Algorithms for Image Registration: Advanced Normalization Tools (ANTS) Brian Avants, Nick Tustison, Gang Song, James C. Gee Penn Image Computing and Science.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Affine Transformations Jim Van Verth NVIDIA Corporation
Advertisements

Nonlinear Shape Modelling John Ashburner. Wellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging, UCL Institute of Neurology, London, UK.
Experiments on a New Inter- Subject Registration Method John Ashburner 2007.
Active Appearance Models
Image Registration  Mapping of Evolution. Registration Goals Assume the correspondences are known Find such f() and g() such that the images are best.
SHAPE THEORY USING GEOMETRY OF QUOTIENT SPACES: STORY STORY SHAPE THEORY USING GEOMETRY OF QUOTIENT SPACES: STORY STORY ANUJ SRIVASTAVA Dept of Statistics.
CS 691 Computational Photography Instructor: Gianfranco Doretto Image Warping.
Medical Image Registration Kumar Rajamani. Registration Spatial transform that maps points from one image to corresponding points in another image.
The content of these slides by John Galeotti, © Carnegie Mellon University (CMU), was made possible in part by NIH NLM contract# HHSN P,
Image Registration: Demons Algorithm JOJO
OverviewOverview Motion correction Smoothing kernel Spatial normalisation Standard template fMRI time-series Statistical Parametric Map General Linear.
Modeling the Shape of People from 3D Range Scans
Intensity-based deformable registration of 2D fluoroscopic X- ray images to a 3D CT model Aviv Hurvitz Advisor: Prof. Leo Joskowicz.
Mapping: Scaling Rotation Translation Warp
NA-MIC National Alliance for Medical Image Computing DTI Atlas Registration via 3D Slicer and DTI-Reg Martin Styner, UNC Guido Gerig,
Xiaofen Zheng, Jayaram Udupa, Xinjian Chen Medical Image Processing Group Department of Radiology University of Pennsylvania Feb 10, 2008 (4:30 – 4:50pm)
Tuesday Seminar Deformable Image Registration
1 GEOMETRIE Geometrie in der Technik H. Pottmann TU Wien SS 2007.
Image Warping : Computational Photography Alexei Efros, CMU, Fall 2008 Some slides from Steve Seitz
Real-time Combined 2D+3D Active Appearance Models Jing Xiao, Simon Baker,Iain Matthew, and Takeo Kanade CVPR 2004 Presented by Pat Chan 23/11/2004.
Face Recognition Based on 3D Shape Estimation
Image Registration Narendhran Vijayakumar (Naren) 12/17/2007 Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering 1.
Medical Image Registration
Preprocessing II: Between Subjects John Ashburner Wellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging, 12 Queen Square, London, UK.
July 2010 Image Registration Techniques, Benchmarking, Strategy Surgical Planning Laboratory Center for Neurological Imaging July 2010 Lidwien Veugen Supervision.
3D Graphics Goal: To produce 2D images of a mathematically described 3D environment Issues: –Describing the environment: Modeling (mostly later) –Computing.
UNIT - 5 3D transformation and viewing. 3D Point  We will consider points as column vectors. Thus, a typical point with coordinates (x, y, z) is represented.
Computer Graphics Group Tobias Weyand Mesh-Based Inverse Kinematics Sumner et al 2005 presented by Tobias Weyand.
Matching 3D Shapes Using 2D Conformal Representations Xianfeng Gu 1, Baba Vemuri 2 Computer and Information Science and Engineering, Gainesville, FL ,
Quantitative Brain Structure Analysis on MR Images
Multimodal Interaction Dr. Mike Spann
Homogeneous Coordinates (Projective Space) Let be a point in Euclidean space Change to homogeneous coordinates: Defined up to scale: Can go back to non-homogeneous.
Course 12 Calibration. 1.Introduction In theoretic discussions, we have assumed: Camera is located at the origin of coordinate system of scene.
Fast Intra- and Intermodal Deformable Registration Based on Local Subvolume Matching Matthias Söhn 1, Verena Scheel 2, Markus Alber 1 (1) Radiooncological.
Detecting Curved Symmetric Parts using a Deformable Disc Model Tom Sie Ho Lee, University of Toronto Sanja Fidler, TTI Chicago Sven Dickinson, University.
CSci 6971: Image Registration Lecture 3: Images and Transformations March 1, 2005 Prof. Charlene Tsai.
Coregistration and Spatial Normalisation
Jan Kamenický Mariánská  We deal with medical images ◦ Different viewpoints - multiview ◦ Different times - multitemporal ◦ Different sensors.
Medical Image Analysis Image Registration Figures come from the textbook: Medical Image Analysis, by Atam P. Dhawan, IEEE Press, 2003.
Author :Monica Barbu-McInnis, Jose G. Tamez-Pena, Sara Totterman Source : IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging April 2004 Page(s): 840 -
NA-MIC National Alliance for Medical Image Computing Registering Image Volumes in Slicer Steve Pieper.
Spatio-Temporal Free-Form Registration of Cardiac MR Image Sequences Antonios Perperidis s /02/2006.
Markov Cluster (MCL) algorithm Stijn van Dongen.
Field Map Constrained Nonrigid Registration Method for Correction of Distortions in Echo Planar Images Yong Li1, Ning Xu1, J. Michael Fitzpatrick1,2, Victoria.
Mark Nelson 3d projections Fall 2013
2006 Mouse AHM Mapping 2D slices to 3D atlases - Application of the Digital Atlas Erh-Fang Lee Laboratory of NeuroImage UCLA.
Statistical Parametric Mapping Lecture 11 - Chapter 13 Head motion and correction Textbook: Functional MRI an introduction to methods, Peter Jezzard, Paul.
Computer Graphics 3D Transformations. Translation.
Morphometry BIRN Semi-Automated Shape Analysis (SASHA) JHU (CIS): M. F. Beg, C. Ceritoglu, A. Kolasny, M. I. Miller, R. Yashinski MGH (NMR): B. Fischl;
ELE 488 Fall 2006 Image Processing and Transmission ( )
Multimedia Programming 07: Image Warping Keyframe Animation Departments of Digital Contents Sang Il Park.
Geometric Transformations UBI 516 Advanced Computer Graphics Aydın Öztürk
Distinctive Image Features from Scale-Invariant Keypoints
CS559: Computer Graphics Lecture 7: Image Warping and Morphing Li Zhang Spring 2010 Most slides borrowed from Yungyu ChuangYungyu Chuang.
1 Teaching Innovation - Entrepreneurial - Global The Centre for Technology enabled Teaching & Learning, N Y S S, India DTEL DTEL (Department for Technology.
Introduction to Medical Imaging Regis Introduction to Medical Imaging Registration Alexandre Kassel Course
Statistics on Diffeomorphisms in a Log-Euclidean Framework Vincent Arsigny ¹,Olivier Commowick ¹ ², Xavier Pennec ¹, Nicholas Ayache ¹. ¹ Research Team.
Homogeneous Coordinates They work, but where do they come from? Jonathan Senning
A Bayesian Approach for Transformation Estimation Camille Izard and Bruno Jedynak Landmark Detection in brain MRI Laboratoire Paul Painlevé Université.
CSE 554 Lecture 8: Alignment
Lecture 10 Geometric Transformations In 3D(Three- Dimensional)
Spatcial Description & Transformation
3. Transformation
University of Ioannina
Homogeneous Coordinates (Projective Space)
Lecture 12 Theory of Registration ch
Multi-modality image registration using mutual information based on gradient vector flow Yujun Guo May 1,2006.
CSC4820/6820 Computer Graphics Algorithms Ying Zhu Georgia State University Transformations.
Computational Neuroanatomy for Dummies
Translation in Homogeneous Coordinates
Presentation transcript:

