SP Swedish National Testing and Research Institute Real-Time GPS Processing with Carrier Phase FILTER PARAMETER INFLUENCE ON GPS CARRIER PHASE REAL-TIME.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Near real time assessment of the Space Weather effect on navigation based on the DGPS technique S.Lejeune, R.Warnant, A. Barré, M. Bavier Royal Observatory.
Advertisements

GPS Theory and applications
T GPS Fundamentals Your location is: 37 o ’ N 122 o ’ W.
2013 Western Australia Surveying Conference
Earth, Atmospheric and Planetary Sciences Massachusetts Institute of Technology 77 Massachusetts Avenue | A | Cambridge MA V F.
Geodetic Reference Frames In Presence of Crustal Deformations Martin Lidberg 1,2, Maaria Nordman 3, Jan M. Johansson 1,4, Glenn A Milne5, Hans-Georg Scherneck.
Use of Kalman filters in time and frequency analysis John Davis 1st May 2011.
A quick GPS Primer (assumed knowledge on the course!) Observables Error sources Analysis approaches Ambiguities If only it were this easy…
Limits of static processing in a dynamic environment Matt King, Newcastle University, UK.
The 15th Workshop on JAXA Astrodynamics and Flight Mechanics, 2005
Excess phase computation S. Casotto, A. Nardo, P. Zoccarato, M. Bardella CISAS, University of Padova.
Space Weather influence on satellite based navigation and precise positioning R. Warnant, S. Lejeune, M. Bavier Royal Observatory of Belgium Avenue Circulaire,
GTECH 201 Session 08 GPS.
TEC and its Uncertainty Ludger Scherliess Center for Atmospheric and Space Sciences Utah State University GEM Mini-Workshop San Francisco December 2014.
Real-Time Orbit And Clock Estimation Using PANDA Software Shi C, Lou YD, Zhao QL, Liu JN GNSS Research Center, Wuhan University, China IGS Analysis Center.
Ground-Based Altimetry Using a Single- Receiver Single-Frequency GNSS Phase Ambiguity Resolution Technique G. Stienne* S. Reboul J.-B. Choquel M. Benjelloun.
13/06/13 H. Rho Slide 1 Geodetic Research Laboratory Department of Geodesy and Geomatics Engineering University of New Brunswick Evaluation of Precise.
Introduction to Global Navigation Satellite Systems Ondrej Kútik.
Geodetic Survey Division EARTH SCIENCES SECTOR Slide 1 Real-Time and Near Real-Time GPS Products and Services from Canada Y. Mireault, P. Tétreault, F.
1 On the use of Numerical Weather Models to Predict Neutral-Atmosphere Delays Felipe G. Nievinski.
GPS “The Next Utility”. Who What Where When Why How GPS: Global Positioning System US System: NAVSTAR (NAVigation System with Timing And Ranging) Managed.
SVY 207: Lecture 4 GPS Description and Signal Structure
Part VI Precise Point Positioning Supported by Local Ionospheric Modeling GS894G.
Simultaneous Estimations of Ground Target Location and Aircraft Direction Heading via Image Sequence and GPS Carrier-Phase Data Luke K.Wang, Shan-Chih.
Modern Navigation Thomas Herring MW 11:00-12:30 Room A
NGS GPS ORBIT DETERMINATION Positioning America for the Future NATIONAL OCEANIC AND ATMOSPHERIC ADMINISTRATION National Ocean Service National Geodetic.
1 LAVAL UNIVERSITY DEPARTMENT OF GEOMATICS Mohammed Boukhecha (Laval University) Marc Cocard (Laval University) René Landry (École technique supérieure.
VRS Network The Magic Behind the Scene
Titelmaster Geometrical and Kinematical Precise Orbit Determination of GOCE Akbar Shabanloui Institute of Geodesy and Geoinformation, University of Bonn.
C-Nav GPS System GPS Services Group
Background to >10 years of BIFROST activities Jan M. Johansson 1, Hans-Georg Scherneck 1, Rüdiger Haas 1, Sten Bergstrand 1 Martin Lidberg 1,2, Lotti Jivall.
Global Positioning System
SVY 207: Lecture 13 Ambiguity Resolution
Case study for the IGS ultra-rapid orbit requirements Jan Douša Miami Beach, June 2-6, 2008.
Geodetic Research Laboratory Department of Geodesy and Geomatics Engineering University of New Brunswick 01/06/27 S.Bisnath A NEW TECHNIQUE FOR GPS-BASED.
測地 VLBI 技術による 高精度周波数比較 VLBI MEASUREMENTS FOR FREQUENCY TRANSFER 日本測地学会第 112 回講演会 2009 年 11 月 6 日 ( 金 ) 産業技術総合研究所 Ⅴ. 測地測量・地球潮汐・測地 瀧口 博士 1 ,小山 泰弘 1 ,市川 隆一.
