INTRO TO COUNTERPLANS!. WHAT IS A CP? A net beneficial alternative proposal to the Plan Competitive with the Plan Strategic if… The Aff is huge The SQ.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
How to Give an Effective 2ar. 1. Think About the Big Picture  Remember: focus on offense – defend your house  Isolate 1 or 2 Impacts  Decide on impacts.
Advertisements

(Counter) Plans Because they didn’t limit the topic.
Matt Gomez Debating the Disadvantage (DA). 4 Part One: What is a Disadvantage?
 The plan says “United States”. The CP replaces that with the word “global” and the net benefit is a critique of ethno-centrism.  2AC says “perm: do.
The Counterplan. A counterplan is a policy defended by the negative team which competes with the affirmative plan and is, on balance, more beneficial.
Mike Shackelford. Factors that make a good counterplan Does it solve the aff better? Is it competitive Does it solve the aff or a portion of the aff.
Advanced cp competition exercises
POLICY DEBATE Cross-Examination (CX). POLICY DEBATE  Purpose of policy debate is to compare policies and decide which is best  Affirmative: Supports.
Answering Counterplans  Acronym is PLOTS  Permutation  Links to their disads  Other disads to the Counterplan  Theory Objections  Doesn’t Solve the.
Counterplans The Negative’s Best Friend The Affirmative’s Worst Nightmare.
Introduction to Kritiks Ryan Galloway Samford University.
PICs….. In spaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaace!.  Cp text  Net benefit  Must be competitive ◦ Uniquely beneficial ◦ Mutually exclusive.
DISADVANTAGES. What is a Disadvantage?  Disadvantages are offcase positions that the negative advances to prove that the costs of the plan outweigh its.
Theory CODI 2014 Lecture. Rules of Debate Debate has surprisingly few rules Time limits and speaking order There must be a winner and loser No outside.
 A counterplan is a competitive policy option to the affirmative plan.
The 1ar: Debate’s Paramedic Get the patient to the hospital…alive.
Matt Gomez Ph.D in Theoretical Objections to Negative and Affirmative argumentation (Bingham Campus) SCFI 2011 THEORY.
What is Debate? A debater’s guide to the argumentative universe…
Counterplan Lecture GDI 2013 Austin Layton Note: This PowerPoint can be accessed on the PaDS website.
Politics. How to pick your disad 1. Link Debate – certain affs just go a certain way. Gotta win that. In my mind, need to win its unpopular or get another.
 Debating the Case Mikaela Malsin, Univ. of Georgia DUDA 2012
The Counterplan. A counterplan is a policy defended by the negative team which competes with the affirmative plan and is, on balance, more beneficial.
POLICY DEBATE Will look like CX on the sign up sheet.
Counterplans CODI 2014 Lecture 2. What is a counterplan? A plan offered by the negative to solve some or all of the affirmative’s advantages The negative.
Introduction to Debate -Affirmative- To access audio: Skype: freeconferencecallhd and enter # Or call and enter # © L.
Counterplans?. Debate should be a means of significantly improving one's education through analytical development and extension of advocacy positions.
Counterplans Debate Central Workshop August 30, 2008.
Constructive Speeches (1AC)- 6 MINUTES CX 1A to 2N- 3 MINUTES (1NC)- 6 MINUTES CX- 1N to 1A- 3 MINUTES (2AC)- 6 MINUTES CX- 2A to 1N- 3 MINUTES (2NC)-
Most important things Keep your personal views outside the room Debaters must adapt to you Be honest about your judging experience.
The Counterplan. A counterplan is a policy defended by the negative team which competes with the affirmative plan and is, on balance, more beneficial.
Counterplans on the Topic The Honorable James R. Stevenson, Ph.D, J.D., M.D., Th.D., A.F., A.D.N.
Debate should be a means of significantly improving one's education through analytical development and extension of advocacy positions. The negative strategy.
Counterplans The Negative’s Best Friend The Negative’s Best Friend.
Advanced Debate Friday, August 21,  Speaking Drills  Counterplans  Work on cases  Exam 1: Next Friday Preview.
Debating the Case GDI Glossary Aff case Advantage Offense Defense Card Analytic.
Going Negative The Surveillance Topic. Outline for the topic I. Categories of neg ground -Go over the specific arguments we have II. Dealing.
Debating the case.
Affirmative Strategy Austin Layton. Overview At least, take two things from this lecture Main Advantage of Being Aff: Familiarity – Preparation Matters.
Debate The Essentials Ariail, Robert. “Let the Debates Begin.” 18 Aug orig. published in The State, South Carolina. 26 Sept
Judging Policy Debate Rich Edwards Baylor University July 2013.
Disadvantages “Advanced” theory.
Intro to Counterplans Casey Parsons. Introduction to Counterplans Thus far in debate, we have assumed that the neg defends the status quo In the vast.
Impact Calculus 101 Casey Parsons. What is impact calculus? You might remember on the first powerpoint that something called “impact calculus” was referenced.
SCFI 2011 SJK. Understand how to structure and write basic LD constructives Understand the basic components of contention-level argumentation Begin to.
GDI 2015 THE NEGATIVE.  The counter to the Affirmative  Negates the course of action proposed  So much variety! Many ways to negate  What makes someone.
Counterplans. Counterplan Burdens Competitiveness To be competitive, CP must be: – Mutually exclusive – Net beneficial Topicality – Traditional theory.
 If you can convince the judge that passing your affirmative plan is a good idea, you will win the debate. Essentially, you need to prove that the affirmative.
POLICY DEBATE. WHAT IS POLICY DEBATE? A structured format for fairly arguing a topic of policy TEAM DEBATE: two teams of two students each 8 speeches.
Judging Policy Debate Rich Edwards & Russell Kirkscey June 2015.
Beginning Policy Debate: I ain’t scared ! NSDA Nationals 2014 Jane Boyd Grapevine HS, TEXAS.
Hays Watson Head Debate Coach UGA.  It is the counterpoint to the Affirmative – instead of Affirming a particular course of action (i.e. the resolution),
Basic Strategies Dallas Urban Debate League December, 2007.
The Counterplan. A counterplan is a policy defended by the negative team which competes with the affirmative plan and is, on balance, more beneficial.
Matt Gomez.  What will occur in the status quo  Factors for good uniqueness  Post-dating – things change  Brink – why is the squo good but not guaranteed.
Affirmative vs. negative
Introduction to the Negative
The Politics DA.
Policy Debate Speaker Duties
How to be negative Gabi Yamout.
Answering the CP Casey Parsons.
Wining the DA Casey Parsons.
Debate What is Debate?.
The 2AC: Answering Disads
ORDER AND PURPOSE OF POLICY SPEECHES
Informative, Persuasive, and Impromptu Speaking all rolled into one!
Plans in LD No Limits Debate Camp.
Topicality Casey Parsons.
The Politics DA Casey Parsons.
Introduction to the Neg
Thinking like a Policy Debater
Presentation transcript:

