Summary and State Implications FCC Report and Order and Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking CenturyLink February 28, 2012.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Universal Service Funding An Overview of the Connect America Fund Marsha Spellman, JD Oregon Connections Conference October 25,
Advertisements

Telecommunications Law CLE State Deregulation at the PUC December 2014 Pete Kirchhof Colorado Telecommunications Association.
MOBILITY FUND OVERVIEW 18 th Annual Oregon Connections Telecommunications Conference Hood River, Oregon Mark P. Trinchero Davis Wright Tremaine LLP
LOCAL RATE INCREASE: OPPORTUNITY FOR ENHANCING PERCEIVED CUSTOMER BENEFITS July 9-11, 2014 TSTCI Accounting and Customer Service Conference Darla Parker.
Feb , ETC DESIGNATION Feb , ETC Designation  What is an Eligible Telecommunications Carrier (ETC)?  Carrier designated.
Unified Carrier Registration (UCR) Update August 24, 2006.
Different approaches before and after Telecom Act Before Telecom Act –Implicit cross subsidies –Based on rate of return approach –ILECs only receivers/IXCs.
Tribal Lands Bidding Credits Extending Wireless Services to Tribal Lands Michael Connelly Attorney Advisor Mobility Division, Wireless Telecommunications.
Wireline Competition Bureau 2004 Promoting Real Consumer Choice and Investment in Broadband Facilities.
MOSS ADAMS LLP | 1 © Moss Adams LLP | April 2012 V2 Rural Telecom Revenues FCC Reform Spring 2012 Presented to ABC Communications.
An analysis of the FCC’s USF and ICC Broadband Reform Proposals.
February 19, 2008 How Should We Think About IP-PSTN Interconnection? NARUC Committee on Telecommunications.
MOSS ADAMS LLP | 1 Tribal Telecom 2013 Federal Telecommunications Regulatory Updates.
Connect America Fund Report and Order and Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking Washington Utilities and Transportation Commission February 28, 2012.
FCC Rural Broadband Trials: Funding to Connect Rural America Panelist: Jonathan Chambers, Chief Office of Strategic Planning and Policy Analysis Federal.
1 Keeping Consumers Connected Washington State and Universal Service WUTC Workshop May 5, 2010 John F. Jones CenturyLink Vice President State Government.
E-rate Modernization December 2, E-rate Basics Schools and Libraries Universal Service Support Mechanism (E-rate) – Authorized by the 1996 Telecommunications.
Unified Intercarrier Compensation – An Old Problem 1980 FCC Tentative Access Plan (pre- divestiture) Found the wide variety of existing access compensation.
1 Special Access “Dispelling the Myths” Wendy M. Moser Vice President Public Policy, Qwest July 14, 2007.
NMECG PRESENTATION TO THE NEW MEXICO PUBLIC REGULATION COMMISSION APRIL 3, 2012 THE FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION’S ORDERS TO IMPLEMENT REFORM AND.
Support For Rural America William Maher Chief, Wireline Competition Bureau July 2, 2003 Universal Service and The FCC.
Funding Broadband & Net Neutrality Implications for the State Lynn Notarianni PUC Telecom Section Chief
Joint Board Recommendation USF Reform NARUC Winter Meeting February 2008 Ray Baum Commissioner Oregon Public Utility Commission State Chair USJB.
1 The Rural Alliance January 25, – A Critical Year 2006 will be a critical year for the RLEC industry Multiple events with significant impact.
THE FEDERAL LIFELINE PROGRAM. Overview Low-income consumers apply for discounts for local telephone service through the telephone company. Low Income.
Disability Rights Office: Update National Deaf-Blind Equipment Distribution Program and Telecommunications Relay Service Certification Renewal Rosaline.
U.S. Telecommunications Regulation and Market Developments September 2008.
Brant Wolf, EVP Oregon Telecommunications Association.
ITA FCC WORKSHOP MARCH 14, Appreciate being here, but... I’d rather be playing Guard for the New York Knicks 2.
Better Thinking. Better Results. Where does my Recovery Come from? Presented by: Bob Schoonmaker MTIA/ATA Annual Meeting August 9,
