Application Profiles: interoperable friend or foe? Rachel Heery Michael Day TEL Milestone Conference Frankfurt am Main, 29-30 April 2002.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Putting the Pieces Together Grace Agnew Slide User Description Rights Holder Authentication Rights Video Object Permission Administration.
Advertisements

T. Baker / 27 March 2000 A Registry for Dublin Core Thomas Baker, GMD IuK 2000: "Information, Knowledge and Knowledge Management Darmstadt, 27 March 2000.
DC8 Ottawa, October 4-6, 2000 Rachel Heery UKOLN, University of Bath Application Profiles: managing metadata.
DC8 Registries Breakout. Goals of the session Discuss and clarify : Requirements for registry Framework for policy Relate issues raised to EOR prototype.
Registry breakout group DC-8, National Library of Canada 5 October 2000.
DC2001, Tokyo DCMI Registry : Background and demonstration DC2001 Tokyo October 2001 Rachel Heery, UKOLN, University of Bath Harry Wagner, OCLC
DC-Education Working Group The DC-Ed Application Profile Jon Mason, EdNA Stuart Sutton, GEM Co-Chairs.
Subject Based Information Gateways in The UK Coordinated Activities in The UK Within the UK Higher Education community, the JISC (Joint Information Systems.
Why metadata matters for libraries... Rachel Heery UKOLN: The UK Office for Library and Information Networking, University of Bath
PwC SCHEMAS Forum for metadata schema implementers The SCHEMAS project and metadata ETB Workshop, London, 9-10 January 2001 Michael Day,
Ontology Servers and Metadata Vocabulary Repositories Dr. Manjula Patel Technical Research and Development
Collection-level description & collection management: tool for the trade or information trade-off? Collection Description Focus Workshop 4 Newcastle, 8.
Metadata vocabularies and ontologies Dr. Manjula Patel Technical Research and Development
The metadata challenge for libraries: a view from Europe Michael Day UKOLN: The UK Office for Library and Information Networking, University of Bath
UKOLN, University of Bath
An overview of collection-level metadata Applications of Metadata BCS Electronic Publishing Specialist Group, Ismaili Centre, London, 29 May 2002 Pete.
An ontology server for the agentcities.NET project Dr. Manjula Patel Technical Research and Development
Metadata and the description of digital images Michael Day UKOLN, University of Bath International Digital Image Symposium London,
Preservation Metadata Initiatives: Practicality, Sustainability, and Interoperability Michael Day UKOLN, University of Bath ERPANET Training.
UKOLN is supported by: The JISC Information Environment Metadata Schema Registry (IEMSR): Update DC-2006, Manzanillo, Mexico October 3-6, 2006 Rachel Heery.
Collection-level description & the Information Landscape: users evaluate strategies for resource discovery Collection Description Focus Workshop 5 Cambridge,
Using the SCHEMAS Forum Registry Sharing schemas: progress and future plans SCHEMAS 4th Workshop Den Haag, The Netherlands 30th November, 2001 Manjula.
February Harvesting RDF metadata Building digital library portals with harvested metadata workshop EU-DL All Projects concertation meeting DELOS.
Collection description & Collection Description Focus JISC/DNER Moving Image & Sound Cluster Steering Group meeting, HEFCE Office, London, 24 September.
The Dublin Core Collection Description Application Profile (DC CD AP) Pete Johnston, UKOLN, University of Bath Chair, DC Collection Description Working.
Application profiles Tutorial session Rachel Heery, UKOLN, University of Bath DC-2003, Seattle, Washington, USA 28 September – 2 October,
Multi-purpose metadata for collections: Creating reusable CLDs Collection Description Focus Workshop 2 Aston Business School, Birmingham 8 February 2002.
Towards consensus on collection-level description Collection Description Focus Briefing Day 1 British Library, St Pancras, London 22 October 2001 Bridget.
An introduction to collections and collection-level description Collection-Level Description & NOF-digitise projects NOF-digitise programme seminar, London,
Thinking collectively : approaching collection-level description Collection Description Focus Workshop 1 Staff House, UMIST, Manchester 1 November 2001.
Collections and collection-level description CIMI Members’ meeting, Boston, MA, USA April 2002 Pete Johnston UKOLN, University of Bath Bath, BA2.
The JISC IE Metadata Schema Registry Pete Johnston UKOLN, University of Bath JISC Joint Programmes Meeting Brighton, 6-7 July 2004
Metadata: Its Functions in Knowledge Representation for Digital Collections 1 Summary.
UKOLUG - July Metadata for the Web RDF and the Dublin Core Andy Powell UKOLN, University of Bath UKOLN.
