1Computer Graphics Implementation II Lecture 16 John Shearer Culture Lab – space 2

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Computer Graphics - Rasterization -
Advertisements

Visible-Surface Detection(identification)
From Vertices to Fragments
CS 352: Computer Graphics Chapter 7: The Rendering Pipeline.
Hidden Surface Removal CSE 581. Visibility Assumption: All polygons are opaque What polygons are visible with respect to your view frustum?  Outside:
CECS461 Computer Graphics II University of Missouri at Columbia Hidden Surface Removal.
CHAPTER 12 Height Maps, Hidden Surface Removal, Clipping and Level of Detail Algorithms © 2008 Cengage Learning EMEA.
Visibility in Computer Graphics Toni Sellarès Unversitat de Girona
Graphics Graphics Korea University cgvr.korea.ac.kr 1 Hidden Surface Removal 고려대학교 컴퓨터 그래픽스 연구실.
Part I: Basics of Computer Graphics
University of British Columbia CPSC 314 Computer Graphics Jan-Apr 2007 Tamara Munzner Clipping II, Hidden Surfaces.
Chapter 6: Vertices to Fragments Part 2 E. Angel and D. Shreiner: Interactive Computer Graphics 6E © Addison-Wesley Mohan Sridharan Based on Slides.
1 Dr. Scott Schaefer Hidden Surfaces. 2/62 Hidden Surfaces.
Vertices and Fragments I CS4395: Computer Graphics 1 Mohan Sridharan Based on slides created by Edward Angel.
Hidden Surface Elimination Wen-Chieh (Steve) Lin Institute of Multimedia Engineering I-Chen Lin’ CG Slides, Rich Riesenfeld’s CG Slides, Shirley, Fundamentals.
1 CSCE 441: Computer Graphics Hidden Surface Removal (Cont.) Jinxiang Chai.
Visible-surface Detection Computer Graphics Seminar MUM
Vertices and Fragments III Mohan Sridharan Based on slides created by Edward Angel 1 CS4395: Computer Graphics.
1 Angel: Interactive Computer Graphics 4E © Addison-Wesley 2005 Implementation I Ed Angel Professor of Computer Science, Electrical and Computer Engineering,
1 Chapter 5 Viewing. 2 Perspective Projection 3 Parallel Projection.
Introduction to 3D Graphics John E. Laird. Basic Issues u Given a internal model of a 3D world, with textures and light sources how do you project it.
Hidden Surface Removal
Graphics Pipeline Hidden Surfaces CMSC 435/634. Visibility We can convert simple primitives to pixels Which primitives (or parts of primitives) should.
Graphics Pipeline Hidden Surface CMSC 435/634. Visibility We can convert simple primitives to pixels/fragments How do we know which primitives (or which.
Objectives Review some advanced topics, including Review some advanced topics, including Chapter 8: Implementation Chapter 8: Implementation Chapter 9:
1 Angel: Interactive Computer Graphics 4E © Addison-Wesley 2005 Chapter 7: From Vertices to Fragments Ed Angel Professor of Computer Science, Electrical.
CS 325 Introduction to Computer Graphics 03 / 08 / 2010 Instructor: Michael Eckmann.
1 Angel: Interactive Computer Graphics 4E © Addison-Wesley 2005 Implementation Ed Angel Professor of Computer Science, Electrical and Computer Engineering,
Objectives Introduce basic implementation strategies Clipping Scan conversion.
From Vertices to Fragments Chapter 7. Part I Objectives Introduce basic implementation strategies Introduce basic implementation strategies Clipping Clipping.
CSC418 Computer Graphics n BSP tree n Z-Buffer n A-buffer n Scanline.
