2. RUTHERFORD BACKSCATTERING SPECTROMETRY Basic Principles.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Accelerator Physics, JU, First Semester, (Saed Dababneh).
Advertisements

Study of Position Sensitive  E-E for Space Particle Telescope Pre-results of Geant4 simulation 张云龙,王文骁,李翠.
Radiopharmaceutical Production
Gamma-Ray Spectra _ + The photomultiplier records the (UV) light emitted during electronic recombination in the scintillator. Therefore, the spectrum collected.
Ion beam Analysis Joele Mira from UWC and iThemba LABS Tinyiko Maluleke from US Supervisor: Dr. Alexander Kobzev Dr. Alexander Kobzev.
Ion Beam Analysis techniques:
Rutherford Backscattering Spectrometry
PIGE experience in IPPE Institute of Physics and Power Engineering, Obninsk, Russia A.F. Gurbich.
Monday, Sept. 24, 2012PHYS , Fall 2012 Dr. Jaehoon Yu 1 PHYS 3313 – Section 001 Lecture #8 Monday, Sept. 24, 2012 Dr. Jaehoon Yu Atomic Model of.
Study of sputtering on thin films due to ionic implantations F. C. Ceoni, M. A. Rizzutto, M. H. Tabacniks, N. Added, M. A. P. Carmignotto, C.C.P. Nunes,
Rutherford Backscattering Spectrometry
An  particle with initial kinetic energy K = 800 MeV
Particle Interactions
Nuclear and Radiation Physics, BAU, 1 st Semester, (Saed Dababneh). 1 Nuclear Reactions Categorization of Nuclear Reactions According to: bombarding.
Count rate estimates from TDR Assuming beam intenisties from previous slide and acc *rec from SIM LH2 case [counts/24h] p [GeV/c] beam momentum Solid.
Cross section measurements for analysis of D and T in thicker films Liqun Shi Institute of Modern Physics, Fudan University, Shanghai, , People’s.
Ion Beam Analysis of Gold Flecks in a Foam Lattice F E Gauntlett, A S Clough Physics Department, University of Surrey, Guildford, GU2 7XH, UK.
Radiation therapy is based on the exposure of malign tumor cells to significant but well localized doses of radiation to destroy the tumor cells. The.
3. PROTON INDUCED X-RAY EMISSION Procedure of Spectrum Analysis
Electron-impact inner shell ionization cross section measurements for heavy element impurities in fusion reactors Jingjun Zhu Institute of Nuclear Science.
Lecture 5: Electron Scattering, continued... 18/9/2003 1
6.1 The Atomic Models of Thomson and Rutherford 6.2 Definition of Cross Section 6.2 Rutherford Scattering 6.3 Structure of the Nucleus Rutherford Scattering.
Medium heavy Λ hyper nuclear spectroscopic experiment by the (e,e’K + ) reaction Graduate school of science, Tohoku University Toshiyuki Gogami for HES-HKS.
Ruđer Bošković Institute, Zagreb, Croatia CRP: Development of a Reference Database for Ion Beam Analysis Measurements of differential cross sections for.
Cross section for potential scattering
Ion Beam Analysis Dolly Langa Physics Department, University of Pretoria, South Africa Blane Lomberg Physics Department, University of the Western Cape,
1 This lecture: What can we learn from scattering experiments? Summary from last time: - planetary model of the atom - isotopes and mass spectroscopy -
Korea Institute of Geoscience and Mineral Resources (KIGAM) Thin Film Analysis by Ion Beam Techniques W. Hong, G. D. Kim, H. J. Woo, H. W.
FRANK LABORATORY OF NEUTRON PHYSICS ION BEAM ANALYSIS STANCIU-OPREAN LIGIA SUPERVISOR DR. KOBZEV ALEXANDER.
Space Instrumentation. Definition How do we measure these particles? h p+p+ e-e- Device Signal Source.
