Mr. A. Square Unbound Continuum States in 1-D Quantum Mechanics.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
One-Dimensional Scattering of Waves 2006 Quantum MechanicsProf. Y. F. Chen One-Dimensional Scattering of Waves.
Advertisements

Rae §2.1, B&J §3.1, B&M § An equation for the matter waves: the time-dependent Schrődinger equation*** Classical wave equation (in one dimension):
“velocity” is group velocity, not phase velocity
Tunneling Phenomena Potential Barriers.
Quantum One: Lecture 5a. Normalization Conditions for Free Particle Eigenstates.
Quantum One: Lecture 4. Schrödinger's Wave Mechanics for a Free Quantum Particle.
Wavepacket1 Reading: QM Course packet FREE PARTICLE GAUSSIAN WAVEPACKET.
1 Chapter 40 Quantum Mechanics April 6,8 Wave functions and Schrödinger equation 40.1 Wave functions and the one-dimensional Schrödinger equation Quantum.
Chapter 16 Wave Motion.
1 atom many atoms Potential energy of electrons in a metal Potential energy  = work function  “Finite square well.”
Given the Uncertainty Principle, how do you write an equation of motion for a particle? First, remember that a particle is only a particle sort of, and.
Almost all detection of visible light is by the “photoelectric effect” (broadly defined.) There is always a threshold photon energy for detection, even.
PH 401 Dr. Cecilia Vogel Lecture 3. Review Outline  Requirements on wavefunctions  TDSE  Normalization  Free Particle  matter waves  probability,
PH 401 Dr. Cecilia Vogel. Review Outline  Particle in a box  solve TISE  stationary state wavefunctions  eigenvalues  stationary vs non-stationary.
2. Solving Schrödinger’s Equation Superposition Given a few solutions of Schrödinger’s equation, we can make more of them Let  1 and  2 be two solutions.
A Fourier series can be defined for any function over the interval 0  x  2L where Often easiest to treat n=0 cases separately.
PHYS 3313 – Section 001 Lecture #17
Mr. A. Square’s Quantum Mechanics Part 1. Bound States in 1 Dimension.
ENE 311 Lecture 2. Diffusion Process The drift current is the transport of carriers when an electric field is applied. There is another important carrier.
Chang-Kui Duan, Institute of Modern Physics, CUPT 1 Harmonic oscillator and coherent states Reading materials: 1.Chapter 7 of Shankar’s PQM.
Simulating Electron Dynamics in 1D
P460 - Sch. wave eqn.1 Solving Schrodinger Equation If V(x,t)=v(x) than can separate variables G is separation constant valid any x or t Gives 2 ordinary.
The free wavicle: motivation for the Schrödinger Equation Einstein showed that hitherto wavelike phenonomenon had distinctly particle-like aspects: the.
Physics 3 for Electrical Engineering Ben Gurion University of the Negev
Lecture_09: Outline Matter Waves  Wave packets  Phase and group velocities  Uncertainty relations  Problems.
1 Reading: QM course packet- ch 5.5 ENERGY EIGENFUNCTIONS & EIGENVALUES OF THE FINITE WELL.
Potential Step Quantum Physics 2002 Recommended Reading: Harris Chapter 5, Section 1.
Topic 5: Schrödinger Equation
MODULE 1 In classical mechanics we define a STATE as “The specification of the position and velocity of all the particles present, at some time, and the.
The Quantum Theory of Atoms and Molecules The Schrödinger equation and how to use wavefunctions Dr Grant Ritchie.
Time-dependent Schrodinger Equation Numerical solution of the time-independent equation is straightforward constant energy solutions do not require us.

More Bandstructure Discussion. Model Bandstructure Problem One-dimensional, “almost free” electron model (easily generalized to 3D!) (BW, Ch. 2 & Kittel’s.
Physics 361 Principles of Modern Physics Lecture 11.
Physics 361 Principles of Modern Physics Lecture 7.
Quantum Mechanical Cross Sections In a practical scattering experiment the observables we have on hand are momenta, spins, masses, etc.. We do not directly.
Free particle in 1D (1) 1D Unbound States
Lecture 21-22: Sound Waves in Fluids Sound in ideal fluid Sound in real fluid. Attenuation of the sound waves 1.
Model Bandstructure Problem One-dimensional, “almost free” electron model (easily generalized to 3D!) (Kittel’s book, Ch. 7 & MANY other references)
Question #1 A gwoster travels to the left with an energy, E. It is in a potential that is 0 for x>0 and V 0 > E for x
Physics 361 Principles of Modern Physics Lecture 13.
Monday, March 30, 2015PHYS , Spring 2015 Dr. Jaehoon Yu 1 PHYS 3313 – Section 001 Lecture #15 Monday, March 30, 2015 Dr. Jaehoon Yu Wave Motion.

