SR 436 / SR 50 Area Redevelopment Plan Board of County Commissioners February 24, 2009 Board of County Commissioners February 24, 2009.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Planning Commission April 14, 2010
Advertisements

July 15, 2008 – GB Work Session Discussion of Mayor Thomas E. Swisstack’s Priority List Recommendations.
Missoula Planning Summit Milestone 14 August, 2008 Missoula, Montana.
 Awarded Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) Grant for integrated land use and transportation planning efforts ( )  Consultant.
Kirkland 2035 Plan Update Summary of EIS Alternatives Transportation Commission – September 25, 2014.
Public Visioning Meeting January 28 & 29, 2015 CenterPlace Regional Event Center.
Twinbrook Sector Plan A New Community in the Technology Corridor
The US 101 Mobility Study will -  Examine current and future conditions, identify key deficiency areas and propose multi-modal improvement packages along.
Tysons 1 Operational Analysis of Dulles Toll Road Ramps to Tysons Board Transportation Committee Meeting September 17, 2013 Seyed Nabavi Fairfax County.
Community Planning Land Use Education Project Charlotte P. Burckhardt, AICP, PCP Principal Planner.
Cobb County Comprehensive Transportation Plan (CTP) Board of Commissioners Briefing January 22, 2008.
Neighborhood Preservation and Revitalization Division Board of County Commissioners March 10, Neighborhood Improvement Plan.
Seattle Station Area Planning Milestones & Events Transit-Oriented Development Program Information & Schedule Station Area Atlas Station Area Recommendations.
Montgomery County Transit Task Force Meeting August 17, 2011.
Schools Jobs Revenues Services Recreation Environment Transportation Transportation Connectivity Housing Public Safety Pontiac’s.
Improving Your World. RS&H tradition began in 1941 Employee-owned company Six programs of client-focused services Multi-disciplined team of planners,
August 2004 Hickory by Choice Linking Land Use and Air Quality Planning.
Multimodal Corridor Plan BCC Discussion Item Transportation Planning Division August 19, 2014.
SUSTAINABILITY TEAM | May 19, 2010 Illinois APA, September 24, 2010.
ANNUAL REPORT MANY CULTURES, ONE BRIGHT FUTURE! Board of County Commissioners August 19, 2014.
Linda K. McCarthy, Executive Director Missoula Downtown Association Missoula, Montana
Collaboration Collaboration Regional Transportation Plan (RTP) Regional Transportation Plan (RTP) Housing choices and opportunities Housing choices and.
2013 Annual Strategic Action Plan Evaluation. Overview Background Role of SAP Implementation Evaluation process Council feedback Enhancement of SAP.
R IDGEFIELD P IONEER & 45 TH S UB -A REA P LAN E. D. Hovee & Company, LLC BergerABAM Stakeholder Meeting #1 June 1, 2015.
Community Development Department Neoga Lakes – Development of Regional Impact (DRI) Master Planned Development (MPD) Rezoning Application.
In association with Kubilins Transportation Group Rose & Associates Design Charrette Public Kick-off
Availability of suitable space for expansion Lack of flexibility in allowed uses.
Village of Ossining Vision Presentation Frederick P. Clark Associates, Inc. May 11 th, 2005.
Implementing the Freeland Subarea Plan Zoning and Development Regulations Island County Planning & Community Development 2016 Comprehensive Plan Update.
US 101 Corridor Plan Prepared by: Oregon Department of Transportation May 2013.
EVALUATION AND APPRAISAL REPORT MAJOR COMMUNITY ISSUES RELATED TO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN Board of County Commissioners/ Local Planning Agency Joint Meeting.
Missoula Long Range Transportation Plan 11 December 2008 Open House.
Implementation of the HUD/DOT/EPA Partnership for Sustainable Communities in EPA Region 5 Stephanie Cwik US EPA Region 5 Community and Land Revitalization.
Board of County Commissioners PUBLIC HEARING Lake Avalon Rural Settlement Commercial Design Overlay District March 10, 2009 Board of County Commissioners.