Algorithms for Image Registration: Advanced Normalization Tools (ANTS) Brian Avants, Nick Tustison, Gang Song, James C. Gee Penn Image Computing and Science Laboratory Departments of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA

Advanced Normalization Tools (ANTs) An open-source toolkit for low and high- dimensional image registration. Simple command-line user interface reflects the variational optimization equation. Few parameters for most applications. Well-evaluated & focus on usability. Large range of functionality – similarity metrics, landmarks, multiple optimization terms, multiple transformation models.

Affine Registration Stochastic gradient descent (Klein, Staring, Pluim) for speed per iteration. Multi-start global optimization option (MMBIA 2007) for challenging problems. Mutual information similarity Landmarks & cost-masking enabled Mapping decomposed into Rotation, Shearing, Translation: easily generates GL group subspaces.

Synthetic Database prior prior mstart grad 0 mNCrNC rMSE rMIdtdKdSdRStrategy Image Similarity Metric (%)Transform parameters metric 48 images warped from the template, 256x256x124, Affine warping + random Bspline nonrigid warping.

Deformation Models Elastic, e.g. Demons method. Exponential Map Diff, e.g. Ashburner’s Dartel. Time-Dependent Diff, e.g. LDDMM. Bi-directional Diff (Exp, T-D or greedy impl.) All are available as optional transformation models. Models may also be combined, in some cases.

Similarity Metrics ANTS -DIFF –m SSD(I,J,w1) –m MI(I,J,w2) –m LM(I,J,w3) Diff Regularization May be easily combined turned on/off, applied to different images etc

ANTS -m MI[CT.nii,PET.nii,32] -Exp -n 3 -i 10x10x10 -o PETtoCT PET warped to CT Unregistered PET and CT Jacobian of transformationPET overlayed on CT Original Pet TransmissionOriginal CT

Diffeomorphic Mapping Difffeomorphism Elastic Under-Normalization

OS & Input/Output Issues ITK-compatible – builds using standard ITK, cmake, etc. NIFTI/SIFTI friendly, using ITK I/O. How do we deal with orientation, etc? Experience has shown header information (particularly origin, orientation, affine matrix) is not always “right.” We thus allow its use as an option.

Conclusion & Future Work Parallelization and memory-efficient. Xml format for organizing processing/results. Alternative optimization – gradient descent now. To Obtain: seek “Advanced Normalization Tools (ANTs)” at sourceforge.net also at NITRC. References: – Evaluation of 14 non-rigid registration algorithms, A Klein, et al in preparation. – B Avants, et al. Symmetric diffeomorphic image registration, – Euler-Lagrange equations of computational anatomy, M. I. Miller, et al, 2003.

Affine Transform Space Parameterization Affine Registration: T(x) = Ax + t A = R x S x K. – Rotation R: a unit quaternion vector – Scaling S: 3 scaling factors in each axis – Shearing K: 3 coefficients in the upper triangle.

Real Image Database prior 50 mstart 200 grad0 template test image their difference registration differencing 67 images of elderly and neurodegenerative human brains, T1 MRI 1.5 T, 1x1x1.5mm, 256x256x prior prior mstart grad 0 mNCrNCrMSErMIStrategy Image Similarity Metric (%)