Physical Chemistry III (728342) The Schrödinger Equation
2. Time Independent Schrodinger Equation
The One-Dimensional Finite Square W ell defined over from x = –a to x = a, so ‘width’ of well is 2a [different definition from Griffiths 1d∞SW  evenness/oddness]
量子力學導論 Chap 1 - The Wave Function Chap 2 - The Time-independent Schrödinger Equation Chap 3 - Formalism in Hilbert Space Chap 4 - 表象理論.
1924: de Broglie suggests particles are waves Mid-1925: Werner Heisenberg introduces Matrix Mechanics In 1927 he derives uncertainty principles Late 1925:
Solid State Physics Lecture 15 HW 8 Due March 29 Kittel Chapter 7: 3,4,6 The free electron standing wave and the traveling wave are not eigenstates.
7. Electromagnetic Waves 7A. Plane Waves Consider Maxwell’s Equations with no sources We are going to search for waves of the form To make things as general.
Lesson 6: Particles and barriers
The Quantum Theory of Atoms and Molecules
Solutions of Schrodinger Equation
Schrödinger Representation – Schrödinger Equation
Quantum Mechanics.
Quantum Mechanics.
Concept test 15.1 Suppose at time
Unbound States A review about the discussions we have had so far on the Schrödinger equation. Topics in Unbound States: The potential step. Two steps:
Christopher Crawford PHY 520 Introduction Christopher Crawford
Quantum One.
Christopher Crawford PHY 520 Introduction Christopher Crawford
Elements of Quantum Mechanics
Quantum One.
Concept test 15.1 Suppose at time
2. Solving Schrödinger’s Equation
Quantum Two.
Quantum Mechanics.
Particle in a box Potential problem.
CHAPTER 3 PROBLEMS IN ONE DIMENSION Particle in one dimensional box
Source: D. Griffiths, Introduction to Quantum Mechanics (Prentice Hall, 2004) R. Scherrer, Quantum Mechanics An Accessible Introduction (Pearson Int’l.
Presentation transcript:

Mr. A. Square Unbound Continuum States in 1-D Quantum Mechanics

With Apologies to Shelley In the previous section, we assumed That a particle exists in a 1-d space That it experiences a real potential, V(x) That its wavefunction is a solution of the TISE or TDSE That at infinity, its wavefunction is zero. In this section, those are removed

The consequences If the boundary condition at infinity is removed, Then a quantum system is not limited to a discrete set of states but A continuum of energies is allowed.

Normalizing Infinity One problem if  (x)  ∞, how do you normalize it? Well, Postulate 7 (wherein we discuss normalization) is based on the proviso that it mainly applies to bound states. Mathematically, if we have to find a matrix element, we perform the following operation:

The Free Particle

Assume k>0 & real, and B(k)=0, then  describes a wave moving from –x to +x Obviously, =  2 k 2 So  p= - 2 =0 There is no variance in momentum, thus the free particle has mixed momentum This is in agreement with Newton’s 1 st Law

Assume k<0 & real, and A(k)=0, then  describes a wave moving from +x to -x Obviously, =  2 k 2 So  p= - 2 =0 There is no variance in momentum, thus the free particle has mixed momentum This is in agreement with Newton’s 1 st Law

Obviously e ikx represents a particle moving from right to left e -ikx represents a particle moving from left to right

The Wave Packet as a solution Another solution to the TDSE is a “wave packet” As an example, let B(k)=0 and the solution is in the form of the integral: Note that this is the inverse Fourier transform A complication arises in that  is not really independent of k

The Wave Packet cont’d Typically, the form of A(k) is chosen to be a Gaussian We also assume that  (k) can be expanded in a Taylor series about a specific value of k

