1 Requirements for MPLS Over a Composite Link draft-ietf-rtgwg-cl-requirement-02 Authors: C. Villamizar, Ed.D. McDysan, Ed. S. Ning A. Malis L. Yong Contributors:

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
CCAMP WG, IETF 80th, Prague, Czech Republic draft-gonzalezdedios-subwavelength-framework-00 Framework for GMPLS and path computation support of sub-wavelength.
Advertisements

MPLS - 74th IETF San Francisco1 Composite Transport Group (CTG) Framework and Requirements draft-so-yong-mpls-ctg-framework-requirement-01.txt draft-so-yong-mpls-ctg-framework-requirement-01.txt.
U-turn Alternates for IP/LDP Fast-Reroute draft-atlas-ip-local-protect-uturn-01.txt Alia Atlas Gagan Choudhury
Composite Link Framework Issues. Functional requirement #1 The solution SHALL provide a means to summarize routing advertisements regarding the characteristics.
MPLS - 75th IETF Stockholm1 Composite Transport Group (CTG) Framework and Requirements draft-so-yong-mpls-ctg-framework-requirement-02.txt draft-so-yong-mpls-ctg-framework-requirement-02.txt.
Long-term Archive Service Requirements draft-ietf-ltans-reqs-00.txt.
1 LSP-Trace over MPLS tunnels draft-nitinb-lsp-ping-over-mpls-tunnel-00 Nitin BahadurJuniper Networks Kireeti KompellaJuniper Networks IETF 69, MPLS WG,
Delay and Loss Traffic Engineering Problem Statement for MPLS draft-fuxh-mpls-delay-loss-te-problem-statement-01 November 8, 2012 IETF 85, Atlanta 8/3/121.
66th IETF Montreal July 2006 Requirements for delivering MPLS services Over L3VPN draft-kumaki-l3VPN-e2e-mpls-rsvp-te-reqts-01.txt Kenji Kumaki KDDI, Editor.
November th Requirements for supporting Customer RSVP and RSVP-TE over a BGP/MPLS IP-VPN draft-kumaki-l3VPN-e2e-mpls-rsvp-te-reqts-05.txt.
IETF 68 Prague: draft-dolganow-ospf-pwe3-ms-pw-ext authors: Alex Zinin (Alcatel-Lucent) Andrew Dolganow (Alcatel-Lucent) Dimitri Papadimitriou (Alcatel-Lucent)
MPLS-TP - 79th IETF1 MPLS-TP Control Plane Framework draft-ietf-ccamp-mpls-tp-cp- framework-03.txt Contributors: Loa Andersson Lou Berger Luyuan Fang Nabil.
MPLS - 73nd IETF Minneaplis1 Composite Transport Group (CTG) Framework and Requirements draft-so-yong-mpls-ctg-framework-requirement-00.txt draft-so-yong-mpls-ctg-framework-requirement-00.txt.
LSP-Ping and BFD encapsulation over ACH draft-nitinb-mpls-tp-lsp-ping-bfd-procedures Nitin BahadurRahul Aggarwal Dave WardTom Nadeau Nurit SprecherYaacov.
9/8/2015 draft-bocci-mpls-tp-gach-gal-00.txt MPLS Generic Associated Channel draft-bocci-mpls-tp-gach-gal-00.txt Matthew Bocci (ALU) & Martin Vigoureux.
November th Diego Requirements for delivering MPLS services over L3VPN draft-kumaki-l3VPN-e2e-mpls-rsvp-te-reqts-02.txt Kenji Kumaki KDDI,
1 Accounting, Authentication and Authorization Issues in “Well Managed” IP Multicasting Services November 9, 2005 Tsunemasa Hayashi
Multi-Protocol Label Switching University of Southern Queensland.
NEMO Requirements and Mailing List Discussions/Conclusions T.J. Kniveton - Nokia Pascal Thubert - Cisco IETF 54 – July 14, 2002 Yokohama, Japan.
Draft-ietf-l2vpn-oam-req-frmk-03.txt 1 L2VPN OAM Requirements & Framework draft-ietf-l2vpn-oam-req-frmk-03.txt Dinesh Mohan (Nortel)
CCAMP Working Group 60th IETF San Diego. Agenda (1 of 3) Group Admin (Chairs) –Blue sheets, Minute takers, Admin, WG secretary, Agenda bash (5 mins) –Status.
IS-IS WG - IETF 71 Summary Route with Detailed Reachability George Swallow, Clarence Filsfils, Stefano Previdi
Proposed Co-convened WG1/2 Objectives, Schedule, and Activities Group Name: TP#1 Source: Omar Elloumi (Alcatel-Lucent), Laurent Laporte (Sprint) Meeting.
Draft-jounay-pwe3-p2mp-pw-requirements-00.txt IETF 68 PWE3 Working Group Prague, March 2007 F. Jounay, P. Niger, France Telecom Y. Kamite, NTT Communications.
Terminology and Use Cases Status Report David Harrington IETF 88 – Nov Security Automation and Continuous Monitoring WG.
NAT64 Operational Experiences draft-chen-v6ops-nat64-experience-01 IETF 83- Paris, Mar 2012 Gang Chen, China Mobile Zhen Cao, China Mobile Cameron Byrne,
CCAMP WG, IETF 81th, Quebec City, Canada draft-zhang-ccamp-gmpls-evolving-g txt Authors & Contributors GMPLS Signaling Extensions for the Evolving.
Routing Area WG (rtgwg) IETF 86 – Orlando Chairs: Alia Atlas Alvaro Retana
