MICE Hydrogen System Tom Bradshaw Yury Ivanyushenkov Elwyn Baynham Collaboration Meeting RAL October 2004.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Carbon Dioxide Systems 1.Carbon dioxide properties 2.Storage 3.Uses 4.Limitations 5.Types of systems 6.Local Application 7.Total Flood.
Advertisements

1 Ann Van Lysebetten CO 2 cooling experience in the LHCb Vertex Locator Vertex 2007 Lake Placid 24/09/2007.
ADX 150 – Engine Repair ADX 170 – Climate Controls
Hydrogen R&D system HAZOP
Hydrogen Pre-Operation Safety Review 4 th October 2011 Hydrogen R&D System Operational Procedures and Test Plan M Courthold.
MICE hydrogen review Commissioning, testing and operations.
1 MICE Hydrogen System Elwyn Baynham, Tom Bradshaw, Iouri Ivaniouchenkov RAL MICE / RAL Safety RAL, 30 October 2003.
AMS-02 Cryosystem Phase III Flight Safety Review January 12, 2010 Phil Mott.
Status of the AFC at RAL Tom Bradshaw John Cobb Wing Lau Matt Hills Elwyn Baynham Mike Courthold Victoria Bayliss MICE Project Board 28 th June 2011.
Hydrogen Hazard Summary and Preliminary FMECA and HAZOP Yury Ivanyushenkov Elwyn Baynham Tom Bradshaw.
1 Status of Hydrogen System Development MICE Collaboration Meeting, Frascati, June 26-29, 2005 Yury Ivanyushenkov, Tom Bradshaw, Elwyn Baynham, Mike Courthold,
1 MICE at RAL MICE Collaboration RAL, 2 November 2003 Elwyn Baynham, Tom Bradshaw, Iouri Ivaniouchenkov, Tony Jones, Jim Rochford Engineering.
MICE Hazard Overview and Analysis Elwyn Baynham Tom Bradshaw Yury Ivanyushenkov.
CM26 – 26 th March 2010 Step IV: Liquid Hydrogen Infrastructure M Hills M Courthold T Bradshaw I Mullacrane P Warburton.
1 MICE Absorber working group Columbia, 13 June 2003 MICE Hydrogen System. Preliminary HAZOP. Elwyn Baynham, Tom Bradshaw and Iouri Ivaniouchenkov,
MICE Safety System DE Baynham TW Bradshaw MJD Courthold Y Ivanyushenkov.
1 Hydrogen Safety System Summary MICE Collaboration Meeting, Osaka, August 1-3, 2004 Elwyn Baynham, Tom Bradshaw, Yury Ivanyushenkov Applied Science Division,
MICE AFCSWG Safety Review Summary Mary Anne Cummings Dec. 17, 2003 MICE Video Conference.
LH2 Absorber Design Mary Anne Cummings MICE Safety Review LBL Dec 9, 2003.
1 Superconducting Magnets for the MICE Channel Michael A. Green Oxford University Physics Department Oxford OX1-3RH, UK.
MICE Hydrogen System Implementation Tom Bradshaw Elwyn Baynham Iouri Ivaniouchenkov Jim Rochford.
A presentation at the MICE Video Conference on Wednesday the 5 th of May 2004 Response to the Safety review comments by Wing Lau -- Oxford.
MICE collaboration meeting RAL 28 October 2004 Absorber R & D Plan by Wing Lau – Oxford University.
1 Infrastructure at RAL Iouri Ivaniouchenkov, RAL MICE Collaboration CERN, 29 March 2003.
LH2 Absorber Design Mary Anne Cummings MICE Safety Review LBL Dec 9, 2003.
Matthew Hills Hydrogen System – Piping and Instrumentation Diagram.
Hydrogen R&D system HAZOP and failure analysis Yury Ivanyushenkov, Elwyn Baynham, Tom Bradshaw, Mike Courthold, Matthew Hills and Tony Jones.
Hydrogen Delivery System – R&D Activities T W Bradshaw M Courthold M Hills J Rochford Daresbury Controls Group etc…
Hydrogen system status Yury Ivanyushenkov for Elwyn Baynham, Tom Bradshaw, Mike Courthold, Matthew Hills and Tony Jones.
MICE Hydrogen System Design Tom Bradshaw Iouri Ivaniouchenkov Elwyn Baynham Columbia Meeting June 2003.
MICE Hydrogen System MICE Collaboration Meeting, CERN, 29 March-2 April 2004 Elwyn Baynham, Tom Bradshaw, Yury Ivanyushenkov Applied Science Division,
MICE hydrogen review Summary of system hardware. System function To provide 22 litres of liquid hydrogen for use as a muon absorber within a superconducting.
STEAM HEATING.
Hydronic Mechanical Controls
Mechanical Safety Systems and DSEAR Compliance
MICE hydrogen review System modifications. Relief circuit repair During leak testing of R&D tests, the insulating vacuum would not go lower than
MICE Hydrogen System Tom Bradshaw Yury Ivanyushenkov Elwyn Baynham Meeting October 2004 – Coseners House.
MICE Hydrogen Control System MICE H2 Review Meeting RAL 15 th Jan 2015 PJ Warburton – STFC Daresbury Lab.
The MICE Hydrogen System Summary Tom Bradshaw, Yury Ivanyushenkov, Elwyn Baynham, Tony Jones, Mike Courthold and Matthew Hills Rutherford Appleton Laboratory.
Iouri Ivaniouchenkov RAL Safety considerations at RAL July 9, RAL MICE Collaboration Meeting 1.
CXS490 Carbon Dioxide Systems
MICE Hydrogen Safety Functions IEC61508 Compliance & Emergency Procedures MICE Safety Review Meeting 4 th Oct 2011 PJ Warburton - Daresbury Lab.
1 Liquid Hydrogen R&D test report Video Conference – 23/08/12 S Watson P Warburton M Courthold.
MICE Hydrogen Control System MICE Collaboration Meeting CM33 27 th July 2012 PJ Warburton – STFC Daresbury Lab.
Hydrogen system R&D. R&D programme – general points Hydrogen absorber system incorporates 2 novel aspects Hydrogen storage using a hydride bed Hydrogen.
Explosion An explosion is a rapid expansion of gases resulting in a rapid moving pressure or shock wave. The expansion can be mechanical or it can be.
Presentation on Feed and Expansion Cistern. Central Heating At the end of this part you should be able to: Identify general system methods of feed and.
Conceptual Design Review of the NPDGamma Experiment in Beam Line 13 Seppo Penttila NPDGamma project manager September 25, 2007 at SNS.
Hydrogen Pre-Operation Safety Review 4 th October 2011 Results from Helium Commissioning M Hills.
The MICE Hydrogen System Safety Review Introduction Tom Bradshaw, Yury Ivanyushenkov, Elwyn Baynham, Tony Jones, Mike Courthold and Matthew Hills Rutherford.
MICE Hydrogen Control System MICE Safety Review Meeting 4 th Oct 2011 PJ Warburton - Daresbury Lab.
CM 28 – 6 th October 2010 LH2 Infrastructure M Hills M Courthold T Bradshaw I Mullacrane P Warburton.
Hydrogen Pre-Operation Safety Review 4 th October 2011 The Hydrogen Delivery System – An Introduction M Hills.
CM27 – 8 th July 2010 LH2 System Progress and Future Plans M Hills T Bradshaw M Courthold I Mullacrane P Warburton.
Progress on Hydrogen R&D System
1 Small Coolers for MICE Michael A. Green University of Oxford Department of Physics Oxford OX1 3RH, UK MICE Collaboration Meeting RAL.
Hydrogen Control System MJD Courthold TW Bradshaw Y Ivanyushenkov D Baynham.
1 Liquid Hydrogen R&D test report CM34 – 17/10/12 S Watson P Warburton M Courthold.
1 MICE Hydrogen system Working group mtg – 01/09/14.
Replacing hydride bed with bottle Advantages No risk of diminished bed capacity Following jobs no longer necessary – Move pressure gauge – Replace cracked.
Working group meeting 07/05/15. Agenda Overview of review and current action list Relief system – Summary of problem – Details of analysis, testing and.
Design of the thermosiphon Test Facilities 2nd Thermosiphon Workshop
Absorber progress MICE-ISIS review of the liquid hydrogen system will be held in early January; guidance from Nominated Engineers on the imported absorber.
Cryogenic behavior of the cryogenic system
Proximity Cryogenics P&IDs meeting
MICE Safety Review Meeting 4th Oct 2011 PJ Warburton - Daresbury Lab
Status of Hydrogen System Development
ESS elliptical cryomodule
Cryogenic behavior of the magnet
Presentation transcript:

MICE Hydrogen System Tom Bradshaw Yury Ivanyushenkov Elwyn Baynham Collaboration Meeting RAL October 2004

Baseline layout Pressure gauge Non-return valve - PP VP Vacuum pump Bursting disk Pressure relief valve Valve Pressure Coolant Out In Metal Hydride storage unit (20m 3 capacity) Purge valve 0.5 bar 0.9 bar H 2 Detector P P VP1 VP2 Purge valve Chiller/He ater Unit 1 bar P P 0.5 bar 0.9 bar Helium supply Hydrogen supply High level vent Buffer vessel Vent outside flame arrester Extract hood H 2 Detector P P Nitrogen supply P P P P 1 m 3 Hydrogen zone 2 Vent manifold P1 PV1 PV7 PV8 PV2 PV3 PV4 HV1 Fill valve Tbed HV2 HV3 P3 P P2 PV6 High level vent Non return valve 0.1 bar - PP VP Vacuum pump Bursting disk Pressure relief valve Valve Pressure regulator Coolant Out In Absorber window Metal Hydride storage unit (20m 3 capacity) Purge valve 0.5 bar 0.9 bar H 2 DetectorH 2 P P VP1 VP2 Purge valve Chiller/He ater Unit 1 bar P P 0.5 bar 0.9 bar Helium supply Hydrogen supply High level vent Buffer vessel Vent outside flame arrester Extract hood H 2 DetectorH 2 P P Nitrogen supply P P P P 1 m 3 Hydrogen zone 2 Vent manifold P1 PV1 PV7 PV8 PV2 PV3 PV4 HV1 Fill valve Tbed HV2 HV3 P3 P P2 PV6 High level vent Non return valve 0.1 bar Safety window

Hydride bed Checked that there are no safety issues if there is a catastrophic ingress of air. Activation procedure: a)Pump out absorber b)Heat to 60-80C c)Add H2 to about 1.2 bar d)Leave to soak for 8 hours Tanks need to be horizontal Air ingress reduces capacity and oxidises material – oxidation rate is low. Alloy will become flammable after activation but it needs an ignition source.