The Wave Packet cont’d The packet consists of “ripples” contained within an “envelope” “the phase velocity” is the velocity of the ripples “the group velocity” is the velocity of the envelope In the earlier expansion, the group velocity is d  /dk

The phase velocity So the ripple travels at ½ the speed of the particle Also, note if =  2 k 2 then I can find a “quantum velocity”= /m 2  2 k 2 /m 2 = E/2m=v q So v q is the phase velocity or the quantum mechanical wave function travels at the phase speed

The Group Velocity The group velocity (the velocity of the envelope) is velocity of the particle and is twice the ripple velocity. BTW the formula for  in terms of k is called the dispersion relation

The Step Potential Region 2 x=0 V(x)=V 0 Region 1

“A” is the amplitude of the incident wave “B” is the amplitude of the reflected wave

Region 2 “C” is the amplitude of the transmitted wave

Matching Boundary Conditions The problem is that we have 2 equations and 3 unknowns. “A” is controlled by the experimenter so we will always solve ALL equations in terms of the amplitude of the incident wave

Applying some algebra If E>V 0 then E-V 0 >0 or “+” Then k 2 is real and  2 is an oscillator propagation If E<V 0 Classically, the particle is repelled In QM, k 2 is imaginary and  2 describes an attenuating wave

Graphically If E>V 0 then E-V 0 >0 or “+” Then k 2 is real and  2 is an oscillator propagation If E<V 0 Classically, the particle is repelled In QM, k 2 is imaginary and  2 describes an attenuating wave Region 2 x=0 V(x)=V 0 Region 1 Region 2 x=0 V(x)=V 0 Region 1

Reflection and Transmission Coefficients If k 2 is imaginary, T=0 If k 2 is real, then

In terms of Energy, If E>V 0 then If E<V 0 then R=1 and T=0

The Step Potential Region 2 x=0 V(x)=V 0 Region 1 x=a Region 3

The Wave Function

Boundary Conditions

Apply Boundary Conditions

Solving

Reflection and Transmission Coefficients

Some Consequences When ka=n* , n=integer, implies T=1 and R=0 This happens because there are 2 edges where reflection occur and these components can add destructively Called “Ramsauer- Townsend” effect

For E<V 0 Classically, the particle must always be reflected QM says that there is a nonvanishing T In region 2, k is imaginary Since cos(iz)=cosh(z) sin(iz)=isinh(z) Since cosh 2 z-sinh 2 z=1 T cannot be unity so there is no Ramsauer- Townsend effect

What happens if the barrier height is high and the length is long? Consequence: T is very small; barrier is nearly opaque. What if V 0 <0? Then the problem reduces to the finite box Poles (or infinities) in T correspond to discrete states

An Alternate Method We could have skipped over the Mr. A Square Bound and gone straight to Mr. A Square Unbound. We would identify poles in the scattering amplitude as bound states. This approach is difficult to carry out in practice

The Dirac Delta Potential The delta barrier can either be treated as a bound state problem or considered as a scattering problem. The potential is given by V(x)=-  (x-x 0 ) x=x 0 Region 1 Region 2

Wavefunctions and Boundary Conditions

From the previous lecture, the discontinuity at the singularity is given by:

Applying the boundary conditions R cannot vanish or only vanishes if k is very large so there is always some reflection

Solving for k and E This is in agreement with the result of the previous section. If  is negative, then the spike is repulsive and there are no bound states

A Matrix Approach to Scattering Consider a general, localized scattering problem Region 1 V(x) Region 2 Region 3

Wavefunctions

Boundary Conditions There are four boundary conditions in this problem and we can use them to solve for “B” and “F” in terms of “A” and “G”. B=S 11 A+S 12 G F=S 21 A+S 22 G S ij are the various coefficients which depend on k. They seem to form a 2 x 2 matrix Called the scattering matrix (s-matrix for short)

Consequences The case of scattering from the left, G=0 so R L =|S 11 | 2 and T L =|S 21 | 2 The case of scattering from the right, F=0 so R R =|S 22 | 2 and T R =|S 12 | 2 The S-matrix tells you everything that you need to know about scattering from a localized potential. It also contains information about the bound states If you have the S-matrix and you want to locate bound states, let k  i  and look for the energies where the S-matrix blows up.