Wireline Competition Bureau State of the Bureau Presentation January 20, 2006.
Access Charges The major questions –What services did IXC’s require in order to provide their interLATA toll and private line services? –What to do about.
Proposal for Reforming the Intercarrier Compensation and Universal Service Systems CTIA – The Wireless Association™ May 18, 2005.
Financial Considerations in the New World!! GTA Annual Meeting Hilton Head, SC June 19, 2012 Leo Staurulakis – Executive Vice President.
Comptel/ASCENT February 17, Tom Sugrue Vice President Government Affairs T-Mobile.
Tribal Lands Bidding Credits Extending Wireless Services to Tribal Lands Michael Connelly Attorney Advisor Mobility Division, Wireless Telecommunications.
THE NEW FCC NPRM THE CHALLENGES, THE RESPONSES AND THE PLAN OF ATTACK A Briefing Provided By The Rural Broadband Alliance STEPHEN G. KRASKIN and DIANE.
© 2007 AT&T Knowledge Ventures. All rights reserved. AT&T and the AT&T logo are trademarks of AT&T Knowledge Ventures. Confronting Tough Questions About.
BROADBAND ACCELERATION INITIATIVE: POLES, ROW State and Local Government Webinar (FCC) Oct. 5, 2011.
The Nation Broadband Plan & Its Effects on USF and ICC Reform Krista K. Tanner Iowa Utilities Board June 7, 2010.
Universal Service and USF Reform: Establishing a Rational and Efficient System Presentation to NASUCA Mid-Year Meeting San Antonio, TX June 28, 2011.
1 Intercarrier Compensation May 27, 2004 Glenn Brown
Better Thinking. Better Results. Beyond “The Order” – The New Regulatory Horizon for Rural Carriers Bob Schoonmaker, President GVNW Consulting,
Wireline Competition Bureau 2006 Annual Report January 17, 2007.
The Regulation of Network Industries Simon Wilkie. Caltech Lecture for May 7, 2004.
Fair Go Rates System Dr Ron Ben-David Chairperson MAV Rate Capping Forum 26 November 2015.
IGA State & Local Government Webinar May 2, 2012 Kim Scardino, Deputy Division Chief Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau.
Intercarrier Compensation: Rate of Return Carrier Impacts Washington Utilities and Transportation Commission – Workshop February 28, 2012 Jeff Dupree NECA.
Level 3 Petition for Forbearance from Interstate and Intrastate Switched Access Charges Victoria R. Mandell Regulatory Counsel Level 3 Communications,
Finding the Right Balance for Rural America: Telecom Policy, Politics and Predictions August
CIPA (Children’s Internet Protection Act) Helping You Succeed Schools and Libraries Division Washington, DC Newark Atlanta Chicago Orlando.
© 2010 AT&T Intellectual Property. All rights reserved. AT&T and the AT&T logo are trademarks of AT&T Intellectual Property. Intercarrier Compensation.
Twenty-First Century Communications and Video Accessibility Act of 2010 (CVAA) Public Law and Public Law Wireless RERC and CTIA Accessibility.
Administering Federal Programs-A Charter School Perspective Dr. Vanessa Nelson-Reed Federal Program Administrator NCDPI.
FCC USF REFORM Presented by: Gordon Dauchy Vice President - JSI May 11, 2016.
1 Tollgate Order Implementation Actions Craig Crowley WorldCom May 14, 2002.
New Reporting Annual ETC Reporting One-time items
Overview of the FCC’s Rate-of-Return Reforms
Agenda Model Accuracy Sufficiency of support and reasonable comparability of rates Standards for Unsubsidized Competitors Disaggregation Caps in the Presence.
Critical Issues.
Different approaches before and after Telecom Act
Fair Go Rates System Dr Ron Ben-David Chairperson
Discussion of Operating Expense Caps and Other Expense Considerations Resulting From the FCC’s Universal Service Fund Reform Order Prepared by Doug Kitch,
NAPM LLC MEMBERSHIP INTRODUCTION
FCC National Broadband Plan (NBP) and Rural Universal Service Reform
Reciprocal Compensation
Fair Go Rates System Dr Ron Ben-David Chairperson
CTIA – The Wireless Association™ May 18, 2005
Federal Policy Update “Fins to the left, fins to the right...”
The New Mexico Rural Universal Service Fund
Presentation transcript:

Summary and State Implications FCC Report and Order and Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking CenturyLink February 28, 2012

Introduction We welcome the opportunity to provide Commission staff with an overview of the order and of the state role under the FCC-ordered changes. With such a lengthy and significant order, we continue the process of review and may have additional insight and reaction in the future. Much of the regulatory and implementation activity associated with the changes falls to the states and we look forward to working closely with Commission staff to interpret and implement the order. This overview generally addresses the FCC order as it applies to us and other companies that are price cap regulated at the federal level. 2

Federal Universal Service Principles Expanded to Explicitly Support Broadband The FCC created a new Universal Service Principle under Section 254(b): “Support for Advanced Services – Universal Service support should be directed where possible to networks that provide advance services, as well as voice services.” The FCC did not add broadband service to the list of supported services but instead required that the supported network be broadband capable and that all recipients offer voice and broadband services as a condition of receipt of Federal USF. The FCC did not alter state obligations regarding voice service, including COLR obligations, while noting the need to harmonize purpose and effect. The Supported Service definition was renamed “Voice Telephony Service” to be technology neutral; allowing VoIP to qualify. Access to operator services and directory assistance was dropped from the definition. 3

Federal Universal Service Reform: Phase I The FCC order will transition present high cost USF support in price-cap areas to a larger Connect America Fund (CAF) program supporting broadband networks in targeted high cost areas. CAF: Phase I Existing High Cost Support Mechanism: Legacy support levels are frozen at 2011 levels and were announced in February These amounts will be distributed on a monthly basis effective January 2012 until Phase II has been implemented. Phase I Incremental Support: Up to $300M additional funding will be made available to price cap carriers for the deployment of broadband. Incremental Support is calculated at the holding company level nationally based on the model currently used to determine high cost funding for non-rural carriers. Available funding amounts will be announced by the FCC 2Q; carriers can accept all, some, or none. 4

Federal Universal Service Reform: Phase I CAF Phase I Obligations Within 90 days, the carrier must provide notice to the states of the amount of support it accepts and identify the areas by wire center and census block that it intends to deploy broadband. Frozen high-cost support must be used in a manner consistent with achieving universal availability of voice and broadband. If Phase I support is extended beyond 2012, the requirement to use frozen support for expanding broadband into currently unserved locations will phase in. Recipients of incremental CAF Phase I support must deploy broadband of at least 4/1 Mbps to at least one unserved location for each $775 in support it receives. Deployment of must occur in areas shown on the National Broadband Map as unserved at 768/200 Kbps. [pending PFR] 2/3 of locations must be built within 2 years; 100% within 3 years. 5

Federal Universal Service Reform: Phase II CAF Phase II During 2012, the FCC will develop a forward looking cost model to estimate the cost of deploying broadband capable networks in high cost areas and to identify at a granular level where support will be available. Currently targeted for introduction in ABC Plan proponents have submitted their model to the FCC for consideration. Supported locations will be in areas not served by an unsubsidized wireline competitor. Total available support for price cap carriers will be limited to the $1.8B annual budget. Annual support, as determined by the cost model, for a period of five years will be offered to each price cap carrier on a state by state basis in exchange for a commitment to offer voice service throughout its service area and broadband service to supported locations. Support will be awarded through a competitive bid auction for all areas where a price cap LEC declines the Phase II support. 6

Federal Universal Service Reform: Phase II CAF Phase II Obligations By the end of the 3 rd year, carriers must offer at least 4/1 Mbps broadband service to at least 85% of the high cost locations By the end of the 5 th year, carriers must offer at least 4/1 Mbps broadband service to 100% of the high cost locations and 6/1.5 Mbps to a portion of the locations (to be identified by the CAF Model) Waivers can be sought for the 1 Mbps upstream requirement to the extent a carrier can demonstrate that the support is insufficient 7

