1 Limestone County School District Energy Update Year Eleven Report September 2008 – August 2009.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Energy, Water Consumption & Carbon Emissions June 2010.
Advertisements

EPA’s Clean Power Plan Proposed Rules for Reducing GHG Emissions from Power Plants Presentation to ACPAC June 16,
Let’s Get Energized Saving Energy At School Sites.
Energy Savings Opportunities in Controls, Lighting, Air Conditioning, Water Heating and Refrigeration Chuck Thomas, P.E. CEM Lead Engineer.
Transformational Energy Management Process ™. Program’s Primary Goals What it is …  A proven process that changes consumption behavior to reduce energy.
Branford Board of Education Conservation Report Efforts and Results 2001-Present Mark Deming Facilities Director Branford Board of Education November 19,
January 2013 – May 2014 Energy Conservation Program Board Update San Bernardino Community College District Insert Organization Logo Here.
Greening America’s Congregations Through Energy Efficiency ENERGY STAR ® Tools, Technical Support and Public Recognition.
Guilford County Schools ENERGY MASTER PLAN for School Facilities July 25, 2008 Facilities Planning and Construction Department Maintenance Department.
Leadership in Environmental Stewardship in a Fiscally Prudent Manner WAUKESHA COUNTY SUSTAINABILITY EFFORTS.
Energy Performance Analysis with RETScreen
MENG 547 LECTURE 3 By Dr. O Phillips Agboola. C OMMERCIAL & INDUSTRIAL BUILDING ENERGY AUDIT Why do we audit Commercial/Industrial buildings Important.
April 25–27, 2005 Phoenix Civic Plaza/Hyatt Regency Phoenix Phoenix, AZ NCMA World Congress 2005 “Prime Time: Contract Management at the Core of the Enterprise”
Energy Education and Jackson County School District June 20, 2011.
Benchmarking Properties for Energy, Water, and Resident Complaints Prepared by Steven Winter Associates & Tohn Environmental Strategies Special Thanks.
J.B. Speed School of Engineering University of Louisville KEEPS Energy Management Toolkit Step 4: Create an Action Plan Toolkit 4: Create an Energy Management.
SAU Energy Talking Points SAU per square foot energy cost of $1.20 is among the most efficient in the state. District Heating and Cooling Systems save.
Benchmarking State Buildings Karen Herter, Heschong-Mahone Group (HMG) Mike Langley, Dept. of General Services (DGS) April 8, 2008.
J.B. Speed School of Engineering University of Louisville KEEPS Energy Management Toolkit Step 2: Assess Performance & Opportunities Toolkit 2A: KEEPS.
Energy Management 101 Lance Stewart Facilities Maintenance Manager/Energy Manager City of Charlottesville, Virginia.
You can achieve 100% Energy Saving WHEN YOU TURN OFF THE LIGHTS.
STAFFORD COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS ENERGY MANAGEMENT PROGRAM 2009 UPDATE Bob Randall CEM,,BEP, CBCP Energy Manager Energy Manager.
DEVELOPING AN ENERGY AND SUSTAINABILITY POLICY FOR HARNETT COUNTY SCHOOLS.
Energy Assessment Tools and Methods National Environmental Partnership Summit 2007 May 8, 2007 Cam Metcalf Executive Director John Sparks TDI Coordinator.
Energy & Environment Report for 2008 – 2009 Ian Rowe Manager (Health, Safety & Environment)
Managing Operational Energy in Buildings
E NERGY S TAR and K-12 Schools Melissa Payne E NERGY S TAR Climate Protection Partnerships Division.
Northeast and Mid-Atlantic States Regional Low Carbon Fuel Standard Stakeholder Meeting
Energy Conservation Program Board Update Capital Region BOCES Consortium Galway Board Presentation Tom Schweizer -Energy Education Specialists BOCES Adam.
How to Conduct a Government Operations GHG Emissions Inventory AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA Broward County Pollution Prevention, Remediation and.
J.B. Speed School of Engineering University of Louisville KEEPS Energy Management Toolkit Step 2: Assess Performance & Opportunities Toolkit 2C: School.
Energy Efficiency in Industrial and Commercial Facilities 2003 Energy and Environmental Conference September 16, 2003.