How Would a Transportation – Land Use Grant Program Work in the Washington Region? Presentation to the Transportation Planning Board Technical Committee.
Roslyn Community Revitalization Plan with Real Estate Strategies October 28, 2009 Community Visioning Workshop.
Planning & Community Development Department 1336 and 1347 East Colorado Blvd. Pre Development Plan Review City Council Meeting January 28, 2013.
F O R W A R D L A P O R T E What are the city’s top 3 economic development priorities? n=300.
On the Road to a New Metropolitan Transportation Plan Spokane Regional Health District Board of Health April 25, 2013.
City of Palm Coast EAR Public Input Process Update Prepared for the Palm Coast City Council By The FCRC Consensus Center November 24, 2009 Update Prepared.
TOD Technical Assistance Panel June 21, rd STREET, San Pablo CA.
April 8, 2008 BCC PUBLIC HEARING ON BZA # SE APPLICANT/APPELLANT: Fernanda Curione.
JUNE 27, 2013 ARB INFORMATIONAL UPDATE: ASSOCIATION OF BAY AREA GOVERNMENTS’/ METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION’S DRAFT SUSTAINABLE COMMUNITIES STRATEGY.
Village of Villa Park Comprehensive Plan Update CPAC Meeting December 2 nd, 2008.
NOVEMBER 19, 2015 STUDY SESSION R IDGEFIELD J UNCTION S UBAREA P LAN DRAFT NOVEMBER 2015.
200/768_K 0 Sustainable Growth & Development Subcommittee Report Committee for a Sustainable Emerald Coast May 17, 2007.
Board of County Commissioners Lake Avalon Rural Settlement Commercial Design Overlay District February 24, 2009 Board of County Commissioners Lake Avalon.
July 13, 2010 Board of County Commission Transmittal Hearing.
EASTSIDE ACTIVITY CENTER DRAFT MASTER PLAN Board of County Commissioners January 22, 2008.
Community Redevelopment for Eastside Report on Advisory Committee Input and Request for Board Direction June 26, 2012.
University of Kentucky College of Agriculture Landscape Architecture Franklin-Simpson County Potential Neighborhood Development Strategies 158 acres Close.
EASTSIDE ACTIVITY CENTER MASTER PLAN PROPOSED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT CPA Board of County Commissioners Hearing May 13, 2008.
Planning Commission Study Session: Preferred Plan July 23, 2015.
Prepared by: Alex Fisch Planning Services Division.
C ENTRAL E STUARY P LAN A V ISION F OR O AKLAND’S W ATERFRONT Central Estuary Plan A VISION FOR OAKLAND’S WATERFRONT Specific Plan and Environmental Assessment.
August 8, :30 p.m-8:00 p.m. City Hall.  Board of Mayor and Commissioners (BOMC)  Avondale Estates Citizens, Property and Business Owners-Including.
CITY OF NEW BERLIN SECTION 35 Neighborhoods G & H Comprehensive Plan Amendment Public Input January 2012.
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN UPDATE MEETING 4 – POPULATION & HOUSING ELEMENTS 1/30/2014.
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN UPDATE MEETING 2 – TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT 12/12/2013.
Council Grove Zoning & Planning Committee Final Plan Presentation March 9, 2016.
Infill Master Plan October 23, 2007 Infill Master Plan October 23, 2007 Board of County Commissioners Discussion Item.
2035 General Plan Update Planning Commission Study Session on Draft Circulation Element February 2, 2016.
North Ponce de Leon Neighborhood Public Input Meeting.
Orange County Consolidated Plan One-Year Action Plan and Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice August 2, 2016 BCC.
Sixth Amendment to the Orange County / City of Winter Garden Joint Planning Area Agreement and Utilities Territorial Agreement April 17, 2007 Sixth Amendment.
Plan Goals: Improve walkability and pedestrian safety Preserve and celebrate neighborhood character and sense of place Address code violations Improve.
Gateway Specific Plan Concepts
Implementing the Transportation/Land Use Connection Program
ROOSEVELT CITY GENERAL PLAN 2010
MPO Board Presentation
Presentation transcript:

SR 436 / SR 50 Area Redevelopment Plan Board of County Commissioners February 24, 2009 Board of County Commissioners February 24, 2009

 Study Area  Project Goals and Objectives  Project Deliverables  Community Involvement Process  Issues and Opportunities  Potential Redevelopment Concepts  Community Responses  Redevelopment Concept 4  Next Steps Agenda

 Study Area  Project Goals and Objectives  Project Deliverables  Community Involvement Process  Issues and Opportunities  Potential Redevelopment Concepts  Community Responses  Redevelopment Concept 4  Next Steps Agenda

Study Area  Almost 4 square miles  From Auver Blvd /Partridge Lane (north), SR 408 (south), Goldenrod Road (east), and Truman/Old Cheney Hwy/City limits (west)  64% of parcels zoned residential  26% of parcels zoned commercial or industrial

 Study Area  Project Goals and Objectives  Project Deliverables  Community Involvement Process  Issues and Opportunities  Potential Redevelopment Concepts  Community Responses  Redevelopment Concept 4  Next Steps Agenda

 Promote redevelopment activity  Preserve and enhance neighborhoods  Create more cohesive land use patterns  Improve the transportation system Project Goals and Objectives

 Serve as a valuable investment in the community  Provide direction and a level of certainty for existing businesses and future business expansion  Ensure that future development is consistent with the community’s vision and values  Recognize Orange County’s fiscal constraints Project Goals and Objectives

 Study Area  Project Goals and Objectives  Project Deliverables  Community Involvement Process  Issues and Opportunities  Potential Redevelopment Concepts  Community Responses  Redevelopment Concept 4  Next Steps Agenda

 SR 436/SR 50 Area Redevelopment Plan  Identify compatible development  Provide an Investment Plan  Identify phasing and implementation cost estimates  Provide architectural, landscaping, and signage standards Project Deliverables

 Existing Conditions Report (prepared by County staff)  Issues Identification Report  Retail/Commercial Market Evaluation  Charrette Summary Report Project Deliverables

 Community Choices Survey  Real-time electronic survey conducted at the Charrette and October 27 Community Meeting  Assessed preferences for many different community design elements  Examples: buildings, streetscape, signage, trails  Limited sampling size at each event  Conducted three times for wider input Project Deliverables

BUILDING TYPE STREETSCAPE SIGNAGEGREENSPACE Examples of Community Choices Survey Elements

 Mapping & Visualizations Project Deliverables

 Study Area  Project Goals and Objectives  Project Deliverables  Community Involvement Process  Issues and Opportunities  Potential Redevelopment Concepts  Community Responses  Redevelopment Concept 4  Next Steps Agenda

 September 2007 Community Stakeholders Meeting  June 2008 Community Meeting  June 2008 Business Owner Interviews for Market Evaluation  August 2008 Three-Day Charrette  September 2008Four Community Input Sessions Community Involvement Process

 October 2008 Community Meeting  October 2008 Local Planning Agency Worksession  December 2008 Local Planning Agency Public Hearing  January 2009 Exhibit at East Orlando Chamber of Commerce Luncheon Community Involvement Process

Charrette Participation

 Four Outreach Sessions:  Sat. Sept. 24 – 8:30 am – Bravo Market  Sat. Sept. 24 – 11:00 am – Home Depot  Sat. Oct. 4 – 5:00 pm – Fashion Square Mall  Mon. Oct. 6 – 5:30 pm – Colonial H.S. Open House Community Involvement Process Community Input Sessions  190 persons discussed the project with project team members  Provided comments on their concerns and preferences for community improvements and redevelopment

Community Involvement Process Community Input Sessions

 Study Area  Project Goals and Objectives  Project Deliverables  Community Involvement Process  Issues and Opportunities  Potential Redevelopment Concepts  Community Responses  Redevelopment Concept 4  Next Steps Presentation Outline