Federal Universal Service Reform: State Roles Eligible Telecommunications Carrier (ETC) Certification States maintain an ongoing role in annual ETC certifications. States now must certify all high-cost support was used in the preceding year and will be used in the coming calendar year consistent with purposes for which the support is intended. Annual certifications by the state must be filed by October 1 of each year in order for carriers to receive full support in the succeeding year. 8

Federal Universal Service Reform: State Roles States should take an active role in monitoring the FCC’s development of the cost model for Phase II CAF funding and that broadband build out requirements and timelines are achievable. Broadband expansion into high cost areas will be jeopardized if unrealistically low amounts of support are available or build out requirements are not reasonable. With continued universal voice obligations and Federal high cost support increasingly focused only on broadband expansion in unserved areas, state high cost support remains a critical component to the maintenance of universal service at affordable rates. States should ensure that any state obligations, such as carrier of last resort, are consistent with and do not conflict with the new federal policies. 9

Intercarrier Compensation Reform: Summary The FCC order sets forth several Intercarrier Compensation (ICC) reforms: The FCC adopted rules to address phantom traffic and access stimulation to address longstanding arbitrage issues. The order also determines that IP non-local traffic is subject to interstate access charges beginning January 1, It made no determination regarding the traffic prior to that date. The FCC issues a reconsideration order establishing bill and keep as the default rate for all intra-MTA traffic exchange with CMRS providers starting July 1, Interstate and intrastate switched access charges are defined as reciprocal compensation subject to the FCC authority under the Telecom Act and a default rate transition is set in motion. Default access charges remain tariffed but negotiated agreements are acceptable. NOTE: AT&T and CenturyLink have both filed limited appeals of the order and will participate in the case at the 10 th circuit in Denver, CO. 10

ICC Reform: Switched Access Charge Transition All interstate and intrastate switched access charged are capped as of the effective date of the FCC rules; December 29, Default Intrastate terminating switched access charges are transitioned to parity with interstate in two steps; July 1, 2012 and July 1, Once parity is reached, Interstate and intrastate terminating switched access default charges for the majority of the elements are subsequently transitioned to bill and keep over the following four years. Disposition of the remaining access elements is the subject of a FNPRM at the FCC. 11

ICC Reform: State Roles Default intrastate switched access rates remain in intrastate tariffs throughout the transition. States should review intrastate switched access reductions through the transition to ensure compliance with the FCC rules for default intrastate switched access charges. Initial intrastate tariffs will be filed pursuant to state rules to be effective July 1, Intrastate tariffs will be updated to address the applicability of interstate access charges to IP-traffic. Incumbent providers will need maximum flexibility to adjust to significant switched access reductions to ensure there is no consumer or investment harm. 12

Retail Customer Impacts The FCC has placed a strict overall budget on the CAF support program to limit increases in the Federal USF contributions. Beginning July 1, 2012 carriers will be allowed to recover a portion of the lost ICC revenues through a transitional end user charge and, in some cases, additional USF support. The Access Recover Charge (ARC) will be calculated separately and likely combined with the SLC for billing purposes. For residential and single line businesses the ARC can increase no more than $0.50 per year up to $2.50. A residential rate cap of $30, inclusive of basic service and mandatory fees, also constrains the level of the ARC [pending PFR]. The multi-line business ARC can increase no more than $1 per year, up to a maximum of $5, with the SLC+ARC no greater than $ Additional PFR item seeks reconsideration of “collected revenues” instead of “billed revenues.” 13

Conclusion The FCC order is highly detailed and touches on many policy issues that are important to state policymakers. States have a key role in the reform process. The intent of the order is to simplify the existing intercarrier compensation system while advancing the goals of the National Broadband Plan by making broadband service available in unserved and underserved high-cost markets. State voice service requirements, including COLR, are not preempted so states must carefully examine their high cost support mechanisms, regulatory requirements, and competitive policies to ensure that any mandates are properly supported and that there is competitive equity among providers. We commit to working with Commission staff on how the order impacts individual states. 14