Hydride Bed Black lines absorbtion Dotted lines desorbtion 20l liquid = 16,000 normal litres gas – will absorb this in under 4 hours Hydride Characteristics If we operate at constant pressure e.g. 1 atm, start at 0C and end up at 17C

Specification for the Hydride Bed Hydrogen Storage Capacity 20 Nm 3 Tank number/system 1 Tank Description: Heat Transfer Medium Water MH Weight 155kg Tank Structure Shell & Tube type Dimensions φ216.3×L1600 ( mm ) ( not include attachments ) Tank Total Weight 220 Kg Operating Condition: Charging Gas Component Hydrogen of 99.99% purity Charging Gas Pressure 1.2 barA Hydrogen Charging Rate 70NL/min (up to 90% of Storage Capacity) Discharging Gas Pressure 1.2 barA Hydrogen Discharging Rate 70NL/min (up to 90% of Storage Capacity) Utility Requirements: Cooling Medium Water Below -10 ℃ ( At 20L/min ) Heating Medium Above 20 ℃ ( At 20L/min ) Design Code AD Merkblaetter Certification Declaration of Conformity to Pressure Equipment Directive 97/23/EC Certified by a Notified Body )

Stillwater News - Montana Stillwater Mine goes for a first For the first time anywhere in the world a Hydrogen powered engine is being tested in an underground mine. The project was to demonstrate that hydrogen could be used safely in mining. To do this hydrogen had to be stored as a solid in what is referred to as a hydride bed. In this state, tests conducted at a US Army firing range showed that even bullets, shot through the bed, would not cause a fire or explosion. A water-cooled Caterpillar 3304 diesel engine was modified to use hydrogen, replacing the factory installed air-cooled engine. As a hydrogen internal combustion engine, it has spark plugs with individual coils, and an engine-driven magneto to provide spark and timing. The hydrogen gas is injected into the cylinders, much as an engine converted to run on natural gas or liquid petroleum.

Effectiveness of Buffer Volume Assumes mixing of gas - cold from absorber + buffer volume Temp in buffer calc on basis of constant Cv - this is optimistic for Tgas ~50K but pretty good for Tgas >100K For large outflow through relief valve the algorithm is not correct because the valve essentially shuts Buffer volume gives a huge safety margin over just the pipe system with vol ~ 0.1m^3 for 50m of 50mm dia pipe The buffer vessel will keep the gas warmer due to its thermal mass - this is not included - it will increase the pressure rise Typically with 1m^3 Tgas ~100K pressure rise rate is 0.1 bar/sec valve opening time of sec would be OK Expected boil-off rate Latent heat446000J/kg Power into liquid10179W Hydrogen boiled off (kg/s) kg/s Start mass of liquid1.544kg Liquid density Start pressure (bar)0.5 Rgas4157 dt0.2 Buffer vol1m^3 density 300K0.08 kg/m^ 3 relief valve pressure 1.60E+ 05Pa outlet mass flow 1.20E- 02kg/s

Pressure relief valves They also manufacture bursting discs and flame arrestors Feel confident that we have a solution for this. Tyco (Crosby) valves – key points: Pilot valves – quick acting 3% tolerance on set pressure Closes at 95% of set pressure Response time is <0.5s Valves re-seat on elastomers 91&94 valves usable to 20K (although situated at RT)

Loss of Vacuum In the event of a catastrophic loss of vacuum the sequence indicated in the previous slide takes place In the event of a moderate vacuum leak the system pressure will rise until 1 bar is reached when the pressure relief valve to the hydrogen bed will open and the gas will be absorbed by the hydride bed without any increase in pressure.

Prototyping Main issue is what will the funding profile allow ?…… Aim is to duplicate the absorber/cryocooler system without the windows, possibly reduced capacity. Using a cryocooler we will perform tests on the control system,condensation rate etc… We are developing a prototype control system logic Next steps are to design layouts in the hall, pipework – test area Installation of venting system Design and order cryostat and cryocooler Order hydride bed Pressure relief valves Control system Issue of the test area is still not finalised – is it sensible to test while other work is going on ? May have to make a safety case or find somewhere else.

Safety Review Process

Conclusions  We have made good progress on the definition of the hydrogen supply system for the absorber.  The safety issues are under control.  Need to define more carefully the development plan – recent cost review.  Test area is still a slight issue. Should be possible to start work on venting in the hall.  Need to start design work to get approvals – meet design codes head on.  Many of the critical components are defined.

END SourceD:\MICE\Cryogenics\HydrogenSystem\[Pressure rise buffer.xls]press buffer-2