RESEARCH

 Activity must classify as human subjects research  Submitted on Exempt application  Reviewed by staff member only  Minimal risk  3 year approval period  Federal regulation do not apply (University regulations apply) EXEMPT RESEARCH

 Exempts research conducted in established or commonly accepted educational settings, involving normal educational practices, such as: (a) research on regular and special education instructional strategies, or (b) research on the effectiveness of or the comparison among instructional techniques, curricula, or classroom management EXEMPT CATEGORY 1

Exempts research involving the use of educational tests (cognitive, diagnostic, aptitude, achievement), survey procedures, interview procedures, or observation of public behavior, unless (a) information obtained is recorded in such a manner that human subjects can be identified, directly or through identifiers linked to the subjects; and (b) any disclosure of the human subjects’ responses outside the research could reasonably place the subjects at risk of criminal or civil liability or be damaging to the subjects’ financial standing, employability, or reputation EXEMPT CATEGORY 2

 Category 1  Research on physical education that involves exercise if the activity is altered in a significant way for the purposes of the research  Category 2  Research involving surveys that may cause the subject to experience severe emotional distress or discomfort  Research involving psychologically invasive surveys  Regarding Children: Research involving surveys, interviews, or observations of public behavior when the investigator is a participant in the activities being observed  All Categories  If the study is greater than minimal risk  Prisoners  Research involving deception EXCEPTIONS TO THE RULE

 Activity does not fall into one of the 6 exempt categories  Submitted on IRB-1 application  Review by staff and expert IRB member  Minimal Risk  1 year approval period (continuing reviews)  Federal regulations apply EXPEDITED RESEARCH

 When a study is considered more than minimal risk  Determined during review of IRB-1 applications  Reviewed by staff and full IRB committee  1 year approval period  Approval period could be less if Board wants to review again  Board decides if study must stay Full Board after initial approval  Federal regulations apply FULL BOARD RESEARCH

Is it human subjects research? IRB-1 or Exempt? WHAT IS THE APPLICATION PROCESS?

 Complete application (including signatures)  Research Team Attachment  Recruiting materials  Data collection measures  Consent forms  Additional forms(device/equipment, waivers, etc.)  Funding proposal  Approvals from outside institutions WHAT DO I SUBMIT?

 Application is submitted to  Application is logged into system and assigned to a reviewer  Pre-Review is conducted  Correspondence and revisions  Once revisions are complete with IRB staff:  If exempt, study can be approved in IRB office  If expedited/full board, study will be sent to an expert reviewer.  Stipulations  Approval WHAT IS THE PROCESS AFTER I SUBMIT?

 All researchers must have completed the following CITI online training requirements before approval will be given:  Belmont Report - SBR  History and Ethical Principles - SBR  Defining Research with Human Subjects - SBR  Assessing Risk in Social Behavioral Sciences - SBR  Informed Consent - SBR  Privacy and Confidentiality – SBR  Online CITI training is good for 3 years CITI REQUIREMENTS

 Amendment Process  Complete the Research Amendment Form  Make revisions to all applicable parts of application  Make sure new documents are signed by RPI  Send revised/additional documents to staff reviewer WHAT IF I NEED TO MAKE A CHANGE AFTER APPROVAL?

 Purpose  Procedures  Risks and Benefits  Voluntariness  Confidentiality  Contact Information  Signature Statement ELEMENTS OF INFORMED CONSENT

 Signed (written) Informed Consent  Waiver of Informed Consent  Alteration of Informed Consent  Waiver of Documentation INFORMED CONSENT OVERVIEW

 Informed consent is an ongoing process rather than just given/obtained at a moment of time.  No exculpatory language, 8th grade reading level, correct grammar/typos  Give participants opportunities to ask questions  Ensure participants understand what they have consented to do  Ensure participants understand that they can discontinue at any time INFORMED CONSENT OVERVIEW

QUESTIONS?

 Campus IRB Web site:  UIUC IRB Training Module:  Belmont Report:  Office for Human Research Protections (OHRP):  U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA): ADDITIONAL RESOURCES

Main IRB Office Suite 203, MC– East Green Street Champaign, IL Phone: Fax: Online: CONTACT INFORMATION