Loving v. Virginia :Of 1967: U.S Supreme court. FACTS OF THE CASE Residents of Virginia named Mildred Jeter, a black women, and Richard Loving, a white.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
HOW DO WE KNOW WHAT WE KNOW?
Advertisements

The Players Vocabulary Plessey v. Ferguson Brown v.
(1896), is a landmark United States Supreme Court decision in the jurisprudence of the United States, upholding the constitutionality of state laws requiring.
 Those powers granted to the national government by the constitution (Article I Sect. 8)  Expressed Powers – Spelled out (expressed) in words in the.
By: Mario Contreras Julian Garcia Roger H. Pruneda Jesus N. Rosales Jr.
Supreme Court Decisions
Legal Background of Civil Rights. Equal Protection Clause 14 th Amendment of the Constitution (1868)  “no state shall make or enforce any law which shall.
American Government Unit 3.
Constitutional Law Part 6: Equal Protection Lecture 3: Classification Based on Race and National Origin.
Famous Civil Rights Cases and Events. Plessy vs. Ferguson Case 1892, Homer Plessy was jailed for sitting in the "White" car of the East Louisiana Railroad.
VII. Minorities and Equal Rights Jason Koncsol and Chris Stokes.
Hands on your buzzers, its... 1 st Semester Federalism 2.
Equal Protection of the Law Fourteenth Amendment Jessica Stickel Ashley Pollack Shannan Petchul.
Loving v Virginia.
Landmark Supreme Court Cases By: Josselyn Sorto & Alex Benigno.
WOMEN AND MINORITIES IN THE UNITED STATES PAST AND CURRENT DISCRIMINATION.
Chapter 5 Civil Rights. 14 th Amendment Equal Protection ◦ Supreme Court’s Standards  Race and Ethnicity (inherently suspect/strict/difficult to meet)*
CIVIL RIGHTS. Civil Rights  Slavery, Missouri Compromise  Dred Scott(1856)  Civil War  Post Civil War Amendments  Reconstruction, 1877 Compromise,
Chapter 21: Civil Rights: Equal Justice Under Law Section 2
The Bill of Rights. Amendment 14 Defines citizenship and citizens’ rights. The Fourteenth Amendment (Amendment XIV) to the United States Constitution.
QOD 2/25 Why was the Brown v. Board of Education supreme court case so monumental in United States history?
 I. What is freedom of expression  A. What basic rights are listed in this portion of the First Amendment?  B. Why do you think these particular rights.
The Fight for Equality in the United States Charles Tanner Computer Skills for the Information Age July 2015.
LEHHS FOCUS: Lawyer Reconstruction to the Rise of Railroads.
Equal Justice under Law
Civil Rights Cases (1883) Background Civil Rights Act in 1875 declared it a crime to deny equal access to public accommodations on account of race or color.
The Civil Rights Movement and Hampton Roads Student SS310-07: Exploring the 1960s Professor Susan Fournier.
You Need Civil Liberties to Protect Our Human and Earth Rights Alex Landon Attorney At Law.
Block 2 Carl Turner. Regents of California vs. Bakke Argued on Wednesday, October 12, 1977 Decided on Monday, June 26, 1978.
SUPREME COURT CASES AFFIRMATIVE ACTION. WHAT IS IT?? Affirmative action refers to policies that take factors including "race, color, religion, gender,
Plessy vs. Ferguson 1896 Angelina Uzueta, Emily Trevino, Elias Ybarra.
Hannah Conwell Supreme Court case 1967 Loving v. Virginia.
Equal Protection of the Law Liam Penland. Equal Protection of the Law (14th Amendment) Each state is required to provide equal protection under the law.
UNITED STATES HISTORY The Warren Court Dr. King-Owen [12.02]
Section Outline 1 of 7 Our Enduring Constitution Section 2: A Flexible Framework I.The Role of the Supreme Court II.Equality and Segregation III.Equality.
Civil Rights Vocab. Black Power African American movement seeking unity and self- reliance.
Loving v Virginia.
Brown vs. Board of Education
Chapter 11: Civil Rights Section 2: Equal Justice Under Law (pgs
Marriage Rights GOVT 2305, Module 5.
Chief Justice Earl Warren wrote the unanimous decision of the Supreme Court: “We come then to the question presented: Does segregation of children in.
Plessy v. Ferguson, 163 US 537 (1896) By Colton Baburich.
Equal Protection Clause
Copy these vocabulary terms!
Loving v. Virginia (1967) “Almighty God created the races…and he placed them on separate continents…”
Bell Work T/F Quiz, Section 2.5
Equal Protection & the 14th Amendment
Civil Rights Movement Chapter 21.
Marriage Rights October 12, 2017.
May 8, 2018 U.S. History Agenda: DO NOW: Multiple Choice Review
Civil Rights Movement:
Equality Before the Law
November 8, 2018 Modern Issues in the U.S. Agenda:
Answers: 1. Trial by Jury only 2. False (every 10 years) 3. Habeas Corpus (immediate presentation of charges); lawyer; speedy trial. 4. January 3 5. January.
In the 1954 case Brown v. Board of Education, the Supreme Court ruled that public schools were required to be desegregated.
Supreme Court – Scrutiny Tests
Section 3: Segregation and Discrimination
Brown vs board of Education 1954
Unit 3: Civil Liberties & Civil Rights
Chapter 21: Civil Rights: Equal Justice Under Law Section 2
Brown v. Board of Education
Lecture 40 Discrimination IV
Branches of Government
Brown v. Board of Education (1954) 347 U.S. 483
Warm UP Is the Supreme Court a vehicle for change?
Topic 6 – Role of the people
By: Isabella Armstrong and Brianna Dinch
Defining a Person by Skin Color By: Desirae White
Plessy v. Ferguson Plessy v. Ferguson (1896) 163 U.S. 537
Presentation transcript:

Loving v. Virginia :Of 1967: U.S Supreme court

FACTS OF THE CASE Residents of Virginia named Mildred Jeter, a black women, and Richard Loving, a white man were married. They were charged with violating the states anti miscegenation statue, which banned inter-racial marriages. They sentence 1 year in jail.

ISSUE The U.S supreme Court had struck down laws banning interracial marriages in the United States. The case was a landmark case, because it wasn’t only African Americans and Whites. Whites and non-white ethnic groups such as Asians and Native Americans. They passed the Racial Integrity Action. March 20, 1924

DECISION Under the Equal Protection Clause they were subject to “ The most rigid scrutiny”, the court found, had no legitimate purpose. The court first rejected the status argument because it only applied to black and whites. NOT to other “R A C I A L P U R P O S E (“ The Fourteenth Amendment”)

DECISION CONT. Under the Constitution, phrase written by, Chief Justice Earl Warren “ The Freedom marry, to marry or not to marry, a person of another race resides with the individual, and cannot be infringed by the state”