CS 480/680 Computer Graphics Shading in OpenGL Dr. Frederick C Harris, Jr. Fall 2013.
From Vertices to Fragments II Software College, Shandong University Instructor: Zhou Yuanfeng
Visible-Surface Detection Jehee Lee Seoul National University.
1 Angel: Interactive Computer Graphics 5E © Addison-Wesley 2009 Week 3 Lecture 1: Implementation Based on Interactive Computer Graphics (Angel) - Chapter.
Hidden Surface Removal 1.  Suppose that we have the polyhedron which has 3 totally visible surfaces, 4 totally invisible/hidden surfaces, and 1 partially.
CS-378: Game Technology Lecture #2.2: Clipping and Hidden Surfaces Prof. Okan Arikan University of Texas, Austin Thanks to James O’Brien, Steve Chenney,
1Computer Graphics Programming with OpenGL Three Dimensions – 2 Lecture 7 John Shearer Culture Lab – space 2
Implementation II Ed Angel Professor of Computer Science, Electrical and Computer Engineering, and Media Arts University of New Mexico.
CS 325 Introduction to Computer Graphics 03 / 22 / 2010 Instructor: Michael Eckmann.
Binary Space Partitioning Trees Ray Casting Depth Buffering
CS 376 Introduction to Computer Graphics 03 / 21 / 2007 Instructor: Michael Eckmann.
Hidden Surface Removal
Implementation II.
Review on Graphics Basics. Outline Polygon rendering pipeline Affine transformations Projective transformations Lighting and shading From vertices to.
Computer Graphics I, Fall 2010 Implementation II.
1Computer Graphics Implementation 1 Lecture 15 John Shearer Culture Lab – space 2
1 CSCE 441: Computer Graphics Hidden Surface Removal Jinxiang Chai.
01/28/09Dinesh Manocha, COMP770 Visibility Computations Visible Surface Determination Visibility Culling.
Computer Graphics Inf4/MSc 1 Computer Graphics Lecture 5 Hidden Surface Removal and Rasterization Taku Komura.
Visible surface determination. Problem outline Given a set of 3D objects and a viewing specification, we wish to determine which lines or surfaces are.
Learning Objectives Classification of Visible Surface Detection Algorithms Classification of Visible Surface Detection Algorithms Back-Face Detection Back-Face.
COMPUTER GRAPHICS CS 482 – FALL 2015 NOVEMBER 10, 2015 VISIBILITY CULLING HIDDEN SURFACES ANTIALIASING HALFTONING.
Visible-Surface Detection Methods. To identify those parts of a scene that are visible from a chosen viewing position. Surfaces which are obscured by.
Lecture 30: Visible Surface Detection
Lecture 9 From Vertices to Fragments. Objectives Introduce basic implementation strategies Clipping Rasterization hidden-surface removal.
Chapter 71 Computer Graphics - Chapter 7 From Vertices to Fragments Objectives are: How your program are processed by the system that you are using, Learning.
Computer Graphics Implementation II
CSC418 Computer Graphics Back Faces Visibility Algorithms.
CSC461: Lecture 20 Parallel Projections in OpenGL
Graphics Pipeline Hidden Surfaces
CSCE 441: Computer Graphics Hidden Surface Removal
3D Rendering Pipeline Hidden Surface Removal 3D Primitives
Implementation II Ed Angel Professor Emeritus of Computer Science
Course code: 10CS65 | Computer Graphics and Visualization
Introduction to Computer Graphics with WebGL
From Vertices To Fragments
Implementation II Ed Angel Professor Emeritus of Computer Science
From Vertex to Fragment
From Vertex to Fragment
Presentation transcript:

1Computer Graphics Implementation II Lecture 16 John Shearer Culture Lab – space 2

2Computer Graphics Objectives Introduce clipping algorithms for polygons Survey hidden-surface algorithms

3Computer Graphics Polygon Clipping Not as simple as line segment clipping – Clipping a line segment yields at most one line segment – Clipping a polygon can yield multiple polygons However, clipping a convex polygon can yield at most one other polygon

4Computer Graphics Tessellation and Convexity One strategy is to replace nonconvex (concave) polygons with a set of triangular polygons (a tessellation) Also makes fill easier Tessellation code in GLU library – GLU provides tessellation routines to let you render concave polygons, self-intersecting polygons, and polygons with holes. The tessellation routines break these complex primitives up into (possibly groups of) simpler, convex primitives that can be rendered by the OpenGL API

5Computer Graphics Clipping as a Black Box Can consider line segment clipping as a process that takes in two vertices and produces either no vertices or the vertices of a clipped line segment

6Computer Graphics Pipeline Clipping of Line Segments Clipping against each side of window is independent of other sides – Can use four independent clippers in a pipeline

7Computer Graphics Pipeline Clipping of Polygons Three dimensions: add front and back clippers Strategy used in SGI Geometry Engine Small increase in latency

8Computer Graphics Bounding Boxes Rather than doing clipping on a complex polygon, we can use an axis-aligned bounding box or extent – Smallest rectangle aligned with axes that encloses the polygon – Simple to compute: max and min of x and y

9Computer Graphics Bounding boxes Can usually determine accept/reject based only on bounding box reject accept requires detailed clipping

10Computer Graphics Clipping and Visibility Clipping has much in common with hidden- surface removal In both cases, we are trying to remove objects that are not visible to the camera Often we can use visibility or occlusion testing early in the process to eliminate as many polygons as possible before going through the entire pipeline

11Computer Graphics Hidden Surface Removal Object-space approach: use pairwise testing between polygons (objects) Worst case complexity O(n 2 ) for n polygons

12Computer Graphics Painter’s Algorithm Render polygons a back to front order so that polygons behind others are simply painted over B behind A as seen by viewer Fill B then A

13Computer Graphics Depth Sort Requires ordering of polygons first – O(n log n) calculation for ordering – Not every polygon is either in front or behind all other polygons Order polygons and deal with easy cases first, harder later Polygons sorted by distance from COP

14Computer Graphics Easy Cases A lies behind all other polygons – Can render Polygons overlap in z but not in either x or y – Can render independently

15Computer Graphics Hard Cases Overlap in all directions but can one is fully on one side of the other cyclic overlap penetration

16Computer Graphics Back-Face Removal (Culling) face is visible iff 90    -90 equivalently cos   0 or v n  0 plane of face has form ax + by +cz +d =0 but after normalization n = ( ) T need only test the sign of c In OpenGL we can simply enable culling but may not work correctly if we have nonconvex objects

17Computer Graphics Image Space Approach Look at each projector ( nm for an n x m frame buffer) and find closest of k polygons Complexity O (nmk) Ray tracing z -buffer

18Computer Graphics z-Buffer Algorithm Use a buffer called the z or depth buffer to store the depth of the closest object at each pixel found so far As we render each polygon, compare the depth of each pixel to depth in z buffer If less, place shade of pixel in color buffer and update z buffer

19Computer Graphics Efficiency If we work scan line by scan line as we move across a scan line, the depth changes satisfy a  x+b  y+c  z=0 Along scan line  y = 0  z = -  x In screen space  x = 1

20Computer Graphics Scan-Line Algorithm Can combine shading and hidden surface removal through scan line algorithm scan line i: no need for depth information, can only be in no or one polygon scan line j: need depth information only when in more than one polygon

21Computer Graphics Need a data structure to store – Flag for each polygon (inside/outside) – Incremental structure for scan lines that stores which edges are encountered – Parameters for planes Implementation

22Computer Graphics Visibility Testing In many realtime applications, such as games, we want to eliminate as many objects as possible within the application – Reduce burden on pipeline – Reduce traffic on bus Partition space with Binary Spatial Partition (BSP) Tree

23Computer Graphics Simple Example consider 6 parallel polygons top view The plane of A separates B and C from D, E and F

24Computer Graphics BSP Tree Can continue recursively – Plane of C separates B from A – Plane of D separates E and F Can put this information in a BSP tree – Use for visibility and occlusion testing