Weatherization 201: Weatherization Works! Updated September 23, 2008.
J.B. Speed School of Engineering University of Louisville KEEPS Energy Management Toolkit Step 2: Assess Performance & Opportunities Toolkit 2B1: KEEPS.
1 every student. every classroom. every day. Building a Sustainable School District Jody London, President, Board of Education October 28, 2011 Council.
1. ◦ Public hearing certifying compliance with Govt. Code for energy projects. From proforma:  Estimated total project cost is $4.09M. Estimated.
M&V Part 2: Risk Assessment & Responsibility Allocation.
Reviewing the Audit Results. Defining a Quality Base Year is Key to Maximizing Project Value n Base year is the mutually agreed upon pre-retrofit annual.
Smartcool Systems Inc. Providing effective and reliable energy efficiency solutions for HVAC-R customers around the globe.
Effective Energy Management. 1.Develop baseline 2.Identify and quantify savings opportunities 3.Measure and benchmark to sustain efforts.
An Approach to Adjust ERCOT’s Long-Term Load Forecast for Utility Energy Efficiency Programs Jay Zarnikau Frontier Associates LLC June 10, 2013.
Confidential and Proprietary | © 2012 Cenergistic This material may not be copied, modified, distributed or disclosed except upon written approval from.
Carbon Emissions from the University of Minnesota Buildings & Facilities Andrew Edwins David Grandall Luke Hollenkamp Patrick Santelli Amy Scheller.
Energy Curriculum Advanced Transportation Technology and Energy Initiative.
Leading by Example Philip Gates, CEM, CMVP, EIT Energy Manager 1.
Plymouth Public Schools Energy Management Program Overview/Refresher & Update Developed By Jay Tobin Energy Manager.
Demand Side Energy Management & Conservation Lighting Retrofits The University of Texas at Austin.
September 21, 2005 ICF Consulting RGGI Electricity Sector Modeling Results Updated Reference, RGGI Package and Sensitivities.
1 Oconomowoc Area School District Energy Update 6-Month Status Report December 2005 – May 2006.
X Hospital’s Sustainable Energy Management Plan. Prescription for Energy Savings Agenda 1. Overview of Duke Energy’s Prescription for Energy Savings 2.
Week 7 Utility Data Analysis. Essential Elements Identify sources for obtaining utility data: paper form, electronically or from the internet Review utility.
Week 13 Introduction to compiling an energy efficiency audit report and Writing the utility analysis section.
REBUILD AMERICA. Why look at the bills? l Bills are the bottom line –they prove the savings!
Energy Conservation Program Initial Board Report February 16, 2016 Pinellas County Public Schools REVIEW OF PERIOD MARCH 2015 – NOVEMBER 2015.
Lack of dedicated building meter – Solution: Estimate square footage of Herberger in relation to total area serviced by meter – Estimate 12% of total.
Utility Bill Management County of Ventura BY BRUCE FISCHER ENERGY MANAGER COUNTY OF VENTURA.
Energy Conservation Program Board Update Norwin School District April 2011 – November 2011 Crit Baker Energy Specialist.
Oakland Schools 2014/2015 Energy Report January 31, 2016.
Presented to The Raymore Peculiar Schools Board of Education Van McLain Energy Educator/Manager February 26 th, 2007Energy Management Conservation Program.
Energy Managers. What do Energy Managers do? Maintain Comfort by: … Monitoring operational efficiency of equipment Eliminate Energy Waste by: … Tracking.
Emission Levels, Reference Case Projections for 2010 and 2020, and Target Caps for Electricity Generators Target 0 2,000 4,000 6,000 8,000.
Energy and Sustainability Update
Fort Stanwix National Monument Energy Audit Contract
EnMS Management Review
August 2013 – July 2014 Jill Parisella, Energy Specialist
Hyde Park Central School District
City of Lebanon, Missouri Electric Department
Energy Conservation Program Update
Regional Climate Alliances Spring 2008
Oconomowoc Area School District December 2005 – July 2011
Presentation transcript:

1 Limestone County School District Energy Update Year Eleven Report September 2008 – August 2009

2 Primary Goals Energy Management Program n Eliminate Energy Waste r Audit buildings during unoccupied times. r Monitor building usage during occupied times r Track & analyze consumption for building efficiency r Use web-based tools & diagnostic loggers to track waste r Maintain energy policy and guidelines n Save Dollars r Minimize consumption and demand charges r Audit and monitor utility bills & meters for errors or overcharges (i.e. recovered over $40,000 YTD) r Evaluate usage trends for abnormalities n Maintain Comfort & Safety in Occupied Areas r Coordinate usage of facilities and monitor operational efficiency of equipment vs. design.

3  Measurement and verification (M&V)" is the terminology commonly used to describe the practice of measuring energy savings and verifying cost avoidance. Energy CAP 's Cost Avoidance module is an M&V tool.  The U.S. Department of Energy recently headed an effort to develop a written standard to define and describe various M&V options. Energy CAP is considered an "Option C -- Whole Building" method of M&V under this standard.  The standard, called the International Performance Measurement & Verification Protocol is U.S. Department of Energy document (DOE/GO )  Energy CAP is an independently owned and developed software product in full compliance with this government standard.  Your School district is a licensed User of the software tool. Measurement and Verification (M&V) Methods

4  Measurement is based on “Consumption” comparisons between the base period and the current billing cycle (meter-by-meter).  All financial/Economic values are based on current cost of energy (I.e. energy savings for a given month use the actual unit cost of energy (for that month) to determine the savings/loss for an accounting period). Savings is never based on past “historical” energy prices.  Adjustments for “load” changes such as added/removed mechanical systems, new technology, increased building square footage and portable building additions are determined by the district Energy Educator/Manager through inventory assessment. The net increase or decrease to building loads are entered into the software to determine projected increase or decreased costs. Measurement and Verification (M&V) Methods

5 Comparing Apples to Apples  Changes in Weather  Changes in Building Square Footage  Special Adjustments (changes in equipment or programs) The accounting program adjusts the Base Year consumption to reflect these changes and an Apples to Apples comparison is achieved. In order to make a valid comparison between consumption in the Base Year and consumption in a Savings Year certain criteria must be taken into account.  Differences in the length of the Billing Periods

6 Changes in the District impacting energy usage n Increased Energy Unit Costs r Electrical 61.8% r Natural Gas 75.8% r Water & Sewer 178.9% r Propane 160.4% n Increased Square Footage r Sq ft r Includes 3 new gyms (all with AC) r New classroom Owens/Clements/West r Enlarged Clements/East r Doubled the size of Johnson r Two New Schools (Creekside and Cedar Hill) r Additional Portable Classrooms n Increased Mechanical Equipment r Tons new AC added, including AC for 4 existing gyms r Additional heating load r Computers added (annual) r Lighting load

7 Utility Cost Comparison (Year Eleven - 12 Months) Compared to Base & Projected Utility Costs

8

9

10 Average Unit Cost Comparison ( 12 months )

11 Average Unit Cost Comparison ( 12 months )

12 Average Unit Cost Comparison ( 12 months )

13 Consumption Comparison ( 12 Months ) Electric – Yr 11 Twelve Months

14 Consumption Comparison ( 12 Months ) Natural Gas - Yr 11 Twelve Months

15 Consumption Comparison ( 12 Months ) Water & Sewer – Twelve Months

16 Consumption Comparison ( 12 Months ) Propane - Yr 11 Twelve Months

17 Monthly/Cost Avoidance (12 Months)

18 Environmental Benefits The EPA estimates that every kilowatt-hour (kWh) of electricity use avoided prevents the emission of the following: 1.5 pounds of carbon dioxide 5.8 grams of sulfur dioxide 2.5 grams of nitrogen oxides. Our District has saved/avoided over 4,255,076 kWh in a 12 month period. These savings are equal to: 6,382,614 pounds of carbon dioxide emissions being prevented, or 966 automobiles being removed from the highways annually, or 1277 acres of trees being planted.

19 Summary Sept Aug 2009 (Twelve-Months) Anticipated Costs Without Energy Program Actual Base Year Costs $1,179,351. Rate Changes (Increase) $799,688. Weather $22,133. Added 375,909 Sq/ft $658,480. Includes 3 New Gyms ( all with A/C ) Added classrooms Owens/Clements/West Enlarge Clements/East Doubled the size of Johnson Two New Schools (Creekside & Cedar Hill) Tons new AC added for old gyms (etc). Total Anticipated Energy Costs $2,955,293. Actual Tenth Year Costs $2,103,974. Cost Avoidance $850,124..