Chinese-European Workshop on Digital Preservation, Beijing July 14 – Chinese-European Workshop on Digital Preservation Beijing (China), July.
Metadata Standards and Applications 5. Applying Metadata Standards: Application Profiles.
CEN/ISSS DC workshop, January The UK approach to subject gateways Rachel Heery UKOLN University of Bath UKOLN is.
Metadata Schema Registries: update on current activity Rachel Heery, UKOLN, University of Bath September 2005.
The role of metadata schema registries XML and Educational Metadata, SBU, London, 10 July 2001 Pete Johnston UKOLN, University of Bath Bath, BA2 7AY UKOLN.
PwC SCHEMAS Forum for metadata schema implementers Metadata: SCHEMAS and other European projects First Austrian Metadata Seminar, 18 May 2001 Michael Day,
A centre of expertise in digital information management The MEG Metadata Schemas Registry Pete Johnston, Research Officer (Interoperability),
The JISC IE Metadata Schema Registry and IEEE LOM Application Profiles Pete Johnston UKOLN, University of Bath CETIS Metadata & Digital Repositories SIG,
Creating an Application Profile Tutorial 3 DC2004, Shanghai Library 13 October 2004 Thomas Baker, Fraunhofer Society Robina Clayphan, British Library Pete.
1 Metadata –Information about information – Different objects, different forms – e.g. Library catalogue record Property:Value: Author Ian Beardwell Publisher.
Lifecycle Metadata for Digital Objects November 1, 2004 Descriptive Metadata: “Modeling the World”
UKOLN is supported by: The JISC Information Environment Metadata Schema Registry (IEMSR) Open Forum on Metadata Registries 2005 Rachel Heery Assistant.
A Quick Introduction to Metadata Michael Day UKOLN: The UK Office for Library and Information Networking, University of Bath
The MEG Metadata Schemas Registry: Architecture & Data Model MEG Registry Workshop, Bath, 21 January 2003 Pete Johnston UKOLN, University of Bath Bath,
Metadata Schema Registries in the Partially Semantic Web: the CORES experience Rachel Heery, Pete Johnston, UKOLN, University of.
SCHEMAS Workshop Bath - May 2000 Andy Powell, UKOLN Example tool/registry integration UKOLN is funded by Resource: The Council.
Metadata Registries Registry: authoritative, centrally controlled store of information – W3C Web Services Glossary, 2004
11 October Shanghai Library © 2004 DCMI 1 The Dublin Core Metadata Initiative: DC-2004 Introduction Makx Dekkers, Managing Director, Dublin.
A centre of expertise in digital information managementwww.ukoln.ac.uk DCMI Affiliates: Implications for Institutions Rosemary Russell UKOLN University.
UKOLN is supported by: Introduction to UKOLN Dr Liz Lyon, Director UKOLN, University of Bath, UK Grand Challenge Meeting, June a centre.
Metadata Interaction, Integration, and Interoperability MODS, MARC and Metadata Interoperability, ALA Conference, June 27, 2005, Chicago, IL William E.
Registry of MEG-related schemas MEG BECTa, Coventry, 17 July 2001 Pete Johnston UKOLN, University of Bath Bath, BA2 7AY UKOLN is supported by:
Metadata Interaction, Integration, and Interoperability NISO Workshop: Metadata Practices on the Cutting Edge, May 20, 2004, Washington, DC William E.
Open Archive Forum Rachel Heery UKOLN, University of Bath UKOLN is funded by Resource: The Council for Museums, Archives.
Application Profiles Application profiles -- are schemas which consist of data elements drawn from one or more namespaces, combined together by implementers,
Surveying the landscape: collection-level description & resource discovery JISC/NSF DLI Projects meeting, Edinburgh, 24 June 2002 Pete Johnston UKOLN,
Collection-level description: from theory to practice Minerva project meeting Paris, 24 January 2003 Pete Johnston UKOLN, University of Bath Bath, BA2.
1 Educational Metadata Paul Miller Interoperability Focus UKOLN U KOLN is funded by Resource: the Council for.
A centre of expertise in digital information management UKOLN is supported by: IEMSR, the Information Environment & Metadata Application.
Metadata Schema Registries: background and context MEG Registry Workshop, Bath, 21 January 2003 Rachel Heery UKOLN, University of Bath Bath, BA2 7AY UKOLN.
Online Information and Education Conference 2004, Bangkok Dr. Britta Woldering, German National Library Metadata development in The European Library.
MICHAEL and the European Digital Library: promoting teaching, learning and research The MICHAEL Project is funded under the European Commission eTEN Programme.
SCHEMAS Forum for metadata schema implementers
XML Schemas for Dublin Core Metadata
The JISC IE Metadata Schema Registry
The JISC IE Metadata Schema Registry
Presentation transcript:

Application Profiles: interoperable friend or foe? Rachel Heery Michael Day TEL Milestone Conference Frankfurt am Main, April 2002

TEL Milestone Conference, Frankfurt am Main, April 2002 Themes of the presentation Increase in schema creation activity Tension between differentiation and interoperability Counterbalances to proliferation of portals –sharing schema –regard for end-user requirements –controlled evolution of vocabularies –cross standard interoperability Rôle of information professionals...

TEL Milestone Conference, Frankfurt am Main, April 2002 Definitions...

TEL Milestone Conference, Frankfurt am Main, April 2002 Definition of Element Set An element set is coherent bounded set of terms formulated as a basis for metadata creation Designed for particular purpose e.g. domain-specific, resource description, rights Identifies designated authority

TEL Milestone Conference, Frankfurt am Main, April 2002 Definition of Schema An schema is a structured representation that defines and identifies terms in an element set Provides authoritatve declaration of terms Indicates semantic relationship of terms Supports unique identification of terms Typically schema will be expressed on RDF or XML schema language

TEL Milestone Conference, Frankfurt am Main, April 2002 Definition of Application Profile An application profile is a schema which consists of terms (metadata elements) drawn from one or more element sets optimised for a particular local application Application profiles are declarations of usage Application profile reuse terms already defined elsewhere; or use terms from a local element set

TEL Milestone Conference, Frankfurt am Main, April 2002 Schema Declares set of terms with identifiers, definitions and comments Self reliant Means of declaring ‘new terms’ Application profile schema Declares set of terms used in particular application or domain Optimised for that application or domain Re-uses terms from elsewhere Means of declaring terms that an application uses and understands

TEL Milestone Conference, Frankfurt am Main, April 2002 Increase in schema creation activity

TEL Milestone Conference, Frankfurt am Main, April 2002 Optimisation and adaptation MARC local fields 9XX and XX9 tags Z39.50 application profiles sub-sets of standard appropriate for application area IMS UK Further Education extension Dublin Core domain specific elements and qualifiers

TEL Milestone Conference, Frankfurt am Main, April 2002 New application profiles RSLP Collection Level description DC Government DC Libraries DC Education Australian Government Locator Service Food and Agricultural Organisation European Environment Agency Renardus EASEL, Schoolnet Various UK educational initiatives etc., etc.

TEL Milestone Conference, Frankfurt am Main, April 2002 Sharing schemas... Standard solutions are published but Implementers’ adaptations/extensions are not made widely available Has this led to unnecessary proliferation of schemas, to duplication and repetition?

TEL Milestone Conference, Frankfurt am Main, April 2002 Characterising requirements Implementers need to declare various characteristics of their schema: terms used whether a term is mandatory any refined definitions of terms from existing namespaces which schemes must be used for content other rules for content

TEL Milestone Conference, Frankfurt am Main, April 2002 How to share...

Best practice for sharing schema "What terms does your metadata use?" Need to express in “comparable“ way: – Which standard terms are used in an application – How terms are adapted or used locally – Other related usage notes

TEL Milestone Conference, Frankfurt am Main, April 2002 Registries of schemas To give access to schemas –searching and browsing –names, definitions, usage –relationships between terms Support evolution of schemas –top-down (standards authorities) –bottom-up (real world usage) Disclosure, discovery, effective reuse, harmonisation

TEL Milestone Conference, Frankfurt am Main, April 2002 Publishing schemas and application profiles Why? To inform and promote To provide authoritative version To facilitate inter-working To support Evolution Alignment

TEL Milestone Conference, Frankfurt am Main, April 2002 Registries MetaForm at the State and University Library in Göttingen MEG registry serving UK Metadata for Education group SCHEMAS registry EC funded, serving European projects (soon to be CORES!) DCMI registry prototypes: access to information on DCMI terms

TEL Milestone Conference, Frankfurt am Main, April 2002 Balancing standardisation and differentiation...