INTRO TO COUNTERPLANS!

WHAT IS A CP? A net beneficial alternative proposal to the Plan Competitive with the Plan Strategic if… The Aff is huge The SQ is indefensible Example: Plan – We should order pizza for dinner tonight. Counterplan – We should make a salad for dinner tonight.

COMPONENTS OF A CP Counterplan text VERY IMPORTANT. WRITE OUT THE EXACT TEXT Be specific, complete, and accurate, as you would with a Plan text Addressing topicality Either explanation of how the CP is non-topical or Defense of why topical CP’s are ok Not super common or explicit in 1NC’s Competition This is intense but it makes sense eventually The opportunity cost of the plan CP needs to be more beneficial than doing the Plan Different kinds of competition

COMPETITION – MUTUAL EXCLUSIVITY FUNCTIONAL COMPETITION The action/policy of the plan and the action/policy of the CP cannot both be done – there is a trade-off Preferable Example: Plan – We should order pizza for dinner CP – We should make salad for dinner. TEXTUAL COMPETITION Looking at the Plan & CP texts reveals competition – the way they are written is such that they cannot be combined It’s ok, not always as compelling as functional competition Example: Plan – We should order pizza for dinner. CP – We should not make a pizza for dinner. We should make a salad for dinner.

COMPETITION – NET BENEFITS Net benefits Internal net benefits Something the CP uniquely solves that the aff does not, kind of like a Neg advantage Example: making a salad is healthier than ordering a pizza External net benefits Disadvantages, etc. to the Aff that the CP does not link to Example: the Aff links to the spending disad, but the CP does not

TYPES OF COUNTERPLANS Advantage Counterplans. These solve one of the Aff’s advantages, meaning you only have to deal with the remaining advantages if you win the CP. Agent Counterplans. A different actor takes the action of the Plan. Process Counterplans Consult. Before doing the plan, we should ask for so-and-so’s opinion first. Delay/Timeframe. We should do the plan, but not until next week. Condition. We can do the plan, but ONLY IF this other thing happens in exchange. PICs. Enact part, but not all of the affirmative mandates. (Not intended to be an exhaustive list)

STATUS OF THE CP In cross-ex, the Aff should ask & Neg should be prepared to answer what the status of the CP is Establishes the conditions under which the CP will stay in the debate Will you go for it in the 2NR or kick it? Conditional. “The status quo is always an option.” Unconditional. They’re going for it. Dispositional. Who freakin knows

ANSWERING COUNTERPLANS Read the CP text very carefully. Determine the differences between the CP and the Plan. Solvency Deficits. They don’t solve part or all of the Aff. Perm. Is the CP competitive with the Aff or could they both happen? “Perm, do both.” Severance Perms (CP + SOME of the Plan) Intrinsic Perms (CP + Plan + SOMETHING ELSE) Timeframe Perm (Do the Plan and THEN the CP later) Offense. Add-on advantages, disads to the CP, etc. Theory. Is this a legit CP or are they being shady?