62nd IETF Minneapolis March 2005 CCAMP Working Group Online Agenda and Slides at:
12/8/2015 draft-blb-mpls-tp-framework-01.txt A framework for MPLS in Transport networks draft-blb-mpls-tp-framework-01.txt Stewart Bryant (Cisco), Matthew.
1 MPLS-TP BFD for CC- CV proactive and RDI functionalities draft-asm-mpls-tp-bfd-cc-cv-02 MPLS WG, 77th IETF - Anaheim.
Framework for G.709 Optical Transport Network (OTN) draft-ietf-ccamp-gmpls-g709-framework-05 CCAMP WG, IETF 82 nd Taipei.
MPLS-TP - 77th IETF1 MPLS-TP Control Plane Framework draft-abfb-mpls-tp-control-plane- framework-02.txt Contributors: Loa Andersson Lou Berger Luyuan Fang.
Kireeti Kompella draft-kompella-mpls-rmr-01
1 Requirements for Very Fast Setup of GMPLS LSPs draft-malis-ccamp-fast-lsps-01 Andrew G. Malis Ronald A. Skoog Haim Kobrinski George Clapp John E. Drake.
LDP extension for Inter-Area LSP draft-decraene-mpls-ldp-interarea-04 Bruno DecraeneFrance Telecom / Orange Jean-Louis Le RouxFrance Telecom / Orange Ina.
Draft-jounay-pwe3-p2mp-pw-requirements-01.txt IETF 70 PWE3 Working Group Vancouver, December 2007 F. Jounay, P. Niger, France Telecom Y. Kamite, NTT Communications.
Inter-area MPLS TE Architecture and Protocol Extensions
1 Y.Doat (ESA) March 2015 Guidelines Status Guidelines Status CSTS Framework March 2015.
1 Multicast Routing Blackhole Avoidance draft-asati-pim-multicast-routing-blackhole-avoid-00 Rajiv Asati Mike McBride IETF 72, Dublin.
IETF-Vienna IEPREP WG, July 2003 Ken Carlberg. Discussion Update –draft-ietf-ieprep-framework-05.txt –draft-ietf-ieprep-ets-general-03.txt –draft-ietf-ieprep-ets-telephony-05.txt.
Routing Area WG (rtgwg) IETF 84 – Vancouver Chairs: Alia Atlas Alvaro Retana
IETF #65 Network Discovery and Selection Problem draft-ietf-eap-netsel-problem-04 Farooq Bari Jouni Korhonen.
17 th APNIC Open Policy Meeting APNIC IPv6 Address Guidelines Akira Nakagawa )/ POWEREDCOM Billy MH Cheon / KRNIC Toshiyuki.
ECRIT requirements update draft-schulzrinne-ecrit-requirements-01 IETF 63 Aug 02, 2005 Roger Marshall
IETF-53-IPv6 WG- Cellular host draft 1 Minimum IPv6 Functionality for a Cellular Host Jari Arkko Peter Hedman Gerben Kuijpers Hesham Soliman John Loughney.
23Mar BGP Data-Plane Benchmarking Applicable to Modern Routers Rajiv Papneja Ilya Varlashkin Bhavani Parise Dean Lee Sue Hares.
1 IETF-70 draft-akhter-bmwg-mpls-meth MPLS Benchmarking Methodology draft-akhter-bmwg-mpls-meth-03 IETF 70 Aamer Akhter / Rajiv Asati /
Routing Area WG (rtgwg) IETF 82 – Taipei Chairs: Alia Atlas Alvaro Retana
1 Role based Auto Mesh IETF90 CCAMP Jul Toronto draft-li-ccamp-role-based-automesh-02.
82 nd Taipei Protection Mechanisms for LDP P2MP/MP2MP LSP draft-zhao-mpls-mldp-protections-00.txt Quintin Zhao, Emily Chen, Huawei.
Network Transport Circuit Breakers draft-ietf-tsvwg-circuit-breaker Most recent version -08 (uploaded for this meeting). Editor: Gorry Fairhurst.
GMPLS extensions to communicate latency as a Traffic Engineering performance metric draft-wang-ccamp-latency-te-metric-03.txt draft-wang-ccamp-latency-te-metric-03.txt.
ITU Liaison on T-MPLS Stewart Bryant
1 RSVP-TE Signaling For GMPLS Restoration LSP draft-gandhi-ccamp-gmpls-restoration-lsp-04 Author list: Rakesh Gandhi - Presenter Zafar.
Ning So Andrew Malis Dave McDysan Lucy Yong Fredric Jounay Yuji Kamite
Authors: Scott Poretsky, Quarry Technologies Brent Imhoff, LightCore
Mobile IP.
Network instantiation
Operating Virtual Concatenation (VCAT) and the Link Capacity Adjustment Scheme (LCAS) with GMPLS draft-ietf-ccamp-gmpls-vcat-lcas-02.txt Greg Bernstein.
FlexE - Channel Control Work in the IETF
I2RS Large Flow Use Case draft-krishnan-i2rs-large-flow-use-case-00
ACTN Information Model
STIR WG IETF-100 PASSPorT Extension for Resource-Priority Authorization (draft-ietf-stir-rph-01) November, 2017 Ray P. Singh, Martin Dolly, Subir Das,
Dynamic Routing Protocols part2
STIR WG IETF-99 PASSPorT Extension for Resource-Priority Authorization (draft-ietf-stir-rph-00) July, 2017 Ray P. Singh, Martin Dolly, Subir Das, and An.
GMPLS Routing and Signaling Framework for Flexible Ethernet (FlexE) draft-izh-ccamp-flexe-fwk-04 Authors Iftekhar Hussain Radha.
Alignment of Part 4B with ISAE 3000
DetNet Architecture Updates
Presentation transcript:

1 Requirements for MPLS Over a Composite Link draft-ietf-rtgwg-cl-requirement-02 Authors: C. Villamizar, Ed.D. McDysan, Ed. S. Ning A. Malis L. Yong Contributors: F. Jounay, Y. Kamite Acknowledgements: D, Papadimitriou, L. Berger, T. Li, J. Scudder, A. Zinin

2 Changes since Version 01 Summary of IETF 78 WG Minutes – –ACTIONS Add additional material on convergence times in Appendix A Clarify requirements having to do with aggregation of routing information and ensure that it is stated as a derived requirement –Consensus was that draft was relatively mature, near ready for last call Summary of WG Mailing List Discussion –Detailed editorial and content review by Tony Li (Thanks!) –Major technical changes summarized in subsequent slides Easiest to see changes at following: – ietf-rtgwg-cl-requirement-02-from-01.diff.htmlhttp://tools.ietf.org/wg/rtgwg/draft-ietf-rtgwg-cl-requirement/draft- ietf-rtgwg-cl-requirement-02-from-01.diff.html

3 Definitional, Terminology Changes Added references for applicable MPLS technologies in section 2 Rewrote composite link and component link definitions in section 3 to make them clearer & self contained –i.e., reduce reliance on reading and translating G.800 Replaced Service Level Agreement (SLA) with Network Performance Objective (NPO) throughout

4 Major Functional Requirements Changes FR#2 –Was: The solution SHALL provide a means for aggregating signaling such that in response to a failure in the worst case cross section of the network that MPLS LSPs are restored within the timeframe needed to meet the SLA objective. –Now: The solution SHALL ensure that all possible restoration operations happen within the timeframe needed to meet the NPO. The solution may need to specify a means for aggregating signaling to meet this requirement. FR#20 - New –The solution SHOULD support the use case where a composite link itself is a component link for a higher order composite link. For example, a composite link comprised of MPLS-TP bi- directional tunnels viewed as logical links could then be used as a component link in yet another composite link that connects MPLS routers.

5 Major Derived Requirements Changes – DR#6 When a worst case failure scenario occurs,the resulting number of links advertised in the IGP causes IGP convergence to occur, causing a period of unavailability as perceived by users. The convergence time of the solution MUST meet the SLA objectivefor the duration of unavailability. – DR#7 The Solution SHALL summarize the characteristics of the component links as a composite link IGP advertisement that results in convergence time better than that of advertising the individual component links. This summary SHALL be designed so that it represents the range of capabilities of the individual component links such that functional requirements are met, and also minimizes the frequency of advertisement updates which may cause IGP convergence to occur. Examples of advertisement update tiggering events to be considered include: LSP establishment/release, changes in component link characteristics (e.g., latency, up/down state), and/or bandwidth utilization. -02 – DR#6 The Solution SHALL support composite link IGP advertisement that results in convergence time better than that of advertising the individual component links. The solution SHALL be designed so that it represents the range of capabilities of the individual component links such that functional requirements are met, and also minimizes the frequency of advertisement updates which may cause IGP convergence to occur. –One solution approach is to summarize the characteristics of the component links in IGP advertisements; however, the intent of the above requirement is not to specify the form of a solution. Examples of advertisement update triggering events to be considered include: LSP establishment/release, changes in component link characteristics (e.g., latency, up/down state),and/or bandwidth utilization.

6 Recommendations Submit -02 draft to rtgwg for last call Focus on advancing cl-framework draft Respond to Alia’s request regarding interest, follow on to this work –Review and comment on emerging solution drafts cited in that thread