DynAMITe: a Wafer Scale Sensor for Biomedical Applications M. Esposito 1, T. Anaxagoras 2, A. Fant 2, K. Wells 1, A. Kostantinidis 3, J. Osmond 4, P. Evans.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Radiation damage in silicon sensors
Advertisements

New Operation Scenarios for Severely Irradiated Silicon Detectors G. Casse University of Liverpool 1 VERTEX 2009, Mooi Veluwe (NL) September 2009.
Digital Radiography.
Study of the MPPC Performance - contents - Introduction Fundamental properties microscopic laser scan –check variation within a sensor Summary and plans.
CHARGE COUPLING TRUE CDS PIXEL PROCESSING True CDS CMOS pixel noise data 2.8 e- CMOS photon transfer.
A silicon microstrip sensor for use in dental digital radiography P.F. van der Stelt Academic Centre for Dentistry Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
GaAs radiation imaging detectors with an active layer thickness up to 1 mm. D.L.Budnitsky, O.B.Koretskaya, V.A. Novikov, L.S.Okaevich A.I.Potapov, O.P.Tolbanov,
Optical image tube with Medipix readout
Microelectronics Design Group RAL - Microelectronics Open Day 28 th June 2005 Intelligent Digital Sensors Jamie Crooks.
06/02/2008CCDs1 Charge Coupled Device M.Umar Javed M.Umar Javed.
Snowmass 2005 SOI detector R&D Massimo Caccia, Antonio Bulgheroni Univ. dell’Insubria / INFN Milano (Italy) M. Jastrzab, M. Koziel, W. Kucewicz, H. Niemiec.
Photon Counting Sensors for Future Missions
Crystals and related topics J. Gerl, GSI NUSTAR Calorimeter Working Group Meeting June 17, 2005 Valencia.
SPIE Instrumentation for Astronomy AO - June22, 2004 John Vallerga, Jason McPhate, Anton Tremsin and Oswald Siegmund Space Sciences Laboratory, University.
1D or 2D array of photosensors can record optical images projected onto it by lens system. Individual photosensor in an imaging array is called pixel.
ISSCC Dig. Tech. Papers, Feb. 2006
Overview of Scientific Imaging using CCD Arrays Jaal Ghandhi Mechanical Engineering Univ. of Wisconsin-Madison.
Copyright : Marconi Applied Technologies Limited. All Rights Reserved. CCDs for Adaptive Optics CfAO Workshop: Nov 1999 By P.
Detecting Electrons: CCD vs Film Practical CryoEM Course July 26, 2005 Christopher Booth.
Progress Towards Active Pixel Sensor Detectors for Solar Orbiter Dr Nick Waltham Head of Imaging Systems Division, Space Science & Technology Department,
ECE 1352 Presentation Active Pixel Imaging Circuits
RAL S&T Rolling Grant CMOS Active Pixel Sensor Development Nov 2004 Nick Waltham Space Science and Technology Department and Mark Prydderch Instrumentation.
Dr Renato Turchetta CMOS Sensor Design Group CCLRC Technology CMOS Image Sensors for non-HEP Applications.
Measurement Results Detector concept works! Flood fields show MCP fixed pattern noise that divides out Spatial resolution consistent with theory (Nyqvist.
Andrew Blue 24 th February 2007 Characterisation of Vanilla - a Novel Active Pixel Sensor for Radiation Detection Andrew Blue* 1, D Maneuski 1, A. Laing.
CMOS Image Sensor Design. M. Wäny Nov EMVA Standard 1288 Standard for Measurement and Presentation of Specifications for Machine Vision Sensors and.
Active Pixel Sensors for Direct Detection of Soft X-rays Andrew Blue* a, R. Bates a, A. Clark c, S. Dhesi b, D. Maneuski a, J. Marchal b, P. Steadman b,
M. Alnafea1*, K. Wells1, N.M. Spyrou1 & M. Guy2
12/09/2011Position Sensitive Detectors 91 &. 12/09/2011Position Sensitive Detectors 92 Tracking of Moving Fiducial Markers during Radiotherapy using a.
The MPPC Study for the GLD Calorimeter Readout Introduction Measurement of basic characteristics –Gain, Noise Rate, Cross-talk Measurement of uniformity.
10/26/20151 Observational Astrophysics I Astronomical detectors Kitchin pp