TEL Milestone Conference, Frankfurt am Main, April 2002 Increase in schema creation activity Implementers must decide on appropriate metadata for a new service or system... but what? Is there a single answer? Re-use Interoperability Users want coherent services But all want new, innovative services Tension between alignment and differentiation

TEL Milestone Conference, Frankfurt am Main, April 2002 Difficult issues! People are keen to reach consensus, but…. Inconsistent approach in practice When should implementers create new terms? When should implementers try to add terms to existing element sets? Varying practice about creation of local element sets Messy issue of data models

TEL Milestone Conference, Frankfurt am Main, April 2002 Is a new DCMI term required? [Based on Stuart Sutton’s Action Chart!] When faced with requirement for schema: –Use existing single schema where possible –else –Will use of domain specific scheme meet requirement? –else –Will term from another schema meet requirement? –else – Will a new domain-specific qualifier meet practice? –else –Create local term?/Recommend schema extension? Then declare terms...

TEL Milestone Conference, Frankfurt am Main, April 2002 Meeting user requirements..

TEL Milestone Conference, Frankfurt am Main, April 2002 Quality control How well does metadata meet needs of user? Needs to be awareness of quality and information retrieval issues in schema design Some suggested criteria: effectiveness of retrieval effectiveness of display of retrieved record cost of metadata creation barriers to interoperability

TEL Milestone Conference, Frankfurt am Main, April 2002 Evolution of element sets

TEL Milestone Conference, Frankfurt am Main, April 2002 Managing evolution of element sets Ordered procedure for new terms approval process historical record of changes Top-down (committee structure) or bottom- up (feedback from usage statistics Possibilities for automation? Registration of new terms harvesting existing metadata

TEL Milestone Conference, Frankfurt am Main, April 2002 Cross standard interoperability

TEL Milestone Conference, Frankfurt am Main, April 2002 Collaboration between standardisation bodies acknowledging overlapping semantics honouring namespaces i.e. re-use elements from existing element sets reach consensus on ‘core elements’ reach consensus on data models for declaring schema collaborate on registries This is the agenda of CORES project!

TEL Milestone Conference, Frankfurt am Main, April 2002 Information on standards Practitioners need accessible information Overviews of standards development Reviews of schema-creating activities Need information on inter-relation of standards in relation to schema e.g. Z39.50 attribute sets and DC schema Need commentary and guidance information

TEL Milestone Conference, Frankfurt am Main, April 2002 The rôle of the information professional? Tradition of collaboration within library world Ability to articulate needs of end-user communities Expertise in information retrieval techniques Ability to create user-friendly, accessible documentation Healthy scepticism of technology?

TEL Milestone Conference, Frankfurt am Main, April 2002 Can contribute to Lobbying for infrastructure for sharing schema, moving from projects to services Lobbying for tools Helping build tools Involvement in standardisation process Putting in quality control Considering costs, developing business models...

TEL Milestone Conference, Frankfurt am Main, April 2002 Further reading Rachel Heery & Manjula Patel, “Application Profiles: mixing and matching metadata schemas,” Ariadne, 25, September 2000: Thomas Baker, Makx Dekkers, Rachel Heery, Manjula Patel & Gauri Salokhe, “What terms does your metadata use? Application Profiles as machine-understandable narratives,” Journal of Digital Information, 2 (2), November 2001: Heike Neuroth & Traugott Koch, “Metadata mapping and application profiles: approaches to providing the cross-searching of heterogeneous resources in the EU project Renardus,” Proceedings of DC-2001: SCHEMAS Registry: DCMI Registry: CORES:

TEL Milestone Conference, Frankfurt am Main, April 2002 Acknowledgements UKOLN is funded by Resource: the Council for Museums, Archives and Libraries, the Joint Information Systems Committee (JISC) of the UK higher and further education funding councils, as well as by project funding from the JISC and the European Union. UKOLN also receives support from the University of Bath, where it is based.