 Neighborhood preservation and community cohesion  Property development and redevelopment  Improved building and streetscape aesthetics and landscaping  Preservation/improvement of open spaces and lakes  Community safety/crime prevention  Multimodal transportation and connectivity Issues and Opportunities

Multi-Division Briefings on August 15 and October 3, 2008 Public SafetyUtilities Public Works Growth Management Community and Environmental Services Health and Family Services  Homeless persons and trespassing  Code enforcement efforts  Funding concerns for Lake Susannah area improvements  Utility line upgrades associated with the SR 50 project  Brownfield properties  Area stormwater improvement projects  Challenges to implementing sidewalk improvements Issues Discussed: Issues and Opportunities

Retail/Commercial Market Evaluation  Analysis timeframe was based on current conditions as of Summer 2008  Current analysis indicated that the area can support:  Up to 188,000 square feet new commercial development  100-room hotel  Projected future conditions: The area is a good infill location with high traffic counts and available, inexpensive acreage Issues and Opportunities

 Study Area  Project Goals and Objectives  Project Deliverables  Community Involvement Process  Issues and Opportunities  Potential Redevelopment Concepts  Community Responses  Redevelopment Concept 4  Next Steps Presentation Outline

Concept 1: Sustainability Focus Concept 2: Connectivity Focus Concept 3: Economic Development Focus Concept 4: Recommended Concept (Compiled by Consultant) Potential Redevelopment Concepts

 Additional pedestrian connections  Commercial / Office / Retail redevelopment near SR 436/SR 50 intersection  Better access to Lake Barton  Residential infill  Enhanced landscaping Concept 1: Sustainability Focus

 Small business and mixed-use space  Extended trails and sidewalk network  Community gathering space near Lake Barton  Improved transit stops  Local circulator transit Concept 2: Connectivity Focus

 Flex-space industrial development  Service and retail infill  Business-oriented hotel near Lake Barton Concept 3: Economic Development Focus

 Study Area  Project Goals and Objectives  Project Deliverables  Community Involvement Process  Issues and Opportunities  Potential Redevelopment Concepts  Community Responses  Redevelopment Concept 4  Next Steps Presentation Outline

 Desire community gathering places (including mixed- use developments, family-oriented retail)  Favor a mid-rise mixed use development in SW quadrant of SR 436/SR50 intersection, including a higher-end hotel  Favor increased bicycle/pedestrian amenities and connections to regional trails  Desire additional open spaces/green spaces Community Responses

 Favor additional business/commercial development and redevelopment  Support infill residential development, if the design is appropriate for the area  Desire a more unified look to the corridors and adjacent commercial areas  Want more mixed use development, including smaller independent business operations (“mom and pop” businesses)

 Study Area  Project Goals and Objectives  Project Deliverables  Community Involvement Process  Issues and Opportunities  Potential Redevelopment Concepts  Community Responses  Redevelopment Concept 4  Next Steps Presentation Outline

 Service and retail infill  “Mom and Pop” commercial infill and business incubator  Community gathering space or business hotel near Lake Barton  Extended trails and sidewalk network  Improved transit stops  Local circulator as another transit option Concept 4: Recommended Concept

 Study Area  Project Goals and Objectives  Project Deliverables  Community Involvement Process  Issues and Opportunities  Potential Redevelopment Concepts  Community Responses  Redevelopment Concept 4  Next Steps Presentation Outline

 Develop Outreach Materials Illustrating Design Preferences  Continue Coordination with the City of Orlando’s Projects in Area  Develop Comprehensive Policy Plan Policies  Establish Smart Growth Code Changes Next Steps

Accept the State Road 436/State Road 50 Area Redevelopment Plan Action Requested

SR 436 / SR 50 Area Redevelopment Plan Board of County Commissioners February 24, 2009 Board of County Commissioners February 24, 2009