Claudinei Rodrigues de Aguiar Federal University of Technology - Parana Paulo de Oliveira Camargo São Paulo State University.
Fugro Chance Inc. Comparison of Network and State Space DGPS Services Real Time Tidal Monitoring for Seismic Data Collection Applications Richard Barker.
Naval Oceanographic Office Charting Products Division (N43) Naval Oceanographic Office Hydrography Department upgrades to its Positioning Systems and Hopes.
Airborne GPS Positioning with cm-Level Precisions at Hundreds of km Ranges Gerald L. Mader National Geodetic Survey Silver Spring, MD National Geodetic.
GSI Japan - 21st of June 1999 GPS-Positioning using Virtual Reference Stations - Theory, Analysis and Applications Herbert Landau Spectra Precision Terrasat.
GPS: Everything you wanted to know, but were afraid to ask Andria Bilich National Geodetic Survey.
GALOCAD GAlileo LOcal Component for nowcasting and forecasting Atmospheric Disturbances R. Warnant*, G. Wautelet*, S. Lejeune*, H. Brenot*, J. Spits*,
Introduction Ian Thomas, Matt King, Peter Clarke, Nigel Penna, David Lavallée Global GPS Processing strategy Conclusions and Future Work The preliminary.
VARIABILITY OF TOTAL ELECTRON CONTENT AT EUROPEAN LATITUDES A. Krankowski(1), L. W. Baran(1), W. Kosek (2), I. I. Shagimuratov(3), M. Kalarus (2) (1) Institute.
M. Gende, C. Brunini Universidad Nacional de La Plata, Argentina. Improving Single Frequency Positioning Using SIRGAS Ionospheric Products.
Global Positioning System Overview
Short-session Static and Kinematic Processing Short-session static: GAMIT processing, sessions 1-3 hours long Kinematic: TRACK processing, coordinates.
1 SVY 207: Lecture 12 Modes of GPS Positioning Aim of this lecture: –To review and compare methods of static positioning, and introduce methods for kinematic.
Civil and Environmental Engineering and Geodetic Science This file can be found on the course web page:
Real Time Stream Editor for PPP  Conventional approaches to Real Time Precise Point Position use ionosphere- free combination of code and phase observables.
1 Satellite geodesy (ge-2112) Processing of observations E. Schrama.
USM RTK Workshop Fugro Chance Inc. Starfix HP: High Performance GPS For Offshore Marine Survey, Navigation and Positioning Richard Barker, Dr. Dariusz.
Geodetic Research Laboratory Department of Geodesy and Geomatics Engineering University of New Brunswick 2/20/2016 K. Cove 1 Carrier Phase Differential.
Chalmers University of Technology Site-Dependent Electromagnetic Effects in High-Accuracy Applications of GNSS Jan Johansson and Tong Ning Chalmers University.
Real Time Stream Editor for PPP  Conventional approaches to Real Time Precise Point Position use ionosphere-free combination of code and phase observables.
Kenneth Johnston US Naval Observatory Presented by Jules McNeff International Committee on GNSS Provider’s Forum Bangalore, India 4 September 2007 GPS.
IGARSS 2011, Vancuver, Canada July 28, of 14 Chalmers University of Technology Monitoring Long Term Variability in the Atmospheric Water Vapor Content.
Vondrák Filtering for Timescales Demetrios Matsakis, Gianna Panfilo, and Gérard Petit USNO & BIPM.
ESOC Navigation Support Office IGS Workshop 2008 Miami IGS Real Time Pilot Project: Analysis Centre Activities Loukis Agrotis 4 June 2008.
Astronomisches Institut der Universität Bern Global Navigation Satellite Systems for Positioning and Time Transfer T. Schildknecht, A. Jäggi R. Dach, G.
Errors in Positioning Matt King, Newcastle University, UK.
Limits of static processing in a dynamic environment Matt King, Newcastle University, UK.
09/24/2008Unavco Track Intro1 TRACK: GAMIT Kinematic GPS processing module R King overview from longer T Herring.
Limits of static processing in a dynamic environment Matt King, Newcastle University, UK.
Thomas Herring, IERS ACC, MIT
Geodesy & Crustal Deformation
Appliance of IceCORS network 2017 by Dalia Prizginiene
R. Warnant*, G. Wautelet*, S. Lejeune*, H. Brenot*,
Agenda Background and Motivation
Presentation transcript:

SP Swedish National Testing and Research Institute Real-Time GPS Processing with Carrier Phase FILTER PARAMETER INFLUENCE ON GPS CARRIER PHASE REAL-TIME TIME AND FREQUENCY TRANSFER FOR SHORT AND LONG BASELINES Carsten Rieck, Per Jarlemark, Kenneth Jaldehag and Jan Johansson SP Swedish National Testing and Research Institute Box 857, S Borås Sweden 36 th PTTI December 7-9, 2004 Washington DC

SP Swedish National Testing and Research Institute Real-Time T&F GPS 1.Introduction 2.Real-time-GPS Filter 3.Station Position Correction Estimation 4.Satellite Orbits 5.Earth Tide Modeling 6.Long Baselines 7.Conclusions and Future Work

SP Swedish National Testing and Research Institute Real-Time T&F GPS: Principle Operation REC1 CLK1 REC2 CLK2 RECN CLKN InterNetwork TCP/IP Client/Server Data Streaming Real-Time Kalman Filter IGS-Orbits Broadcast EPH KF-States  CLK1-2, …  CLK1-N TROP1, … TROPN  STAPOS1, …  STAPOSN AMBIGUxy x – clockdiff y – satellite Residuals: Receiver Pair/Sat

SP Swedish National Testing and Research Institute Real-Time Kalman Filter Raw Data Modeling RT Filter  CLK STATROP STAPOS AMBIGU - common view differential phase observations, L3 ionospheric ”free” phase, P3 code support, - satellite orbits (broadcast, IGS predicted,P3) - earth tides (simple elastic) - continental drift, rebound - ocean loading (optional) - forward Kalman filter, Matlab/GNU Octave, purely L3 based, RW noise model non standard troposphere, RW noise model station position corrections, constant non-integer ambiguities, constant

SP Swedish National Testing and Research Institute Method & Result Verification “real-time” streaming of RINEX observation and navigation files to the filter software RT results compared to solutions based on TWSTFT, Circular-T, GPS post-processed PPP, GPS-P3 Real-Time

SP Swedish National Testing and Research Institute Results: UTC(SP)-UTC(PTB) 623km

SP Swedish National Testing and Research Institute Results: UTC(SP)-UTC(PTB) 623km

SP Swedish National Testing and Research Institute Results: UTC(SP)-UTC(PTB) 623km

SP Swedish National Testing and Research Institute Results: UTC(SP)-UTC(PTB) : RT-TWSTFT

SP Swedish National Testing and Research Institute Station Position Offsets assume: perfect orbits & atmosphere modeling, max range error  is initially absorbed by the respective (non-integer) satellite ambiguity parameter Several different filter state variables have to compensate for an absolute range error of 2  :  CLK STATROP residuals SAT AMB

SP Swedish National Testing and Research Institute West->East Dominance of Satellite Passes A majority of all satellite passes have a west-east orientation and thus dominantly influence the initial satellite ambiguities in one direction.

SP Swedish National Testing and Research Institute Station Position Offset Example SP-PTB East :10 mm offset  f  200 ps/day North :10 mm offset  f  35 ps/day Vertical :10 mm offset  f  2 ps/day

SP Swedish National Testing and Research Institute Station Position Correction If station positions are not properly known they can be estimated as constant offsets from an approximate position. Offsets do not necessarily reflect real positions but correct for wrong baseline geometry (local).

SP Swedish National Testing and Research Institute Orbit Position Modeling Broadcast Ephemerides have an uncertainty of about 2m (IGS). IGS ultra-rapid orbit predictions are available in real- time and can be used to correct broadcast orbits.

SP Swedish National Testing and Research Institute Earth Tide Modeling, Simple Elastic (VLBI)

SP Swedish National Testing and Research Institute Earth Tide Modeling – Complex & Ocean Loading

SP Swedish National Testing and Research Institute Earth Tides – Differential Errors of Simple Model

SP Swedish National Testing and Research Institute AMC2 PTBB MDVJ ALGO support stations allow to estimate a better local troposphere  precise station positions and good orbits needed ! >3x 2361 km 786 km 622 km 1484 km Transatlantic Baselines : UTC(SP)-UTC(USNO) USNO SP01 1 common sat observation versus 3 states (  clk+2trop) 6184 km >1x

SP Swedish National Testing and Research Institute Transatlantic Baselines : UTC(SP)-UTC(USNO)

SP Swedish National Testing and Research Institute Conclusions and Future Work In good agreement with GIPSY, TWSTFT and Circular-T. UTC(SP) –UTC(PTB): 40ps/day frequency offset between TWSTFT and RT. RMS differences of 50ps between real-time processing and GIPSY PPP post-processing are achievable. To do … filter : –combination with code, steer the long term frequency, –loading models, correct short term frequency, –short smoothing, –KF code migration to a ”clean” POSIX environment. To do … real-time data handling: –support for raw data streams, NTRIP,… –encryption, authentication, –multicast mode.

SP Swedish National Testing and Research Institute Thanks and Contact Thanks to: IGS Open Source Community LMV, National Land Survey of Sweden OSO, Onsala Space Observatory Contact : Carsten SP / Mtehttp://tempus.sp.se Box Borås / Sweden