Nuclear and Radiation Physics, BAU, First Semester, (Saed Dababneh). 1 Nuclear Reactions Sample.
FRANK LABORTORY OF NEUTRON PHYSICS ION BEAM ANALYSIS
Cross Sections One of the most important quantities we measure in nuclear physics is the cross section. Cross sections always have units of area and in.
Ion Beam Analysis of Gold Flecks in a Foam Lattice F E Gauntlett, A S Clough Physics Department, University of Surrey, Guildford, GU2 7XH, UK.
Conception of cross section 1) Base conceptions – differential, integral cross section, total cross section, geometric interpretation of cross section.
Wednesday, Jan. 25, 2012PHYS 3446 Andrew Brandt 1 PHYS 3446 – Lecture #2 Wednesday, Jan Dr. Brandt 1.Introduction 2.History of Atomic Models 3.Rutherford.
Inelastic scattering When the scattering is not elastic (new particles are produced) the energy and direction of the scattered electron are independent.
Monday, Sep. 20, 2010PHYS 3446, Fall 2010 Andrew Brandt 1 PHYS 3446 – Lecture #4 Monday, Sep Dr. Brandt 1.Differential Cross Section of Rutherford.
COSIRES 2004 © Matej Mayer Bayesian Reconstruction of Surface Roughness and Depth Profiles M. Mayer 1, R. Fischer 1, S. Lindig 1, U. von Toussaint 1, R.
Daniela Adriana LĂCĂTUŞ1 Supervisor: Alexander Pavlovich KOBZEV
Quantum Mechanical Cross Sections In a practical scattering experiment the observables we have on hand are momenta, spins, masses, etc.. We do not directly.
Sect. 3.11: Transformation to Lab Coords Scattering so far: –Treated as 1 body problem! Assumed 1 particle scatters off a stationary “Center of Force”.
PHYS 3446, Fall 2010 Andrew Brandt
PHYS 3446 – Lecture #3 Wednesday, Sept. 3, 2008 Dr. Andrew Brandt
PHYS 3446 – Lecture #6 Monday, Sept. 15, 2008 Dr. Andrew Brandt
Lecture 9: Inelastic Scattering and Excited States 2/10/2003 Inelastic scattering refers to the process in which energy is transferred to the target,
Particle Detectors for Colliders Robert S. Orr University of Toronto.
Basics of Ion Beam Analysis
1 Design of active-target TPC. Contents I.Physics requirements II.Basic structure III.Gas property IV.Electric field Distortion by ground Distortion of.
Monday, March 16, 2015PHYS , Spring 2014 Dr. Jaehoon Yu 1 PHYS 3313 – Section 001 Lecture #12 Monday, March 16, 2015 Dr. Jaehoon Yu Rutherford.
Rutherford Backscattering Spectrometry (RBS)
Monday, Jan. 31, 2005PHYS 3446, Spring 2005 Jae Yu 1 PHYS 3446 – Lecture #4 Monday, Jan. 31, 2005 Dr. Jae Yu 1.Lab Frame and Center of Mass Frame 2.Relativistic.
Nuclear Physics Discovery of the nucleus Nuclear properties Nuclear binding energies Radioactivity Nuclear Models Nuclear Energy: Fission and Fusion.
Laboratory system and center of mass system
PHYS 3446 – Lecture #13 Energy Deposition in Media
12th Geant4 Space Users Workshop
Efficient transfer reaction method with RI BEams
PHYS 3446 – Lecture #3 Rutherford Scattering
Summary of hadronic tests and benchmarks in ALICE
Elastic Scattering in Electromagnetism
1. Introduction Secondary Heavy charged particle (fragment) production
PHYS 3313 – Section 001 Lecture #13
ION BEAM ANALYSIS.
Hour 38 Scattering Cross Sections
PHL424: Rutherford scattering discovery of nucleus
Design of active-target TPC
PHYS 3446 – Lecture #5 Monday, Feb Dr. Brandt
PHYS 3446 – Lecture #13 Energy Deposition in Media
PHYS 3446 – Lecture #4 Monday, Sept. 11, 2006 Dr. Jae Yu
Ion Beam Analysis (IBA)
Presentation transcript:

2. RUTHERFORD BACKSCATTERING SPECTROMETRY Basic Principles

ELASTIC COULOMB SCATTERING Consider an ion of charge z, mass m and initial kinetic energy Eo being scattered elastically from a stationary nucleus of charge Z and mass M purely by the Coulomb force. The final energy E of the scattered ion is a function of the angle of scatter  from the initial direction and the ratio M/m. M, (Eo – E) M, 0 Recoiling nucleus m, Eo  Scattered ion m, E

KINEMATIC FACTOR The scattered E can be derived from the principles of conservation of energy and momentum, and is given by (in laboratory frame of reference): The multiplication factor k on the right hand side of the equation is often referred to as the kinematic factor. For M/m > 1, k is a slow-varying function of , having the maximum value of 1 at  = 0 and the minimum value at  = 180o. For M/m = 1, the value of k is zero beyond 90o.

Plots of k vs  for M/m = 0, 4, 20 M/m = 20 M/m = 4 M/m = 1

Plots of k vs M/m for  = 180o The small gradient at large M/m ratios implies that mass separation is poor for higher M/m ratios.

DIFFERENTIAL SCATTERING CROSS SECTION The theoretical differential cross section for a given scattering angle is given by: The higher order terms are usually negligible for M>m and the differential cross section can be expressed in the following form, which has the unit of mb/sr (millibarns per steradian) when MeV is used as the unit for Eo:

ds/d versus q The dependence of ds/d on sin-4(q/2) means that ds/d has very large values at small forward scattered angles and approaches infinity at 0o. However, for q = 90o to 180o, it decreases rather slowly because sin-4(q/2) drops gradually from a value of 4 at 90o to 1 at 180o. The diagram below shows the plots of ds/d vs q for the Coulomb scattering of 2 MeV 4He+ ions for oxygen and calcium. Ca (Z=20, A=40) O (Z=8, A=16)

ds/d versus Eo ds/d is inversely proportional to the square of the incident ion energy Eo, implying that it increases with decreasing Eo. This also means that for a thick target, more ions are scattered from a greater depth. The diagram below show a plot of ds/d vs Eo for the scattering of 4He+ from an aluminium target at q = 180o. Projectile: 4He+ Target: Al Scatter angle: 180o

RBS YIELD FOR THIN TARGETS The number of backscattered ions detected by a particle detector at an angle of q and subtending a solid angle  at the target is called the yield. Its relation with the differential cross section is as follows: where no is the number of incident ions and nz is the areal concentration of the target atom. The simple relation is only valid for thin targets, namely targets which are so thin that the loss of energy by an incident proton in them is negligibly small.

RBS SPECTRUM OF A THIN Pt-Co ALLOY TARGET The diagram below shows a simulated RBS spectrum at q = 160o for a 200A thick Pt-Co alloy target and 2 MeV 4He+ incident ions. The width of the Pt and the Co peaks is essentially attributable to the intrinsic resolution of the detector plus the electronic noise. The ratio of Pt to Co in the alloy is 1:1. the Pt peak is much higher than the Co peak because the yield for an element is proportional to the square of it atomic number Z (Z=27 for Co and Z=78 for Pt). Thickness = 200A Pt Co

EFFECT OF TARGET THICKNESS If the thickness of the Pt-Co target is increased, the peaks would be broadened due to the loss of energy by the 4He+ ions in the target through the ionization process. The following simulated RBS spectrum depicts the effect for the case where the Pt-Co alloy thickness is 1000A. Thickness = 1000A Pt Pt Co Co

SIMULATED RBS SPECTRUM Target : Pt-Co (1:1) alloy of thickness 6000A Incident ion: 2 MeV 4He+ Scatter angle: 160o Co edge Pt edge Pt Co

SIMULATED RBS SPECTRUM Target : Pt-Co (1:1) alloy of thickness 12000A Incident ion: 2 MeV 4He+ Scatter angle: 160o Pt edge Co edge Co Pt

SPECTRUM ANALYSIS The technique used to extract information from a RBS spectrum is similar to that used to extract information from a PIXE spectrum. Namely, a model spectrum is constructed and fitted to the experimental spectrum. If the fit is not satisfactory, the parameters for constructing the model spectrum are adjusted and fitting is repeated. This is basically an iterative process to find the best values for the parameters. With the RBS software packages available nowadays, the adjustment of parameters cannot be done automatically. The values of the parameters must be changed manually and the goodness of fit inspected visually. Download simulation code SIMNRA from website

MODEL PARAMETERS Two sets of parameters are needed to construct a model RBS spectrum. One set describes the structural and chemical properties of the specimen. It consists of the following parameters: number of layers, thickness of each layer, and chemical composition of each layer. The other set specifies the experimental conditions. It includes: type of ion beam used, total irradiation charge, beam-target angle, beam-detector angle, solid angle subtended by the detector at the target, the energy calibration parameters, and the detector resolution.