The Multidimensional Integrated Intelligent Imaging Project (M-I 3 ) Phil Evans on Behalf of M-I 3 consortium.
Fully depleted MAPS: Pegasus and MIMOSA 33 Maciej Kachel, Wojciech Duliński PICSEL group, IPHC Strasbourg 1 For low energy X-ray applications.
9 September 2009 Beam Loss Monitoring with Optical Fibers for Particle Accelerators Joint QUASAR and THz Group Workshop.
Munich-Centre for Advanced Photonics A pixel detector system for laser-accelerated ion detection Sabine Reinhardt Fakultät für Physik, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität.
First tests of CHERWELL, a Monolithic Active Pixel Sensor. A CMOS Image Sensor (CIS) using 180 nm technology James Mylroie-Smith Queen Mary, University.
Active Pixel Sensors in Nuclear Medicine Imaging RJ Ott, N Evans, P Evans, J Osmond, A Clark, R Turchetta Physics Department Institute of Cancer Research.
Astronomical Institute University of Bern 31th IADC Meeting, April , 2013, ESOC, Darmstadt, Germany Improved Space Object Observation Techniques.
Characterisation of Active Pixel Sensors
IFAE-ALBA Meeting, December 13 th 2012BL24 - CIRCE 1 of 13 BL 24 – CIRCE Photoelectron spectroscopy and microscopy.
1 Radiation Hardness of Monolithic Active Pixel Sensors Dennis Doering, Goethe-University Frankfurt am Main on behalf of the CBM-MVD-Collaboration Outline.
TDI-CIS扫描MTF模型 李林
1 Wojciech Dulinski Pixel 2000, Genova, Italy Pixel Sensors for Single Photon Detection Contents - Idea and basic architecture.
Human vision The image is formed on retina (sítnice) –The light is focused on retina by lens (čočka) –Retina contains two types of receptors: rods (tyčinky)
Radiation hardness of Monolithic Active Pixel Sensors (MAPS)
Beam Halo Monitoring using Optical Diagnostics Hao Zhang University of Maryland/University of Liverpool/Cockcroft Institute.
Active Pixel Sensors in Medical and Biologi The application of Large Area Active Pixel Sensor (LAS) to high resolution Nuclear Medicine imaging Bob Ott.
Progress with GaAs Pixel Detectors K.M.Smith University of Glasgow Acknowledgements: RD8 & RD19 (CERN Detector R.&D. collaboration) XIMAGE (Aixtron, I.M.C.,
Eleuterio SpiritiILC Vertex Workshop, April On pixel sparsification architecture in 130nm STM technology ILC Vertex Workshop April 2008 Villa.
6/19/06 Su DongSiD Advisory: VXD DOD Summary II1 VXD DOD Summary (II) Sensors & Other system Issues.
DIGITAL RADIOGRAPHY.
Cameras For Microscopy Ryan McGorty 26 March 2013.
Digital Cameras in Microscopy Kurt Thorn Nikon Imaging QB3/UCSF.
Comparison of a CCD and the Vanilla CMOS APS for Soft X-ray Diffraction Graeme Stewart a, R. Bates a, A. Blue a, A. Clark c, S. Dhesi b, D. Maneuski a,
Topic Report Photodetector and CCD
Date of download: 6/26/2016 Copyright © 2016 SPIE. All rights reserved. Simulations and comparison of SOFI reconstructions with different optical pixel.
Presented by Renato Turchetta CCLRC - RAL 7 th International Conference on Position Sensitive Detectors – PSD7 Liverpool (UK), September 2005 R&D.
1 Topic Report Photodetector and CCD Tuan-Shu Ho.
Semiconductor Detectors and Applications on X-ray imaging Natalie Diekmann Particle Physics 1 NIKHEF.
Progress with GaAs Pixel Detectors
for the SPiDeR collaboration (slides from M. Stanitski, Pixel2010)
Elettra Sincrotrone Trieste
ADvanced MOnolithic Sensors for
Exploring the limits of hybrid pixel detectors with MÖNCH
of APS (Full Depleted FDAPS, MAPS and Hybrid Technology HPD)
Detector Basics The purpose of any detector is to record the light collected by the telescope. All detectors transform the incident radiation into a some.
SCIENTIFIC CMOS PIXELS
Vertex Detector Overview Prototypes R&D Plans Summary.
New detectors are needed! Prototype Characterization
The MPPC Study for the GLD Calorimeter Readout
Presentation transcript:

DynAMITe: a Wafer Scale Sensor for Biomedical Applications M. Esposito 1, T. Anaxagoras 2, A. Fant 2, K. Wells 1, A. Kostantinidis 3, J. Osmond 4, P. Evans 4, R. Speller 3 and N. Allinson 2 1 University of Surrey, Guildford, U.K. 2 University of Lincoln, Lincoln, U.K 3 University College London, London, U.K. 4 Institute for Cancer Research, Sutton, U.K. The 9th International Conference on Position Sensitive Detectors Aberystwyth 12 th - 16 th September

Contents Biomedical imaging requirements Large area imaging detector with bimodal dynamic range and resolution Pixel structure and readout architecture Optical testing Conversion gain/ Read Noise/ Quantum efficiency/ FWC Charge collection test Non destructive readout- two separated readouts M.EspositoPSD9 Aberystwyth /14

Large area imaging detectors K. Lee et al., J. Bone Joint. Surg. Am. 2010;92: Large Area Detectors Near real time frame rate Flat Panel Imagers Large pixels High noise Low frame rate Artefacts CMOS APS M.EspositoPSD9 Aberystwyth /14

Biomedical Imaging detectors Large Pixels → High dynamic range Small Pixels → Low Noise High Spatial Resolution Low Noise High Spatial Resolution High Dynamic range M.EspositoPSD9 Aberystwyth /14

The DynAMITe detector 12.8 cm × 12.8 cm 2 side buttable Dynamic range Adjustable for Medical Imaging Technology M.EspositoPSD9 Aberystwyth /14

DynAMITe: sensor architecture 1260×1280 Pixels (P) 100  m pitch Different reset voltages → 2520×2560 Sub-Pixels (SP) 50  m pitch Different depletion widths M.EspositoPSD9 Aberystwyth /14

Single Pixel readout Reset (S)P1 Reset (S)P2 Pixel Select (S)P2 Select (S)P1 Out (S)P1Out (S)P2 Frame rate SP fps → fps P fps → fps Region of interest (100×100) SP → SP fps M.EspositoPSD9 Aberystwyth /14

DynAMITe: readout Pixels Sub-Pixels Pixels & Sub-Pixels Pixels & Sub-Pixels (ROI) Sub-Pixels & Pixels (ROI) Non destructive readout Online dose sensing M.EspositoPSD9 Aberystwyth /14

Radiation hardness 38 MeV protons 1.5 MeV photons A1 A2 B1 B2 C1 C2 D1 D2 M.EspositoPSD9 Aberystwyth /14

First images with DynAMITe M.EspositoPSD9 Aberystwyth /14

Optical performance (Sub-Pixels) Conversion Gaine-/DN50.0±0.2 Read Noisee-149.9±0.7 Full Well Capacity10 5 e-2.8±0.2 Quantum Efficiency%45.2 Dynamic RangedB65.3 Linearity%65.2 Integral Non Linearity% nm M.EspositoPSD9 Aberystwyth /14

Charge collection tests M.EspositoPSD9 Aberystwyth /14

Non destructive readout (I) time Signal SP2 ResetSP1 SP1 T2 2×T23×T24×T2 = T1 SP2 T2 SP1 sampled and T2<T1 T2 2×T2 3×T2 4×T2 SP2 RESET M.EspositoPSD9 Aberystwyth /14

Non destructive readout ROI (SP2) 26.3 fps Full frame (SP1)sampled and fps M.EspositoPSD9 Aberystwyth /14

Conclusions Dynamite sensor High dynamic range Low Noise High Spatial Resolution Several readout modalities Optical characterisation (Sub-Pixel camera) 45% QE 150 e- read noise 2.8 × 10 5 e - FWC Charge collection tests / Non destructive readout Future applications: Radiotherapy portal imaging Breast mammography Diffraction imaging Electrophoresis M.EspositoPSD9 Aberystwyth /14

+